Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
“[...] how did people um Western Europe between the end of the Middle Ages and the
eighteenth-century attempt to master the enormously increased number of texts that first the
manuscript book and then print put into circulation?” p. vii
“That relationship typically contains an internal contradiction. On the one hand, every
reader has to deal with an entire set of constraints and obligations. The author, the
bookseller-publisher, the commentator, and the censor all have an interest in keeping close
control over the production of meaning and in making sure the text that they written,
published, glossed, or authorized will be understood with no possible deviation from their
prescriptive will. On the other hand, reading, by definition, is rebellious and vagabond.
Readers use infinite numbers of subterfuges to procure prohibited books, to read between the
lines, and to subvert the lessons imposed on them.” P. viii
“Understanding the principles that govern the ‘order of discourse’ supposes that the
principles underlying the processes of production, communication and reception of book wil
also be deciphered in a rigorous manner.” P. ix
FORM
Materiality
“[…] the text exists only because there is a reader to give it meaning.” P. 2
“in the societies of the ancient régime, how did increased circulation of printed matter
transform forms of sociability, permit new modes of thought, and change people’s
relationship with power?” p. 3
“Readers and hearers, in point of fact, are never confronted with abstract or ideal texts
detached from all materiality; they manipulate or perceive objects and forms whose
structures and modalities govern their reading (or their hearing), thus the possible
comprehension of the text read (or heard).” P. 3
[…] forms produce meanings and that a text, stable in its letter, is invested with a new
meaning and status when the mechanisms that make it available to interpretation change.” P.
3
“[…] a history of reading must identify the specific mechanism that distinguish the various
communities of readers and traditions of reading.” P. 4
“What is essential is thus to understand how the same texts can be differently apprehended,
manipulated, and comprehended.” P. 8
“A second shift of emphasis reconstructs the networks of practices that organized historically
and socially differentiated modes of access of texts.”
“[…] there is no text apart from the physical support that offers it for reading, hence there is
no comprehension of any written piece that does not at least in part depend upon the forms in
which it reaches its reader.” P. 9
“The space between text and object, which is precisely the space in which meaning is
constructed, has too often been forgotten, not only by the traditional sort of literary history
that thinks of the work as an abstract text whose typographic forms are without importance,
but also by the ‘aesthetic of reception’ that, in spite of its desire to historicize the readers’
experience, postulates a pure and unmediated relationship between the ‘signals’ emitted by
the next and the ‘horizon of expectation’ of the public to which those signals are addressed.”
P. 10
“A second figure pertains when a text is transferred from one form of publishing to another,
dictating both a transformation of the text and the constitution of a new public.” P. 12
“In societies of ancient régime as in our own, however, access to print cannot be reduced
to book ownership alone: every book that is read is not necessarily a book that is
personally owned, and all printed matter kept in the home is not obligatory a book.” P.
19
French historiography was not interested in authors, but in book trade, alliances, wealth,
printers (sociology of readers).
“a sociology of texts” proposed by McKenzie focuses on way which the physical forms
through which texts are transmitted to their readers affect the process of the construction of
meaning.” P. 28
We can go beyond: how the communication circuit (Darnton) affects the process of the
construction of the normative knowledge?
Author-function, Foucault
“Foucault states that, far from being universal or relevant to all texts in all ages, the
attribution of a proper name to a work is a way of discriminating between texts.” P. 29
Books really began to have authors to the extent that authors became subject to punishment.
(Foucault)
“The first major revision suggested that the affirmation of literary ownership, far from arising
from a particular application of a modern individual property law, derived directly from the
book trade’s defense of permissions to print – authorizations that guaranteed exclusive rights
to a work to the bookseller who had obtained title to it.” P. 32
Sorbonne’s Index p. 49
“The author-function was thus constituted as an essential weapon in the battle against
the diffusion of texts suspected of heterodoxy.” P. 50
The text examines three sets of mechanism – juridical, repressive and material – fundamental
for the invention of the author p. 59
The term “bibliothéque” in a book title to refer to a collection of text on a given subject
Or a list/catalogue of other books p. 72