Sei sulla pagina 1di 13

Mataura School Analysis of Variance 2019

Introduction
In 2019 our schoolwide focus has been on wellbeing. Our annual goal focuses on developing wellbeing for all students, staff, and across our community, and
based on this our target has been:

To ensure students know when they are happy and have strategies to cope appropriately when tricky stuff happens… to be resilient!

We have taken a more holistic view of education since the removal of National Standards. In 2018 our focus was on raising students’ oral language skills. This
intervention was very successful: we saw improvements in students’ speaking and listening, reading, and writing, as well as their social skills in the playground
and when working with their peers. Our aim with this year’s wellbeing focus has been to continue this work on developing the whole child.

We started our wellbeing journey in 2018, when our principal, deputy principal, and Board of Trustees chair went to the Positive Education Conference in
Christchurch. Our leadership team has explored models of best practice in Australia and New Zealand, and wanted our school to develop a programme that
would add value to the uniqueness of our students, staff and wider community. We are acutely aware of the mental health challenges that exist in our society.
Our aim has been to raise wellbeing above a neutral baseline, so that our stakeholders have higher levels of happiness and possess the resilience to cope
with life’s challenges. This is a move away from the traditional model of using wellbeing interventions when people are in crisis (the proverbial “ambulance at
the bottom of the cliff”).

ERO (2016) ​Wellbeing for success​: discusses why wellbeing is important for children to be able to learn effectively. We had had a relatively static pattern of
learning results for several years. We would have an intervention which would lift achievement for a couple of years then we would be back to around the
usual 60% of students achieving at the expected Curriculum Level. We are working from a perspective that if we improve everyone's well being then we will
long-term be able to lift the achievement across the school. Please note we have been pleased with the results of our Year 6 graduates over the past few
years, however, it often takes us until Year 3 or 4 to see a true shift in learning. Will explicit teaching of wellbeing shift this over time? Will this make the
accelerated progress students are able to make more sustainable?

Finally, our community demographics have started to change over the last 3 years. Previously we could expect an approximately 30% turnover of our roll in a
year, whereas the picture this year is looking like less than 10% turnover, with 36 in and 10 out during 2019 with a closing roll of 138.
Action Plan
Lead Teacher Professional
Teacher Professional Learning Learning, Support, Mentoring and Schoolwide Intervention Community Engagement
Idea Generation

