Middle English Period

The Normans, who were residing in Normandy (France) defeated the Anglo-Saxon King at the Battle of
Hastings (1066) and conquered England.

The Norman Conquest inaugurated a distinctly new epoch in the literary as well as political history of
England. The Anglo-Saxon authors were then as suddenly and permanently displaced as the Anglo-Saxon
king.

The literature afterwards read and written by Englishmen was thereby as completely transformed as the
sentiments and tastes of English rulers. The foreign types of literature introduced after the Norman
Conquest first found favour with the monarchs and courtiers, and were deliberately fostered by them,
to the disregard of native forms. No effective protest was possible by the Anglo-Saxons, and English
thought for centuries to come was largely fashioned in the manner of the French. Throughout the whole
period, which we call the Middle English period (as belonging to the Middle Ages or Medieval times in
the History of Britain) or the Anglo-Norman period, in forms of artistic expression as well as of religious
service, the English openly acknowledged a Latin control.

It is true that before the Norman Conquest the Anglo-Saxons had a body of native literature distinctly
superior to any European vernacular. But one cannot deny that the Normans came to their land when
they greatly needed an external stimulus. The Conquest effected a wholesome awakening of national
life. The people were suddenly inspired by a new vision of a greater future. They became united in a
common hope. In course of time the Anglo-Saxons lost their initial hostility to the new comers, and all
became part and parcel of one nation. The Normans not only brought with them soldiers and artisans
and traders, they also imported scholars to revive knowledge, chroniclers to record memorable events,
minstrels to celebrate victories, or sing of adventure and love.

The great difference between the two periods—Anglo-Saxon period and Anglo-Norman period, is
marked by the disappearance of the old English poetry. There is nothing during the Anglo-Norman
period like Beowulf or Fall of the Angels. The later religious poetry has little in it to recall the finished art
of Cynewulf. Anglo-Saxon poetry, whether derived from heathendom or from the Church, has ideas and
manners of its own; it comes to perfection, and then it dies away. It seems that Anglo-Saxon poetry
grows to rich maturity, and then disappears, as with the new forms of language and under new
influences, the poetical education started again, and so the poetry of the Anglo-Norman period has
nothing in common the Anglo-Saxon poetry.

The most obvious change in literary expression appears in the vehicle employed. For centuries Latin had
been more or less spoken or written by the clergy in England. The Conquest which led to the
reinvigoration of the monasteries and the tightening of the ties with Rome, determined its more
extensive use. Still more important, as a result of foreign sentiment in court and castle, it caused
writings in the English vernacular to be disregarded, and established French as the natural speech of the
cultivated and the high-born. The clergy insisted on the use of Latin, the nobility on the use of French;
no one of influence saw the utility of English as a means of perpetuating thought, and for nearly three
centuries very few works appeared in the native tongue.

In spite of the English language having been thrown into the background, some works were composed in
it, though they echoed in the main the sentiments and tastes of the French writers, as French then was
the supreme arbiter of European literary style. Another striking characteristic of medieval literature is its
general anonymity. Of the many who wrote the names of but few are recorded, and of the history of
these few we have only the most meagre details. It was because originality was deplored as a fault, and
independence of treatment was a heinous offence in their eyes.

(a) The Romances

The most popular form of literature during the Middle English period was the romances. No literary
productions of the Middle Ages are so characteristic, none so perennially attractive as those that treat
romantically of heroes and heroines of by-gone days. These romances are notable for their stories
rather than their poetry, and they, like the drama afterwards, furnished the chief mental recreation of
time for the great body of the people. These romances were mostly borrowed from Latin and French
sources. They deal with the stories of King Arthur, The War of Troy, the mythical doings of Charlemagne
and of Alexander the Great.

(b) The Miracle and Morality Plays

In the Middle English period Miracle plays became very popular. From the growth and development of
the Bible story, scene by scene, carried to its logical conclusion, this drama—developed to an enormous
cycle of sacred history, beginning with the creation of man, his fall and banishment from the Garden of
Eden and extending through the more important matters of the Old Testament and life of Christ in the
New to the summoning of the quick and the dead on the day of final judgment. This kind of drama is
called the miracle play—sometimes less correctly the mystery play—and it flourished throughout
England from the reign of Henry II to that of Elizabeth (1154-1603).

Another form of drama which flourished during the Middle Ages was the Morality plays. In these plays
the uniform theme is the struggle between the powers of good and evil for the mastery of the soul of
man. The personages were abstract virtues, or vices, each acting and speaking in accordance with his
name; and the plot was built upon their contrasts and influences on human nature, with the intent to
teach right living and uphold religion. In a word, allegory is the distinguishing mark of the moral plays. In
these moral plays the protagonist is always an abstraction; he is Mankind, the Human Race, the Pride of
Life, and there is an attempt to compass the whole scope of man’s experience and temptations in life, as
there had been a corresponding effort in the Miracle plays to embrace the complete range of sacred
history, the life of Christ, and the redemption of the world.

(c) William Langland (1332 ?...?)

