Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department of Education
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents the related literature and studies after the thorough and in-
depth search done by the researchers. This will also present the synthesis of the art,
theoretical and conceptual framework to fully understand the research to be done and
Conceptual Reading
Nowadays, the students is not that good when it comes on the reading comprehension
under the group of grade 10 at Dacanlao Gregorio Agoncillo National High School. There
were also studies conducted that were related to this topic. We as researchers choose
this topic to be the major concern of our study because our purpose is to identify if the
reading program really improves the reading comprehension of the mentioned students
Related Studies
This research paper reported the results from research conducted regarding
technologically-based reading comprehension programs for students who have
intellectual disabilities. It provided evidence-based research and theoretical bases for
learning (i.e. Zone of Generatively, Constructivism, Self-Efficacy) on the issue of these
students not being adequately prepared to academically compete with their non-disabled
peers in the classroom in a technologically-based world which requires proficient reading
skills. This paper addressed low reading comprehension skills development at the
foundational elementary level for basic reading comprehension skills. This paper
examined the students’ academic performance and integrated commentary from
educational leaders and other stakeholders. Data were collected via surveys from
stakeholders to inform the work of education focus groups, curriculum developers and
technologically-based reading comprehension program designers. It offered a design for
action using an Improvement Science Model to address the issue which will culminate in
Department of Education
Department of Education
Department of Education
Department of Education
Comprehension, increased time reading may only be able to moderately improve the
reading skills of students.
They carefully set-up sample selection protocol ensured that the treatment group
and control group were comparable. The sampling protocol consisted of two steps. To
choose sample schools, they visited first the county where the reading program
treatments were implemented. From the county education bureau, we obtained a list of
schools that had at least one of the reading programs that they were evaluating. In total,
there were 73 schools in 15 townships in their treatment school sampling frame. Next,
assuming neighboring counties have similar economic, cultural, and geographical
characteristics, they obtained lists of schools from two neighboring counties where no
school had implemented any reading program treatments. The list of the schools in these
two counties became the sampling frame for the control schools in our study.
The third and final block of the survey collected information on the characteristics of
teachers and schools in their sample. In this part of the survey, we asked Chinese
teachers about their attitudes toward reading (whether Chinese teachers believe that
reading has a positive effect on the math performance of students, whether Chinese
teachers believe that reading has a negative effect on the math performance of students).
In addition, the survey also collected information on teacher and school characteristics
that are included as control variables in our analysis. They asked Chinese teachers about
their gender and education (specifically, whether they graduated from college). We also
gathered data on the size of their school from the school principal (specifically, area in
square meters).
Department of Education
This study concluded that programs utilizing an explicit phonics approach result in
higher achievement, especially for students who may be at risk of reading failure
(Foorman, Francis, Fletcher, Schatschneider, and Mehta 1998). Similarly, there is a
strong body of evidence for the use of decodable books in early first grade as children
develop insight into the code of written English. Student achievement information is
crucial. The best assessments will be aligned to the reading program, tracking student
progress, and monitoring teacher pacing and program use. In an effective reading
program, assessment is used to inform instruction for both large groups and individuals.
Assessment information will provide the evidence not only the students are learning,
but also that teachers are teaching skillfully. Assessment information should provide the
guidance necessary for grouping students for special intervention and added support.
The leadership can use four levels of students to provide organized instructional
intervention and focused support.
Department of Education
The strategies to continue to build the reading skills of their students will always
be needed in secondary schools. The more successful programs tended to place a strong
emphasis on relationships, not just teaching strategies. The relationships were
particularly between the teachers and the students. The student-student relationships
were emphasized in cooperative learning. In addition to relationships, these approaches
give students opportunities to be active and social and combine learning with fun.
Department of Education
This may be particularly important for adolescents who have not been very successful
in school. They generally allowed for personalization is another common feature across
the more successful programs. This is most obvious in the tutoring programs, which can
substantially personalize teaching to meet students’ learning, motivational, and social
needs. Personalization is also facilitated by cooperative learning, where students can
adapt tasks to explain and concepts to each other. Technology-assisted instruction,
where the teachers, students, and computers, can readily determine what individual
students need and facilities personalization.
The purpose of the article was to identify the frequency of reading comprehension
instruction in middle and high school. An additional purpose of the study was to explore teachers’
perceptions and beliefs about the need for reading comprehension of the students. The findings
of this study reveal that teachers did not feel qualified or responsible of providing instruction on
reading comprehension.
There is clear evidence that reading comprehension highly beneficial for students of all
levels. The reading levels of middle and high school students improve when teachers explain and
uses comprehension strategy or multiple strategies, as well as provide guided and independent
practice with feedback until students begin to use the strategy independently. As a result of such
convincing evidence, perhaps the most widely cited recommendation for improving reading
comprehension.
