Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

DETAILED DESIGN SIX LANING AND STRENGTHENING OF NEW NH-248A FROM EXISTING KM 24+400 (DESIGN CH: KM 9+282 TO

KM 22+000) IN THE STATE OF HARYANA PKG II UNDER NHDP PHASE-IV ON "HYBRID ANNUITY MODE".

Date 25th October 2019


Document Ref. no. Design Documents of Reinforced Soil Walls (T PANEL) (Doc. No: SGI-100-SWP-
H-HG-2019-ELEVATED 1@ CH: 9+406 TO 10+990-DD/01),(Doc. No: SGI-100-
SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: 19+211 TO 19+931-DD/02),(Doc. No: SGI-100-SWP-H-HG-
2019- CH: 15+910 DD/01)

Reinforced Soil Wall Designer M/s STRATA GEOSYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

EPC Contractor M/s H.G INFRA ENGINEERING LTD.

Sl. Reference to Observations Response


No. the Report

1 Design Statement made in the report:


Report (Doc. No: SGI-100-SWP-H-HG-
2019-ELEVATED 1@ CH: 9+406 TO Backfill soil properties:
10+990-DD/01),(Doc. No: SGI-100-  = 300 submit test report for backfill & retained soil material.
Please
SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: 19+211 TO The laboratory test results of fill material should consist of (Grain
19+931-DD/02),(Doc. No: SGI-100- Size analysis, Atterberg’s Limit, Density, Shear Parameters (i.e Cohesion
SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: 15+910 DD/01) and friction angle) as mentioned in Clause 4.2 of IRC SP-102-2014.
The shear strength properties considered for foundation soil considered
in design is not matching with soil invetsigation attached in reoprt. Shear
strength parameters given in soil investigation report for BH No.2 RHS @
CH: 9+442 are:
f = 270
g = 17kN/m3

2 Design Report (Doc. No: SGI-100-SWP- Statement made in the report:


H-HG-2019-ELEVATED 1@ CH: 9+406 Geogrid SGI 40 SGI 100 SGI 120 SGI 150 SGI 80
TO 10+990-DD/01),(Doc. No: SGI-100- TultData
(kN/m) 40 100 120 150 180
SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: 19+211 TO RFd 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
19+931-DD/02),(Doc. No: SGI-100-
SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: 15+910 DD/01) RFid 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
RFcr 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43
Scale-effect 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
correction
factor, a

Our Comments:
Supporting relevant test results with reference to Clause 4.1 of IRC
SP 102-2014, standards should be furnished w.r.t creep, installation
damage and durability factors.
.Creep reduction factor should be considered as per ambient site
temperature as per clause 4.1 of IRC SP 102-2014.
Ramification failure should
be considered as per clause 5.2 of BS: 8006-2010 for abutment
structures given in table 9.

3 Design Report (Doc. No: SGI-100- Our Comments:


SWP-H-HG-2019-ELEVATED 1@ Design standards used in this design document is FHWA-NHI-10-
CH: 9+406 TO 10+990-DD/01),(Doc. 024(LFRD). Design calculations should be done in accordance with Indian
No: SGI-100-SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: standard code IRC SP-102-2014.
19+211 TO 19+931-DD/02),(Doc. Partial load factors and factors of saftey
No: SGI-100-SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: against sliding along base, Overturning, Internal sliding,Pull out resitance
15+910 DD/01) should be in accordance with IRC SP-102-2014.
Permissible limit of eccentricity is
L/6 in static conditions as per Clause 5.1 a IRC SP-102-2014. but in
manual claculation it is taken as L/4.Please revise accordingly.
4 Design Report (Doc. No: SGI-100- Our Comments:
SWP-H-HG-2019-ELEVATED 1@ Loading
CH: 9+406 TO 10+990-DD/01),(Doc. a) Density of earth crust is considered as 22
No: SGI-100-SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: KN/m3 instead of this density of earth crust is to be taken equivalent to
19+211 TO 19+931-DD/02),(Doc. density of P.C.C (24 KN/m3). Please revise calculation accordingly.
No: SGI-100-SWP-H-HG-2019- CH: b) Width of friction slab is taken
15+910 DD/01) as 1.8 m in calculation of strip load and moments but in drawings width of
friction slab is not mentioned.Please consider it as per actual.

As per clause 3.3 of IRC SP-102-2014 ,a darinage bay of 600 mm width at the back of facing to be used instead of 300 mm wide drainage bay as
shown in drawings. Please revise drawings accordingly.

Potrebbero piacerti anche