Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PICTORIAL REVIEW
Department of Radiology and Imaging, G.K.N.M Hospital and Research Centre, PN Palayam,
Coimbatore – 641037, India
Intraductal papillomas are common neoplasms with a to a single breast, while bilateral lesions are reported in
relative incidence of 2–3% [1]. In elderly patients, up to 14% of cases [4].
intraductal papillomas are often asymptomatic and are Central papillomas are subareolar in location within a
seen commonly as an incidental finding in biopsy major duct. On macroscopic examination, a papilloma
specimens [2]. Even though intraductal papillomas are appears as a round to oval, small mass usually
primarily benign, these lesions can pose problems in measuring a few millimetres in size within a dilated
view of their similarity to intraductal papillary carci- duct. Larger lesions dilate the duct more and extend
noma clinically, on ultrasound and histologically [3]. along the long axis of the duct presenting a spheroidal
Intraductal papillary carcinoma (IPC) is a rare ductal shape. With ductal obstruction, the dilated duct with a
carcinoma forming papillary structures, with reported papillary lesion may resemble a cyst with an intracystic
incidence of 1–4% of breast carcinomas [4]. These solid component, this variant being termed as an
neoplasms have certain characteristic imaging features intracystic papilloma. Histologically, papillomas show
which help to differentiate these lesions from other focal hyperplastic proliferation of ductal epithelium, having
breast abnormalities. an arborescent growth pattern with branching fibromus-
cular core of myoepithelial and epithelial cells. Lesions
may be pedunculated or broad based [3, 4].
Pathological observations Multiple peripheral papillomas are a rare entity in
which the lesions are located in the peripheral duct
Papillomas are essentially benign proliferations of system within the terminal ductal lobular unit. Several
ductal epithelium. They may occur at any age between adjacent ducts are involved with segmental dilatation of
30 years and 77 years [4], but are commonly seen the ducts, often resulting in a peripherally located mass.
between 30 years and 55 years [3]. They are known to The incidence of nipple discharge is lower in these
occur anywhere within the ductal system and are patients compared with the papillomas in larger ducts.
broadly classified into central and peripheral types. There is an increased risk of carcinoma in peripheral
Central types are usually solitary, while the peripherally papillomas which is directly related to the degree of
located papillomas tend to be multiple within the cellular atypia. Peripheral papillomas are often asso-
terminal duct lobular unit. Lesions are often confined ciated with coexisting malignancy with a reported
incidence of 10–30% [3–6].
Address correspondence to: Dr Karthik Ganesan, Department of
Intraductal papillary carcinoma (IPC) is an uncommon
CT and MRI, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, 15, Dr G ductal malignancy forming papillary structures.
Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai – 400026, Maharashtra, India. Histologically papillary carcinoma shows multilayered
Ultrasound features
Ultrasound features of intraductal papillary neo-
plasms (IPN) primarily depend on the gross macroscopic
appearance of the lesion. Three basic patterns of IPNs are
recognized on ultrasound – intraductal mass with or
without ductal dilatation, intracystic mass and a pre-
dominantly solid pattern with the intraductal mass
totally filling the duct [3, 7]. If the tumour is small, a
focally dilated duct may be the only observation. A
solitary dilated duct, even in the absence of a demon-
strable intraductal mass, is highly suggestive of an
intraductal papilloma, especially, if the patient is Figure 2. Papillary carcinoma. A moderately large mass is
presenting with a serosanguinous nipple discharge [3]. seen to almost totally fill the entire dilated duct. Relatively
Dilated duct with an intraductal mass or a cyst with an hypoechoic debris is seen to fill the peripheral duct adjacent
intracystic solid mass is the hallmark of intraductal to the mass. A short segment of proximal duct is noted at 10–
papillomas (Figure 1). The ductal component may vary 11 o’clock position.
in size from a minimally dilated duct to a large cystically
dilated, obstructed duct. Similarly the intraductal soft
relationship between the mass and the duct on ultra-
tissue component may range in size from a very small
sound and classified the masses into four categories: type
lesion which may be impossible to image to a large mass
I – intraluminal mass; type II – extraductal mass; type III
completely filling the dilated duct or the cyst obscuring
– purely solid mass; type IV – mixed variety [9]. Benign
the ductal or cystic component simulating other
papillomas are known to exhibit calcifications. These
solid masses (Figure 2) [3, 8]. Han et al analysed the
calcifications tend to be dense and coarse (Figures 3–5).
(a) (b)
Figure 4. Benign calcified intraductal papilloma with adjacent oil cyst. (a) Small focal mass with coarse, irregular and dense
calcifications (small arrows) adjacent to a cystic mass (C). Echogenic floating debris within the cyst with floating fat-fluid level
(long arrows). (b) Colour flow studies – focal increase in flow within the mass.
Small IPNs are often mammographically negative. A mammography (Figure 7). Calcified IPNs exhibit dense,
minimal to moderate duct dilatation may be observed on central, peripheral or combined form of coarse calcifica-
mammography as a progressively tapering band-like tion similar to those seen in cases of calcified fibro-
density extending from the nipple-subareolar region adenomas (Figure 8). Boonjuwetat et al described the
towards the breast parenchyma for a variable distance mammographic appearances of papillary neoplasms in a
(Figure 6). Larger lesions in a dilated duct may resemble series of 15 cases. They reported that most lesions
any other focal well-circumscribed dense mass on presented as solitary dense masses with no evidence of
(a) (b)
Figure 5. Calcified giant intraductal papilloma. (a) Ultrasound and (b) mammography demonstrate a large, bilobed, densely
calcified mass with distal shadowing (arrows).
