Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Academic
Guidelines
Trauma Care
Same Problems with Different Solutions
29 June ~ 06 July
2020
AMSC2020
Contents
Competition 04 −− Format
Overview −− Submission
Procedure
General Information 04
−− Oral Presentation
Eligibility 05
White Paper & Video 12
Key Dates 05
−− Format: Abstract
General Overview 07 −− Format: Full Paper
01
Subtheme 2: In-Hospital Care
02
Subtheme 3: Post-Hospital Care
03
Competition
Overview
There are a total of 3 academic competitions in AMSC 2020.
General
Information
1 The deadline for submission of all
3 competitions is 29th April 2020
6 Plagiarism is not acceptable.
Entries with any form of plagiarism
at 12PM (GMT +8). Information will be eliminated immediately.
on submission is provided in the
following sections.
7 Prizes will be awarded to the top
3 finalists of each competition.
2 All deadlines should be strictly
adhered to. We will not accept
Certificates of participation will be
awarded to all chapters.
any late submissions upon any
AMSA chapter’s failure to comply
with the deadline. 8 Delegates are not allowed to with-
draw from this conference after
payment of the registration fee.
3 Only entries submitted by the
Regional Chairpersons will be
considered in this conference. 9 The AMSC 2020 Committee
reserves the right to make chang-
es to the academic guidelines and
4 A maximum of 1 entry for each
competition can be sent by each
competition format as necessary.
Regional Chairpersons will be noti-
AMSA chapter. fied of the amendments.
4
Eligibility
1 All participants and main research
authors must be currently enrolled
4 The presenting authors must
register as participants of Asian
in any medical school that is Medical Students’ Conference
affiliated with AMSA International. 2020.
However, they are allowed to have
faculty members as co-authors
and/or advisors. 5 For group researches, the
presenting speakers shall be
designated as the primary authors
for competition purposes.
2 All authors must declare no conflict
of interest in a single signed letter.
The letter with the signatures of all
the authors must be emailed to-
gether with each competition entry
6 Studies SHOULD NOT have been
published in a journal or be in the
to acadamsclondon2020@gmail. process of peer review.
com
Key Dates
1 Opening date for submission of all
entries: 1st February 2020
4 Selected 8 chapters’ submission of
oral presentation slides file for sci-
entific paper, white paper and video
competitions: 27th June 2020
2 Deadline for submission of all
entries (scientific paper, scientific
poster, white paper & video): 29th
April 2020, 12:00pm (GMT +8)
5 Selected 8 chapters will have to
arrive at presentation venue (TBC)
to set up poster for the scientif-
ic poster competition before the
3 Selection of top 8 chapters for
oral presentation by judges (scien-
competition time: 30th June 2020
tific paper, scientific poster, white
paper & video): 10th May 2020 6 Competition finale (scientific paper,
scientific poster, white paper & vid-
eo): 30th June – 1st July 2020
5
Opening for submission of
01 manuscript
−− Scientific poster
−− White paper abstract, full manuscript and
FEB video
29
−− Scientific paper abstract and full manuscript
−− Scientific poster
−− White paper abstract, full manuscript and
video
10
presentation for
−− Scientific paper
−− Scientific poster
27
Submission of oral presentation file for
selected chapters
−− Scientific paper
JUNE
−− White paper and video
JUNE
−− Scientific poster
6
General
Overview
The research question for all three competitions may be based on one of
the three branches of the over-arching theme – Trauma Care: Same Prob-
lems with Different Solutions – that we will be discussing in this conference:
Pre-Hospital, In-Hospital and Post-Hospital Care. However, chapters are not
required to stick to these three categories and are free to explore other
areas under the general umbrella of trauma care.
For the White Paper & Video category, the AMSA chapter participating will be
required to produce a video as an introduction to their motion and explana-
tion of their solution/policy.
Scientific
Paper
Format: Abstract
7
Format: Full paper
Submission procedure
8
Oral Presentation
1 The top 8 chapters will be selected on the 10th May 2020. They will
present their work during AMSC 2020 on the 1st July 2020. All delegates
from the chapter are allowed to participate in both the presentation and
Q&A session.
−− Language: English
4 Submission specifications:
5 Both paper and presentation scores will be included in the final score.
9
Scientific
Poster
Format
Submission procedure
10
4 An acknowledgement email will be sent upon receiving each entry.
Oral Presentation
1 The top 8 chapters will be selected on the 10th May 2020. They will
present their work during AMSC 2020 on the 30th June 2020. All
delegates from the chapter are allowed to participate in both the
presentation and Q&A session.
−− Language: English
−− Format of presentation:
−− 5 minutes will be allocated for the poster presentation
−− 5 minutes will be allocated for the Q&A session
5 Both poster and presentation scores will be included in the final score.
11
White paper/
Video
Format: Abstract
12
Format: Video
1) The video should be about the 4) Language used in the video must
problem & the suggested solution/ be in English. All local words or
policy. phrases should be provided with
English translation or definition.
2) The video can be in any form of
presentation (drama, documentary, 5) We highly encourage submission of
singing etc.) high-quality files.
