Assessment

30-39 (Bad Fail) 40-49 – (Fail) 50-59 - Pass 60-69 (Merit) 70 + ( Distinction)
Criteria
(8-12) A limited / insufficient
(12-16) An acceptable
(0-7) Very poor understanding and
work with some clear and (16-20) Very good work
presentation of the presentation of the chosen (20-25) Outstanding work
Discussion of the logical presentation of with presentation of the
chosen company. The company with errors, with presentation of the
organisation, its chosen company showing chosen company of a high
work displays no real omissions and inconsistencies. chosen company done to a
environment and some good understanding standard, based on
knowledge base or The work displays a weak very high standard, based on
operations (25%) of the topic, although relevant research and
understanding of the knowledge base and a lack of strong research and reading.
further development reading.
chosen company. sufficient understanding of the
would be beneficial.
company.
(10-12) Insufficient ratios (13-14) Evidence of
Appropriate (0-9) Very weak data (15-17) Appropriate (18-25) Excellent critical
calculations with limited sound and relevant ratio
calculation of calculation and analysis. calculations to support the engagement with proper
performance measures used to calculations and some
performance There are lots of errors critical analysis and calculations to build
analyse the performance of the good use of other relevant
measures (25%) and miscalculations writing up of the report. interesting findings.
company not enough performance measures.
(0-14) Extremely poorly
(18-21) Satisfactory (22-24) Very good review
structured review (15-17) Poorly structured (25-35) Exceptional review
review showing some use showing coherent use of
showing no effective review showing limited use of showing coherent use of a
Evaluation of of relevant material, both relevant material, both
use of relevant material, relevant material, neither wide range of material, both
comparative theoretical and practical, theoretical and practical,
neither theoretical nor theoretical nor practical, theoretical and practical,
performance (35%) associated with associated with
practical, associated associated with accounting associated with accounting
accounting application accounting application
with accounting application and practice. application and practice.
and practice and practice.
application and practice.

(0-6) An extremely
(10-11) A very good
poorly structured (8-9) A satisfactory (11-15) An excellent
(7) A poorly structured introduction and
introduction and introduction and introduction and conclusion.
introduction and conclusion. conclusion. The
conclusion. The conclusion. The The introduction is providing
The introduction is not introduction is nicely
introduction is not introduction is providing an interesting insight to the
providing insight to the report. providing insight to the
Overall presentation, providing insight to the insight to the report. The report. The conclusion is
The conclusion is not report. The conclusion is
style and references report. The conclusion conclusion is summarising summarising ground
summarising the findings and clearly summarising the
(15) is not summarising the the findings and breaking findings and
arguments of the report. The findings and arguments of
findings and arguments arguments of the report. arguments of the company.
formatting and referencing the report. The formatting
of the report. The The formatting and The formatting and
didn't follow guidelines and referencing
formatting and referencing guidelines referencing guidelines were
properly. guidelines were followed
referencing didn’t follow were followed properly followed properly.
properly.
stipulated guidelines.