Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
UWORLD
newaGcrest -
HIRSCHPRUNG
MECKELS -
99 TC PERTECNETAFE
-
failure obliteration
uttehne duet
by
10
in
is
4
months
N n
Na
N
1) Health counseling at PCP checkup in
pt w/ no current illness is a form
of 10
prevention ) health
promotion
400
2) Cholesterol
study of
mortality in
pts mean
220mg 1dL
-
¥
T
2T
find
↳ 2.5%
. 95×400=380
-3%
900 T=
10mg 1dL
2T =
95% son
9) NAT ✓
A.AT - N
MY 9 trim
19 MF N P T PPV
\
FP
sensitivity specificity
-
a)
zgroupsensoms::¥%n II
'
ignutsmtejt.to
"
tiff's in:*.net.in
test
nodule no
mmaa.li#gqne*a*yf
9) D prevalence =
O PPV 3 DNPV
TE
-
-1
2T T T 2T
IN
-
-
)
10 serum folate mean
5
WI F- 0.5 ; calculate mean of 95%
-4
174--6 0% as #
5 I 1.0
ANSWER
=
=
It crossover
study
=
.
"
T=
-
active treatment
treatment active
out benefit from
was # period reduces treatment
carry over
-
previous
µ¥ao
¥,€_
K ① FP
specificity
'
test t # free
*
people disease
- -
① 30 180
TN
specificity #
people disease free
-
*
-
"
Acing
ON
,
top
-
#
¥F¥µFtj
100 Zero 300
MUTATION → HT N
BLOOD CHLORIDE
⑦
B) > RISK FACTOR
SthDyEfgmskfaeter@I-f7eTaP8Fee.e.is
-
ALL PATIENTS
:÷: ÷
15 ) A
graph W ) to SHEW . . . WHAT is true about it ?
"
↳ mean us is always @ the
bottom mode is
,
always @ the top
" DIABETES )
TD disease prevalence increases when incidence / time remain constant . . .
how is this
possible?
A / survivability
quality of care A
) FEIN -200
-
people had
18 is 75% ; 200 Ml ; how
sensitivity many were en
F%←
I 9) A CRP is associated ,
w d new marker, but has
strong negative correlation (close to slope)
.si?..ioIIiIi:i::sIi::i:i:ioii:o.......i'
TOTAL
" "" "
÷: ¥9
*
solioo as
-
-
" e. . =
drug control
.mn#of*eo&I:./;Irishfaetor-o:Y4
⑦ -0
23 ) NWT # Y ARR ARR -
⇐ - t
Atb Mi - to
¥
;÷¥
-
ARR=as¥g >s
-
LAW diseased
A CONTROL ?
sooo
CASE
f people
Disease a control
-
CASE
✓
controls should represent general population
-
⑦ Emon -
Diabetic
= ' as in 200 pts probability difference is
pure chance is Si .
= x (alpha ) =
type / error Calculate
power
= I -
13=180%7
-0 to
B (Beta ) 11 error
type
=
* Diabetic 185 pts there is difference when is there is 20%
=
probability
=
210 in of concluding no one
④ to
probability of seeing difference when is there power
=
one
%) New
calculate
unrest
specificity
f%"°!E
-
140 180
-1 TINTED
=
⑦ NEW test
gives readings
11.2
,
13.5
,
t 7. I
} Normal
ranges 4 -
14
.
. . .
WHAT can
you say about this test ?
Validity accuracy
=
reliability =
precision
DX
① -0 total
'¥.¥
La ⑤
-
90
① >o
)
20
28 odds ratio
9jq I
BB
30
40 70
afters
9,0€
=
OR = before Christ
OR
7%79-0 81%-0 0.381
-
-
=
=
p
29 ) INV 7 studies cocoa reduces SBP onttg C- 2.2 ;
-
1.3 ) .
This is
statistically significant !÷q !÷q
:
y; .
|mAtcmngJ
30 ) Type of measure to prevent c ts wave your test subjects are semi - to your control subjects Kage , ethnicity ,
etc )
a) It
31 ) Homocysteine 11.1 I 1.2 How should these dates be
compared ?
B)
g) mewans-sIIII.IT#It-tesI
'
9. s ± i. 3
categories ?
%)
co # ou → BLADDER CANCER
its
-
'
.
