Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The Rabbitkettle Formation is a widespread lower Paleozoic unit in the northern Cordillera. A trilobite faunule collected
from the middle part of the type section and described here documents an early Ibexian (Early Ordovician) age for this interval
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
and provides the first biostratigraphic reference point for the type section. This faunule is dominated by the agnostoid Micra-
gnostus, the leiostegiid Leiostegium, and the remopleuridid Kainella. These genera and rarer taxa have North American, South
American, and Austral-Asian affinities. A new species, Kainella eleutherolf, is established.
La formation de Rabbitkettle est une unit6 du PalCozoique infkrieur largement dpandue dans la Cordilkre du nord. Une
faunule de trilobites, CchantillonnCe dans la partie moyenne de la section type et dtcrite ice, donne un Pge Ibexien prCcoce
(Ordovicien prCcoce) pour cet intervalle et foumi le premier point de kfCrence biostratigraphique pour la section type. Cette
faunule est dominee par l'agnostolde Micragnostus, le leiostbgiide Leiostegium et le kmopleuridide Kainella. Ces genres et
taxa plus rares ont des affinitks nord-americaines, sud-americaines et austral-asiennes. Une nouvelle espkce, Kainella
eleutherolf, est Ctablie.
sequence of interbedded silty limestones and limy siltstones The Rabbitkettle at its type area consists mainly of thin-
exposed in the southern Mackenzie Mountains of northwestern bedded, laminated argillaceous and calcareous siltstone and
Canada. It replaced unit 9 of Blusson (1968) and has a desig- lenticular- and nodular-bedded silty lime mudstone, with scat-
nated type area near the headwaters of Rabbitkettle River and tered medium to thick beds of burrow-mottled silty lime mud-
Flat River (Fig. 1). Although no fossils were found in the type stone (Fig. 2). In plan view, many of the lime mudstone
area, Blusson (1968) presumed the unit to be Middle to nodules are interconnected, resembling horizontal 77zalassi-
possibly Late Cambrian in age, whereas Gabrielse et al. (1973) noides burrow systems; small, spar-filled burrows are locally
suggested a Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician age because preserved in the nodules. Short vertical spreite burrows and
it overlies with angular unconforrnity the Lower Cambrian squashed trilobite fragments are occassionally seen in the lami-
Sekwi Formation and is in turn unconformably overlain by nated siltstone. Only one thin, lenticular bed of silty bioclastic
upper Middle Ordovician graptolitic shale near Flat River. grainstone was observed; this bed contained the trilobites
Usage of the name Rabbitkettle Formation has extended described here and pelmatozoan ossicles (Fig. 3). Trilobite
northwestward along the entire Mackenzie Mountains as far as remains are occasionally present in the lime mudstone beds,
Arctic Red River (Tipnis et al. 1978; Gordey 1979, 1980; but their primary fibrous calcite skeletons have recrystallized
Gordey et al. 1981; Landing et al. 1980; Fritz 1981; Ludvigsen to equant micrite and microspar, too similar to the matrix to
1982a, 1982b; Cecile 1982), and the formation has been corre- permit recovery by splitting.
lated with the Kechika Group of the northern Rocky Mountains Tectonic deformation from west-east compression has
and Cassiar Mountains of northern British Columbia and adja- affected the entire section, and most of the trilobites are dis-
cent Yukon Territory (Gabrielse et al. 1973, p. 51; Fritz torted. Lenticular and nodular lime mudstone beds have been
1985). The Rabbitkettle thus represents a lithologic unit that is formed into lumpy nodules up to about twice their original
widely distributed along the northern Cordillera as a facies thickness. The 1500 m of Rabbitkettle measured by Blusson
transitional from shallow-water carbonates to the east and (1968) is therefore an exaggeration of true thickness, perhaps
basinal shales to the west. by as much as one third.
Precise correlations, however, have been hampered because The Rabbitkettle lithologies at the type area suggest a rela-
the age of the Rabbitkettle is only broadly constrained by stra- tively deep depositional environment; the near absence of
tigraphic relationships, and firm faunal control has been grainstone horizons suggests that it was mostly below storm
absent. This paper describes the first and thus far only fossils wave base, i.e., below 100 m depth for a location facing the
recovered from the Rabbitkettle Formation at its type area. open ocean. The absence of slumped beds and obvious trans-
ported units such as turbidites and debris-flow conglomerates
indicates that the depositional slope was low and that the over-
Stratigraphic section all environment may be characterized as a deep shelf. The
The type area of the Rabbitkettle Formation is a discontinu- trilobite fauna recovered from the single grainstone bed is
ous series of measured sections (sections 14 and 15 of Blusson interpreted as indigenous (that is, a rare, in situ product of win-
1968) along a mountainside southwest of the Flat River, nowing and concentration) because of the lack of associated
18-20 krn southeast of Tungsten, Northwest Temtories. The coarse-grained allochthonous beds, the lack of abrasion of the
unit is over 1500 m thick, but its base and top are not exposed fossils, and the presence of scattered trilobite fragments in
Pnnted in Canada I Imprim.6 au Canada
1596 CAN. J. EARTH SCI. VOL. 25, 1988
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
For personal use only.