● We used an Appreciative ● Darran Ingram from CORE ● We collected pre-intervention ● Posters for the six schoolwide
Inquiry model with our Education worked with our data to inform the design and wellbeing focus areas were
teachers. We started with wellbeing lead teacher (Shona delivery stages of the shared in the newsletter, along
defining wellbeing​. Teachers Willis), focussing on moving Appreciative Inquiry cycle. We with suggestions for how
favoured the Whare Tapa Whā staff through the stages of used the Feel Brave survey caregivers could increase their
model of wellbeing, and the learning, facilitating work on across all year levels of our own wellbeing and their
ERO definition of wellbeing staff wellbeing, and leadership school. We felt that the 5 children’s wellbeing.
from ​Wellbeing for Children’s mentoring. questions in this survey would ● These posters were also
Success at Primary School ● Our wellbeing lead teacher and capture a snapshot of shared in the Mataura
(ERO, 2015). We used this principal (Susan Dennison) wellbeing at our school, and Messenger publication.
work as the foundation for our attended the 2019 Positive that they were accessible for ● Whānau were made aware of
inquiry. Education Conference in all children, irrespective of age community events that link to
● In Term 1 we completed a Christchurch. From this we or curriculum level. wellbeing, e.g. a Nathan Wallis
What’s Working Well audit​ to made valuable contacts and ● In our first staff meeting of presentation about child
appreciate the many deliberate refined our intervention plan. Term 2, teachers identified a development.
actions to increase student ● Our wellbeing lead teacher focus area for their teaching. ● A community wellbeing
wellbeing that already happen completed a 10-week online This was based on identified evening was organised and
in our school. We then took wellbeing course run by student needs and the Feel was well-attended by our
time to vision what we would Harvard University, and used Brave survey data. Focus community. A presentation was
like wellbeing to look like at this to inform the design of our areas were diverse and ranged made elaborating on the six
Mataura School. schoolwide intervention. from praise and compliments in areas of wellbeing. Whānau
● Staff attended a Kathryn ● We used resources to explore our New Entrants class, to participated in a scavenger
Berkett workshop during best-practice wellbeing problem solving skills, hunt around our school to learn
noncontact time. This teaching, e.g. ​Practising self-regulation, understanding more about these areas of
workshop focussed on Positive Education: A Guide to how our brain works, and an wellbeing and explore the work
neuroscience and the Improve Wellbeing Literacy in exploration of the Whare Tapa that students had done in their
development of the brain in Schools​ by P. Robinson, and Whā model. classes.
children. The Whole-Brain Child​ by D. J. ● A 10-week wellbeing ● Teachers shared the work their
● Ara Simmons from CORE Siegel & T. P. Bryson. intervention occurred across class was doing on wellbeing
Education provided support for ● A website was developed by Terms 2 and 3. Wellbeing was through Seesaw posts.
our staff, modelling wellbeing our wellbeing lead teacher as a explicitly taught 4 days per ● Wellbeing was explicitly
lessons and leading a staff hub for our intervention. Aside week during this intervention, reported on in our half-year
meeting that focussed on from definitions of wellbeing for a minimum of 20 minutes and end of year reporting to
character strengths and the and our What’s Working Well per day. caregivers.
Whare Tapa Whā model. audit, this website outlined our ● Staff used their own resources ● Our principal led the wellbeing
● Staff meetings were held intervention. The ​Good Ideas as well as the ​Good Ideas workshop at the Kahui Ako
throughout the year to identify section of the website was a section of our Wellbeing teacher/staff only day in March.
areas of wellbeing that would valuable resource for teachers website to design lessons that There were more than 100
make the biggest difference for when they were planning their catered to the identified needs participants.
each class/ cohort of students, wellbeing interventions. of their class. In accordance ● Our wellbeing lead teacher has
and to ensure consistency in with the Appreciative Inquiry been appointed as our Kāhui
the delivery of wellbeing model, the focus was on Ako within school teacher. The
teaching across our school. amplifying existing strengths focus for this position is on
● We started to explore staff and meeting the focus areas wellbeing. She lead a very well
wellbeing in our meetings. Our identified at the beginning of attended presentation for
focus was on burnout and on Term 2. teachers across the Kahui Ako
the factors that contribute to ● Six wellbeing focus areas were on the wellbeing work that our
burnout. selected (kindness, gratitude, school has done in 2019, and
savouring, exercise, social shared our school’s ​wellbeing
connections, and sleep) for website​.
schoolwide promotion. There is ● Our wellbeing lead
a wealth of scientific evidence teacher/within school teacher
to show that these six areas has worked with other teachers
have considerable impact on in our Kāhui Ako to design a
wellbeing. We had a two-week survey that can be used as
focus on each area. Posters part of a wellbeing Appreciative
were created as a teaching tool Inquiry cycle that we will be
for staff and a visual prompt for leading in our Kāhui Ako in
students. 2020.
● School designed website
shared across NZ by Core
Education
● Our principal led a workshop
for other Southland Principals
in Term 4 about leading
wellbeing focus.
What our Students Have to Say:
“Filling buckets up makes us happy. I helped people. I say thank you and please.”
(New Entrant student)

“I can be nice. I help people and that’s kind. I help people play.”
(New Entrant student)

“Bucket fillers is about being good. You help people. If they get hurt, you can hug them and take them to the office.”
(Year 1 student)

“I made a brain hat. The brain involves memories and your feelings.”
(Year 1 student)

“It’s OK to make mistakes when learning. You’re just trying your hardest and practising. That’s how you learn.”
(Year 2 student)

“I talk to my friends.”
(Year 2 student who receives Ongoing Resourcing Scheme funding)

“I learnt about how to be nice to each other, and about teamwork. Helping everyone including little kids. We were learning about the Whare Tapa Whā, I put
my whānau on my Whare Tapa Whā model.”
(Year 4 student in our bilingual class).