. .
its ;
f - C0NFONG
SERS NON-SMOKERS
1212=0.95 RR -
- 1.03
Additionally
'
A
Large p value the difference is
suggests
-
RR from 1 is due to
thee alone . . .
meaning
there is
no real association on a) whelp bladder
)
cancer
33 Dr t
pt UNAWARE OF WHICH Pt drag us who is method to reduce obseias
.
gets .
gets placebo
)
34 CASE
FATALITY RATE =
# FATAL
#ea+d,dn#
=
Lotto =4
dxl
↳
prevented Lyon)
Acute
*
① nary Event
o#
to ooo
'
4-
* ACE inhibitors
)
①
-
Reamer . , , Oo
200 300
35
.
=÷=÷÷=÷i¥
36 ) [④
American Chinese
NEW Biomarker -
It CAN BE SAID that American NPVS would be higher; t PPVS lower b/c of prevalence ; vice versa inching
37 ) is the
thing that
really change the
sample size one can
p value
-
infected
potatosalade.at#
38 ) Attach Rate in
potato salad =
an
potato salad eaters
=
3+5+3+-14=2,53--0-34
to test set so
90 ) RELIABLE =
precise
valid accurate
-
-
b) Snapshot on landmasses = cross -
sectional SNAPSHOT on
populations =
Ecological
study
2)
.
✓
NEW DRUG KM 28
US
⑧%
,
✓ Recurrence notte
4× 8 = 3.2 g 3.2=19.8J
gyp
-
care
.
groups
?y groups ? @ / →
# ? How
g)
or
IS DATA r ma
z
FEE of 200
groups of
-
smokers INN 4
#
LI
*
mte-atfsstgtaifegor.ca
heavy hi med
light
Atlantic Adua Fineman
'
Ava
, ,
smoking §1 -
FEE
7,000
5) Incidence = H-NEWCAS.ES/-year===-z,-q
#
people @ risk
6) Everyone gets breast ) prostate but not too high mams help
cancer at some
point 's mortality Also
'
ANYONE if LIVE
WHO GETS LUNG CANCER is LUCKY they
GI cancer is
pretty common , but
prevented complications by colonoscopies
disease
-0 "
T¥LYYo
④
Risk of exposure
=
exposure @ Hate =
Fo 40.5J
RR=2 means your 2x more Likely t 3=3×8 4=4 x t5=5x then its easy to say that it would be 80
9)
Bias ? selection blots
Atri.tl?onpegjBuiFstuayynpowowup
-
"
disuse
* -
Fn¥as
t TP F P 5%
"
test
)
"
10
NEW CANCER TEST ① in 954 . Who dont have disease →
95% TN -
P =
(t -
0.958 )
" ) A medication that takes time to work I show effectiveness must be measured
of time
Over a longer period . I LATENT PERIOD EFFECT
the
things that change RR
confounding
-
12 ) RR -
-
1.4 ← STATES Rish
present latent period
Cl 95%
W/ NULL 1.02 1.85
-
p
>
# ↳Ip=c
0.05
I
B) CI 95% =
It 1.965ft
A
95%
stamp
size
2.58
^
994 .
14 ) tell pathologist a dx pt has DM TI t his biopsy s are 3x more likely to be biased as an observer
"
t Life
"
Lead The blots
5) expectancy by 73 months -
' New Biomarker .
. .
6) Cancer
mortality ? Lung
'
Leading cancer
odds
pregnancy to
Exposure
L-TNNOSALy.DZ/NTD/NTD#
-0
I 8
)
"
"
19) BIAS?
Asking mother
↳ These
us .
y¥¥I# USED
↳*
NSAID
During pregnancy
mothers would be
more likely to recall Most
.
B/C it didnt affect them .
level
the ground
21 ) ÷i÷€ A
decreasing center line is
good for
isensitinty t
specificity
Sens, # Ipecac
NPV =
TNKTNTFN)
dix
"↳
TP
÷i%
F P
90% 80 's .
I 00 LOG
→
i t cancer ?
smokers
✓
)
"
23 2 - followed 10
"
COHORT
groups non-smokers years →
pro
-
Spectre STUDY
↳ ←•→
# cancer ? Retro
disease
⑤ ⑤
④
"
TPHPTFP
-
root
24 ) test -0
)
225
0.02
2¥ 2o÷oz=
=
=
"÷
iii. iii. ÷:
'
:÷÷ ..