Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Before the treatment, a man can freeze some of his sperm for
future use in artificial insemination.
1. Only the sperm and egg of the married couple are involved.
2. Fertilized eggs are not intentionally lost or destroyed.
As long as both the egg and the sperm are from the same married couple, then I can see no
problem with this process. After all, both the egg and the sperm belong to the married couple,
and there is no intrusion of seed from outside that marriage bond. If the married couple accepts
the sperm from another man (a man outside of the marriage bond with that woman), then she is
inviting the intrusion of another man's seed into herself. This is an adulterous occurrence.
In addition, if the process of artificial insemination involves the fertilization of many eggs with
only one being implanted in the womb of the mother, this is not acceptable since the other
fertilized eggs must then be discarded. This is not an acceptable option for a Christian couple
since it risks destroying human life.
Christian marriage is a covenant between the husband and wife before God with people as
witnesses. This covenant is taken seriously by the Lord. It should also be taken seriously by the
couple. God knows all situations and circumstances and is in complete control. If a Christian
couple cannot get pregnant and if the only way the wife can get pregnant is through the donation
of sperm from a man outside of the marriage bond, then it is best to avoid that pregnancy.
Otherwise, the couple is inviting into the woman's body the seed of another man -- which is
adultery. If the couple desires to have children, they should adopt. This prevention of pregnancy
could be a means by which the Lord arranges for couples to adopt, thereby, taking care of other
children.
Objections Answered
Some claim that using another man's sperm to impregnate a woman is not morally wrong
because there is no physical act of adultery involved and there is no intention of adultery. Also,
if the husband agrees, then how could the impregnation be adulterous?
We must be very careful to not let situational ethics govern biblical principles. God has ordained
that husband and wife, a married couple, be the bearers of children within that covenantal bond
of marriage. Whether or not the physical act of adultery has occurred or not does not excuse the
fact that the sperm of another man has entered the body of a woman to whom he is not married.
The Bible is silent on artificial insemination since that technology wasn’t available in
those days. The closest analogy in the Old Testament before the Law was instituted was
a man may marry another to start a family through her.
In Gen. 16:1–2, Sarai said this to Abram, “Now Sarai, Abram’s wife, had borne him no
children. But she had an Egyptian slave named Hagar; 2 so she said to Abram, “The
Lord has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my slave; perhaps I can
build a family through her.” This was an acceptable custom in those days. God didn’t
condemn this practice in the Old Testament. There are New Testament saints as
Zechariah and Elizabeth who had no children remained faithful to each other without
marrying another woman.
This is a matter of personal conscious between a husband and wife. Whether one
chooses to adopt a child, live without a child, or use some technological means would
be a personal choice as long as it doesn’t violate the marital bonds between a man and
woman.
SUMMARY: The Scripture is silent on the use of technology as long as it is not misused
in defaming the image and likeness of God.