“We learnt about four different wellbeings. There was spiritual and mental wellbeing. Our ancestors and iwi are part of spiritual wellbeing. We made these
posters and put things on them that are to do with wellbeing. I put a Māori flag and a tiki on mine because I wanted to have
things about New Zealand.”
(Year 6 student in our bilingual class)

“We learnt lots of science facts like when you sleep it helps you brain. It’s pretty cool learning that science stuff. It was gross learning about the brain, but it
was also really fun especially the brain hats we made. If you know what happens to flip your lid [get upset], then you also know what to do about it, like our
calm down strategies.”
(Year 6 student)
“I really liked learning about savouring. I used to never savour anything like lollies, and I used to be very ungrateful for what I got. Now I really appreciate the
things I get, and I’m grateful for them. I realise what I have and what I don’t have, and I think what I’ve got is OK. I liked learning about
the downstairs brain and how you can flip your lid.”
(Year 6 student)

“We learned about the left side and the right side of the brain. It was good because I want to know more about my brain. I learnt that
the left side is the working side about laws, logic and language.”
(Year 6 student who has received In-Class Support funding this year)
Data

Feel Brave Survey Results


We conducted the Feel Brave survey at the beginning of Term 2 to collect pre-intervention data, and at the end of Term 3 to collect post-intervention data. The
Feel Brave survey comprises five questions. Responses to these five questions fall into three areas of wellbeing: self-confidence, resilience, and
response-ability (the ability to calm oneself down and choose how we react to stressors).

Below are the data that we collected from the intervention. The yellow column shows the percentage shift between the pre-intervention and post-intervention
data. Average scores fell in half of our classrooms, and this has resulted in a negative percentage change in some of our data.
The data show that there have been gains in students’ “response-ability”, which is their perceived ability to choose their reaction to different stimuli. In our
senior mainstream class, this is the result of the work that has been done on how the brain works; children better understand where their feelings are coming
from, and can control their responses to these feelings. Our Year 2 class has also done work on growth mindset and problem solving skills, which will also
have contributed to raising these students’ sense of “response-ability”.

The progress that other classes made in their focus areas has been harder to capture in the data. This is because some teachers structured their intervention
to meet needs that came from incidental classroom observations, not the Feel Brave survey. Their survey results therefore do not adequately reflect the
progress that the children have made. For example, our Year 1 and 2 classroom’s focus on play-based learning has led to considerable gains in students’
social skills and their ability to participate and contribute, but this is difficult to capture in the data. Likewise, the New Entrants’ work on kindness and “bucket
filling” was not captured by the questions that children were asked in the survey.

Several classes has seen an increase in resilience, which the Feel Brave survey measures by asking about children’s friendships and whether they know what
to do with their worries. Raising levels of resilience in our school was an explicit aim from our 2019 target, so it is heartening to see that we are already seeing
a positive impact from our intervention. We expect children’s resilience to continue to grow as they consolidate this year’s wellbeing learning.

Three classes saw either little change in the data, or lower post-intervention scores. The teachers in all of these classrooms felt that their students made gains
in the knowledge and practice of wellbeing (see the next section for further details), which leaves the question of why this was not reflected in students’
wellbeing scores. One possibility is that students had a better understanding of the questions when they were asked in the post-intervention survey, as had
participated in ten weeks of intensive wellbeing instruction. Therefore, the post-intervention data may simply have been more accurate than the
pre-intervention data. The junior school teachers also noted that many of their students thought much more deeply about their answers to the post-intervention
questions, compared to when they gave their first answers at the beginning of Term 2. It is possible that our younger students did not give accurate responses
when we gathered pre-intervention data.

Finally, we are now aware of issues with collecting post-intervention data as soon as the intervention programme has been completed, which is what was
done this year. Going forward, we would like to research the optimal time to collect post-intervention data, being mindful that we do not wish to prejudice the
results. Initial enquiries indicate that it is preferable to leave a period of six weeks between the end of the intervention and the collection of data.

