Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
is defined as the totality of character attributes and behavioral traits of a
person.
is a methodology for categorizing the character and
behavior of a person.
Personality concerns the most important, most noticeable parts of an individual's
psychological life. Personality concerns whether a person is happy or sad, energetic or
apathetic, smart or dull. Over the years, many different definitions have been proposed
for personality. Most of the definitions refer to a mental system -- a collection of
psychological parts including motives, emotions, and thoughts. The definitions vary a bit
as to what those parts might be, but they come down to the idea that personality
involves a pattern or global operation of mental systems. Here are some definitions:
"Personality is the entire mental organization of a human being at any stage of his
development. It embraces every phase of human character: intellect, temperament,
skill, morality, and every attitude that has beeen built up in the course of one's life."
(Warren & Carmichael, 1930, p. 333)
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1957). Theories of personality. New York, NY: John Wiley &
Sons.
Warren, H. C., & Carmichael, L., Elements of human psychology (Rev. Ed.; Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin, 1930), p. 333/Cited in Allport, Pattern & growth in
personality (1937/1961, p.36).
personality
- 7 dictionary results
MBTI
Test
Pick the Right Test for You & Take It. Rated A+ By the BBB.
Visit Now!
www.DiscoverYourPersonality.com
AboutAstro.com/horoscope
Polycythemia Vera
Patient support group information Funding
polycythemia vera research
Sponsored Results
www.mpdfoundation.org
o o [pur-suh-
-i-tee] Show IPA
-ties.
the visible aspect of one's character as it impresses others:He has a pleasing personality
.
Psychology .
the sum total of the physical, mental, emotional, andsocial characteristics of an individu
al.
the organized pattern of behavioral characteristics of theindividual.
â
!
"
#
$
%
Use
in a Sentence
&'
(
1350ƛ1400; ME personalite (< MF) < LL persl . Seeperoa, -y
1. See character.
Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2010.
Cite This Source
|
www.TiniusOlsen.com
Sponsored Results
www.sciedu.ca/wjp
(öp$ös;önæliti)
Ɯ , p )
1 p te um tta f a te beaviura and mentaarateriti b mean f w
. i an individua i regnized abeing unique
2 te ditintive arater f a pern tat make im iaattrative: a aeman nee
. d a t f pernait
late 14c., "quality or fact of being a person," from M.L.personalitatem (nom. personalit
as ), from L. personalis (seepersonal). Sense of "a distinctive character" is first recorde
d 1795,from Fr. personnalité.
Meaning "person whose character stands out from that of others" isfrom 1889. Personal
ity cult is attested from 1956.
Medical Dictionary
Pronunciation: /öp;rs- ; n-öal-;t-ē, öp;r-ösnal-/
Function: n
l )
; ( the complex of characteristics that distinguishes anindividual especially in rela
tionships with others
( the totality of an individual's behavioral and emotionaltendencies
( the organization of the individual's distinguishing charactertraits, attitudes, or habits
per·son·al·i·ty (pûr's ;-nāl'ĭ-tē)
n.
1. The quality or condition of being a person.
2. The totality of qualities and traits, as of character orbehavior, that are peculiar to a
specific person.
3. The pattern of collective character, behavioral,temperamental, emotional, and men
tal traits of a person.
4. Distinctive qualities of a person, especially those personalcharacteristics that make
one socially appealing.
The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton M
ifflinCompany.
Cite This Source
Legal Dictionary
Cultural Dictionary
The
ttern of feelings, thoughts,
nd
ctivities th
t distinguishesone erson from
not
her.
The Americ
n Herit
ge® New Diction
ry of Cultur
l Liter
cy, Third Edition
Co yright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Com
ny.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Com
ny. All rights reserved.
Cite This Source
F
mous Quot
tions
"When science,
rt, liter
ture,
nd hiloso hy
re sim l..."
"Person
lity is the su reme re
liz
tion of the inn
te id..."
"So little
re the Homeric heroes resented
s develo in..."
"There is
very im ort
nt
nd fund
ment
l rel
tion betw..."
More Quotes
p *(
Se
e w ee
Te
Ree ee
MBT p
Te
P e R Te Y & T
e . R
e A+ B e BBB.