The primary reason for conducting this study was to determine the frequency of reading
comprehension of the students in middle and secondary content area classrooms and the
perceptions of the teachers in reading comprehension was influenced their decision.
Furthermore, the teachers’ knowledge to teach strategies was narrow. The students learn
how to apply the reading comprehension through different strategies, guided practice, and gradual
release of instructional responsibilities. The teachers in this study provide reading comprehension
Department of Education
Instruction, they directed the students to use different strategies. It is possible that
the teachers in this study provide explicit instruction to enhance the reading skills and
comprehension of the students’ strategies earlier in the school. It is also possible for the
students to know how to rely on some of these strategies and some students were already
using these strategies.
In the study, they say that they cannot overlook the possibilities that the secondary
teachers will come to the field because of their love for a particular domain of knowledge.
The teachers’ training programs would be wise to encourage future teachers to see the
possibility content area and schools of education.
This study review the value of cost-effectiveness analysis for evaluation and
making with respect to educational programs and discuss its application to early reading
interventions. They describe the conditions for the cost-effectiveness analysis and they
illustrate the challenges of applying the method, providing examples of program that they
estimated cost, but find the effectiveness of data lacking in comparability they provide a
demonstration of how cost-effectiveness analysis can be applied to early reading
programs: the Wilson Reading System and Corrective Reading. They combined those
data with cost data and they collect it by using the ingredients method to calculate the
cost-effectiveness ratios for the alphabetic domain. They use existing effectiveness data
from an experimental evaluation in which the programs were implemented under the
simi8lar conditions for both programs yielded data that are being comparable.
In the last thirty years, reading researchers have made considerable progress in
identifying the elements of effective early reading instructions. The National Reading
Panel report is synthesizing evidence from a large body of research. This research based
Department of Education
Practices have informed the development of early reading program and includes
curricular for class wide instruction as well as intervention for struggling readers. This
research focus primarily on the alphabetic domain, it is necessary for proficient
Reading and in part because it is the only domain for which comparable data were
available from WWC for multiple programs. It acknowledge that success in the alphabetic
domain is far from sufficient for proficient reading and comprehension outcomes, if the
effectiveness data were available it would be more valuable to the decision makers.
Based on the details that they obtained regarding the Torgesen et al.
implementation, they estimated the cost per students for the Wilson Reading System and
for corrective Reading. As expected for the educational programs, the largest percentage
of cost attributable to personnel it is over 9% to each program. Specific ingredients data
are the further details for program implementation.
Department of Education
Finally, researchers often prioritized reading, hoping that better reading skills will
equip children to learn other subjects and encourage them to read outside of school.
They assess that the first hypothesis by testing children in math and social studies, but
they find no effect for either subject. However, the researcher do find that in-school
reading encourages children to read outside of school. For example, treatment children
read 1.24 and 0.89 more books in the last month at the first and second follow-up
surveys. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows.
The purpose of this mixed methodology study was to identify the frequency of reading
comprehension instruction in middle and high school social studies and science
classrooms. And additional purpose was to explore teachers’ perceptions of and beliefs
about the need for reading comprehension instruction. In 2,400 minutes of direct
classroom observation, a total of 82 minutes (3%) of reading comprehension instruction
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Was observed. The qualitative findings reveal that teachers did not feel qualified
or responsible for providing explicit instruction on reading comprehension. Teachers
pointed to the pressure to cover content in preparation for state standardized tests as
barriers to providing reading instruction.
There is clear evidence that reading comprehension instruction is highly
beneficial for students of all levels. The teachers explain and model a single
comprehension strategy or multiple strategies, as well as provide guided and
independent practice with feedback until students begin to use the strategy
independently, the reading levels of middle and high school students improve (e.g.
Biancarosa & Snow, 2006; Collins, 199l; Deshler, Ellis, & Lenz, 1996; National Reading
Panel, 2000; Rosenshine & Meister, 1996; Schorzman & Cheek, 2004; Stevens, 2003;
Wood, Winne, & Carney, 1995). As a result of such convincing evidence, perhaps the
most widely cited recommendation for improving reading comprehension is increasing
specific instruction in comprehension strategies (National Reading Panel, 2000).
The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which secondary
teachers included explicit comprehension strategies in routine classroom instruction.
Additionally, in collecting qualitative data, the researcher hoped to give voice to
teachers’ attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs about reading comprehension instruction in
content area classrooms. In examining the instructional practices of four middle school
content area teachers and four high school content area teachers, the following
questions were addressed.
