Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
What is Constitution?
It is a legal document which has rules written and which governs the functions. It lays down the
organs of country. The constitution is the framework for political principles, procedures, and
powers of government. It's also the longest constitution in the world with 448 articles, 22 parts,
12 schedules.
The Constitution lays down the basic structure of government under which the people are to be
governed. It established the main organs of government.
The constitution defines the powers of each organs, also democrats their responsibilities. It
regulates relationship between the different organs and between the government and the
people.
All the three institutions derive their respective power from the constitution itself because
constitution has provided separation of powers for these three institutions. The Power, Scope
and Role of each organ are specifically demarcated in the constitution is Supreme. These Three
Organs not only derive powers from the constitution, but exercise those powers within the
framework of the constitution. They cannot overlap from such framework while exercising their
respective powers.
The doctrine separation of powers is the very important salient feature of the constitution.
Among the Three Institutions, one is not superior to the other, and one will not control the
other, in any manner. But, the expectation of the frames of the constitution is the harmonious
working of these Three Organs collectively towards the realisation of objects enunciated in the
constitution. In case of legislature, a stigma is imposed on it, that the legislature cannot
legislate a statute or a law which is beyond its powers. It cannot encroach into the powers of
the other two organs.
Or if the legislature attempts or makes a breach of Fundamental Rights or attempts to alter and
change the basic features of neither the constitution nor the legislature assumes the role of the
often two organs, in the above instances, even though the legislature have powers to legislate,
it will be declared as unconstitutional, ultra vies its powers, void and ultimately that piece of
legislation, as passed by the legislature, will be declared as Null and Void by the Constitutional
Courts in India. There-fore, the scope of powers of legislature are very limited and an embargo
is imposed on its powers by the constitution itself. On the other hand the Judiciary has got
powers to review.
The law passed by the legislature is scrutinized, its tenor and vigour. Whether it is within the
framework of the constitution or whether it is violative of powers of the legislature so
conferred on it, and in any such event, the law passed by the legislature will be declared by the
Judiciary as unconstitutional ultra wires the powers. If the legislation is found as colourable, it
will also be declared as by such under judicial review.
Regarding the other organs the executive is concern, its powers are limited to and subjected to
permissible limits/imposed by the constitution. The action of the Executive can be attributed as
mole-fide., with an ulterior motive, bias, corruption and arbitrary. Such actions of the Executive
powers are questioned by the Judiciary. And any infraction of law, violation of fundamental
rights in derogation of Directive Principles of State Power. Then the action can be declared as
Null and Void, and the same shall not be enforced or implemented.
The checks on Judiciary are also imposed by the constitution. The basic power and function of
the Judiciary is the Review of the action of the legislature and the Executive. Judiciary is the
Vanguard for the Fundamental Rights, assumed to the people / citizens of the country under
chapter III. It is also other important function of Judiciary, that the International Agreements
Treaties, Bi-lateral Covenants and Resolutions of the United Nations, shall be carried out in
India by the government in its letter and spirit. But the frames of the constitution did not
envisage any superior powers on the Judiciary over the other two organs. But viewed it as a
nightmare / guardian custodian in safeguarding the analysis, the three organs are the creatures
of the constitution and as such they owe elegance to the constitution. But however, an
independent Judiciary is the indispensible requisite of a free society under the principles of Rule
of Law.
- On 29th August 1947 the drafting committee was formed under the leadership of Dr. BR
Ambedkar
- The draft was submitted to the constituent assembly on 21 Feb 1948
- Indian Act 1935
- 26 Nov 1949 signed by President Dr. Rajendra Prasad
- 26 jan 1950 the constitution was enforced
The Indian constitution is neither purely federal nor purely unitary but is a combination of both.
In a Democratic government, Constitution plays a primary role in efficient governance.
Constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a
State can be governed. Constitutions may be classified into two categories.
Such as: Federal or Unitary.
Although the word ‘federation’ is nowhere used in the Indian constitution yet all the
structural features of a federal government were incorporated.
1. Dual system of Government: The Indian constitution provides for dual system of government
consisting of a federal or union government and a number of state governments, and
distributes powers between both the governments.
2. Supremacy of the constitution: Further, the constitution is supreme and both the
governments desire their powers from it. This legal supremacy of the constitution is maintained
by the Supreme Court which is vested with the power to interpret the constitution and declare
any act of the union or state governments which violates the provisions of the constitution as
null and void.
The debate whether India has a ‘Federal Constitution’ and ‘Federal Government’ has been
grappling the Apex court in India because of the theoretical label given to the Constitution of
India, namely, federal, quasi-federal, unitary. The first significant case where this issue was
discussed at length by the apex Court was State of West Bengal V. Union of India. The main
issue involved in this case was the exercise of sovereign powers by the Indian states. The
legislative competence of the Parliament to enact a law for compulsory acquisition by the
Union of land and other properties vested in or owned by the state and the sovereign authority
of states as distinct entities was also examined. The apex court held that the Indian Constitution
did not propound a principle of absolute federalism. Though the authority was decentralized
this was mainly due to the arduous task of governing the large territory. The court outlined the
characteristics, which highlight the fact that the Indian Constitution is not a “traditional federal
Constitution”.
Thus, it can be said that Indian Constitution is primarily federal in nature even though it has
unique features that enable it to assume unitary features upon the time of need.
Principles of Federalism
The Indian Constitution is basically federal in form and is marked by the traditional
characteristics of a federal system, namely, supremacy of the Constitution, division of power
between the Union and State Governments, existence of an independent judiciary and a rigid
procedure for the amendment of the Constitution.
There is an independent judiciary to determine issues between the Union and the States, to be
exercised in fields assigned to them respectively. However, there are marked differences
between the American federation and the Indian federation. They are:
CASE LAWS
Unitary form of Government is a converse of federation and is a system in which all powers are
centralized in the hands of a central government. A single central government controls the
whole state with full might. Although the state is divided in provinces and other units but these
divisions are administrative in their nature. These sub-divisions completely work under the
supervision and control of the central government. In unitary form of government, the political
authority is centralized. Unitary State is useful in those states where there are no strong
nationalities or in the small states.
Indian Constitution is an hybrid of both federal and unitary nature of a Constitution and hence
rightly termed as ‘Quasi-federal‘ Constitution. It means a federal set up where despite having
two clear sets of government – central and the states, more powers are given to the Central
Government.
Professor K.C. Wheare, who regards the American constitution as the model of a true
federation has described the Indian constitution as ‘quasi federal’, that is ‘a unitary state with
subsidiary federal features rather than a federal state with subsidiary unitary features’. This is
not wholly true.
In India, the Centre-States relations constitute the core elements of the federalism. The Central
Government and State Government cooperate for the well-being and safety of the citizens of
1
https://grrajeshkumar.com/class-notes-on-constitutional-law-1st-sem-3-year-ll-b/
India. They work together in the field of environmental protection, terror control, family control
and socio-economic planning.
The Indian constitution aims at reconciling the national unity while giving the power to
maintain state to the State governments. It is true that the union has been assigned larger
powers than the state governments, but this is a question of degree and not quality, since all
the essential features of a federation are present in the Indian constitution