FIG. 1. (A) Map of northwestern Canada showing location of the Flat River area (B). (C) Topographic map of the type area of the Rabbitkettle
Formation shows the location of Blusson's (1968) sections 14 and 15 and the trilobite locality.
interbedded siltstones and lime mudstones. kettle by Kainella eleutherolji. In northwestern Argentina
Blusson (1968, p. 14) reported finding unidentified trilobite there are two species: Kainella conica, from the Parabolina
fragments from the middle part of the formation at a locality 12 argentina Zone of the lower part of the lower Tremadocian,
krn to the west of the type section. The fossils described here and Kainella meridionalis, which characterizes the Kainella
also came from the middle part, near the top of Blusson's meridionalis Zone of the upper part of the lower Tremadocian
(1968) section 14 at 61°47'N, 127O57'W. (Hamngton and Leanza 1957). Angelina hyeronimi occurs in
the Kainella meridionalis Zone of Argentina as well as in cen-
Age and composition of the faunule tral Mexico. The presence of this species in the Rabbitkettle
The trilobite faunule is dominated by three genera, Micra- collection suggests that Zone D correlates with the Kainella
gnostus, Leiostegium, and Kainella (Fig. 4; Appendix); in meridionalis Zone of the lower Tremadocian as defined in
addition, rare components include Angelina, Apatokephalus, Argentina. Leiostegium douglasi, a species very close to Leio-
Perischodory, and Gymnagnostus?. Although a trilobite bio- stegium manitouensis, also occurs in this zone. No species
facies scheme has not yet been formulated for rocks of this from the Rabbitkettle collection are common to the Tremado-
age, lithostratigraphic observations suggest that this faunule cian of Great Britain. However, Apatokephalus serratus,
represents a deep-shelf association of taxa tolerant of some- which occurs in the early upper Tremadocian Shumardia
what cooler water than that of the adjacent carbonate platform pusilla Biozone of England and Wales (Rushton in Whittington
of the Broken Skull Formation. Most of these genera are world et al. 1984; Thomas et al. 1984), also occurs in the Kainella
wide in their distribution, but the Rabbitkettle faunule specifi- meridionalis Zone and in the upper Tremadocian of Argentina.
cally links those of shallow-water carbonate strata of the Great This suggests that the Rabbitkettle collection is approximately
Basin with those in colder water, noncarbonate strata of Argen- correlative with the middle Tremadocian of Great Britain.
tina, northwest Europe, Tasmania, and central Mexico. The presence of the collection in the middle part of the
Leiostegium manitouensis is the most characteristic trilobite Rabbitkettle suggests that the formation in its type area ranges
of Zone D of the Utah-Nevada Ibexian trilobite zonation upward into the later Ibexian at least and downward well into
(Ross 1949; Hintze 1952; Ross et al. 1982). The abundance of the Late Cambrian. It is not known, however, if the lower part
this species in the Rabbitkettle collection indicates a Zone D is correlatable with the Rockslide Formation defined farther
age for this faunule. This is supported by the presence of north.
Apatokephalus finalis, which also occurs in Zone D strata in
Nevada (Hintze 1952). This zone, termed the Leiostegium - Systematic paleontology
Kainella Zone by Hintze (1952), also yields a species of Repository
Kainella in Nevada. This genus is represented in the Rabbit- Illustrated and type specimens are housed at the Royal
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
For personal use only.
FIG.2. Lithology of the Rabbitkettle Formation. (A) Outcrop view of laminated siltstone and lenticular-, wavy-, and nodular-bedded lime
mudstone, with thick bed of burrowed lime mudstone at the top. Scale bar is 5 cm. (B) Negative print of acetate peel showing lenticular and wavy
beds of lime mudstone (dark coloured), containing rare trilobite fragments, and laminated siltstone (light coloured); trilobite grainstone at top.
Scale bar is 1 cm.
