Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
gov
T
o improve their second lan- tant aspects of vocabulary learning
guage proficiency, English and introduce teachers to six practical
language learners (ELLs) vocabulary activities.
need a solid knowledge of vocabu-
The five types of words and
lary. While a basic level of vocabulary
vocabulary learning—
will allow learners to communicate
It is important to define what we
some ideas to a certain degree, better
mean by second language vocabulary.
communication—whether in speak-
When we talk about vocabulary, we
ing/listening or writing/reading—can
usually mean words, but what is a
be accomplished when learners have
word? Most people think of words
acquired more vocabulary.
as single units, such as cat, dozen, or
At times, not knowing a spe-
reluctant. However, these single words
cific word can severely limit com-
are merely one part of the vocabulary
munication; however, in many cases
load that our students face. In fact,
a lexical lapse can actually stop com-
a “word” can be one of five types,
munication completely. Our second
namely (1) a single word, (2) a set
language learners certainly recognize
phrase, (3) a variable phrase, (4) a
that insufficient vocabulary is one of
phrasal verb, or (5) an idiom.
their biggest frustrations (Green and
Meara 1995; James 1996), but just Type 1: Single words—
how important is vocabulary really? This classification includes the
What our learners have been say- bulk of the vocabulary of any lan-
ing all along—that they need more guage. To be sure, there are thousands
vocabulary—is more than a hunch; it of single words that learners must
is a fact. As a result, teachers need to know. Schmitt (2000), for example,
know what kinds of classroom activi- notes that second language students
ties they can use to help their students need approximately 2,000 words to
gain new vocabulary. The purpose of maintain conversations, 3,000 word
this article is to present some impor- families to read authentic texts, and as
12 2008 N u m b e r 3 | E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m
americanenglish.state.gov
many as 10,000 words to comprehend chal- Because of their quantity and frequency,
lenging academic texts. Single words are the phrasal verbs are an especially difficult vocab-
largest type of words and are used more fre- ulary item for ELLs. In particular, phrasal
quently than other words. verbs are extremely common in everyday con-
By single words, we mean not only a word versation. More problematic is the fact that
like room but also bedroom and living room. All each phrasal verb can also be polysemous, that
three of these examples are considered single is, each one can have multiple, very different
words even though living room requires two meanings.
traditional words, that is, two collections of How problematic is the polysemy of phras-
letters, to express its concept, while bedroom al verbs? A good example is the base verb take,
requires only one. (The actual number of tradi- which, as was shown above, can combine
tional words in a vocabulary item reflects spell- with all nine particles to produce nine new
ing conventions in English, not vocabulary.) phrasal verbs. However, each of these new
Type 2: Set phrases— nine phrasal verbs is in turn polysemous. For
example, consider some different meanings
Set phrases consist of more than one word of take off:
and do not vary. For example, in the set phrase • remove clothing (“He took off his
on the other hand, we cannot say in the other sweater.”)
hand, or in other hands, or in other fingers, • succeed (“His career took off.”)
even though these options are semantically • gain altitude (“The jet took off.”)
related. • leave (“I’m going to take off.”)
Common set phrases include now and
then (not then and now), the bottom line (not Likewise, take up has at least three distinct
the lowest line), ladies and gentlemen (not meanings:
gentlemen and ladies), and all of a sudden (not • collect (“I’m going to take up the exam
some of a sudden or none of a sudden). now.”)
Type 3: Variable phrases— • occupy space (“The table takes up half
the room.”)
While most of the components in variable • begin a new hobby or pastime “(I took
phrases will stay the same, there is some varia- up tennis when I was fifteen.”)
tion, often with personal pronouns, possessive
adjectives, or word order. For example, in the Thus, take, which forms part of at least
variable phrase It has come to our attention nine phrasal verbs, has more than nine mean-
that, we can change the possessive adjective ings, perhaps in fact as many as thirty.
our to my. Likewise, the phrase off and on can Type 5: Idioms—
also be on and off. Thus, if it has been raining
intermittently, we can hear “it’s been raining All languages feature idiomatic expres-
off and on” as well as “it’s been raining on sions, and each idiomatic expression, or
and off.” idiom, is a separate vocabulary item. A group
of words is an idiom if the meanings of
Type 4: Phrasal verbs— the individual words are different from the
A phrasal verb consists of two or three meaning of the whole phrase. For example,
words with the first word being a verb and when a person lets the cat out of the bag, it
the second (and third) word a particle. Many means that the person has revealed a secret.
