Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Nuclear Disarmament
Abstract
With the great power infamous nuclear weapons possess, what have we done to limit or
prohibit them. What are the various initiatives undertaken through disarmament talks and
international treaties to limit or control nuclear weapons proliferation? Is the complete ban of
“Since the first test (of a nuclear weapon) in New Mexico by the United States in 1945,
2,475 nuclear weapons have been detonated across the globe…(however) only two of those
thousands of detonations were ever used in a war-- the ones dropped on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki during WWII by the United States.” (RealLifeLore) The first nuclear detonations in
Japan was enough to intimidate the world with such great power it possesses -the capability of it
However, those detonated in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are “very small compared
15,000 tons worth of TNT. The bomb dropped on Nagasaki had an explosion of 21
kilotons… In October 1961, the Soviet Union created the largest man-made explosion
ever in human history. When they detonated the Tsar Bomba. The bomb detonated with
tested, the Soviets did have plans to create a bomb that would be twice as powerful as
even the Tsar Bomba-- a bomb so powerful that it would have produced a mind-boggling
100 megaton blast, or about 6,666 Hiroshima blasts all together… in total, (there are)
Modern nuclear weapons are clearly superior to those dropped on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, and the number of nuclear weapons that still exist is threatening to both the planet and
the entire human race. So what steps have we taken and currently taking to avoid a nuclear war?
Nuclear Disarmament 4
What are the various initiatives diplomats have undertaken to limit or prohibit nuclear weapons?
And is complete nuclear disarmament the solution to have peace and content in this world?
Only nine countries control the nuclear weapons stockpile of 15,600, “and 92% of those
weapons are controlled by only the United States(6,970) and Russia(7,300). The other 8% of the
secretive about their nuclear program), North Korea(<10).” (RealLifeLore) Why exactly do
The Cold War era put the world in a competitive phase, though the Soviet Union and the
United States were the two powerhouse at the time, a lot of the other countries/nations were also
trying to outdo one another. France’s, as well as Israel’s, motive for pursuing nuclear weapons
was their insecurity of being inferior to their neighboring countries. Another reason why some
countries are hesitating on giving up their nuclear weapons is because of the fear of being
attacked. “North Korea illustrates this nicely,” (Keck Z. 2013) during the Cold War the United
States had nuclear weapons set in South Korea, in response to this North Korea started their own
nuclear program. Nuclear weapons is a good representation of the saying “defense is the best
offense,” which is true in this case. The countries who hold parts of global nuclear stockpile
“were engaged in a spirited competition to develop and build more powerful weapons
supposedly for the purpose of deterrence.” (C.R.T.A) A recent incident that only makes other
countries reluctant to give up their nuclear weapons is the invasion of Russian of Ukraine in
2014. When Ukraine gained its independence in 1992, it found itself in a particularly awkward
situation. Breaking away from the Soviet Union, Ukraine was in possession of about 5,000
Nuclear Disarmament 5
nuclear weapons, but “they agreed to hand them all over to Russia in exchange for a super
serious promise that nobody would violate their territory or borders in the future. And we all
In the midsts of these, diplomats around the world are putting in the effort to try to
resolve the old problem of complete nuclear disarmament or at least nuclear non-proliferation for
the common good, but how successful have they been in their mission to a world free of nuclear
weapons/ or contained nuclear stockpile? To my advantage, my father, who was part of the UN
General Assembly First Committee, explained to me all of the various initiatives that diplomats
took to contain or prohibit nuclear weapons. During my dad’s six-year term in the Philippine
Mission To The United Nations, he was part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or the NPT.
The NPT is the keystone or the main nuclear non-proliferation initiative, it is the first step to
nuclear non-proliferation that is legally binding since it is a treaty. “The states parties meet every
five years at a Review Conference to assess the implementation of the Treaty.” (Reaching
Critical Will) Actually, in 2010, when Philippines was the president of NPT review conference,
to the delight of most, the NPT conference had a successful outcome document agreed by the
consensus of all member states of the NPT. “However, their fulfilment of this action plan, in
Will) Another initiative that is not legally binding (all member states are not obligated to
cooperate) is the Humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons. The main purpose of this meeting is
“to discuss the global and long-term consequences of a nuclear detonation from the perspective
and variables of the 21st century society.” (Reaching Critical Will) They’ve held meetings in
Oslo, Norway in 2013, Nayarit, Mexico in early 2014, and Vienna, Austria in late 2014. In each
Nuclear Disarmament 6
meeting they “will further explore the humanitarian and environmental impacts of a nuclear
weapon detonation and will take a look at existing international law relevant to this issue.”
(Reaching Critical Will) Another step taken, is the Open-ended working group on nuclear
disarmament or the OEWG. The purpose of the OEWG is “to develop proposals to take forward
multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations for the achievement and maintenance of a world
without nuclear weapons. The group met throughout 2013 and produced a final report. In
October 2015, states adopted resolution L.13/Rev.1 to establish a second OEWG to address
concrete effective legal measures, legal provisions, and norms that will need to be concluded to
attain and maintain a world without nuclear weapons.” (Reaching Critical Will) And the most
recent legally binding initiative is the Nuclear weapon ban treaty- “The UN General Assembly
weapons in 2017. Negotiations are set to take place 27–31 March and 15 June–7 July 2017 in
Now to answer the question, how successful have the diplomats been in achieving world
peace? Pretty successful, I can say. For the most part, the initiatives for nuclear nonproliferation
and nuclear disarmament are effective due to the fact that the majority of the UN members
cooperate. Though we may not notice it because it doesn’t directly affect our daily lives we’ve
actually come a long way thanks to diplomatic meetings, conferences, assemblies. But can we
I feel that eventually, we will live on a planet free of nuclear weapons. I believe that we
will get there. It may not be now, tomorrow or five years from now, but I believe in the
upcoming generation, my generation, to achieve what others have been longing for so long. How
Nuclear Disarmament 7
can I say this? Others may disagree or even think I am a fool for believing this, but I believe that
the world is becoming better, maybe not the planet, but the people that live in it. This is sole
because millennials today are more open to change now than ever. And being open-minded, not
being afraid of change; being dynamic is the best characteristic to have that will produce fruits
and harvests and innovations. We now live in a society where people are more considerate, have
more sympathy and empathy, and most importantly connected. For the most part, we are aware
of what’s going on with our surroundings thanks to social media. And social media when used
properly can be the tool to spread awareness of causes. Being more connected and open-minded,
I believe it is not long until we live in Utopia. The world ruled by hate and fear is slowly
becoming a thing of the past. With such characteristics, I honestly believe it will not take long
Bibliography
Keck, Zachary. “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century.” The Diplomat,
thediplomat.com/2013/07/why-countries-build-nuclear-weapons-in-the-21st-century/. Accessed
2 Mar. 2017.
Panganiban, Evangeline S. “Nuclear Arms Race.” Creative Responses Through the Ages, World