Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
English 1103
12/5/10
Since the No Child Left Behind Act was signed in 2002 by the Bush Administration
many questions have been raised about equality in public school education. Thinking of this
problem led me to wonder why there is an education gap in the United States, what causes it, and
what kind of effects it has on the literacy level of students who have fallen into that gap.
Furthermore, is there a way we, the United States, in a 21st century learning environment can fix
this problem? I chose to explore this problem in various areas of this country, and even tried to
One of the first things I chose to explore was if one’s socioeconomic background played
a role in education and literacy levels. A 2006 study conducted by The National Center for
Education Statistics found that students from lower income families were four and one-half times
more likely to drop out of high school than their peers of high income families (Laird). These
statistics do not explain why, though, lower income students are more likely to drop out than
higher income students. Raewyn Connell, a professor at the University of Sydney, has studied in
depth about social justice and education. She explains that in countries that have a higher average
of income, “poverty is the effect of unequal distribution, rather than the effect of absolute level
of resources” (14). This could be an explanation of why lower income students have a lower rate
Bradt 2
of graduating, because the public schools they attend may be in poorer areas, and may not have
access to resources that other schools may have. Is it just one’s socioeconomic background, or
did one’s parents and culture they were submerged into play a role too in their success? Betty
Hart and Todd R. Risley were two child psychologists at the University of Kansas that studied
language acquisition and the effects on a child’s success in school. They found that children
whose parents had a higher vocabulary and exposed them to language at an early age, and also
were sensitive and encouraging to their children, were more likely to have higher rates of success
than children whose parents did not have a sophisticated vocabulary and did not encourage them.
For example, the average IQ of children whose parents had professional jobs was 117, and
After reading the various statistics about graduation rates of students in various locations
and of different backgrounds, I wondered how significant the role of being a teacher, school
administrator, or a parent is in the effort to reduce the education gap. Many researchers believe
that by changing policies, training teachers how to reach low income students, and encouraging
parents to work closely and encourage their students in school would help to increase the
possibility of success in school. Raewyn Connell suggests that part of the problem is the
competitive pressures that current school systems have; for example, “mandatory objective
testing, parental choice plans, and ‘gifted and talented’ programs” are part of how students of
poorer backgrounds are excluded from educational opportunities (23). Possibly by reducing the
amount of seriously competitive programs that schools offer, or by providing ways to encourage
lower income students to reach for these programs, could help close the achievement gap
“mainstream” curriculum in schools to help the success rate of lower income and minority
students. The reason why is because many students learn in different ways. Researchers advise
educators to organize a different way for students to learn, without totally changing the content
to help disadvantaged schools. The way teachers connect with their students also plays a large
role in their success (26). Although all these suggestions were provided by Raewyn Connell the
book fails to provide any statistics that really support these ideas.
From the reading I have done from the book, Opportunity Gap: Achievement and
Inequality in Education, it was a common theme that parents played an integral part in the
success of their child in school, whether from a low income or high income family. Parents need
to encourage their child, and help them at any point if they can. Again, this is where it becomes a
problem for low income and minority students whose parents may have not finished in school
and do not have that higher level of education. As I found earlier, parents who use a higher level
of vocabulary with their children at a younger age leads to success later in life. Also parents need
to play a role in the policy making at their child’s school. With the help of administrators,
teachers, and parents working together schools can better their policies to really ensure that no
child is left behind. The educational director of National Heritage Academies in Grand Rapids,
Michigan explains that, “there is a basic subject material that every child regardless of
socioeconomic background should know.” National Heritage Academy is a school that was
model school for educational methods for student populations that vary in socioeconomic
Another example I found of a successful public city school was the Frederick Douglas
Academy in Harlem, New York. Though many think this is a private school, it is in fact, a public
school that has a very strict curriculum and policies. This school provides A.P. and multiple
foreign language classes to students. Also, preparation for college begins very early on in a
student’s school career. PSAT preparation begins in seventh grade, and college visits start in
sixth and seventh grade for students. Principal Gregory Hodge stressed how important it was that
students were encouraged to continue their education early in life; he said that they would always
say to students, “You are going to college, you are going to college, you are going to college.” In
addition to high level curriculum, students and guardians had to sign a pledge promising to do
their nightly homework, respect the school building and teachers, and to be prepared every day.
If one of these promises were broken consequences would follow. Most surprisingly for this high
level of public education, funding per-student is only about 8,000 dollars a year (Wooster). To
compare the cost of this school to private schools in the United States I went to the website of a
private catholic school in my hometown of Albany, New York. The Academy of Holy Names, a
prestigious girls only school, on average costs over 12,000 dollars a year for grades nine through
12.
If most public schools were to be run like the Fredrick Douglas Academy in Harlem,
New York the chance of reducing the achievement gap in education would be much higher. I
sincerely believe that this is a perfect example of a school that took inner city students and gave
them every opportunity they could to achieve, not because they wanted to show their school had
the highest test scores but to show their dedication to the success of their students. Even a
suburban school with students mostly in a middle or high class family, like the one I attended,
Bradt 5
would not encourage their students in sixth and seventh grade to be concentrating on which
As I have researched the different public schools that were successful in reducing the
achievement gap I came up with another question. We have the information on the
characteristics of these schools, and examples of what they have done to reduce this problem, but
my new question is how do we get school administrators, educators, and parents to take the time
to invest in this issue? With the research I have done there is not a lot to suggest on how we can
influence these individuals to take the time for this or to care enough about this problem; as what
seems to be important to most public schools now is the average of their student’s standardized
test scores and the graduation rates of students who are already most likely to succeed, as they do
not always require as much extra help as students who are caught in the achievement gap.
As I have researched my inquiry question I still feel as though I am left with more
questions. Although we have all these policies in place, like the No Child Left Behind Act, is
what we are doing now, as a society, truly working in providing quality and equal education to
all students no matter their race or socioeconomic background? And what is working and why?
Do we really know why these certain methods are working, or does it just depend on the student
and the culture of the area they live in? I hope to continue to learn about this topic. When I chose
this inquiry question for this paper I did it because it seemed to be the one that was slightly
interesting to me than anything else I thought about reading and writing. The more I have
researched this topic I found that I am becoming passionate about this issue. As a student who,
although, still had to work hard to get through school and to get to where I am now in college I
Bradt 6
consider myself one of the lucky ones who attended a suburban school in a middle class town
that had access to all the resources we needed to learn. I believe all students should be provided
that opportunity, because it is not hard to tell that how one performs in school is going to have a
Works Cited
daSilva, Carol eds. Opportunity Gap: Achievement and Inequality in Education.Cambridge, MA:
Harvard College, 2007. Print.
Laird, Jennifer, et al. "Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 2006." Dropout and
Completion Rates in the United States: 2006. Sept. 2008: 1-14. SIRS Government
Reporter. Web. 5 Nov 2010.
Tough, Paul. "What It Takes to Make a Student." New York Times Magazine. Nov. 26 2006:
44+. SIRS Researcher. Web. 10 Nov 2010.
“Tuition and Fees.” ahns.org. Academy of the Holy Names, n.d. Web. 4 December 2010
Wamba, Nathalis G. “Poverty and Literacy: An Introduction.” Reading and Writing
Quarterly. October 2010: Vol. 26, Issue 2, 109-114.
Wooster, Martin et al. “Model Schools: 14 Academies that Teach.” American Enterprise.
January 2001: 18-44. SIRS Researcher. Web. 31 October, 2010.