Ontario Museum, Toronto (ROM prefix), Geological Survey Geragnostus intermedius Palmer, 1968, p. 24, P1. 12,
of Canada, Ottawa (GSC prefix), United States National figs. 1, 2.
Museum, Washington (USNM prefix), and the Department of non Geragnostus intermedius, Robison and Pantoja-Alor,
Geology, University of Buenos Aires (UBA prefix). 1968, p. 776, P1. 97, figs. 1 - 10.
Geragnostus curvata Robison and Pantoja-Alor, 1968,
FAMILY Agnostidae McCoy, 1849
p. 775, P1. 97, figs. 11-14.
SUBFAMILY Agnostinae McCoy, 1849
non Geragnostus (Micragnostus) cf. intermedius, Shergold,
GENUS Micragnostus Howell, 1935
1975, p. 52, P1. 13, figs. 7, 8, 12.
Type species ?Geragnostus intermedius, Stitt, 1977, p. 36, P1. 3, fig. 1.
Agnostus calvus Lake, 1906 from the Tremadocian of North
Wales, by original designation. Holotype
A pygidium (USNM 146842) from the Hillard Limestone,
Remarks east-centralAlaska, illustrated by Palmer (1968, P1. 12, fig. 2).
I follow Fortey (1980) (see also Shergold and Sdzuy 1984)
in the concept of this genus. He suggested that the location Occurrence
of the glabbellar node well behind the transverse glabellar Rabbitkettle Formation, Flat River area, District of Mac-
furrow and the muscle scar pattern are particularly distinctive kenzie, Northwest Territories, Ibexian; Deadwood Formation,
characteristics not shared by Geragnostus, with which it has east-central Montana (subsurface), Ibexian (Lochman 1964);
hitherto been confused. However, illustrations of cephala of Hillard Limestone, east-central Alaska (Palmer 1968), Sun-
other species of Micragnostus show that many have more ante- waptan; Tiiiu Formation, Oaxaca, Mexico, Tremadocian
riorly curved transverse glabellar furrows than Fortey (1980, (Robison and Pantoja-Alor 1968).
p. 21) implied and that not all have as tightly "rolled" postero- Description
lateral borders as Micragnostus serus Fortey, 1980. Cephalon is subcircular in outline, approximately as wide as
Micragnostus intermedius (Palmer, 1968) long, and moderately convex; maximum height is slightly
(Figs. 5, 8L-8R) more than one third the width. Border is wide; marginal fumw
is well incised, wide or wider than rim. Acrolobe is evenly
Geragnostus mundus (Raymond, 1925) Lochman, 1964, convex, of the same width around glabella. Glabella occupies
p. 464, P1. 63, figs. 39-41. about two thirds the cephalic length and about one third the
1598 CAN. 1. EARTH SCI. VOL. 25,1988
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
Type species
Gymnagnostus gongros Robison and Pantoja-Alor, 1968 Raymond, 1937, L. (Manitouella) Berg and Ross, 1959, and
from the Tiiiu Formation of Oaxaca, Mexico, by original L. (Evansaspis) Kobayashi, 1955. Shergold (1975, p. 167)
designation. also followed this scheme. Two additional subgenera were
erected by Zhou and Zhang (1978): L. (Alloleiostegium) and
Remarks L. (Euleiostegiurn). Harrington and Leanza (1957, p. 81) and
This genus was erected by Robison and Pantoja-Alor (1968, Lochman-Balk (in Moore 1959) regarded Leiostegium as a
p. 776) because they regarded the genus Leiagnostus Jaekel, subgenus of Lloydia Vogdes, 1890. However, because the dis-
1909 (type species L. erraticus Jaekel, 1909 from glacial tinctively swollen pre-occipital part of the glabella of the type
gravels, northern Germany) as inadequately illustrated and species of Lloydia, L. bituberculatus (Billings, 1865), is not
thus unsuitable for embracing effaced agnostoids of Early shared by any other species, Ross (1970, p. 73) considered
Ordovician age. Even though the holotype of L. erraticus, an Leiostegium a separate genus. I follow Ross (1970) in avoiding
enrolled specimen, has since been reillustrated by Neben and use of the subgenera because of uncertainty whether they
Krueger (1971, P1. 11, figs. 37, 38), Gymnagnostus still embrace separate, but related, species groups. The various
