Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Outlook
1) Background
2) Scope of the Revamping
3) Tower modifications
4) Test run data
5) Analysis of the plant data
6) Conclusions
Background, page 1 of 2
MF To Amine
Absorber
Sponge
Primary Absorber
Absorber
Stripper
Reactor
To De-C4
HCN
LCO
Feed
Slurry
Stripper EA1501
D1507 T-1504 D1536
P1516 EA1526 D1537
D1508
P1545
P1543
P1517
LCN
P1542
EA1530
De-C2
Rich LCO
E1508 T-1513
E1521A E1524
E1521B
EA1528 EA1502
Background, page 2 of 2
5) The De-Butanizer was originally equipped with 30
Conventional 2 pass trays, and put on stream in 1985.
6) Ten years later, it was retrofitted with 30 High
Performance Chordal Downcomer trays to boost the
capacity by 15 %.
7) The column achieved the target of the first revamping,
and was running at its maximum useful capacity, in
particular the Stripping section was not able to produce
more than 80 m3/h of Stabilized Naphtha with 75 m3/h of
LPG from the Rectifying section.
8) The tray efficiency at the maximum achievable
throughput was not more than 65%
Feed
De-C4 Revamp / Gas Plant FCC / PreemRaff / AIChE April 2007 9
PreemRaff Sulzer Chemtech
Feed
Chordal DC HPT
To Reboiler
ConSep™ Trays
De-C4 Revamp / Gas Plant FCC / PreemRaff / AIChE April 2007 10
PreemRaff Sulzer Chemtech
HiFi™ downcomer
HiFi Plus™ trays in the
Rectifying Section
Self-Balancing MVG
Multi-pass Trays valve
ConSep™ Trays in
the stripping section
Swirl Tube
HiFi™ downcomer
Swirl Tube
Secondary
downcomer
ConSepTM : The Ultra System Limit Mass Transfer Component tested at FRI
Liquid Liquid
Liquid
entrainment Liquid
L
120
100
Tray efficiency (%)
80
60
0
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14
Column load factor (m/s)
90 1.5
88
1.1
Maximum acceptable
87
86 0.9
85 0.7
84
83 0.5
82 0.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
350 6.7
300 6.6
250 6.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
190 60
180
Temperature (°C)
170
Flow Rate (m3/h)
160
150 59
140
130
120 58
110
100
90
80 57
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time (hours) Time (Hours)
Top Receiver Level Btm Tower Level Bottom Pilot Tray #29
60 123
Temperature (°C)
55
Percent (%)
122
50
121
45
40 120
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
PI302 18
94.3 9.5
TI13 TI131 PI348 TC-349
TC512 TI362
TC303 121.1 FC174
117 212 39.5 E1523 111
E1530 5.33
6.48 HCO HCN
EA1528 EA1502
FC152
RVP KPa
C5s %M
77 8 220 17.2
100.4 139.5 240 0.70 50.6 100.9 358 134.9
C4s %V. 0.52
3.9 FC-81 TI-19 PI162 TI513 FC23 FC205 TI350 PI336 FC181 TI364
104
1.1 Maximum acceptable
103
0.9
102
0.7
101
100 0.5
99 0.3
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
450 7.5
400 7.4
350 7.3
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
190 61 MUC
180
Temperature (°C)
170
Flow Rate (m3/h)
160
150 60
140
130
120 59
110
100
90
80 58
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Time (hours) Time (Hours)
Top Receiver Level Btm Tower Level Bottom Pilot Tray #29
60 129
Temperature (°C)
55
Percent (%)
128
50
127
45
40 126
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
PI302 NA
94.1 NA
TI13 TI131 PI348 TC-349
TC512 TI362
TC303 128.1 FC174
119.4 212 41 E1523 111.4
E1530 5.02
8.29 HCO HCN
EA1528 EA1502
FC152
RVP KPa
C5s %M
NA 17.1
95.4 144.1 7.98 240 220.4 NA 56.8 101.4 358 134.1
C4s %V. 1.47
NA FC-81 TI-19 PI162 TI513 FC23 FC205 TI350 PI336 FC181 TI364
Test #2: 17Jan, 2-9 pm, MUC at 7.15 pm: measured plant data
Feed LCN C4s+ C3s-
m3/h 180.7 95.4 56.8 34.7
Out - In 186.9 - 180.7
Material Balance: = = 3.32 %
Out 186.9
Top Reflux: 105.2 m3/h
Reboiler Duty: 7.52 MMKcal/h
106 1.5
104
1.1
Maximum acceptable
103
0.9
102
0.7
101
100 0.5
99 0.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
450 7.5
400 7.4
350 7.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
190 61
180
170
Temperature (°C)
Flow Rate (m3/h)
160
150 60
140
130
120 59
110
100
90
80 58
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time (hours) Time (Hours)
Top Receiver Level Btm Tower Level Bottom Pilot Tray #29
60 129
Temperature (°C)
55
Percent (%)
128
50
127
45
40 126
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time (Hours) Time (Hours)
PI302 18
94.2 9.2
TI13 TI131 PI348 TC-349
TC512 TI362
TC303 128 FC174
120.1 212 40 E1523 111.4
E1530 4.92
8.05 HCO HCN
EA1528 EA1502
FC152
RVP KPa
66 220 C5s %M 17.1
95.4 144.4 8 239.4 52.2 101.1 358 133.5
0.4
C4s %V.
0.41
0.7 FC-81 TI-19 PI162 TI513 FC23 FC205 TI350 PI336 FC181 TI364
Conclusions
1) The Unit was re-started 8 months ago.
2) The Column has a proven capacity higher than revamp
design for the normal case: 185 VS 175 m3/h, with lower
C5s content in the top and lower RVP in the LCN as well.
3) The overall tray efficiency (HiFi PlusTM & ConSepTM ) has
exceeded any optimistic expectation: > 86%.
4) The column can operate steadily even at an average tray
pressure drop of 14 mBar.
5) The Maximum Useful Capacity has been detected at an
average tray pressure drop of 15.6 mBar, at which the trays
can still provide an efficiency of 69%.
Thank You