verbs can serve as the verb in a phrasal verb, There is no cat, there is no bag, and there is
but common verbs here include put, take, no cat in any bag. The words let, cat, out, and
come, call, make, go, and get. These base verbs bag are all high frequency words, ones that
are often mixed with nine different particles— might be covered in any basic or even begin-
up, down, on, off, in, out, away, back, and ning level English class. However, knowing
over—to form unique words. For example, the meaning of these four words does not
the base verb take with these nine particles prepare the learner to figure out the meaning
produces these nine phrasal verbs: take up, of the idiom.
take down, take on, take off, take in, take out, Furthermore, this idiom is a set phrase. If
take away, take back, and take over. the secret is extremely important, we cannot
E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m | Number 3 2008 13
americanenglish.state.gov
say let the lion out of the bag, nor can we say let names the item without assigning a value.
the kitten out of the bag for a relatively unim- Negative and positive words have a value
portant secret. In addition, we would never assigned to the word. Thus, dog is neutral,
say let the cat out of the sack, even though sack mutt is negative, and purebred is positive.
can be a synonym for bag. Likewise, child is neutral, kid can be negative,
Most phrasal verbs are idiomatic. For and youngster is positive.
example, the phrasal verb throw up, which Connotation affects usage. For example, a
means “to vomit,” is not the simple sum of the given word may be appropriate for a formal
meanings of throw and up. Likewise, learners talk but sound stilted in everyday conversa-
are rightly justified in being confused when tion. Two or more words may mean more or
they find out that the opposite of put on cloth- less the same thing, but they have different
ing is not put off clothing. If the airplane takes connotations and therefore different usages.
off at the beginning of a flight, why doesn’t the For example, sweat and perspire refer to the
plane take on at the end? With idioms, logic same bodily function. However, we rarely say
often has no place. that athletes perspire, and deodorant contain-
ers never feature the word sweat. Instead, we
Additional aspects of vocabulary say that athletes sweat but deodorants help
knowledge— control perspiration.
In theory, mastering vocabulary should not As another example, let us consider the
be so different from learning any other com- concept of “not continue to live.” The basic
ponent of a language, such as grammar, spell- vocabulary item to express this concept is the
ing, or pronunciation. Vocabulary, however, is word die, but we could also use the words pass
a special problem because there are multiple away or kick the bucket. While we can say “I’m
aspects of vocabulary knowledge that learners sorry to hear that your uncle died,” it might
must master, including polysemy, connota- be more common, especially when talking
tion and usage, part of speech, frequency, and with a known person and wishing to convey
collocation. our sympathy, to say “I’m sorry to hear that
your uncle passed away.” The usage of pass
Polysemy—
away is restricted to a speaker who knows
One of the biggest challenges for ELLs the listener and who wishes to express sincere
when learning vocabulary is that most regret or sympathy. That same person would
words—whether single words, set phras- never say, “I’m sorry to hear that your uncle
es, variable phrases, phrasal verbs, or idi- kicked the bucket.”
oms—often have multiple meanings. This
Part of speech—
polysemy is a real problem for ELLS. Some
words have just a few meanings. The word The part of speech of an unknown word
hammer, for example, can be the instrument can present problems. To use a word cor-
(noun) or the action (verb). Many words, rectly in a sentence, ELLs must know the
however, have a large number of meanings. difference between four basic parts of speech:
For instance, the word table can be a piece noun (amazement), verb (to amaze), adjec-
of furniture, a set of numbers or figures, the tive (amazing), and adverb (amazingly). In
action of ceasing discussion about something learning new words, nouns are probably the
in a meeting, or a descriptive word (as in easiest part of speech to learn, followed by
table scraps or tablecloth). As discussed earlier, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs (Ellis and Bea-
a phrasal verb such as take up can be polyse- ton 1993; Atkinson 1975). Among nouns,
mous, as in these examples: take up the test Mackey (1965) notes that frequent, concrete
papers, take up too much space, or take up a nouns are easier to learn than less frequent,
new hobby. abstract nouns but cautions that even fre-
quent, concrete nouns can be a problem
Connotation and usage— because they may contain other factors of
The connotation of a word is its value, that difficulty, such as polysemy.
is, the way native speakers view that particular Some teachers may assume that knowing
word. Connotations of words can be neutral, one part of speech of a word allows students
negative, or positive. A neutral word simply to learn all four basic parts of speech of
14 2008 Number 3 | E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m
americanenglish.state.gov
that word. However, in a study of nonna- Let us consider the verb squander, which
tive-English-speaking university students, means “to waste” or “use unwisely.” Squander
Schmitt and Zimmerman (2002) found is a transitive verb; thus, any noun in theory
that few students know all four forms of could follow this verb. Studies of an actual
a word. In other words, partial knowledge language sample, or corpus, are useful in
of at least one form was the norm. Results revealing the most common collocations for
also showed that learners tended to have a words (Nation 2001). For example, the most
better understanding of the noun or verb common collocations for squander are money
forms rather than the adjective or adverb or resources (salary, $1,000, inheritance), time
forms. The authors conclude that teachers (the morning, her vacation, a lifetime), or
cannot assume that learners will absorb opportunity (chance or prospect). Thus, com-
the derivative forms of a word family auto- mon collocations for the verb squander are
matically from exposure and suggest explicit money, time, and opportunity.
instruction in this area of vocabulary, that Another good example of collocation
is, morphology. occurs with the verb commit. The basic
meaning of commit is “to make” or “to do.”