appears to be a valid genus. The cephalon of L. erraticus lacks species can be accommodated under a single genus, Leiosteg-
a border, whereas a narrow one is present in both G. gongros ium, with the exception of those of Perischodory, as it is
and Gymnagnostus? mexicanus. Pygidia of the holotype and known only from the pygidium that bears a pair of anteriorly
all other species assigned to Leiagnostus (see, e.g ., Pek 1977) located spines. The pygidium of Evansaspis also bears a pair
are characterized by a relatively wide border lacking postero- of thick spines that extend from the posterolateral margin, but
lateral spines. These spines are present in G. gongros but not the cranidium closely resembles that of Leiostegium. Manitou-
in G.? mexicanus. Both genera may be related, on the basis of ella has wider fixed cheeks and smaller, more anteriorly posi-
faint axial impressions preserved on interior molds of some tioned eyes than Leiostegium, but the two genera are otherwise
species of Leiagnostus (e.g., Pek 1977, P1. 4, fig. 5, P1. 5, similar. Alloleiostegium is characterized mainly by a border-
figs. 1, 4) and the retention of similar axial furrows in mera- less pygidium bearing shallow pleural furrows, although it
spids and early holaspids of G. gongros (Robison and Pantoja- may be a junior synonym of Leiostegium, as Jell (1985, p. 55)
Alor 1968, P1. 97, figs, 28, 33). implied. Euleiostegium has a rounded anterior margin, but its
Gymnagnostus? mexicanus Robison and Pantoja-Alor, 1968 resemblance to L. douglasi Hamngton, 1937 suggests it may
(Fig. 64) also be a junior synonym of Leiostegium. Several species of
Leiostegium have been erected on the basis of pygidia only
Gymnagnostus? mexicanus Robison and Pantoja-Alor,
(see Shaw 1966, p. 1315); all lack marginal spines.
1968, p. 780, P1. 97, figs. 15, 16, 19-22.
Gymnagnostus? mexicanus, Fortey in Fortey et al., 1982, Leiostegium manitouensis Walcott, 1925
p. 105, P1. 2, fig. 6. (Figs. 6A-60, 7)
Holotype Leiostegium manitouensis Walcott, 1925, p. 104, P1. 23,
A pygidium (USNM 158883) from the Tiiiu Formation, figs. 12-19.
Oaxaca, Mexico, illustrated by Robison and Pantoja-Alor Leiostegium manitouense, Ross, 1951, p. 105, P1.27, fig. 1.
(1968, P1. 97, fig. 22). Leiostegium manitouensis, Ross, 1957, p. 489, P1. 43, figs.
1600 CAN. J. EARTH SCI. VOL. 25, 1988
P1. 22, figs. 11, 12. posteriorly. Gently inflated pleural field lacks furrows. Lateral
Diagnosis border is wide, gently convex, and defined by faint border
A species of Leiostegium with anteriorly rounded, rectangu- furrow. External surface is smooth.
lar glabella. Anterior border short, convex. Palpebral lobe Remarks
relatively short, broad, positioned at glabellar mid-length. This species exhibits some variability in cranidial shape (see
Pygidium with moderately wide border defined by shallow also Ross 1970, p. 74). Some Rabbitkettle specimens have a
border furrow. longer, more tapering glabella and longer anterior border, like
Lectotype those from Tasmania (Jell 1985), and approach the morphol-
A cranidium (USNM 70350) from the Manitou Formation, ogy of L. douglasi Hamngton, 1937 described from Argentina
central Colorado, illustrated by Walcott (1925, P1. 23, figs. (see also Hanington and Leanza 1957, p. 81; Jell 1985, p. 63).
12- 14) and designated herein. However, the overall combination of short anterior border,
rectangular glabella, and centrally located eyes is distinctive
Occurrence and separates L. manitouensis from other species.
Rabbitkettle Formation, Flat River area, District of Mac- Leiostegium douglasi has a longer, convex anterior border
kenzie, Northwest Territories, Ibexian; Manitou Formation, and posteriorly located eyes; pygidia appear indistinguishable
For personal use only.