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 6. Benign intraductal papilloma. (a) Mammography – oblique band like density along inferolateral quadrant of the left
breast. (b) Ultrasound – focal dilatation of a solitary duct with an intraluminal mass arising from the ductal wall. (c) Doppler
studies – distinct vascular pedicle within the central core with branching vessels arborising within the mass.
calcification in any of these lesions. A few lesions were bleed into the cyst, is virtually suggestive of a mural
mammographically negative either due to the size of the proliferative lesion (Figures 9 and 10) [11]. IPNs have a
lesion or due to the dense parenchymal pattern [10]. characteristic flow pattern on colour flow studies. A
IPNs are highly vascular and have a propensity to bleed distinct vascular pedicle is identified in IPNs within the
spontaneously. Spontaneous haemorrhage into a dilated central core with branching vessels arborising within the
duct characteristically produces a fluid–debris level due to mass. Colour flow studies are sensitive in identifying even
the denser cellular components settling down to the very small IPNs, in view of its characteristic vascularity
dependant position. The supernatant serum is anechoic (Figure 11). Intraductal papillomas and papillary carcino-
while the dependant cellular debris is echogenic. Presence mas have considerable overlap in imaging features and it
of fluid–debris level in a cyst, representing spontaneous may not be possible to differentiate them on ultrasound. In
(a) (b)
Figure 7. (a) Mammography – focal well circumscribed dense mass along the retroareolar region of the left breast.
(b) Ultrasound – large cystic mass with echogenic debris totally filling the cyst.
an older age group presence of a larger solid component vascularity. A cystically dilated duct may resemble a
and evidence of spontaneous intracystic bleed are more simple cyst when the intracystic component is very
suggestive of papillary carcinomas than benign papillo- small. This has to be differentiated from other cystic
mas (Figure 12) [9]. masses like a simple cyst, complex cyst, haematoma,
The differential diagnosis of IPNs depends upon the abscess and fat necrosis. A dilated duct with an
basic imaging appearances. Presence of sectoral dilata- intraductal solid component consisting of a central core
tion of ducts with no demonstrable intraductal mass has and peripheral fronds, with characteristic flow on colour
to be differentiated from mammary duct ectasia, which is flow studies, is virtually diagnostic of IPNs. When the
a chronic inflammatory condition. Bleeding into a duct, mass is large enough to fill the dilated duct or the cyst, it
inspissated material in mammary duct ectasia and ductal may not be possible to delineate the peripheral ductal or
carcinoma in situ may produce dilated ducts with cystic component. These lesions have to be differentiated
intraductal filling defects resembling IPNs. Mammary from other solid masses [3].
ductectasia is often bilateral and tends to affect multiple Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core biopsy is
ducts. In intraductal carcinoma, ductal dilatation is required in all cases to arrive at a definitive diagnosis even
unilateral, sectoral and irregular with ductal wall though the imaging findings are suggestive of IPNs.
thickening. Colour flow studies reveal lack of flow in FNAC from non-palpable small masses and from the solid
inspissated intraductal debris. Increased or variable component in large cystic lesions can be performed under
periductal flow may be present in intraductal carcinomas ultrasound control. At our institution, small papillary
while the IPNs reveal the characteristic arborescent lesions within a minimally dilated duct, observed as
on excision biopsy as B2 lesions, all lesions categorised as Sloane JP, editors. Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases.
B3 and above are subjected to excision biopsy at our Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994:94.
institution. 8. Yang WT, Suen M, Metrewell C. Sonographic features of
benign papillary neoplasms of the breast: review of 22
patients. J Ultrasound Med 1997;16:161–8.
References 9. Han BK, Choe YH, Ko YH, Yang JH, Nam SJ. Benign
1. Cilotti A, Bagnolesi P, Napoli V, et al. Solitary intraductal papillary lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic
papilloma of breast. An echographic study of 12 cases. correlation. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:217–23.
Radiol Med (Torino) 1991;82:617–20. 10. Boonjunwetwat D, Prathombutr A. Imaging of benign
2. Kramer WM, Rush BF. Mammary duct proliferation in the papillary neoplasm of the breast: mammographic, galacto-
elderly: a histopathologic study. Cancer 1973;31:130–7. graphic and sonographic findings. J Med Assoc Thai
3. Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP. Benign processes- 2000;83:832–8.
tumors. In: Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP, editors. 11. Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP. Diagnostic features on
Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. Edinburgh: ultrasound. In: Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP, editors.
Churchill Livingstone, 1994:94–7. Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. Edinburgh:
4. Dahnert W. Breast disorders. In: Dahnert W. Radiology Churchill Livingstone, 1994:58–9.
review manual, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Williams and 12. Lee AH, Denley HE, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Vujovic
Wilkins, 1999:458–74. P, et al. Excision biopsy findings of patients with breast
5. Haegenson CD. Diseases of the breast, 3rd edn. needle core biopsies reported as suspicious of malignancy
Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 1986:136–75. (B4) or lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3).
6. Murad TM, Contesso G, Mouriesse H. Papillary tumors of Histopathology 2003;42:331–6.
large lactiferous ducts. Cancer 1981;48:122–33. 13. Agoff SN, Lawton TJ. Papillary lesions of the breast with
7. Kasumi F. Ultrasound of breast diseases. Shinohara – and without atypical ductal hyperplasia: can we accurately
shuppan Co., Tokyo, 1983. Cited in Benign processes – predict benign behaviour from core needle biopsy? Am J
Tumors, Intraductal Papilloma, In: Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Clin Pathol 2004;122:440–3.