Submission procedure
2 The White Paper must be sent in .doc or .docx format. The video should
be in .mp4 format. For larger files, a link to a Google Drive folder must
be included; the file name shall be ‘White Paper & Video – (Theme) –
Name (Authors) – AMSA Chapter’.
13
Oral Presentation
1 The top 8 chapters will be selected on the 10th May 2020. They will
present their work during AMSC 2020 on the 1st July 2020. All delegates
from the chapter are allowed to participate in both the presentation and
Q&A session.
−− Language: English
−− Format of presentation:
−− Video will be shown before the respective group’s presentation
−− 1 0 minutes will then be allocated for the presentation
−− A bell will be rung at the 8th minute
−− 1 0 minutes will be allocated for the Q&A session
3 Submission specifications:
−− Submission format: Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation (.ppt or .pptx)
/ Keynote / Prezi.
5 Both paper and presentation scores will be included in the final score.
14
APPENDICES
Criteria for Competitions
& Judging Procedure
15
Total: 100 points
Appendix A:
Scientific Paper Criteria
Statement of the 2 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Concrete, clear and
Problem unnecessary adequate adequate
Background of the 2 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Up to date, clear and
Problem unnecessary adequate adequate
Significance of the 4 points Unoriginal Irrelevant Relevant Timely and relevant Realistic, timely and
Study relevant
Novelty of the 4 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Clear and complete
Study unnecessary adequate
Relevance to 4 points Completely unrelated Remotely Related to trauma Applies masterfully Presents a novel
Theme to trauma care related to care concepts already contribution to the
trauma care known in trauma understanding of
care trauma care
16
Procedures Used: Materials and Methods (15 points)
Research 5 points Flawed and does Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all the Innovative and
Design not address the one objective of the objectives objectives addresses all the
objectives objectives clearly
Explanation of 5 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Clear and complete
Methods unnecessary adequate
Statistical Analysis 5 points Incorrect sample size Good sample Good sample Good sample Good sample size,
and analysis size but incorrect size with some size with correct correct analysis and
analysis relevant analysis analysis justification
Results (8 points)
Data Presentation 8 points Incomplete data Disorganised but Organised and Well synthesised, Easily understood,
complete data complete data organised and well synthesised and
complete data organised data
Discussion of 15 points Vague and Vague Related to Has some relevant Insightful, well-related
Results unnecessary objectives insights and to objectives and
well-related to has a comprehensive
objectives analysis of data
17
Conclusion and Recommendation (14 points)
Relevance to the 5 points Does not address the Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all the Addresses all the
Objectives objectives one objective of the objectives objectives and objectives and
provides relatively provides excellent
relevant recommendations
recommendations
Relevance to the 5 points Unrelated to the Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all Addresses all the
Presented Results results one result of the findings the findings and results and provides
and results results relevant
recommendations
Delivery of 12 points Incomprehensible and Disorganised and Organised and Easily understood, Innovative, emphatic,
Presentation incomplete incomplete complete organised and easily understood and
complete complete
Presentation 10 points Incomprehensible and Disorganised and Complete data Organised Innovative, organised
Material inadequate citing of inadequate citing and adequate and effective
references of references citing of
references
Question and 10 points Unable to answer Inadequate Adequate Complete Clear and complete
Answer Session judges’ questions or
irrelevant
18
Total: 100 points
Appendix B:
Scientific Poster Criteria
Statement of the 2 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Concrete, clear and
Problem unnecessary adequate adequate
Background of the 2 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Up to date, clear and
Problem unnecessary adequate adequate
Significance of the 4 points Unoriginal Irrelevant Relevant Timely and relevant Realistic, timely and
Study relevant
Novelty of the 4 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Clear and complete
Study unnecessary adequate
Relevance to 4 points Completely unrelated Remotely Related to trauma Applies masterfully Presents a novel
Theme to trauma care related to care concepts already contribution to the
trauma care known in trauma understanding of
care trauma care
19
Procedures Used: Materials and Methods (12 points)
Research 4 points Flawed and does Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all the Innovative and
Design not address the one objective of the objectives objectives addresses all the
objectives objectives clearly
Explanation of 4 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Clear and complete
Methods unnecessary adequate
Statistical Analysis 4 points Incorrect sample size Good sample Good sample Good sample Good sample size,
and analysis size but incorrect size with some size with correct correct analysis and
analysis relevant analysis analysis justification
Results (8 points)
Data Presentation 8 points Wrong choice of all Correct choice Correct choice Correct choice Correct choice of all
figures, tables and of at least one of some figures, of most figures, figures, tables and
graphs figure, table or tables and graphs. tables and graphs. graphs. Excellent
graph Good layout and Good layout and layout and design of all
design of some design of most of data.
data. the data.