V N
H e
2011
C
ee Re
e &
ee A e
e
Ve
e
e
e
ee
S e Re
.
.
6 e
W e
, e ee e e
Te "p
+
, e
e b e 16 Qe
e, e e
e-e e b R
C
e.
Be
be e.
R
C
e' 16 e
p
,
+
W
e
,
, , ee e, W
, ,
ee
()
e
e,
,
e , , e
-,
(S
) p
rp
ng, lkes peple
(e
)
Re
ve en
ll,
nge
ble,
En
l En
ll s
ble,
d
pve,
Deeren
l, per
ve,
vds
Dn
n, reul,
sserve,
nl, subssve, uble, Dn
ne
ggressve, peve, subbrn,
beden, e
sl led, dle, (E)
bss (Dn
ne)
d
ng (Subssveness)
vel,
n
ed, spn
neus,
, resr
ned, pruden,
urn,
velness enus
s,
pp g luk,
nrspeve, slen (Desurgen) (F) eerul, expressve, pulsve
(Surgen)
Rule-nsus, duul,
Expeden, nnnrng, Rule-
nsenus, nrng,
dsreg
rds rules, sel ndulgen Cnsusness
r
ls, s
d, rule bund (Hg
(
w Super Eg Sreng) (G)
Super Eg Sreng)
S, re
-sensve, d, S
l Bldness S
ll bld, venurese, k
es
n, nd
ed (Tre
) (H) sknned, unnbed (
r
)
Ul
r
n, bjeve, Sensve,
ese, senen
l,
Sensv
unsenen
l, ug nded, sel- ender nded, nuve, rened
reliant, no-nonsense, rough (I) (resia)
(Harria)
Re
xed,
d,
qu, d, Tese, ee y, m
e,
Tes
e, m sed w d ve (
w d ve, us
ed, ve w u,
(Q4)
E Tes) me d ve. (H E Tes)
P m
y F
s
d Des s
e's 16 Pe s
y F
Mde (Ad
ed F m
& Reke, 1994).
e ee ed ese 16
s
s m
y
s,
s sed e s
ed "B
Fve"
s w e sde ed b
s.A e m
y
s e
e w
b
s
d ud e e e be sde ed sub
s w em.
Ree ees
Overview
The Big Five factors and their constituent traits can be summarized as follows:
f
The initial model was advanced by Ernest Tupes and Raymond Cristal in 1961,[3] but
failed to reach an academic audience until the 1980s. In 1990, J.M. Digman advanced
his five factor model of personality, which Goldberg extended to the highest level of
organization (Goldberg, 1993).[4] These five over-arching domains have been found to
contain and subsume most known personality traits and are assumed to represent the
basic structure behind all personality traits. These five factors provide a rich conceptual
framework for integrating all the research findings and theory in personality psychology.
The Big Five traits are also referred to as the ï+-+ . ï or FFM (Costa &
McCrae, 1992),[5] and as the Global Factors of personality (Russell & Karol, 1994).[6]
At least four sets of researchers have worked independently for decades on this
problem and have identified generally the same Big Five factors: Tupes & Cristal were
first, followed by Goldberg at the Oregon Research Institute,[7][8][9][10][11] Cattell at the
University of Illinois,[12][13][14][15] and Costa and McCrae at the National Institutes of
Health.[16][17][18][19] These four sets of researchers used somewhat different methods in
finding the five traits, and thus each set of five factors has somewhat different names
and definitions. However, all have been found to be highly inter-correlated and factor-
analytically aligned.[20][21][22][23][24]
Because the Big Five traits are broad and comprehensive, they are not nearly as
powerful in predicting and explaining actual behavior as are the more numerous lower-
level traits. Many studies have confirmed that in predicting actual behavior the more
numerous facet or primary level traits are far more effective (e.g. Mershon & Gorsuch,
1988;[25] Paunonon & Ashton, 2001[26])
When scored for individual feedback, these traits are frequently presented
as percentile scores. For example, a Conscientiousnessrating in the 80th percentile
indicates a relatively strong sense of responsibility and orderliness, whereas an
Extraversion rating in the 5th percentile indicates an exceptional need
for solitude and quiet. Although these trait clusters are statistical aggregates,
exceptions may exist on individual personality profiles. On average, people who register
high in Openness are intellectually curious, open to emotion, interested in art, and
willing to try new things. A particular individual, however, may have a high overall
Openness score and be interested in learning and exploring new cultures but have no
great interest in art or poetry.