Frequency—
Corpus studies reveal that the most common
Knowing a word can also mean that the collocations for commit as a verb are types of
learner knows the frequency of occurrence of crimes: commit murder, commit suicide, com-
that word. Though this aspect of a word may mit grand larceny, and commit fraud. Thus,
seem trivial, the frequency of a word is often commit does not mean just “to make or do”
cited as a major factor in a given word’s diffi- but “to make or do something negative.”
culty. In fact, Brown (1993) claims that word An ELL who learns that commit in commit a
frequency is probably the major component murder means “to do or perform an action”
in word difficulty. might attempt to make the following seem-
A given word may well express the con- ingly logical combinations: commit a joke on
cept that the person wants to express; how- someone, commit the housework, or commit
ever, that concept may have several possible a meal. The problem—a huge problem for
names, some of which may be more useful ELLs—is that commit does not collocate
to a nonnative learner because that par- with joke, housework, or meal. Because of
ticular word is more frequent. The rarer both the difficulty and the importance of
forms, though most certainly semantically collocations, McCarthy (1984) advocates
appropriate, would make the speaker sound direct instruction and practice in this area.
strange. For example, usual and common can
be synonyms, but we say that “Smith” and Important goals in selecting vocabulary
“Thompson” are common last names, not activities—
usual last names. While discard and throw In this section, I draw on the second
away are synonyms, it would be unnatural language vocabulary research explaining the
for a native speaker to say to a good friend, need for learning tasks that emphasize lan-
“I’m going to discard these books.” guage output (Swain 1993). The most suc-
Collocation— cessful vocabulary activities are those that
allow students to accomplish three goals:
Perhaps the single most important aspect (1) focus on the vocabulary, (2) experience
of knowing a word for nonnative learn- multiple retrievals of the vocabulary, and
ers—besides the obvious synonyms for (3) develop successful vocabulary learning
the word—is the collocation(s) of a new strategies.
vocabulary item. Collocation (co- meaning
“together” + location) is a word or phrase that Goal 1: Focus on the vocabulary—
naturally and frequently occurs before, after, Students learn second language vocabu-
or very near a particular vocabulary item. lary better when they “notice,” or focus their
The challenge here for ELLs is not learn- attention on, the vocabulary (Schmidt 1990).
ing the word’s meaning (or other previously If students read a passage in which a certain
explained factors) but rather learning which unknown word is present but not essential
words are actually used with this word. to understanding the passage, students are
E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m | Number 3 2008 15
americanenglish.state.gov
less likely to notice the word, which means Goal 3: Develop successful vocabulary learn-
they are less likely to learn the word (Laufer ing strategies—
1997). Comprehensible input alone is not Teachers would like a list of three or four
sufficient for the large number of vocabulary solid vocabulary learning strategies that work
items that learners must master to improve well for all students, but such a list does not
their language ability. The input needs to be exist (Folse 2004). Sanaoui (1995) found that
noticed so that it can become intake (Swain the best vocabulary learners do not use a lim-
1993). ited set of strategies; instead, she found that
To make sure that students notice new the best learners have a selected set of strate-
words, teachers can write them on the board gies that they use consistently. Thus, teachers
for all to see. They can also keep a separate need to acquaint students with a variety of
section of the board for vocabulary, or in strategies and encourage them to discover the
classrooms where this is not possible, post a strategies that they prefer. Teachers should
large sheet of paper or newsprint on the wall continue to monitor students to help them
where new words are written. It is not a good become aware of their strategy use. In other
idea to write down every new word; instead, words, teachers must train learners to develop
teachers should write down words that they their own set of strategies and employ them
think are useful to their students. Teachers consistently. Schmitt and Schmitt (1993)
should focus on words that are relevant to provide a comprehensive listing of strategies
their students’ actual language needs, which for keeping a vocabulary list, using the word
may include actual communication or pass- in a speaking task, or illustrating the word in
ing a standardized examination. Any teacher’s some way.
