Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Is a line always straight so that it is considered to be a line.

Is a
line a must to be continuous so that it is considered a line to have
something created? A segment may be missed or hidden
somewhere else that appears to be broken but the function is
continuous, always. Historical events tell that the historical line
must be straight forward to make an event happened as fore
reason is always the straight forward background for the latter.
But to have a closer look, things entangle. A system is entangled
with another system to make up a straight line for the latter to be
happened that it appears to be a straight line for an event
historically. Backgrounding is so promiscuous that spiralling
mixture of different backgrounding leads to the fore reason and
with a spotaneous sparkle, the event comes into existence on the
plane of transcendental dasein.

The broken place on the appearring plane may lead to 'The


Mystery' that is so promiscuous and is gone stray from 'The
Unique'. Life form has its own very straight forward line that it
can't exprience much impact from 'The Mystery'. Life form must
be protected by 'The Unique' to keep on straight forward to
produce the exact same latters. Or it would have gone stray to
produce or to transmutate into 'The Mystery'. 'The Mystery' is an
unknown abyss of danger that any transmutation uncontrolled will
happen to destroy mankind.

Mankind, as in The Bible already has said, is the tertiary level of


all organism and rule them all. The ruling sysytem is such a
triangular functional space-time enity that even a single line
produced is strictly restricted into the proper place so that the
system is kept intact from being gone stray into the abyss of
danger. The line should be strictly seen in the triangle by God's
eyes or it is in the abyss of danger to be unseen. Whether God
have to join in the triangle is a problem because Heraclitus said
already everything is just one and no more. The Hindism denied
that there is God, a personality to rule inside the triangle. Karl
Marx denied there should be God to rule the humanity because
humanity have the ability to manage themselves. But Karl Marx is
a genius Philosopher whom showed his talent in his early stage.
Genius is of God's personality and it is impossible for him to deny
God's existence. Should we have a theory unique to include God
or not?

As in the Bible had said that people's falling was due to denial of
God's governorship. So on which level of Humanity should we be
eligible to see God's face and by which level of astral knowledge,
we are garanteed to refrain from the consciousness of falling?

Destruction means to be thrown down into the abyss of danger


without return. Because the broken place lies there and the line
brings one through the dark abyss. Once fallen into the dark
abyss, there is no chance to return because the space-time
function tells it is another contincey there that is cleaved from our
conical space-time universe where strictly restricted seen lines are
weaving our consumation of astral plane. This astral plane is the
place where happiness is to take place and no hidden unknown
danger is allowed to take place.

Potrebbero piacerti anche