The most frequently used measures of the Big Five comprise either items that are self-
descriptive sentences[27] or, in the case of lexical measures, items that are single
adjectives.[28] Due to the length of sentence-based and some lexical measures, short
forms have been developed and validated for use in applied research settings where
questionnaire space and respondent time are limited, such as the 40-item
balanced International English Big-Five Mini-Markers[29] or a very brief (10 item)
measure of the Big Five domains.[30]
[edit]
M
i
tie: O ee t ex e iee
i
gee
ei
ti f
t, emti,
dvetu e, uuu
ide
,
im
gi
ti, u iity,
d v
iety f ex e iee. The t
it ditiguihe im
gi
tive
e e f m dw-t-e
th, veti
e e. Pe e wh
e e t ex e iee
e iteetu
y u iu,
ei
tive f
t,
d eitive t be
uty. They ted t be,
m
ed t ed e e, m e e
tive
d m e
w
e f thei feeig. They
e
m e ikey t hd uveti
beief.
mbiguu,
d ubte. They m
y eg
d the
t
d iee with u ii eve
view thee ede
v
uite etig.
[edit]
þ
edey hw ef-dpe,
dfy,
d
m f
heveme. The
hw
p efe ee f p
ed
he h
p
e
beh
v . I fee he w
y whh we , eg
e,
d d e mpe.
ee de he f
kw
Need f Aheveme (NAh).
[ed
f I am always prepared.
f I am exacting in my work.
f I follow a schedule.
f I like order.
f I pay attention to details.
f I leave my belongings around. (reversed)
f I make a mess of things. ( ee se)
f I often forget to put things back in their proper place. (reerse)
f I shirk my duties. (reersed)[31]
[edit]: -
r
i
rtie: Extr
ersi
d itrersi
: -
is h
r
terized by psitie emtis, surgey,
d the tedey t
seek ut stimu
ti
d the mp
y f thers. The tr
it is m
rked by prued
eg
gemet with the exter
wrd. Extr
erts ejy beig with pepe,
d
re fte
pereied
s fu f eergy. They ted t be ethusi
sti,
ti-rieted idiidu
s
wh
re ikey t s
y "Yes!" r "Let's g!" t pprtuities fr exitemet. I grups
they ike t t
k,
ssert themsees,
d dr
w
tteti t themsees.
Itrerts
k the si
exuber
e
d
tiity ees f extr
erts. They ted t
seem quiet, w-key, deiber
te,
d ess ied i the si
wrd. Their
k f
si
iemet shud t be iterpreted
s shyess r depressi. Itrerts simpy
eed ess stimu
ti th
extr
erts
d mre time
e. They m
y be ery
tie
is a teey to be ompassioate a oope ative athe tha
suspiious a ataoisti towa s othe s. The t ait eflets iiviual iffe ees i
ee al oe fo soial ha moy. eeable iiviuals value etti alo with
others. They are generally considerate, friendly, generous, helpful, and willing to
compromise their interests with others. Agreeable people also have an optimistic view
of human nature. They believe people are basically honest, decent, and trustworthy.
Disagreeable individuals place self-interest above getting along with others. They are
generally unconcerned with othersƞ well-being, and are less likely to extend themselves
for other people. Sometimes their skepticism about othersƞ motives causes them to be
suspicious, unfriendly, and uncooperative.
[edit '
f I am interested in people.
f I feel others' feelings.
f I have a soft heart.
f I make people feel at ease.
f I sympathize with othersƞ feelings.
f I take time out for others.
f I am not interested in other peopleƞs problems. (reersed)
f I am not really interested in others. (reersed)
f I feel little concern for others. (reerse)
f I insult people. ( ee se)[31]
f I like being isolated. ( ee sed)
[edit]Ö /
rain a tile: Ne otiis
Ö / is the tendeny to expe iene negatie eotions, sh as ange , anxiety,
o dep ession. It is soeties alled eotional instability. Those who so e high in
ne otiis a e eotionally eatie and lne able to st ess. They a e o e likely to
inte p et o dina y sitations as th eatening, and ino f st ations as hopelessly
diffilt. Thei negatie eotional eations tend to pe sist fo nsally long pe iods of
tie, whih eans they a e often in a bad ood. These p obles in eotional
eglation an diinish the ability of a pe son so ing high on ne otiis to think
lea ly, ake deisions, and ope effetiely with st ess.