One of the greatest poets of the Middle Ages was William Langland, and his poem, A Vision of Piers the
Plowman holds an important place in English literature. In spite of its archaic style, it is a classic work in
English literature. This poem, which is a satire on the corrupt religious practices, throws light on the
ethical problems of the day. The character assumed by Langland is that of the prophet, denouncing the
sins of society and encouraging men to aspire to a higher life. He represents the dissatisfaction of the
lower and the more thinking classes of English society, as Chaucer represents the content of the
aristocracy and the prosperous middle class. Although Langland is essentially a satiric poet, he has
decided views on political and social questions. The feudal system is his ideal; he desires no change in
the institution of his days, and he thinks that all would be well if the different orders of society would do
their duty. Like Dante and Bunyan, he ennobles his satire by arraying it in a garb of allegory; and he is
intensely real.

(d) John Gower (1325?—1408)

Gower occupies an important place in the development of English poetry. Though it was Chaucer who
played the most important role in this direction, Gower’s contribution cannot be ignored. Gower
represents the English culmination of that courtly medieval poetry which had its rise in France two or
three hundred years before. He is a great stylist, and he proved that English might compete with the
other languages which had most distinguished themselves in poetry. Gower is mainly a narrative poet
and his most important work is Confession Amantis, which is in the form of conversation between the
poet and a divine interpreter. It is an encyclopaedia of the art of love, and satirises the vanities of the
current time. Throughout the collection of stories which forms the major portion of Confession Amantis,
Gower presents himself as a moralist. Though Gower was inferior to Chaucer, it is sufficient that they
were certainly fellow pioneers, fellow schoolmasters, in the task of bringing England to literature. Up to
their time, the literary production of England had been exceedingly rudimentary and limited. Gower, like
Chaucer, performed the function of establishing the form of English as a thoroughly equipped medium
of literature.

(e) Chaucer (1340?...1400)

It was, in fact, Chaucer who was the real founder of English poetry, and he is rightly called the ‘Father of
English Poetry’. Unlike the poetry of his predecessors and contemporaries, which is read by few except
professed scholars, Chaucer’s poetry has been read and enjoyed continuously from his own day to this,
and the greatest of his successors, from Spenser and Milton to Tennyson and William Morris, have
joined in praising it. Chaucer, in fact, made a fresh beginning in English literature. He disregarded
altogether the old English tradition. His education as a poet was two-fold. Part of it came from French
and Italian literatures, but part of it came from life. He was not a mere bookman, nor was he in the least
a visionary. Like Shakespeare and Milton, he was, on the contrary, a man of the world and of affairs.

The most famous and characteristic work of Chaucer is the Canterbury Tales, which is a collection of
stories related by the pilgrims on their way to the shrine of Thomas Becket at Canterbury. These pilgrims
represent different sections of contemporary English society, and in the description of the most
prominent of these people in the Prologue Chaucer’s powers are shown at their very highest. All these
characters are individualized, yet their thoroughly typical quality gives unique value to Chaucer’s picture
of men and manners in the England of his time.

The Canterbury Tales is a landmark in the history of English poetry because here Chaucer enriched the
English language and metre to such an extent, that now it could be conveniently used for any purpose.
Moreover, by introducing a variety of highly-finished characters into a single action, and engaging them
in an animated dialogue, Chaucer fulfilled every requirement of the dramatist, short of bringing his plays
on the stage. Also, by drawing finished and various portraits in verse, he showed the way to the
novelists to portray characters.

Chaucer’s works fall into three periods. During the first period he imitated French models, particularly
the famous and very long poem Le Roman de la Rose of which he made a translation—Romaunt of the
Rose. This poem which gives an intimate introduction to the medieval French romances and allegories of
courtly love, is the embryo out of which all Chaucer’s poetry grows. During this period he also wrote the
Book of the Duchess, an elegy, which in its form and nature is like the Romaunt of the Rose; Complaint
unto Pity, a shorter poem and ABC, a series of stanzas religious in tone, in which each opens with a letter
of the alphabet in order.

The poems of the second period (1373-84) show the influence of Italian literature, especially of Dante’s
Divine Comedy and Boccaccio’s poems. In this period he wrote The Parliament of Fowls, which contains
very dramatic and satiric dialogues between the assembled birds; Troilus and Criseyde, which narrates
the story of the Trojan prince Troilus and his love for a damsel, Creseida; The Story of Griselda, in which
is given a pitiful picture of womanhood; and The House of Fame, which is a masterpiece of comic
fantasy, with a graver undertone of contemplation of human folly.

Chaucer’s third period (1384-90) may be called the English period, because in it he threw off foreign
influences and showed native originality. In the Legend of Good Woman he employed for the first time
the heroic couplet. It was during this period that he wrote The Canterbury Tales, his greatest poetic
achievement, which places us in the heart of London. Here we find his gentle, kindly humour, which is
Chaucer’s greatest quality, at its very best.

Chaucer’s importance in the development of English literature is very great because he removed poetry
from the region of Metaphysics and Theology, and made it hold as “twere the mirror up to nature”. He
thus brought back the old classical principle of the direct imitation of nature.

(f) Chaucer’s Successors

After Chaucer there was a decline in English poetry for about one hundred years. The years from 1400 to
the Renaissance were a period bereft of literature. There were only a few minor poets, the imitators and
successors of Chaucer, who are called the English and Scottish Chaucerians who wrote during this
period. The main cause of the decline of literature during this period was that no writer of genius was
born during those long years. Chaucer’s successors were Occieeve, Lydgate, Hawes, Skelton Henryson,
Dunbar and Douglas. They all did little but copy him, and they represent on era of mediocrity in English
literature that continues up to the time of the Renaissance.