Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
com/mt
ISA 330
The auditor’s responses to assessed risks.
Contents
This International Standard on Auditing deals with the auditor’s responsibility to design and
implement responses to the risks of material misstatement identified and assessed by the
auditor in accordance with ISA 315 in the audit of the financial statements
ISA 330 lists the following overall responses that may be used by auditors in order to address
the assessed risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level:
The objective of the auditor is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the
assessed risks of material misstatement, through designing and implementing appropriate
responses to those risks.
Recall that;
AR = IR + CR + DR
2. Design and perform further audit procedures whose nature, timing and extent are
based on and are responsive to the assessed risks of material misstatement at the assertion
level.
- In designing further audit procedures, the auditor shall always keep in mind the level of audit risk.
- Inspection.
- Observation.
- Recalculation and re-performance.
• If there have been changes that affect the continuing relevance of the audit evidence from
the previous audit, the auditor shall test the controls in the current audit.
• If there have not been such changes, the auditor shall test the controls at least once in
every third audit, and shall test some controls each audit to avoid the possibility of testing all
the controls on which the auditor intends to rely in a single audit period with no testing of
controls in the subsequent two audit periods.
• If the auditor plans to rely on controls over a risk the auditor has determined to be a
significant risk, the auditor shall test those controls in the current period.
Substantive tests must be performed for each material class of transactions, balance or
disclosure. They include tests of details of classes of transactions, account balances, and/or
substantive analytical procedures.
For significant risks we must perform substantive procedures that will respond specifically to
those risks. If we choose to only do substantive procedures on key risks, we must include
tests of details.
Tests of details include:
1. Enquiry and confirmation
2. Inspection
3. Observation
4. Re-calculation and re-performance
We must also consider whether external confirmation procedures are to be performed as audit
procedures. Mainly these would apply in responding to risks involving:
- Bank balances
- Accounts receivable
- Inventories held by third parties
- Amounts due to lenders / Accounts payable
July 2018
PwC 13
Substantive Procedures- continued
July 2018
PwC 14
Requirements of ISA 330 – continued
NOTE: The form and extent of audit documentation is a matter of professional judgement, and is influenced by the size, nature and
complexity of the entity and its internal control, availability of information from the entity and the audit methodology and technology
used in the audit.
2. Work performed
Recording the details of the specific audit test performed, incl. the size of the sample and selection method
3. Results
It is not enough to say that you tested 10 items and they were all fine. You need to make clear which 10 items you looked at and include
an audit tick showing exactly what audit work was performed on them.
4. Evaluation
Recording details on the impact of any errors found.
5. Conclusion
Confirming whether or not the audit assertion has been satisfied. The working paper must also document who performed the audit
work and the date that the audit work was completed. It should also indicate who reviewed the audit work and the date of review.
a. Professional competence
b. Due diligence
c. Professional Skeptism
d. Integrity
a. Professional competence
b. Due diligence
c. Professional Skeptism
d. Integrity
True of False?
a. True
b. False.
True of False?
a. True
b. False.