At the othe end of the sale, indiidals who so e low in ne otiis a e less easily
pset and a e less eotionally eatie. They tend to be al, eotionally stable, and
f ee f o pe sistent negatie feelings. F eedo f o negatie feelings does not ean
that low so e s expe iene a lot of positie feelings.
e
f I am easily disturbed.
f I change my mood a lot.
f I get irritated easily.
f I get stressed out easily.
f I get upset easily.
f I have frequent mood swings.
f I often feel blue.
f I worry about things.
f I am relaxed most of the time. (reersed)
f I seldom feel blue. ( ee sed)[31]
[edit]Histo y
[edit]:
Sir Francis Galton was the first scientist to recognize what is now known as the Lexical
Hypothesis. This is the idea that the most salient and socially
relevant personality differences in peopleƞs lives will eventually become encoded into
language. The hypothesis further suggests that by sampling language, it is possible to
derive a comprehensive taxonomy of human personality traits.
In 1936, Gordon Allport and H. S. Odbert put this hypothesis into practice.[32] They
worked through two of the most comprehensivedictionaries of the English language
available at the time and extracted 17,953 personality-describing words. They then
reduced this gigantic list to 4,504 adjectives which they believed were descriptive of
observable and relatively permanent traits.
Raymond Cattell obtained the Allport-Odbert list in the 1940s, added terms obtained
from psychological research, and then eliminated synonyms to reduce the total to
171.[12] He then asked subjects to rate people whom they knew by the adjectives on
the list and analyzed their ratings. Cattell identified 35 major clusters of personality
traits which he referred to as the "personality sphere." He and his associates then
constructed personality tests for these traits. The data they obtained from these tests
were analyzed with the emerging technology of computers combined with the statistical
method of factor analysis. This resulted in sixteen major personality factors, which led
to the development of the 16PF Personality Questionnaire.
In 1961, two Air Force researchers, Ernest Tupes and Raymond Christal, analyzed
personality data from eight large samples. Using Cattell's trait measures, they found
five recurring factors, which they named "Surgency", "Agreeableness", "Dependability",
"Emotional Stability", and "Culture".[33] This work was replicated by Warren Norman,
who also found that five major factors were sufficient to account for a large set of
personality data. Norman named these factors Surgency, Agreeableness,
Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Culture.[34] Raymond Cattell viewed these
developments as an attack on his 16PF model and never agreed with the growing Five
Factor consensus. He refers to "...the five factor heresy" which he considers "...is partly
directed against the 16PF test". Responding to Goldberg's article in the American
Psychologist, 'The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits', Cattell stated, "No
experienced factorist could agree with Dr Goldberg's enthusiasm for the five factor
personality theory". This determined rejection of the FFM challenge to his 16 factor
model is presented in an article published towards the end of his life and entitled 'The
fallacy of five factors in the personality sphere', Cattell, R. B. (1995), The
Psychologist, The British Psychological Society, May Issue pp 207ƛ208.
[edit]
For the next two decades, the changing zeitgeist made publication of personality
research difficult. In his 1968 book Personality and Assessment, Walter Mischel asserted
that personality tests could not predict behavior with a correlation of more than
0.3. Social psychologists like Mischel argued that attitudes and behavior were not
stable, but varied with the situation. Predicting behavior by personality tests was
considered to be impossible.
Emerging methodologies challenged this point of view during the 1980s. Instead of
trying to predict single instances of behavior, which was unreliable, researchers found
that they could predict patterns of behavior by aggregating large numbers of
observations. As a result correlations between personality and behavior increased
substantially, and it was clear that Ơpersonalityơ did in fact exist. Personality and social
psychologists now generally agree that both personal and situational variables are
needed to account for human behavior. Trait theories became justified, and there was a
resurgence of interest in this area.