Student Engagement
Other data that is also relevant here is stand down and suspension information. In 2019 we have had a higher roll and have had significantly less stand
downs. In 2019 we have had 7 students have a total of 8 stand down days, this is compared to 8 students with 20 days in 2018. There have been no
suspensions in 2019.
Office Referrals
The office referrals for 2019 are nearly the same exactly the same as 2018 in volume even though we have more children. The 2019 data shows 91 students
have had office referrals, whereas 76 had them in 2018. 6 students in 2018 had more than 30 office referrals, some of them up to 50. In 2019 we only have 3
students who have just more than 30 referrals. This is an improvement.

Learning Data
The 2018-2019 learning data comparison shows that there is a variation in the rates of progress across our school. 85% of students made gains of at least
one year progress in reading, in writing this was closely mirrored with 84%. In maths however this drops to 69% progress of one years progress or better.
The reading and writing progress results are pleasing however there appears to be some inconsistency in the maths OTJs from one class/year to another.
You can see the results in the table below:
What our Teachers & Principal Have to Say

Teacher Summary
Staff found our wellbeing intervention to be highly successful. Several teachers have changed their classroom programmes substantially in order to
incorporate explicit wellbeing instruction, and they are very keen to maintain this in the coming years. Teachers found it relatively easy to integrate elements of
wellbeing into their classroom programme (alongside explicit wellbeing instruction), e.g. through play-based learning and fitness/health education. The Whare
Tapa Whā model has been especially successful in our bilingual class, and is likely to be the foundation for this class going forward. In a recent whānau hui,
caregivers of some of our bilingual students noted that their tamariki are now more confident in their Māori identity, and their teacher attributes this in large
part to the wellbeing work that she has done with her students.

Teachers welcomed the Appreciative Inquiry approach of amplifying students’ strengths rather than focusing on their weaknesses. Our staff found Kathryn
Berkett and Ara Simmon’s professional development workshops to be highly effective; they took away many new pieces of learning from these PLD sessions,
which they implemented in their classroom programmes. The contextual learning that some teachers experienced during Ara’s visit was especially effective.
The Feel Brave website and series of books were also key to the success of many classroom programmes. These resources were an excellent
“pick-up-and-go” resource for many of our teachers, and were the starting point for their intervention programmes.

The intervention programmes that teachers planned were highly flexible. Teachers adapted their programmes in response to emerging needs. They also took
note of students’ interests (e.g. contexts that they particularly enjoyed in play-based learning sessions) and took this into consideration when planning, in order
to ensure that children’s engagement remained high. Teachers noted an increase in students’ ability to self-regulate, higher levels of kindness, and more
inclusivity. Changes were also noted in some of our learners with special educational needs. For example, one ORS-funded child showed significant
improvement in his oral language skills, especially his ability to communicate with his peers, as a result of his engagement in play-based learning.

Across the school, teachers have noticed that children are happier in the playground and are better able to manage minor problems that arise during the
course of morning tea and lunch. This is evidence that students’ resilience has increased, which was the central aim of our 2019 target. Teachers have
reported that they are more aware of the wellbeing strengths and needs of children in other classes, which is helpful when they are on duty. Our staff have
also had a greater awareness of their own wellbeing this year. This has been reflected in their lunch choices, deliberate attempts to get more sleep and
exercise, and the wellbeing-related conversations in our staffroom.

Based on our evaluation of the intervention programme, it is clear that the wellbeing resource website could have been used more effectively. Some members
of staff did not take the opportunity to explore this website. Going forward, we will need to re-examine how best to share resources with staff, so that they are
able to extend their pedagogical content knowledge. We will also look at refining the Feel Brave survey, so that we are better able to capture data that
represents the full breadth of wellbeing in our school.

Principal’s Summary
Wellbeing is now a government priority for all of New Zealand. Our focus in 2019 certainly made us aware of what we were teaching, how we were teaching,
and how we could be the best possible human beings before we stepped in front of our kids. During 2019 there were many opportunities for this work to
happen quite deliberately across our school. 2019 certainly felt like there was a calmness across our school, even when situations were tough. I would like to
think that this is a direct result of deliberate acts of wellbeing teaching- to students as well as staff.

