Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Risk Management:
vManagement Dashboard - Issues & Risks
vCloud Computing Risk Log
vImpact analysis
vRisk Codes
Risk analysis initial review date : 15th Feb, 2018 Last Review Date: 6th March, 2018
Process owner
my B /Prakash Y - Sr.Manager-QA
ar E - AGM-QA
- Sr.Manager-QA
M -QA
, DGM-QA
Risk Register
Internal
Live Document
ne.com
Management Dashboard - Issues & Risks
Quality Assurance
Issue Status
Issue Summary Risk Summary
Open 1 Open 1 Open Closed In Progress Monitoring Resolved
Closed 33 Closed 33
2%
In Progress 2 In Progress 2 14%
Monitoring 6 Monitoring 6 5%
Resolved 0 Resolved 0
Low Impact 17 Low 13
Med Impact 14 Moderate 12 79%
25 14 13
12
20 11 11 12
15 10 9
8 Risk Type 8
10 7 8
11 11 Issue Type
8 5 6
5 7
5 4
0 2
Incoming Inprocess Final inspection Calibration Customer quality 0
inspection inspection
Low Moderate High Extreme
Page 4 of 10
Cloud Computing Risk Log
R16 Final Inspection 2/16/2018 Final inspection Air Pressure low Manohar E Rare 1 Insignificant L AM Check sheet daily basis monitoring. 3/6/2018 Closed
Multigauge probe pressure
R17 Final Inspection 2/16/2018 Final inspection Manohar E Rare 1 Insignificant L Every start of shift to ensure pressure level. 3/6/2018 Closed
variation
Lux level as per plan Vs actual monitoring for cell
R18 Final Inspection 2/15/2018 Final inspection Lux level low Manohar E Rare 1 Insignificant L 3/6/2018 Monitoring
wiseby using lux meter
Lux level as per plan Vs actual monitoring for cell
R19 Final Inspection 2/15/2018 Final inspection Eye test for visual Inspectors Manohar C Possible 3 Moderate H 3/6/2018 Monitoring
wiseby using lux meter
Almost Standardisation packing and trays
R20 Final Inspection 2/15/2018 Final inspection Shortage of packed qty Manohar A 4 Major E 3/6/2018 Closed
certain Verification and signing on packed boxes
Calibration(MSA and Monitored through gaugetrack software and daily
R21 Calibration 2/15/2018 Calibration due Mahesh KR D Unlikely 2 Minor L 3/6/2018 In Progress
SPC) basis.
Calibration of
Calibration done from Verification of NABL certification and
R22 Calibration 2/15/2018 Instruments and Mahesh KR C Possible 4 Major E 3/6/2018 Monitoring
unauthorized agency manufacturer of instrument.
gauges
Calibration of
TI-10 for Calibration is followed. Calibration done
R23 Calibration 2/15/2018 Instruments and Wrong calibration Mahesh KR C Possible 4 Major E 3/6/2018 In Progress
by trained People
gauges
Calibration(MSA and Non availability of qualified/ Skill Matrix arrieved and competency mapping
R24 Calibration 2/15/2018 Mahesh KR E Rare 1 Insignificant L 3/6/2018 Monitoring
SPC) competent manpower fixed.
Calibration(MSA and Mixup of rejected gauges The instrument /gauges kept in lock & key.
R25 Calibration 2/15/2018 Mahesh KR E Rare 1 Insignificant L 3/6/2018 Closed
SPC) during calibration Scraped gauges red paint system followed.
Calibration(MSA and Only verified during calibration and frquency
R26 Calibration 2/15/2018 Error in instruments Mahesh KR D Unlikely 2 Minor L 3/6/2018 Closed
SPC) updating in gauge tarck.
Calibration(MSA and Adherence of MSA plan for customer and cell
R27 Calibration 2/15/2018 MSA not conducted as per plan Mahesh KR E Rare 1 Insignificant L 3/6/2018 Closed
SPC) wise.
Calibration(MSA and Gauge design will be changed and recalibration
R28 Calibration 2/15/2018 Not meeting R&R requirements Mahesh KR B Likely 2 Minor M 3/6/2018 Closed
SPC) done by same gauge.
Calibration(MSA and As per the calibration due list maintaining.
R29 Calibration 2/15/2018 Delay in calibration Mahesh KR E Rare 1 Insignificant L 3/6/2018 Closed
SPC) Monitored through SAP
Calibration(MSA and Identification missing on Indentification ID is available on all gauges before
R30 Calibration 2/15/2018 Mahesh KR E Rare 1 Insignificant L 3/6/2018 Closed
SPC) instruments releasing it to regular use.
Calibration(MSA and Measured through lux- meter as per plan Vs
R31 Calibration 2/15/2018 In- adequate lighting Mahesh KR B Likely 2 Minor M 3/6/2018 Closed
SPC) Actual sheet for cell wise.
Page 5 of 10
Cloud Computing Risk Log
R42 Customer quality 2/16/2018 Customer quality 4M changes Namit E Rare 1 Insignificant L 4M board 3/6/2018 Closed
Page 6 of 10
Risk Management
Each risk has been rated in terms of it’s resulting likelihood of occurrence and the potential impact, using the rating system specified in AS/NZ
STANDARD 4360:2004 Risk Management. These are explained in the tables below.
Consequences
Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
Likelihood: 1 2 3 4 5
A (almost certain) H H E E E
B (likely) M H H E E
C (possible) L M H E E
D (unlikely) L L M H E
E (rare) L L M H H
Key Description
E Extreme Risk: Immediate action required to mitigate the risk.
H High Risk: Action should be taken to compensate for the risk.
M Moderate Risk: Action should be taken to monitor the risk.
L Low Risk: Routine acceptance of the risk.
Raw material racks & MS Bins Stored Diffcult to issue the rawmaterial to line, & it will take Maximum 5 bins will be stacked in
I6 Incoming inspection 2/15/2018 Med <select> 3/6/2018 Open 15.09.2018 2
higher than excess level more lead time design as per new layout.
I36 Customer quality 2/15/2018 Customer quality Non adherance to SOP Med <select> 3/6/2018 Adherence to SOP. Closed 4
Plan Vs Actual available and
I37 Customer quality 2/16/2018 Customer quality Non adherance to Manufacturing process audit schedule Low <select> 3/6/2018 Closed 1
reviewed in monthly meeting.
4M changes /Deviation report /
I38 Customer quality 2/16/2018 Customer quality Process/Product parameter changes Med <select> 3/6/2018 Closed 2
Customer approval mail.
Previous audit points closure with
I39 Customer quality 2/16/2018 Customer quality Non closure of previous audit points Med <select> 3/6/2018 Closed 2
CFT meeting conducting
Daily portal access and 8D
I40 Customer quality 2/16/2018 Customer quality Failing to update customer 8D report Med <select> 3/6/2018 Closed 2
discipline followed.
IMPACT ANALYSIS
Main requirements / interfaces Supplier explanations
Part or parts with [1] are concerned by the modification:
No
Is the capability requirement of 1,67 maintained
during and after the change? yes
Is the traceability secured during and after the
change? yes
Does the planned change affect the logistic flow in the
following areas:
Packaging
no
Pick Up Point
no
Surya Prakash
8/5/2013 0 First Live Document
GM & Corporate MR