central Colorado, Ibexian (Berg and Ross 1959); Jost and from those of L. manitouensis. Jell (1985, p. 64) suggested
Snake Hills formations, New Mexico, Ibexian (Flower 1968); that Leiostegium Jloodi Shergold, 1975 from the Ninmaroo
Deadwood Formation, east-central Montana (subsurface), Formation of Queensland might be a subjective synonym of
Ibexian (Ross 1957; Lochman 1965); Garden City Formation, L. manitouensis. However, L. Jloodi possesses a short, flat
northeastern Utah, Ibexian (Ross 1951); Digger Island Forma- anterior border, eyes that are located posteriorly, and a poorly
tion, Victoria, Australia, Tremadocian (Jell 1985). defined pair of pits in the anterior border furrow. Leiostegium
Description (L.) planum Peng, 1984 from northwestern Hunan, China,
Cephalon is semicircular in outline and arched. Anteriorly resembles L. douglasi but differs in having narrow, fixed
rounded glabella is moderately convex and subrectangular in cheeks. Leiostegium (L. ) constrictum Peng , 1984, also from
outline in most specimens; rarely it is more elongate and Hunan, resembles Rabbitkettle specimens of L. manitouensis
slightly tapered and only gently convex. It is well defined by with elongate glabellas, but its glabella tapers more markedly,
firmly impressed axial furrows that terminate at anterolateral and it has shorter palpebral lobes. Leiostegium mccoyi
comers of glabella; glabella may bear three pairs of faint (Walcott, 1884) from the Pogonip Group of Eureka, Nevada,
lateral glabeller furrows. Occipital ring is well defined by deep has an anteriorly expanded glabella. Leiostegium puteatum
occipital furrow. Subtransverse anterior border is very short in Raymond, 1924 from the Highgate Formation of Vermont is
most specimens, is slightly convex, and bears indistinct terrace based on cranidia similar to that of L. manitouensis but having
lines; rarely it is slightly longer and flatter. Anterior border posteriorly located eyes. The pygidium assigned by Raymond
furrow is shallow laterally and contains a deep pit at antero- (1924, P1. 14, fig. 16) is also similar to those from the Rabbit-
lateral comer of glabella forward of the anterior termination of kettle but appears to have a more tapered axis; it was subse-
axial furrow. Palpebral lobe is short and broad, located at gla- quently assigned by Shaw (1966, p. 1316) to Leiostegium
bellar mid-length; palpebral furrow is shallow. Anterior trace elongatum Raymond, 1937, which is characterized by a narrow
of facial suture is straight forward or slightly divergent; fixed border and deeper border furrow. The anterior border of
cheek is relatively narrow, about half the width of the glabella, Leiostegium mudgei Ross, 1958 from upper Ibexian pillow
and may bear a faint, oblique palpebral ridge. Posterior fixed basalts of Nevada is short and its glabella tapers, and it thus
cheek is moderately narrow and extends laterally a distance resembles some specimens from the Rabbitkettle. As Ross
about equal to two thirds the glabellar width. External surface (1970, p. 74) noted, it may be synonymous with Leiostegium
is smooth. saflordi (Billings, 1860) from the Uvis Conglomerate and
FIG. 6. (A-0) Leiostegiurn manitouensis Walcott, 1925. (A-C) Cranidium: dorsal, anterior, and oblique views, ROM 45748a, ~ 4 .
(D) Cranidium: dorsal view, ROM 49749a, x5. (E) Free cheek: dorso-lateral view, ROM 45750, x6. (F) Cranidium: dorsal view, ROM
. H) Cranidium: dorsal and oblique views, ROM 45752, x 5. (I, J) Latex cast of cranidium: dorsal and oblique views, ROM
4575 1, ~ 4 . 5 (G,
45753a, ~ 3(K, . L) Pygidium: dorsal and oblique views, ROM 45754a, ~ 4 (M,
. N) F'ygidium: dorsal and oblique views, ROM 45755, ~ 3 . 5 .
(0) Hypostome: ventral view, ROM 45756, x 2 . (P) Perischodory incornperturn Berg and Ross, 1959. Fragment of pygidium: dorsal view,
ROM 45753c, x 3.5. (Q) Gymnagnostus? mexicanus Robison and Pantoja-Alor, 1968. F'ygidium: dorsal view, ROM 45754b, X 16.5.
(R) Apatokephalus finalis (Walcott, 1884). Cranidium: dorsal view, ROM 45757, x 13.5. All specimens are from the type area of the Rabbit-
kettle Formation, Flat River, Northwest Territories.
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
For personal use only.
PRATT
1601
1602 CAN. J. EARTH SCI. VOL. 25,1988
also Shaw 1966, P1. 161, figs. 12, 13a, 14, 15), but that of (Lochman 1965).
L. rnudgei has a distinct flat or concave marginal flange, which
is only weakly expressed in L. saffordi. Leiostegiurn tyboensis Remarks
Ross, 1970 from the Goodwin Limestone, Nevada, has a The fragmentary pygidium collected from the Rabbitkettle
square glabella, a short, highly convex anterior border, and a shows the spine projecting from the lateral border, just behind
very wide pygidial border. Lloydia (Leiostegium) valrnyensis the anterior margin, which is characteristic of P. incornperturn.
