Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Format: MS WORD | Chapter: 1-5 | Pages: 75 | 468 Users found this project useful | Price
₦3,000
ABSTRACT
Consequent upon titanic competition that has beclouded business environment of all sorts,
organizations have employed myriad of strategies. Positive reward to workers for good performance
by management is among the motivational tools employed by management to enhance productivity
and maintain high standard products. Organizations that are indifferent to motivational tool suffer
lack of productivity and standard products. To achieve productivity and standard products, team
work is imperative. To achieve teamwork, a system of reward administration and implementation is
pertinent. To this end it is imperative to investigate the relationship between system of reward
administration and its implementation to establish the influence of reward administration
implementation. On this premise, this study seeks examine the impact of reward administration
implementation has on total quality management (TQM). The object of this study aims at
understanding the influence of reward administration on total quality management.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Consequent upon the myriad of changes which have beclouded the operations of modern business
organisations in recent times, including the fundamental and core changes in the nature of work and
organisations, the dynamic nature of the competitive environment and the need to ensure a
convergence of shareholders interests in the way the organisations are run, a need for new
approaches in human resources management has arisen. The paradigm shift, in other words, includes
“total”. Put differently, total quality management. This means that everyone in the organisation must
be involved in the continuous improvement effort. The concept quality indicates a concern for
consumer satisfaction. Management on the other hand refers to the people and processes needed to
achieve the quality (Aragon, 2003).
Subsequently, reward management deals generally with the handling of workers needs, drives and
motivations in a way that will elicit the desired behavior from employees. This becomes more
reasonable going by the submission of Brian Tracy (a world class management expert) in Omotosho,
(2002) that an average worker will only put in 40% - 50% of his capacity to any job-function at a point
in time. Therefore, for us to induce and trigger off exceptional performance of 70% - 95% from
workers we need to motivate them using any or combination of the reviewed motivational theories
as our foundation. From the foregoing, it becomes one of the ethical issues in staff management in
Caritas University, that is, stimulating reward to emerge with total quality management
implementation. Some experts contend that total quality management can only be implemented
when there is a critical need for remunerative justice in organisation irrespective of teamwork
syndrome.
For organizations to toe “total quality management” (TQM) and rewarding variables for its
implementation, astute methods of determining the value of individuals not group needs to be
delineated. Understanding the context of the research work, (de-unionized workers operating in a
peripheral capitalist state, baptismal mission University), concentration on collective responsibility
and collaborating effort is replaced by acknowledging individuals responsibility and achievement,
even within the context of a team approach (Cole, 2002).
On the above premise, the mechanics of this work is articulated on rewards as stimulating
performance/motivation which makes or mark the implementation of total quality management not
in the absence of performance appraisal as a veritable tool in assessing rather than control of
processes of walk of paradigm shift. The thrust of TQM concept is mainly to help work organisation
cope with changing environment and the need to integrate an organisations human resource
strategy and it‟s cooperate strategy. There quality control should be conducted as an integrate part
of management control. Thus, the purpose of this work therefore, is to examine the origin and
development of the reward valuation model in juxtaposition with performance appraisal as
technique for evaluating employees.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Work relation concern the control of the process wherein worker‟s capacity to labour is translated
into actual work. In pursuit of profitability those who own the means of production adopt control
processes to ensure that maximum effort is extorted from those who have to sell their labour for
wages. Control strategy in relations may be located in the dimensions of bureaucracy-hierarchy,
specialization and division of labour, impersonality and formalized rules as well as in the system of
discipline and reward as occurred in the workplace. The direction of work, the procedures for
evaluating workers performance and the exercise of the firms‟ sanctions and reward becomes
subject with of the company policy work becomes highly stratified, each given its distinct title and
description and impersonal rules govern promotion. Similarly the disciplinary system takes care of act
of challenge, recalcitrance and resistance, which inherently threaten „order‟ whilst the pay system
rewards compliance. Paying people for performance or compliance to the procedure for the
installation and implementation of TQM in organisations particularly Caritas University remains a
mixture of paradoxes. The contradiction arises from the never abating controversy about objectivity
of the appraisal process on one part and the link between individual‟s performance and corporate
goals on the other hand.