By 1980, the pioneering research by Tupes, Christal, and Norman had been largely
forgotten by psychologists. Lewis Goldberg started his own lexical project,
independently found the five factors once again, and gradually brought them back to
the attention of psychologists.[35] He later coined the term "Big Five" as a label for the
factors.
[edit]
+-
In a 1981 symposium in Honolulu, four prominent researchers, Lewis Goldberg, Naomi
Takemoto-Chock, Andrew Comrey, and John M. Digman, reviewed the available
personality tests of the day. They concluded that the tests which held the most promise
measured a subset of five common factors, just as Norman had discovered in 1963.
This event was followed by widespread acceptance of the five factor model among
personality researchers during the 1980s. In 1984 Peter Saville and his team included
the five-factor ƠPentagonơ model with the original OPQ. Pentagon was closely followed
by the NEO five-factor personality inventory, published by Costa and McCrae in 1985.
One of the most significant advances of the five-factor model was the establishment of
a common taxonomy that demonstrates order in a previously scattered and
disorganized field. What separates the five-factor model of personality from all others is
that it is not based on the theory of any one particular psychologist, but rather
on language.
A number of meta-analyses have confirmed the predictive value of the Big Five across a
wide range of behaviors. Saulsman and Page examined the relationships between the
Big Five personality dimensions and each of the 10 personality disorder categories in
theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Across 15
independent samples, the researchers found that each disorder displayed a unique and
predictable five-factor profile. The most prominent and consistent personality predictors
underlying the disorders were positive associations with Neuroticism and negative
associations with Agreeableness.[36]
In the area of job performance, Barrick and Mount reviewed 117 studies utilizing 162
samples with 23,994 participants. They found that conscientiousness showed consistent
relations with all performance criteria for all occupational groups. Extraversion was a
valid predictor for occupations involving social interaction (e.g. management and sales).
Furthermore, extraversion and openness to experience were valid predictors of training
proficiency criteria.[37][38]
[edit]Selected scientific findings
Ever since the 1990s when the consensus of psychologists gradually came to support
the Big Five, there has been a growing body of research surrounding these personality
traits (see for instance, Robert Hogan's edited book "Handbook of Personality
Psychology" (Academic Press, 1997).
[edit]
This section /0
/c120
Pleaseimprove this section if you can. The talk page may
contain suggestions. (June 2010)
All five factors show an influence from both heredity and environment. Studies of twins
suggest that these effects contribute in roughly equal proportion.[39] Of four recent twin
studies, the mean estimated broad heritabilities on self-report measures for the Big Five
traits were as follows:[40]
Openness: 57%
Conscientiousness: 49%
Extraversion: 54%
Agreeableness: 42%
Neuroticism: 48%
[edit]- /
Many studies of longitudinal data, which correlate people's test
scores over time, and cross-sectional data, which compare
personality levels across different age groups, show a high
degree of stability in personality traits during adulthood.[41] More
recent research and meta-analyses of previous studies, however,
indicate that change occurs in all five traits at various points in
the lifespan. The new research shows evidence for
a maturation effect. On average, levels of Agreeableness and
Conscientiousness typically increase with time, whereas
Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Openness tend to decrease.[42] In
addition to these group effects, there are individual differences:
different people demonstrate unique patterns of change at all
stages of life.[43]
[edit]3
Cross-cultural research from 26 nations (N = 23,031 subjects)
and again in 55 nations (N = 17,637 subjects) has shown a
universal pattern of sex differences on responses to the Big Five
Inventory. Women consistently report higher Neuroticism and
Agreeableness, and men often report higher Extraversion and
Conscientiousness. Sex differences in personality traits are larger
in prosperous, healthy, and egalitarian cultures in which women
have more opportunities that are equal to those of men; both
men and women tend to grow more extraverted and
conscientious and less neurotic and agreeable as cultures grow
more prosperous and egalitarian, but the effect is stronger for
men.[44][45]
[edit]
The suggestion has often been made that individuals differ by
the order of their births. Frank J. Sulloway argues that birth
order is correlated with personality traits. He claims that
firstborns are more conscientious, more socially dominant, less
agreeable, and less open to new ideas compared to laterborns.