Lochman, 1966 from upper Ibexian pillow basalts of Nevada In P. grandgei, the spines are extensions of the anterior border.
and the upper Ibexian of the subsurface of Montana is a It is possible that larger collections may show that this subtle
coarsely tuberculate form with wide and long palpebral lobes. distinction falls within the variability exhibited by one species,
Two hypostomes from the Rabbitkettle collection, one of in which case P. grandgei would take priority. The Rabbit-
which is figured (Fig. 60), are assigned to L. manitouensis kettle specimen lacks the shallow border furrow seen in the
rather than Kainella eleutherolfi because (i) there is a relative types of both these species, but this may be due to tectonic dis-
abundance of the two genera in the collection; (ii) none has yet tortion.
been described for Kainella: (iii) one assigned to L. (Evan- SUPERFAMILY Remopleuridacea Hawle and Corda, 1847
saspis) glabrurn Kobayashi, 1955 (Pl. 2, fig. 16) is similar; FAMILY Kainellidae Ulrich and Resser, 1930
(iv) the transverse anterior margin appears to conform better GENUS Kainella Walcott, 1925
with the more transverse anterior border of L. manitouensis
than the arcuate anterior border of Kainella. Type species
Hungaia billingsi Wallcot, 1913 from the Chushina Forma-
GENUS Perischodory Raymond, 1937 tion (= lower part of the Survey Peak Formation (Aitken and
Type species Norford 1967, p. 157)) of southeastern British Columbia, by
Perischodory grandgei Raymond, 1937 from the Highgate original designation.
Formation of Vermont, by original designation (see also Shaw Kainella eleutherolfi n. sp.
1966, P1. 161, figs. 3, 4). (Figs. 8A -8G, 9)
Diagnosis Diagnosis
A genus of Leiostegiidae with broad pygidium bearing an A species of Kainella with moderately divergent facial
FIG. 8. (A-G) Kainella eleutherolji n. sp. ( A , B) Cranidium: dorsal and oblique views, ROM 45757, ~ 4 (C, . D) Pygidium: dorsal and
oblique views, ROM 45760, ~ 3 . 5 (E)
. Free cheek: dorso-lateral view, ROM 45749b, ~ 3 . 5 (F)
. Pygidium: dorsal view, ROM 45753b, ~ 5 .
(G) Holotype pygidium: dorsal view, ROM 45748b, ~ 3 . 5 (H). Kainella stenorachis Kobayashi, 1953. Holotype pygidium: dorsal view, GSC
11931, x 2, McKay Group, Mount Goodsir, British Columbia. (I-K) Angelina hyeronimi (Kayser, 1876). Cranidium: dorsal and oblique views
and enlargement, ROM 45763, x 5 and x 9.2 (enlargement). (L -R) Micragnostus intermedius (Palmer, 1968). ( L , M) Cephalon: dorsal and
oblique views, ROM 45754c, x 8.8. (N) Cephalon: dorsal view, ROM 45759, x 13.8. ( 0 , P) Pygidium: dorsal and oblique views, ROM 45761,
X8.8. (Q, R) Pygidium: dorsal and oblique views, ROM 45762, x 12.5. All specimens, with the exception of (H), are from the type area of the
Rabbitkettle Formation, Flat River, Northwest Territories.
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
For personal use only.
'.,..
,'k.
,;
a',
1604 CAN. J. EARTH SCI. VOL. 25,1988
suture. Lateral glabellar furrows absent. Row of pits located quadrate rather than subrectangular, and the palpebral lobes
are smaller than those of the Rabbitkettle specimens. Kainella
For personal use only.
Dicellocephalus jnalis Walcott, 1884, p. 89, P1. 12, figs. fig. 35 (see for synonymy to date).
12, 12a. Angelina punctolineata, Harrington and Leanza, 1957,
Apatokephalus jnalis, Brogger, 1896, Figs. 6a, 6b. p. 101, figs. 3612~-3612e.
Diplapatokephalus jnalis, Raymond, 1937, p. 1086. Angelina punctolineata, Henningsmoen, 1957, p. 156.
Apatokephalusjnalis, Lochman, 1965, P1. 62, figs. 3 1, 32. Angelina steinmanni (Kayser, 1897) Henningsmoen, 1957,
p. 157.
Cotypes Angelina hyeronimi, Robison and Pantoja-Alor, 1968,
A cranidium and associated pygidium (USNM 24563) from p. 785, P1. 101, figs. 1-7.
the lower Pogonip Group, Eureka District, Nevada, illustrated Angelina hyeronimi, Pnbyl and VanCk, 1980, P1. 8,
by Walcott (1884, P1. 23, figs, 12, 12a) and reillustrated by figs. 4-6.
