Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

CLINICIAN’S CORNER

Short-root anomaly in an orthodontic patient


Leandro Silva Marques,a Rodrigo Generoso,b Mônica Costa Armond,c and Camila Alessandra Pazzinid
Diamantina, Treˆs Corações, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Short-root anomaly is a rare condition, but it can be a problem for orthodontists and their patients. Our aim in
this article was to report the treatment of an orthodontic patient with short-root anomaly, highlighting the
diagnostic aspects involved and the strategy used. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:346-8)

S
hort-root anomaly (SRA) is a rare condition, with was to present the treatment of an orthodontic patient
a prevalence estimated at 1.3%. It is more com- with SRA, highlighting the diagnostic aspects involved
mon in female patients and principally affects and the strategy used.
the premolars and the maxillary incisors, the apexes of
which are rounded rather than the usual pointed CASE REPORT
shape.1,2 The condition has a genetic background and A girl, aged 10 years 7 months, sought orthodontic
is related to other dental anomalies, such as agenesis, care, accompanied by her parents. Their objective was
invaginated teeth, conoid teeth, supernumerary teeth, to continue the treatment that had been started 6 months
microdontia, taurodontia, pulp calculus, and type I earlier by another orthodontist. The girl had an ortho-
dentin dysplasia.3-6 Moreover, it can be related to dontic appliance in her maxillary arch from second
syndromes, such as Down7 and Stevens-Johnson.8 premolar to second premolar (Fig 1). She had a mesofa-
SRA has also been associated with exogenous factors, cial growth pattern, a convex facial profile, and a Class
including radiation of the head and neck or chemother- II dental and skeletal malocclusion. The radiographs
apy in children with malignant tumors during dental showed SRA in the maxillary and mandibular central in-
development.9 cisors and first premolars (Fig 2). The mandibular cen-
Short dental roots, resulting in unfavorable root- tral incisors were affected to the greatest degree. There
crown ratios, can affect the prognosis of teeth and compli- were no reports of disease or systemic abnormalities.
cate the treatment plan in orthodontics and prosthodontics The new treatment plan involved removal of the
when considering aspects such as anchoring and the ca- fixed appliance and placement of a functional orthope-
pacity of teeth to bear mastication forces.10 Specifically dic appliance aimed at mandibular advancement
in orthodontic patients, this problem takes on an even (Fig 3). Headgear was also prescribed to limit the
more critical dimension, because of the tendency in anterior movement of the maxilla. After 8 months of
patients with short roots toward root resorption during functional orthopedic appliance treatment, the patient
orthodontic treatment.11,12 Moreover, anomalies such as exhibited significant mobility in the mandibular central
agenesis, ectopic teeth, and taurodontism are risk incisors. The decision was then made to place a fixed
factors for periapical resorption.13,14 lingual retainer, with a 0.025-mm braided fiber, on the
Although SRA is a potential problem in the clinical mandibular incisors and canines (Fig 4). After 19
practice of orthodontists, no studies were found that di- months of retention, there was stability of the sagittal
rectly address this subject. Thus, our aim in this study correction and satisfactory intercuspation (Fig 5).
a
Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Vale do Rio Verde Throughout this period, there was no change in the
(UNINCOR), Três Corações, Brazil; private practice, Diamantina, Brazil. amount of root shortening (Fig 6).
b
Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Vale do Rio Verde
(UNINCOR), Três Corações, Brazil.
c
Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Vale do Rio Verde
(UNINCOR), Três Corações, Brazil. DISCUSSION
d
PhD student, Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics Department, Federal
University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil. There are 2 main reasons for short dental roots: dis-
The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the turbance during dental development and resorption of
products or companies described in this article. originally well-developed roots. Clinical orthodontists
Reprint requests to: Leandro Silva Marques, Arraial dos Forros, 215, Centro,
Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil, Cep: 39100-000; e-mail, lsmarques.prof@ should be careful not to diagnose SRA as root resorp-
gmail.com. tion. Because of the genetic background, the diagnosis
Submitted, revised and accepted, August 2008. of SRA is established when members of the family
0889-5406/$36.00
Copyright Ó 2010 by the American Association of Orthodontists. also have short roots and the possibility of systemic dis-
doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.037 ease has been discarded.15 Root resorption is most often
346
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Marques et al 347
Volume 138, Number 3

Fig 1. Intraoral photographs of a patient seeking to continue treatment started 6 months earlier with
a different provider.

Fig 2. Radiographs showed the SRA of the central incisors and first premolars.

Fig 3. Fixed appliances and a functional orthopedic ap-


pliance were placed.

