Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Electric Vehicle
Transition Masterclass
EV penetration (%)
50% Investment ($ Bn) 0.5 4 54.5
Quantity (Mn) 0.02 0.1 1
60 40% Superchargers
Investment ($ Bn) 0.7 5.1 50
Quantity (Mn) 0.04 0.2 3
40 30% Destination chargers
Investment ($ Bn) 0.09 0.7 8.2
20%
20
15% 10%
5%
- 0%
2025 2030 2040 Plant & Factory projections and Benefit to Power
EV sales (USD
1 2 17
investment required Utilities
Bn)
EV fleet (Mn) 1 7 95
Parameter 2025 2030 2040 Parameter 2030
EV Penetration 5% 15% 65% Electricity demand from EVs
Vehicle plants ($ Bn) 1 4 40.2
Year-wise (Twh) 69.6
Giga-factories ($ Bn) 2 10 100.5
Expected revenue from
Service Centers ($ Bn) 0.7 4 50 electricity demand from EVs
($ Bn) 11
Page 3 Source: Morgan Stanley and *EY Analysis
A two-dimensional value chain best represents the possible business
opportunity interventions
Value Chain
Illustrative representation
Raw Mat. Build Sell/leasing Finance Install Operate Maintain
1 EV Batteries
2 Charging stations
3 Vehicles
4 Networks
5 Distributed generation
6 Distributed storage
7 Energy Management
EV value pools offer varied appeal for investors due to different opportunity size, capex requirement, investment
horizon, market competition and complexity
Opportunity size
Excavation and exploration Processing battery grade lithium
Battery module and pack manufacturing Battery pack assembly for EVs
A clear government Regulations for resale Presence of natural Availability of fossil fuels Demographics and
roadmap with a defined of electricity, resources (metals / (oil and gas) reserves geographical constraints
policy target for EVs and standardization of minerals) for batteries impacting cost (parking availability, road
EVSE, along with policies charging infrastructure and other raw materials competitiveness of EVs length, etc.), determining the
and incentives to promote and calibration of potential size and scale of
EV sales, battery and battery configurations operations in a particular
component manufacturing market
Market attractiveness
+ Synergy with existing business
Attractiveness of EV
value pools = Opportunity size Competition Barriers to entry
City level partnerships have the potential to reduce cost to consumers, capital cost
and increase charger utilization
Land is a major cost component for charging station operators that can be
optimized through strategic city-level collaborations that can enhance
overall business viability and timeliness of deployment.
City-led development
4C approach
Collaborations among
stakeholders
Charging infrastructure deployment
Customer experience
enhancement
retail
Network Public Public charging stations
optimization charging
EV fleet management
Battery repurposing
Market evaluation
Page 14 Source: EY Analysis
Note: Size of the bubble represents value pool attractiveness | All value pools are not labelled for visual clarity
4
Have we seen this in
action?
Case Study: Developing EV Ecosystem in the Nordics
OEMs are highly involved in EV ► Fixed rent ► Fixed price per ► Fixed software
►
charging infrastructure as it ► Shared investment charger investment €/minute
► Buy-out option after ► Smart grid ► Software license
impacts EV sales
contract end investment on case
€/kWh
► Fleet operators are dependent
on charging infrastructure to ► Variable rent
(income dependent)
to case basis
► Hardware lease
€/charge
electrify fleets
Charging environment
User interface
Kanv Garg
Director, Electric Mobility
+91-9711060647
kanv.garg@in.ey.com
The better the question. The better the answer.
The better the world works.