Discussion of 12 points Vague and Vague Related to Has some relevant Insightful, well-related
Results unnecessary objectives insights and to objectives and
well-related to has a comprehensive
objectives analysis of data
20
Conclusion and Recommendation (12 points)
Relevance to the 4 points Does not address the Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all the Addresses all the
Objectives objectives one objective of the objectives objectives and objectives and
provides relatively provides excellent
relevant recommendations
recommendations
Relevance to the 4 points Unrelated to the Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all Addresses all the
Presented Results results one result of the findings the findings and results and provides
and results results relevant
recommendations
Delivery of 10 points Incomprehensible and Disorganised and Organised and Easily understood, Innovative, emphatic,
Presentation incomplete incomplete complete organised and easily understood and
complete complete
Presentation 20 points Irrelevant visual aids The design is The design is The design adds Visually appealing, there
Material and the design is distracting in only appropriate and value and appeal is synergy between the
distracting some aspects of helps to convey to the research message and design
the poster the message
across
Question and 10 points Unable to answer Inadequate Adequate Complete Clear and complete
Answer Session judges’ questions or
irrelevant
21
Total: 100 points
Appendix C:
White Paper & Video Criteria
Statement of the 1 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Concrete, clear and
Problem unnecessary adequate adequate
Background of the 1 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Up to date, clear and
Problem unnecessary adequate adequate
Significance of the 3 points Unoriginal Irrelevant Relevant Timely and relevant Realistic, timely and
Study relevant
Novelty of the 2 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Clear and complete
Study unnecessary adequate
Relevance to 3 points Completely unrelated Remotely Related to trauma Applies masterfully Presents a novel
Theme to trauma care related to care concepts already contribution to the
trauma care known in trauma understanding of
care trauma care
22
Procedures Used: Materials and Methods (10 points)
Research 3 points Flawed and does Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all the Innovative and
Design not address the one objective of the objectives objectives addresses all the
objectives objectives clearly
Explanation of 3 points Vague and Vague Adequate Clear and Clear and complete
Methods unnecessary adequate
Statistical Analysis 4 points Incorrect sample size Good sample Good sample Good sample Good sample size,
and analysis size but incorrect size with some size with correct correct analysis and
analysis relevant analysis analysis justification
Discussion of 10 points Vague and Vague Related to Has some relevant Insightful, well-related
Results unnecessary objectives insights and to objectives and
well-related to has a comprehensive
objectives analysis of data
23
Conclusion and Recommendation (15 points)
Relevance to the 3 points Does not address the Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all the Addresses all the
Objectives objectives one objective of the objectives objectives and objectives and
provides relatively provides excellent
relevant recommendations
recommendations
Relevance to the 3 points Unrelated to the Addresses at least Addresses most Addresses all Addresses all the
Presented Results results one result of the findings the findings and results and provides
and results results relevant
recommendations
Delivery of 12 points Incomprehensible and Disorganised and Organised and Easily understood, Innovative, emphatic,
Presentation incomplete incomplete complete organised and easily understood and
complete complete
Presentation 10 points Irrelevant visual aids The design is The design is The design adds Visually appealing,
Material and the design is distracting in only appropriate and value and appeal there is synergy
distracting some aspects of helps to convey to the research between the message
the poster the message and design
across
Question and 10 points Unable to answer Inadequate Adequate Complete Clear and complete
Answer Session judges’ questions or
irrelevant
24
Video Presentation (18 points)
* Note that video will be shown during the presentation of the White Paper
Cinematography 4 points Angles of the shots taken, scenes, lighting, and special effects
used
26
Appendix E:
Judging Procedure
1 Screening: Judges will be invited to evaluate all emailed entries based
on the criteria in Appendices A-C. The total score of each entry (not in-
cluding points for Oral Presentation) will be determined. The scores will
be tallied by the organisers. The judging process will be blinded.
3 Emailed entries along with the research data should not be edited with
the exception of adding the names of the authors, schools, and other
affiliations. The content of the oral presentation slides submitted by the
final 8 chapters will be counter-checked by the organising committee.
4 Public health experts will judge the competition finals. Finalists will be
judged based on the criteria provided.
Chapters with the top 3 mean scores of each competition will be award-
6 ed in the Closing Ceremony on the 6th July 2020. In cases of a tie, the
judges will be informed and may deliberate with one another to break
the tie. The judges’ decision is final. Special prizes will also be awarded
during the Closing Ceremony.
27
Appendix F:
Recommended Readings
In preparation for the AMSC 2020 conference, we recommend the following read-
ings to all participants and delegates. These readings highlight the current practices
in trauma care worldwide. They can stimulate critical thinking which will be relevant
for everyone to gain the best experience out of this conference.
2 Mackenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al.
A National Evaluation of the Effect of Trauma-Center Care on Mortality. New
England Journal of Medicine. [Online] 2006;354(4): 366–378. Available from:
doi:10.1056/nejmsa052049
3 Moore EE, Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Offner PJ, Biffl WL. Staged Physiologic
Restoration and Damage Control Surgery. World Journal of Surgery. [Online]
1998;22(12): 1184–1191. Available from: doi:10.1007/s002689900542
4 Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Mackenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and the long-term
outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation. [Online] 2000;81(3): 292–300. Available from:
doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.0810292
Roudsari BS, Nathens AB, Cameron P, Civil I, Gruen RL, Koepsell TD, et al.
6 International comparison of prehospital trauma care systems. [Online] Injury.
U.S. National Library of Medicine; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/pubmed/17640641 [Accessed: 15thNovember2019]
28