Fig 4. Eight months later, the mandibular central inciors


considered a collateral effect of orthodontic treatment.
showed significant mobility, so a fixed lingual retainer
In the case presented here, although the patient was al- was placed.
ready in orthodontic treatment and the root shortening
affected both maxillary and mandibular teeth, this could
not be attributed to the forces of the appliance, since it
was attached only to the maxillary teeth. Furthermore, demonstrated that, in model short root, significant stress
the diagnosis of SRA was confirmed by a similar situa- was concentrated at the middle of the root, enough for
tion observed in the patient’s sister, although to a lesser the development of root resorption. Thus, orthodontic
degree. forces should be applied with considerable caution
No reports were found in the literature regarding and preferentially avoided in patients with this anomaly.
orthodontic treatment in patients with SRA. However, Fortunately, in our patient, the severity of the malocclu-
using the finite element method, Oyama et al16 sion did not require complex mechanics or considerable
348 Marques et al American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
September 2010

Fig 5. After 19 months of retention, there was stability in the sagittal correction and satisfactory
intercuspation.

REFERENCES
1. Apajalahti S, Hölttä P, Turtola L, Pirinen S. Prevalence of short-
root anomaly in healthy young adults. Acta Odontol Scand
2002;60:56-9.
2. Apajalahti S, Sorsa T, Ingman T. Matrix metalloproteinase -2, -8,
-9, and -13 in gingival crevicular fluid of short root anomaly
patients. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:365-9.
3. Lerman RL, Gold R. Idiopathic short root anomaly. J Pedod 1977;
1:327-33.
4. Brook AH, Holt RD. The relationship of crown length to root
length in permanent maxillary central incisors. Proc Br Paedod
Soc 1978;8:17-20.
5. Näsman M, Björk O, Söderhäll S, Ringdén O, Dahllöf G. Distur-
bances in the oral cavity in pediatric long-term survivors after differ-
ent forms of antineoplastic therapy. Pediatr Dent 1994;16:217-23.
6. Desai RS, Vanaki SS, Puranik RS, Rashmi GS, Nidawani P. An
Fig 6. Root shortening did not increase.
unusual combination of idiopathic generalized short-root anomaly
associated with microdontia, taurodontia, multiple dens invagina-
tus, obliterated pulp chambers and infected cyst: a case report.
J Oral Pathol Med 2006;35:407-9.
force. Moreover, she was in phase 2 (acceleration) of 7. Prahl-Andersen B, Oerlemans J. Characteristics of permanent
vertebral maturation and, therefore, before the pubertal teeth in persons with trisomy G. J Dent Res 1976;55:633-8.
growth spurt. These characteristics allowed a treatment 8. De Man K. Abnormal root development, probably due to
erythema multiforme (Stevens-Johnson syndrome). Int J Oral
plan that preferentially addressed orthopedic aspects
Surg 1979;8:381-5.
(activator and headgear) that did not involve force di- 9. Jaffe N, Toth BB, Hoar RE, Ried HL, Sullivan MP, McNeese MD.
rectly on the affected teeth. Once mobility was found Dental and maxillofacial abnormalities in long-term survivors of
in the mandibular incisors, we decided to apply a splint childhood cancer: effects of treatment with chemotherapy and
to stabilize them to prevent movement and an overload radiation to the head and neck. Pediatrics 1984;73:816-23.
10. Hölttä P, Nyström M, Evälahti M, Alaluusua S. Root-crown ratios
of forces as much as possible. A possible explanation for
of permanent teeth in a healthy Finnish population assessed from
the mobility observed in these teeth was the effect of the panoramic radiographs. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:491-7.
projection of the incisors from the mandibular advance- 11. Lind V. Short root anomaly. Scand J Dent Res 1972;80:85-93.
ment appliance. 12. Jacobsson R, Lind V. Variation in root length of the permanent
maxillary central incisor. Scand J Dent Res 1973;81:335-8.
13. Kjaer I. Morphological characteristics of dentitions developing
excessive root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Eur J
CONCLUSIONS Orthod 1995;17:25-34.
14. Levander E, Malmgren O, Stenback K. Apical root resorption dur-
The definition of short roots has been most often ing orthodontic treatment of patients with multiple aplasia: a study
used subjectively. However, orthodontists and dental of maxillary incisors. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:427-34.
professionals should be careful to make a correct 15. Apajalahti S, Arte S, Pirinen S. Short root anomaly in families and
diagnosis and an individualized treatment plan for this its association with other dental anomalies. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;
107:97-101.
abnormality, because these determinations could mean 16. Oyama K, Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Hosoi K, Shimizu N.
the difference between success and failure of the Effects of root morphology on stress distribution at the root
strategy. apex. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:113-7.

Potrebbero piacerti anche