Akata (2003: 211) argued that when objectives are stretched, employees easily become
disenchanted but to otherwise is to encourage performance mediocrity. Akata further opined that
different pay rate and bonuses to high performers of the quality implementation team and others
who strive hard to attain average performance will feel aggrieved; Rewarding underperforming
executives with fat performance related bonuses and the work force would grumble. On the above
premise, it could be deduced that part from noting the human element in implementing TQM, other
factors such as basic salary, cash allowance (housing, electricity, transportation, medical etc), fringe
benefits (sale bonus/profit share, entrepreneurial reward, productivity bonus etc), cash awarded for
loyalty, honesty, long service etc, and quality of leadership, workplace relationship and official
recognition of employees ability and contribution to corporate growth and development has great
influence on the level of quality expected from workers.
Taking cursory look at the reward variables, a process of determining who gets what, and how, in
terms of income. Quality implementation in Caritas University however tends to be fixed on
problems anchored on perceived trust, mediocrity religious ethic and appliance of viable oppressive
apparatus on non mediocre workers. This translates into almost general silence by rank and file staff
amidst so much important welfare and corporate issues to discuss. This is explained only in the
context of fear of being sacked and driven back to swollen labour market. To many staff, half bread is
better than none. Thus no matter the dehumanizing conditions of service it is better than none. This
is against the view of Alwitt and Berger, (1993) that rewarding quality has been translated into
economic vote which ultimately influence the purchase and investment decision of individuals.
Most academic staffs are beclouded by visible and invisible spies. The management system seems so
operative that has attracted the slag hammer of the National Universities Commission (NUC). But
still, it seems unabated. Student are not left out in this managerial mis-normed. History is empty with
the record of academic and general behaviour stimuli in terms of reward of any kind. Thus
monument of doubts have strange up in the mind of staff and students regarding the expected
positive impact of the NUC forensic auditing. Is this obnoxious managerial flaw inherent that even
NUC appears too gullible in removing it? Derven, 1990 and lawrie, 1990 advocated for standardized
performance appraisal as the most crucial aspect to guarantee organizational life and growth.
Total quality management calls for the elimination of performance assessments that rate employee
in relations to each other and in mediocre criteria. Lack of performance appraisal has conferred on
the managers of this University too power over employees and they most often abuse. Many
managers fill performance assessment will let them document employee performance for possible
reward, but some employee fear the assessment might used against them in some disciplinary
actions. Performance assessments may give employees with grievances the documentation they
need to prove that managers are treating them unfairly. Thus, the crux of this study, therefore, is to
identify the inherent contradictions in the workability of TQM and the manipulation of the reward
variables in furthering its implementation in Caritas University.
1. What is the relationship between pay, general performance reward and TQM implementation?
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT PRICE
₦3,000
NUMBER OF PAGES
75
NUMBER OF CHAPTERS
1-5
ADDITIONAL CONTENT
JONNAH EHIS
I was scared at first when I saw your website but I decided to risk my last 3k and surprisingly I got my
complete project in my email box instantly. This is so nice!!!
Excellent
MATTHEW NGBEDE
I wish I knew you guys when I wrote my first degree project, it took so much time and effort then.
Now, with just a click of a button, I got my complete project in less than 15 minutes. You guys are too
amazing!
Excellent
TEMITAYO AYODELE
My friend told me about iprojectmaster website, I doubted her until I saw her download her full
project instantly, I tried mine too and got it instantly, right now, am telling everyone in my school
about iprojectmaster.com, no one has to suffer any more writing their project. Thank you for making
life easy for me and my fellow students... Keep up the good work
Very Good
STANCY M
I did not see my project topic on your website so I decided to call your customer care number, the
attention I got was epic! I got help from the beginning to the end of my project in just 3 days, they
even taught me how to defend my project and I got a 'B' at the end. Thank you so much
iprojectmaster, infact, I owe my graduating well today to you guys...