Lochman (1965, P1. 62, figs. 31, 32).
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
BILLINGS, E. 1860. On some new species of fossils from the lime- Bulletin 48.
stone near Point Ltvis opposite Quebec. Canadian Naturalist and
JAEKEL,0 . 1909. ~ b e die r Agnostiden. Zeitschrift der Deutschen
Geologist, 5: 301-323: ( ~ e G n t e d in Billings 1865, pp. geologishen Gesellschaft, 61: 380 -401.
395-418).
JELL,P. A. 1985. Tremadoc trilobites of the Digger Island Forma-
1865. Paleozoic fossils of Canada. Vol. I. Geological Survey tion, Waratah Bay, Victoria. Memoirs of the National Museum of
of Canada, Separate Report 43 1.
Victoria (Melbou.rne), No. 46, pp. 53 -88.
BLUSSON, S. L. 1968. Geology of tungsten deposits near the head-
KAYSER, E. 1876. Uber primordiale und untersilurische Fossilien aus
waters of Flat River, Yukon Territory and southwestern District of
der argentinischen Republik. Palaeontographica, Supplementum 3,
Mackenzie, Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 67-22.
Liefemng 2, Theil 11.
BR~~GGER, W. C. 1896. Uber die Verbreitung der Euloma-Niobe-
KOBAYASHI, T. 1935. On the Kainella fauna of the basal Ordovician
Fauna (der Ceratopygenkalkfauna) in Europa. Nyt Magazin for
age found in Argentina. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geo-
Naturvidenskaberne, 35: 164-240.
graphy, 12: 59-67.
CECILE,M. P. 1982. The lower Paleozoic Misty Creek embayment,
1936. Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from north-
Selwyn Basin, Yukon and Northwest Territories. Geological
western Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 10: 157- 167.
Survey of Canada, Bulletin 335.
1937. The Cambro-Ordovician shelly faunas of South
FLOWER,R. H. 1968. Some El Paso guide fossils. New Mexico
America. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of
Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Memoir 22.
Tokyo, Section 2: Geology, Mineralogy, Geography, Seismology,
FORTEY, R. A. 1980. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. III.
For personal use only.
4: 369-522.
Remaining trilobites of the Valhallfonna Formation. Norsk Polar- 1939. On the agnostids (part I). Journal of the Faculty of
institutt, Skrifter 171. Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section 2: Geology,
FORTEY,R. A,, LANDING,E., and SKEVINGTON, D. 1982. Cam- Mineralogy, Geography, Seismology, 5: 69 - 198.
brian-Ordovician boundary sections in the Cow Head Group, 1953. On the Kainellidae. Japanese Journal of Geology and
western Newfoundland. In The Cambrian-Ordovician boundary: Geography, 23: 37 -61.
sections, fossil distributions, and correlations. Edited by M. G. 1955. The Ordovician fossils from the McKay Group in
Bassett and W. T. Dean. National Museum of Wales, Cardiff, British Columbia, western Canada, with a note on the Early Ordo-
Wales, Geological Series, No. 3, pp. 95- 129. vician paleogeography. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Univer-
FREDERICKSON, E. A. 1949. Trilobite fauna of the Upper Cambrian sity of Tokyo, Section 2: Geology, Mineralogy, Geography,
Honey Creek Formation. Journal of Paleontology, 23: 34 1-363. Seismology, 9: 355 -493, pls. 1-9.
FRITZ,W. H. 1981. Two Cambrian stratigraphic sections, eastern 1960. The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of
Nahanni map area, Mackenzie Mountains, District of Mackenzie. South Korea, part VI. Paleontology V. Journal of the Faculty of
In Current research, part A. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper Science, University of Tokyo, Section 2: Geology, Mineralogy,
81-lA, pp. 145-155. Geography, Seismology, 12: 2 17-275.
1985. The basal contact of the Road River Group-a proposal LANDING, E., LUDVIGSEN, R., and VON BITTER,P. H. 1980. Upper
for its location in the type area and in other selected areas & the Cambrian to Lower Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy and
northern Canadian Cordillera. In Current research, part B. Geolog- biofacies, Rabbitkettle Formation, District of Mackenzie. Royal
ical Survey of Canada, Paper 85-lB, pp. 205 -215. Ontario Museum, Life Sciences Contributions, No. 126.
GABRIELSE, H., BLUSSON, S. L., and RODDICK, J. A. 1973. Geology LOCHMAN, C. 1964. Basal Ordovician faunas from the Williston
of Flat River, Glacier Lake, and Wrigley Lake map-areas, District Basin, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 38: 453 -476.
of Mackenzie and Yukon Temtory. Geological Survey of Canada, 1965. Lower Ordovician (Zone D) faunules from the Willis-
Memoir 366. ton Basin, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 39: 466-486.