Much research has been conducted on the Big Five. This has
resulted in both criticism[52] and support[53] for the model. Critics
argue that there are limitations to the scope of Big Five as an
explanatory or predictive theory. It is argued that the Big Five
does not explain all of human personality. The methodology used
to identify the dimensional structure of personality traits, factor
analysis, is often challenged for not having a universally-
recognized basis for choosing among solutions with different
numbers of factors. Another frequent criticism is that the Big Five
is not theory-driven. It is merely a data-driven investigation of
certain descriptors that tend to cluster together under factor
analysis.
[edit],/
One common criticism is that the Big Five does not explain all of
human personality. Some psychologists have dissented from the
model precisely because they feel it neglects other domains of
personality, such
as Religiosity, Manipulativeness/Machiavellianism,Honesty, Self-
Awareness, Thriftiness, Conservativeness, Critical
Judgement, Masculinity/Femininity, Snobbishness, Sense of
humour,Identity, Self-concept, and Motivation. Correlations have
been found between some of these variables and the Big Five,
such as the inverse relationship between political conservatism
and Openness;[54] although variation in these traits is not well
explained by the Five Factors themselves. McAdams has called
the Big Five a "psychology of the stranger," because they refer to
traits that are relatively easy to observe in a stranger; other
aspects of personality that are more privately held or more
context-dependent are excluded from the Big Five.[55]
In many studies, the five factors are not fully orthogonal to one
another; that is, the five factors are not independent. Negative
correlations often appear between Neuroticism and Extraversion,
for instance, indicating that those who are more prone to
experiencing negative emotions tend to be less talkative and
outgoing. Orthogonality is viewed as desirable by some
researchers because it minimizes redundancy between the
dimensions. This is particularly important when the goal of a
study is to provide a comprehensive description of personality
with as few variables as possible.
[edit].
The methodology used to identify the dimensional structure of
personality traits, factor analysis, is often challenged for not
having a universally-recognized basis for choosing among
solutions with different numbers of factors. That is, a five factor
solution depends on some degree of interpretation by the
analyst. A larger number of factors may, in fact, underlie these
five factors. This has led to disputes about the "true" number of
factors. Big Five proponents have responded that although other
solutions may be viable in a single dataset, only the five factor
structure consistently replicates across different studies.[citation
needed]
[edit]See also
+2
+
Ex
s > Pe s
> F eud's Pe s
F
s
T ee eves
w
eess | T ee m es e s
| Ee g
d
C
exs | S w
?
à : : the life intinct that mtivate peple t fcu n pleau e-eeking
tendencie (e.g., exual u ge).
à =
: e de
iic
miv
e peple ue
ggreive urge
dery.
:
Unlike the Id, the Ego is aware of reality and hence operates via the reality
principle, whereby it recognizes what is real and understands that behaviors have
consequences. This includes the effects of social rules that are necessary in order to
live and socialize with other people. It usessecondary processes (perception,
recognition, judgment and memory) that are developed during childhood.
The dilemma of the Ego is that it has to somehow balance the demands of the Id and
Super ego with the constraints of reality.
The Ego controls higher mental processes such as reasoning and problem-solving,
which it uses to solve the Id-Super ego dilemma, creatively finding ways to safely
satisfy the Id's basic urges within the constraints of the Super ego.
5
The Super ego contains our values and social morals, which often come from the rules
of right and wrong that we learned in childhood from our parents (this is Freud,
remember) and are contained in the conscience.
The Super ego has a model of an ego ideal and which it uses as a prototype against
which to compare the ego (and towards which it encourages the ego to move).
The Super ego is a counterbalance to the Id, and seeks to inhibit the Id's pleasure-
seeking demands, particularly those for sex and aggression.
:
þ
Freud viewed the forces on us as a form of energy, with energy from the senses being
converted into psychic energy in the personality through a topographic model that
takes sensed energy, filters it through various associative metaphors, then passes it
through the unconscious and preconscious before it finally reaches the conscious mind.
*)
This is the investment of energy in the image of an object, or the expenditure of
energy in discharge action upon such an object. It occurs in the Id.
:
)
This is the investment of energy in mental representations of reality through
associations and metaphors, which is needed for the Ego's secondary processes. It
occurs in the Ego.