goal is to select words that match students’
real-world needs. Six vocabulary activities for the ESL/EFL
Focus can also be achieved by having ELLs classroom—
mark key vocabulary in some way. Nowadays Results from research on second language
many textbooks have key vocabulary under- vocabulary clearly call for more vocabulary
lined or in boldface. However, if your textbook practice in classes, especially classroom activi-
does not identify key v ocabulary in some very ties that include the three goals of focusing,
visible way, then have your students underline multiple retrievals, and developing successful
or circle words that you indicate are important learning strategies. In this section, I explain
to know. six activities that help learners focus their
Goal 2: Experience multiple retrievals of attention on the vocabulary, require learners
vocabulary— to retrieve the forms and meanings of the new
words, and encourage learners to identify and
Perhaps the single most important com- develop a personalized repertoire of specific
ponent in learning vocabulary efficiently is a preferred strategies for vocabulary learning.
high number of retrievals of the word (Folse These six activities have been used successfully
2006a). What does this mean? The simple in several EFL settings with learners ranging
answer is that learners must interact with a from teenagers to adults.
word multiple times. Rather than complet-
ing just one type of learning task multiple Activity 1: Keeping a running list of words—
times, such as repeating a word, learners Students remember a certain percentage of
should interact with a word in different what they see and a certain amount of what
ways. These ways of retrieving a word could they hear, but they will remember even more
include matching words with definitions, of what they see and hear. Therefore, you
asking themselves the meaning of a word, should make a list of vocabulary as you are
pronouncing a word, naming a word that is teaching. Point out the words to focus learners’
connected in some way (e.g., match cook or attention on the words. In addition to provid-
food with bake), or even simply spelling the ing focus and multiple retrievals, writing a list
word. Each link strengthens connections and also shows the students an example of keep-
increases learning success (Atkins and Bad- ing a vocabulary notebook, which is one of
deley 1998). many good vocabulary learning strategies. It
16 2008 Number 3 | E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m
americanenglish.state.gov
E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m | Number 3 2008 17
americanenglish.state.gov
18 2008 Number 3 | E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m
americanenglish.state.gov
E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m | Number 3 2008 19
americanenglish.state.gov
Note: For handouts on teaching vocabulary, McCarthy, M. 1984. A new look at vocabulary in
see: www.keithfolse.com/handouts.html EFL. Applied Linguistics 5 (1): 12–22.
Mackey, W. 1965. Language teaching analysis. Lon-
References don: Longman.
Nation, I. S. P. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another
Atkins, P., and A. Baddeley. 1998. Working memo- language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
ry and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Press.
Psycholinguistics 19 (4): 537–52. Sanaoui, R. 1995. Adult learners’ approaches to
Atkinson, R. 1975. Mnemotechnics in second- learning vocabulary in second languages. Mod-
language learning. American Psychologist 30 (8): ern Language Journal 79 (1): 15–28.
821–28. Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in
Brown, C. 1993. Factors affecting the acquisition second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11
of vocabulary: Frequency and saliency of words. (2): 129–58.
In Second language reading and vocabulary learn- Schmitt, N. 2000. Vocabulary in language teaching.
ing, ed. T. Huckin, M. Haynes, and J. Coady, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
263–86. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Schmitt, N., and D. Schmitt. 1993. Identifying and
Ellis, N., and A. Beaton. 1993. Psycholinguistic assessing vocabulary learning strategies. Thai
determinants of foreign language vocabulary TESOL Bulletin 5 (4): 27–33.
learning. Language Learning 43 (4): 559–617. Schmitt, N., and C. Zimmerman. 2002. Derivative
Folse, K. 1993. Beginning reading practices: Building word forms: What do learners know? TESOL
reading and vocabulary strategies. Ann Arbor: Quarterly 36 (2): 145–71.
University of Michigan Press. Swain, M. 1993. The output hypothesis: Just
—–. 2004. Vocabulary myths: Applying second lan- speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian
guage research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor: Modern Language Review 50 (1): 158–64.
University of Michigan Press.
–––. 2006a. The art of teaching speaking: Research
and pedagogy for the ESL/EFL classroom. Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
–––. 2006b. The effect of type of written exercise
on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly
40 (2): 273–93.
Green, D., and P. Meara. 1995. Guest editorial.
Computer Assisted Language Learning 8 (2–3):
97–101.
James, M. 1996. Improving second language
reading comprehension: A computer-assisted
vocabulary development approach. PhD diss.,
University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Laufer, B. 1997. The lexical plight in second lan-
guage reading: Words you don’t know, words
you think you know, and words you can’t Keith S. FolSe is Associate Professor of
guess. In Second language vocabulary acquisition: TESOL at the University of Central Florida.
A rationale for pedagogy, ed. J. Coady and T. He is the author of over 40 books on topics
Huckin, 20–34. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- such as vocabulary, grammar, reading, and
versity Press. composition.
20 2008 Number 3 | E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m
americanenglish.state.gov
E n g l i s h T E a c h i n g F o r u m | Number 3 2008 21