Department of Education
600 total minutes observed in high school social studies classrooms, no explicit
instruction on reading comprehension strategies occurred. In that same time, reading
comprehension instruction accounted for only three minutes (0%) of instruction. Similar
to the middle school science classrooms, high school science teachers relied only upon
teaching Text Structure and Question Answering. During instruction on climate zones,
high school science students worked in small groups to research the temperature,
climate controls, latitude and longitude, and average precipitation of a predetermined
city.
Department of Education
Students who enter high school with poor literacy skills face long odds against
graduating and going on to postsecondary education or satisfying careers. Joftus and
Maddox-Dolan (2003) reported that in the United States, roughly 6 million secondary
students read far below grade level and that approximately 3,000 students drop out of
U.S. high schools every day. The secondary years provide a last chance for many
students to build sufficient reading skills to succeed in their demanding courses
(Biancarosa & Snow, 2006; Joftus, 2002). Even among students who do graduate from
high school, inadequate reading skills are a key impediment to success in
postsecondary education. Students who struggle with reading of ten lack the
prerequisites to take academically challenging coursework that could lead to more wide
reading and thus exposure to advanced vocabulary and content ideas (Au, 2000). The
2006 report by ACT, Inc., Reading between the Lines: What the ACT Reveals about
College Readiness in Reading, describes even more troubling.
Department of Education
Success in beginning reading is key prerequisite for success in reading in the late
years. Longitudinal studies (e.g., Joel, 1988) have shown that children with poor reading
skills at the end of first grade are unlikely to catch up later on, and are likely to have
difficulties in reading throughout their schooling. It is in the early elementary grades where
the gap in performance between children of different races first appears. On the fourth
grade National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP, 2007), 43% of White
children achieved at the “proficient” level on the National Assessment of Educational
Progress, but only 14% of African American, 17% of Hispanic, and 8% of American Indian
children scored at this level. Effective beginning reading programs are important for
children of all backgrounds, but for disadvantaged and minority children and for children
with learning disabilities, who are particularly depend on school to achieve success,
effective beginning reading programs are especially important.
Department of Education
In recent years, there has been a shift in policy and practice toward more of a focus
on phonics and phonemic awareness in beginning reading instruction. Based in large part
on the findings of the National Reading Panel (2000) and earlier research syntheses, the
Bush Administration’s Reading First program strongly favoured phonics and phonemic
awareness, and a national study of Reading First by Gamse et al. (2008) and Moss et al.
(2008) found that teachers in Reading First schools were in fact doing more phonics
teaching than were those in similar non-Reading First schools. Yet outcomes were
disappointing, with small effects seen on first grade decoding measures and no impact
on comprehension measures in grades 1-3.
The findings has suggest and benefit more from engaging from additional time
which is the secondary research. The reading program and performance of students in
America’s high school and middle school is one of the most important problems in
education. The lack of progress in twelfth grade in reading was combined with recent
increases in high school from graduation rates.
The results of this study reinforce the need to intervene on an individualized level
of the student, with relevant and meaningful content, and deliverable in a manner befitting
learning style and preference. A framework for effective reading intervention program
types is presented and supported by the results of this study. This study was unique
because it investigated two types of reading comprehension, implicit and explicit,
separately to determine the most statistically significant reading intervention type for
intermediate students, grades third through fifth.
Reading scores for intermediate school students, grades three through five,
demonstrate a 7% growth nationally and in Texas while scores for intermediate school
students are on a decline, decreasing 2% nationally and 3% in Texas, according to the
Nations Report Card (NAEP, 2015). State reading scores show only 45% of all
intermediate school students tested in Texas met postsecondary readiness standard in
reading, only 60% of intermediate school students in Texas met expected annual
progress and only 16% exceeded annual progress expectations (Texas Education
Agency, 2016a). The educational pendulum swings towards good practice and includes
learner-centered instruction (Preus, 2007) but does not include best practice and
motivation for struggling readers beyond third grade (Rice, 2013; Vadasy, Sanders, &
Abbott, 2008).
The target of this study was the population neglected, the struggling readers.
NAEP (2015) reported 36% of 4th and 34% of 8th grade students are proficient readers.
The National Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD, 2015) reported 1.22 million students
repeated a grade and 76% had not yet been identified with a learning disability.
The intent of the study was to analyse research-based intervention programs to
discover the most effective reading intervention type for struggling readers in intermediate
school. Improved systematic and targeted intervention, based on the reading needs of
students, creates a personalized learning plan for improvement. Focusing on successful
strategies and the most successful learning environment for each student promotes self-
efficacy for the student, provides best practice support for educators and improves hope
for positive literacy outcomes for the community of stakeholders.