)
This is energy used to block object-cathexes of the Id. Repression occurs in the battle
between cathexis and anti-cathexis. It occurs in the Ego and Super Ego.
5
Although later theories have improved understanding, Freud's ideas still provide a
useful model for the more complex actions that are really going on.
To persuade, you can appeal either to the basic urges of the Id or the higher morals of
the Super ego. Then encourage the Ego to make the 'right choice'.
5
Defense Mechanisms, Freud's Psychosexual Stage Theor
Nature vs Nurture
Scientists have argued for many years what is the factor that shape us, is it our genes?
Or is it our environment? The simple answer is both. Imagine Johnny and Blake who's
parents are both mathematical genuinenesses who unfortunately died in a car accident.
John and Blake are twins but were separated at birth Johnny was taken by a doctor and
Blake was stolen and raised by hardened criminals accustomed to violence in a daily
basis. Johny how ever was raised in a formal way with a loving, peaceful and caring
community and supportive parents as his environment. Among the two who is most
likely to do a crime as an adult?
Blake of course having a violent environment growing up. But there is a chance that
both men will be good at mathematics since there parents are brilliant at it, its called
aptitude. I'll explain about it later.
Aptitude is a pattern of traits needed for learning a task. Ability is to execute what you
have learned. Aptitude is inherited ability is acquired. Let's say you are good in
basketball. Can you say your children will be good at it? No, aptitude will be passed
on(like Blake and Johny being good in Mathematics) not your skills as a basketball
player although aptitude can be inherited to learn the task they can not inherit the
ability to do a slam dunk it would take some time and practice.
Environment Factor
A child's behavior is also learned from environment the things and the people around
the child. At birth, the new born has no understanding of the world around him. He has
to learn to learn to walk, eat, talk and act like others which is socially accepted. The
people he would be interacting with will play a big role in molding his personality since
it will determine the GOOD and the BAD in him. For example is stealing bad or good? It
will depend on the society he lives at weather or not it is socially acceptable.
By 5 years old we already have an idea of who we are I'm nice, I'm cute, I'm naughty,
people like me when I smile etc... we already have an idea of who we are. During this
crucial stage the primary group which are our family, playmates and neighbors they are
the ones we have face to face contact with the second groups are the ones later on in
life like School, classmates and new peers.
My name is Kim Ian Tumblod I'm a psychologist so I'm pretty sure with I'm saying. To
know more about how to develop you personality and self improvement visit our
site http://developthypersonality.blogspot.com
The NEO that you have just completed looks at 5 personality traits, known as the Big
Five. We will briefly look at what traits are, how these personality factors were
determined, what the traits mean, what the Big Five predict about our behaviour, and
how these factors might relate to motivation.
Traits are consistent patterns of thoughts, feelings, or actions that distinguish people
from one another. Traits are basis tendencies that remain stable across the life span,
but characteristic behaviour can change considerably through adaptive pr ocesses. A
trait is an internal characteristic that corresponds to an extreme position on a
behavioural dimension.
There have been different theoretical perspectives in the field of personality psychology
over the years including human motivation, the whole person, and individual
differences. The Big Five falls under the perspective of individual differences.
The Big Five represents a taxonomy (classification system) of traits that some
personality psychologists suggest capture the essence of individual differences in
personality. These traits were arrived at through factor analysis studies. Factor anal ysis
is a technique generally done with the use of computers to determine meaningful
relationships and patterns in behavioural data. You begin with a large number of
behavioural variables. The computer finds relationships or natural connections where
vari ables are maximally correlated with one another and minimally correlated with
other variables, and then groups the data accordingly. After this process has been done
many times a pattern appears of relationships or certain factors that capture the
essence of all of the data. Such a process was used to determine the Big Five
Personality factors. Many researchers tested factors other than the Big Five and found
the Big Five to be the only consistently reliable factors.
Allport, Norman and Cattell were influential in formulating this taxonomy which was
later refined. Allport compiled a list of 4500 traits. Cattell reduced this list to 35 traits.
Others continued to analyze these factors and found congruence with self- ratings,
ratings by peers and ratings by psychological staff, that eventually became the Big Five
factors.
