Evaluation Form

Content validity tool for semi-structured Questionnaire

The instrument is designed to describe the criteria for the questionnaires evaluation.

Direction: Please put a check on each statement that corresponds to the following point equivalent.

Point Equivalent:

5 – Excellent

4 – Very Good

3 – Good

2 – Fair

1 – Poor

Criteria for Evaluation 5 4 3 2 1

1. Clarity of Direction and Items

The questions are presented in a manner that

is clear and comprehensive.

2. Presentations/Organization

The items are organized in logical manner

3. Suitability

The items appropriately represent the

substance of the research. The questions are
designed to determine the conditions,
knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured

4. Adequateness of Items per Category

The number of questions is enough to answer

the need for research

5. Objectivity

The questions being asked do not suggest bias

on the part of the researcher

6. Attainment of Items per Category

The instrument as a whole fulfils the

objective/goal to which it was constructed

7. Scale and Evaluation in Rating System

The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Average

GIAN JANE QUIǸONES, LPT

Name and Signature of the Validator
 Evaluation Form

Content validity tool for semi-structured Questionnaire

The instrument is designed to describe the criteria for the questionnaires evaluation.

Direction: Please put a check on each statement that corresponds to the following point equivalent.

Point Equivalent:

5 – Excellent

4 – Very Good

3 – Good

2 – Fair

1 – Poor

Criteria for Evaluation 5 4 3 2 1

1. Clarity of Direction and Items

The questions are presented in a manner that

is clear and comprehensive.

2. Presentations/Organization

The items are organized in logical manner

3. Suitability

The items appropriately represent the

substance of the research. The questions are
designed to determine the conditions,
knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured

4. Adequateness of Items per Category

The number of questions is enough to answer

the need for research

5. Objectivity

The questions being asked do not suggest bias

on the part of the researcher

6. Attainment of Items per Category

The instrument as a whole fulfils the

objective/goal to which it was constructed

7. Scale and Evaluation in Rating System

The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Average

EDGAR AYON, LPT, MAEd

Name and Signature of the Validator
 Evaluation Form

Content validity tool for semi-structured Questionnaire

The instrument is designed to describe the criteria for the questionnaires evaluation.

Direction: Please put a check on each statement that corresponds to the following point equivalent.

Point Equivalent:

5 – Excellent

4 – Very Good

3 – Good

2 – Fair

1 – Poor

Criteria for Evaluation 5 4 3 2 1

1. Clarity of Direction and Items

The questions are presented in a manner that

is clear and comprehensive.

2. Presentations/Organization

The items are organized in logical manner

3. Suitability

The items appropriately represent the

substance of the research. The questions are
designed to determine the conditions,
knowledge, skills and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured

4. Adequateness of Items per Category

The number of questions is enough to answer

the need for research

5. Objectivity

The questions being asked do not suggest bias

on the part of the researcher

6. Attainment of Items per Category

The instrument as a whole fulfils the

objective/goal to which it was constructed

7. Scale and Evaluation in Rating System

The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.

Average

KLOYDE A. CADAY, LPT, MAEd

Name and Signature of the Validator