In this type of undertaking it is not always easy to see the results of this teaching - we haven’t moved students from one level to another, this is to do with
human emotions and behaviour. However we can see the mahi through the experiences of students. On camp with our Year 6 students this was particularly
evident. Two students at school were often in trouble for inappropriate reactions. On camp even though they were faced with uncertainty and uncomfortable
feelings in challenging situations they were able to use the learning they had made and coped exceptionally well. So much so they didn’t throw tantrums, didn’t
swear, and acted appropriately even when being led by people from outside our school organisation. In previous years both students had needed action plans
around them for their unpredictability and often volatile behaviour.

In the future I hope to see all those senior students who had that specific, deliberate teaching about the brain science go on and have success across all
aspects of their lives. Success will look like them “having a go” at school, making & keeping friends, having a great sense of worth, and knowing where to go if
they need help. For our junior students we will look forward to continuing wellbeing learning with them. We have a comprehensive collection of resilency books
to use as teaching resources, we have access to great teaching resources through the development of the school website (includes excellent NZ resources
such as Sparklers), and we have appointed the COL within school leader as the Wellbeing Champion of our school.

This focus has made me think of the hauora of our teaching staff. The job of teaching is complex, time-consuming and at times all consuming. Hopefully by
giving staff the tools to ensure their lives are well managed they will be able to better cope with the stress of the job. In 2019 there has been considerable hype
about the stress of the job, yet they have been mostly able to move past this and enjoy coming to school and seeing the rewards for the success they have
with individual students. It is important to hang onto this...and to realise that sometimes what is taught today might not “stick” until other stuff happens further
down the track. One recent example of this for me was the Year 11 student who I remember everybody being so concerned about as a 5 year old because
she just sat on the mat. As Year 11 she has just completed NCEA with excellence endorsed. Sometimes good things take time! Her teachers are no longer
here but this story is important for current staff who worry about students not moving fast enough with their learning.

Wellbeing will continue to be an area that needs deliberately focused on here so that everyone has a set of tools they can apply to their lives
Next Steps
We met as a staff at the end of our wellbeing intervention, so that we had time to analyse the data and reflect on the process. We also took this opportunity to
continue the Appreciative Inquiry cycle by revisiting the dreaming stage. Our aim was to look ahead and discuss “what could be” for 2020 and beyond. One of
our focuses for 2020 will be on maintaining the common wellbeing vocabulary that has been built up over the course of this year. We also wish to continue
using the wellbeing strategy posters, and to find ways to make them more relevant to our students. One way to do this may be to get notable community
members to act as role models, e.g. by explaining how they use a particular wellbeing strategy in their daily lives. Continued explicit teaching about how the
brain works has also been identified as a need for 2020. The bilingual class will continue to use the Whare Tapa Whā model as the foundation for their
classroom, as this model maintains and enhances the identity, culture and language of our Māori learners.

Some teachers are still unsure of the Appreciative Inquiry model. Going forward, our leadership team will ensure that this inquiry process is more explicit for
teachers. Our wellbeing lead teacher has secured a position as within school teacher in our Kāhui Ako, and the focus will be on using the Appreciative Inquiry
process to explore the teaching of wellbeing with teachers across our Kāhui Ako. Thus there is the opportunity for our staff to continue their exploration of
wellbeing teaching through a collaborative inquiry model. If they choose to participate in this process, it will help them to consolidate their understanding of
Appreciative Inquiry. Our Appreciative Inquiry model will likely evolve, so that we deliberately plan to use existing strengths in order to target areas of
weakness in wellbeing. For example, we might use students’ existing understanding of how the brain works in order to further improve their resilience.

Spending more time explicitly discussing staff wellbeing is also a need for the future. We will be working with Allison Mooney at the beginning of 2020, with a
focus on understanding one another’s personalities so that we are better able to work together as a high-performing team. We also plan to continue our work
with Ara Simmons, who has a great deal of value to add to our existing wellbeing work.

Potrebbero piacerti anche