II ƛ agreeableness vs antagonism
III ƛ conscientiousness vs undirectedness
Cross-cultural studies looking at the replicability of the Big Five have been less
extensive due to the costs and difficulties involved. One reason for looking at cross
cultural consistency is that it could provide an evolutionary interpretation of the way
individual differences have been processed or encoded as personality categories in
language. A Dutch analysis found 5 factors as well, the first 4 being similar to 4 of the
Big Five, and the 5th being closer to unconventionality and rebell iousness. A German
factor analysis replicated the Big Five factors. A problem with interpreting cross-cultural
data is language translation. Some mistranslation may result in underestimating cross-
cultural generalizability. Work has been done to reduce th is problem and higher
congruence has been found with correlational analysis. Overall, the Big Five have been
studied in 7 languages. The 5th factor (openness to experience) has the weakest
replicability.
There was a need for an integrative framework for measuring these factors. The NEO
Personality Inventory was created by Costa and McCrae and originally measured only
neuroticism, extraversion and openness. The other factors were added later. There are
other measures of the Big Five, such as the BFI (Big Five Inventory) and the TDA
(Traits Descriptive Adjectives). The NEO has the highest validity of the Big Five
measurement devices.
Keep in mind that the traits fall on a continuum and this overhead shows characteristics
associated with each of the traits. Looking at these characteristics we can formulate
what each of the traits mean.
thinking
: -
implies an energetic approach to the social and material world and
includes traits such as sociability, activity, assertiveness, and positive emotionality.
contrasts a prosocial and communal orientation toward others with
antagonism and includes traits such as altruism, tender-mindedness, trust, and
modesty.
þ
describes socially prescribed impulse control that facilitates task
and goal-directed behaviour, such as thinking before acting, delaying gratification,
following norms and rules, and planning, organizing, and prioritizing tas ks.
(versus closed-mindedness) describes the breadth, depth,
originality, and complexity of an individualƞs mental and experiential life.
The Big Five are broad dimensions or categories in a hierarchical sense, such that they
encompass a lot without detail. Inevitably you lose information, and while the Big Five
factors provide useful personality descriptors they are somewhat less useful at
predicting specific berhaviours. So a researcher chooses a hierarchical level of analysis
suited to the research being conducted. Some researchers such as Norman, Goldberg
and Costa and McCrae, have developed middle level categories that provide more
description or are less abstract but I wonƞt go into that here.
What do the Big Five predict about our behaviour?
First, having a trait means reacting consistently to the same situation overtime, for
example, being agreeable or cooperative means consistently going along with
reasonable requests, but does not mean always complying with othersƞ wishes.
Second, to respond consistently in the same situation people must have a capacity to
respond to situational cues, that is to have the trait to be responsive to situations. For
example, if someone purchases a house in the woods, they might want that hou se
because of its secluded location.
Third, behaving differently in a given situation does not mean there is inner
inconsistency. For example, someone who likes to attend parties might not often do so
because of a stronger desire to work.
Here are some examples of what the Big Five predict in regards to life outcomes and
behaviour. *While I am giving you these examples, notice how different combinations
of traits can lead to very different outcomes and behaviours, and think about why t his
might be the case. Also, think about whether you see any of these combinations in your
own personality.
Generally speaking, low agreeablesness and low conscientiousness can predict juvenile
delinquency.
Conscientiousness is also a general predictor of job performance, while other Big Five
traits predict job performance in specific types of jobs. For instance extraversion
predicts success in sales and management positions.
Overall, traits are relatively poor predictors of single behavioural acts, but are better
predictors of general trends of a personƞs behaviour. Looking at past behaviour of an
individual may be the best predictor of future behaviour.
Letƞs look quickly at each trait. I will only present one end of the continuum, for
example extraversion as opposed to introversion. Since these traits are on a continuum
someone at the opposite extreme would show very different types of motivation tha n
those at the extreme I will be talking about.
Neuroticism tends to be viewed negatively and is associated with negative affect, being
tense and nervous. Keep in mind that neuroticism is only one trait that an individual
has. A person could be neurotic and conscientious which may have negati ve health
effects but may motivate an individual toward success in school and work situations.
The bottom line is that the Big Five are an integral part of the study of personality
psychology, and it is fascinating to learn about what makes people tick.
References:
- /
)5)