Excellent
It's a site that give researcher student's to gain access work,easier,affordable and understandable. I
appreciate the iproject master teams for making my project work fast and available .I will
surely,recommend this site to my friends.thanks a lot..!
Excellent
This is my first time..Your service is superb. But because I was pressed for time, I became jittery when
I did not receive feedbackd. I will do more business with you and I will recommend you to my friends.
Thank you.
Very Good
JOSEPH M. YOHANNA
Thanks a lot, am really grateful and will surely tell my friends about your website.
Excellent
I am now a graduate because of iprojectmaster.com, God Bless you guys for me.
Excellent
You guys just made life easier for students. Thanks alot iprojectmaster.com
Excellent
Thank you iprojectmaster for saving my life, please keep it up and may God continue to bless you
people.
Excellent
Call Our Instant Help Desk on 0813-292-6373 and Get Your Complete Project Material Instantly.
All project materials on this website are well researched by professionals with high level of
professionalism.
Look for your department and select any topic of your choice
I have a fresh topic that is not on your website. How do I go about it?
It is a Complete Research Project i.e Chapters 1-5, Abstract, Table of Contents, Full References,
Questionnaires / Secondary Data
One of your topics suites my project, but the case study is different. What do i do?
Call Our Instant Help Desk Now: (+234) 813-292-6373 and you will be responded to immediately
Your Complete Project Material will be sent to your Email Address in Ms Word document format
Yes! We can send your Complete Research Project to your WhatsApp Number
What if my Project Supervisor made some changes to a topic i picked from your website?
Call Our Instant Help Desk Now: (+234) 813-292-6373 and you will be responded to immediately
Yes! Call Our Instant Help Desk Now: (+234) 813-292-6373 and you will be responded to immediately
Smiles! We've Got You Covered. Chat with us on WhatsApp Now to Get Instant Help: (+234) 813-
292-6373
AN ASSESSMENT OF MASS MEDIA’S ROLE IN THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST DRUG ABUSE IN NIGERIA
THE ROLE COMMUNITY RELATIONS HAS PLAYED ON THE CORPORATE IMAGE OF SHELL PETROLEUM
PLC PORTHARCOURT
IMPACT OF RADIO AND TELEVISION CAMPAIGN AGAINST CULTISM IN NIGERIA – A CASE STUDY OF
OSUN STATE POLYTECHNIC, IREE
ACCOUNTING3686
ACCOUNTING EDUCATION5
ADULT EDUCATION5
ACTUARIAL SCIENCE5
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION181
ARCHITECTURE41
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE288
ANIMAL SCIENCE48
AFRICAN LANGUAGES6
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION1050
BUSINESS EDUCATION11
BIOCHEMISTRY167
BREWING SCIENCE4
COMPUTER SCIENCE1550
CHEMISTRY38
COMMERCE25
CURRICULUM STUDIES4
CIVIL ENGINEERING80
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING212
ECONOMICS1167
EDUCATION3596
ENGLISH360
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE266
ESTATE MANAGEMENT207
ENTREPRENEURSHIP167
GEOGRAPHY59
GEOLOGY43
HOME ECONOMICS50
HUMAN KINETICS26
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY31
INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY36
INSURANCE139
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS108
LAW214
LIBRARY SCIENCE196
MARKETING929
MASS COMMUNICATION1323
MATHEMATICS EDUCATION4
MICRO BIOLOGY158
MARINE AND TRANSPORT4
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING149
NURSING76
OFFICE TECHNOLOGY246
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION863
POLITICAL SCIENCE503
PSYCHOLOGY59
PHILOSOPHY162
PHYSICS29
PROJECT MANAGEMENT8
PHARMACY4
PETROLEUM ENGINEERING49
SOCIAL STUDIES9
SCIENCE LABOURATORY251
SOIL SCIENCE11
SOCIO