GORDEY, S. P. 1979. Stratigraphy of southeastern Selwyn Basin in 1966. Lower Ordovician (Arenig) faunas from the Williston
the Summit Lake area, Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories. Basin, Montana and North Dakota. Journal of Paleontology, 40:
In Current research, part A. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 512-548.
79-lA, pp. 13-16. LUDVIGSEN, R. 1982a. Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilo-
1980. Stratigraphiccross-section, Selwyn Basin to Mackenzie bite biostratigraphy of the Rabbitkettle Formation, western District
Platform, Nahanni map area, Yukon Temtory and District of of Mackenzie. Royal Ontario Museum, Life Sciences Contribu-
Mackenzie. In Current research, part A. Geological Survey of tions, No. 134.
Canada, Paper 80-lA, pp. 353 -355. 1982b. The Cambrian -Ordovician boundary in the western
GORDEY,S. P., WOOD,D., and ANDERSON, R. G. 1981. Strati- District of Mackenzie, Canada. In The Cambrian-Ordovician
graphic framework of southeastern Selwyn Basin, Nahanni map boundary: sections, fossil distributions and correlations. Edited by
area, Yukon Temtory and District of Mackenzie. In Current M. G. Bassett and W. T. Dean. National Museum of Wales,
research, part A. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 81-IA, pp. Cardiff, Wales, Geological Series, No. 3, pp. 141- 153.
395 -398. MOORE,R. C., editor. 1959. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology.
HARRINGTON, H. J. 1937. On some Ordovician fossils from northern Part 0 . Arthropoda 1. Geological Society of America and Univer-
Argentina. Geological Magazine, 74: 97 - 124. sity of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS.
1938. Sobre las faunas del Ordoviciano inferior del norte NORTHAMERICAN COMMISSION ON STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE.
Argentino. Revista del Museo de La Plata, nueva sene, 4: 1983. North American stratigraphic code. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 67: 841 - 875. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia,
NEBEN,W., and KRUEGER, H. H. 1971. Fossilien ordovicischer Bulletin 153.
Geschiebe. Staringia, No. 1. SHERGOLD, J. H., and SDZUY,K. 1984. Cambrian and early Trema-
NORFORD, B. S., et al. 1970. Ordovician and Silurian faunas. In docian trilobites from Sultan Dag, central Turkey. Senckenbergiana
Geology and economic minerals of Canada. Edited by R. J. W. lethaea, 65: 51 - 135.
Douglas. Geological Survey of Canada, Economic Geology Report STITT,J. H. 1977. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites,
1, pp. 601-613. Wichita Mountains area, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey,
PALMER, A. R. 1968. Cambrian trilobites of east-central Alaska. Bulletin 124.
United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 559-B. THOMAS, A. T., OWENS,R. M., and RUSHTON, A. W. A. 1984. Tri-
PEK, I. 1977. Agnostid trilobites of the Central Bohemian Ordovi- lobites in British stratigraphy. Geological Society of London, Spe-
cian. Sbornik Geologicljch vM, Paleontologie, 19: 7-44. cial Report 16.
PENG S.-C. 1984. Cambrian-Ordovician boundary in the Cili - TIPNIS,R. S., CHATTERTON, B. D. E., and LUDVIGSEN, R. 1978.
Can. J. Earth Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of Saskatchewan on 05/07/14
Taoyuan border area, northwestern Hunan with descriptions of Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy of the southern District of
relative trilobites. In Stratigraphy and palaeontology of systemic Mackenzie, Canada. In Western and Arctic Canadian biostratig-
boundaries in China (1). Cambrian-Ordovician boundary. Com- raphy. Edited by C. R. Stelck and B. D. E. Chatterton. Geological
piled by Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Aca- Association of Canada, Special Paper 18, pp. 39 -91.
demia Sinica. Anhui Science and Technology Publishing House, VOGDES, A. W. 1890. A bibliography of Paleozoic Crustacea from
pp. 285-405. 1698 to 1889 including a list of North American species and a sys-
P ~ B Y LA.,
, and VANEK,J. 1980. Ordovician trilobites of Bolivia. tematic arrangement of genera. United States Geological Survey,
Rozpravy CeskoslsovenskC akademie vEd, R5da matematicljch a Bulletin 63.
piirodnich v8d, 90, No. 2. WALCOTT, C. D. 1884. Paleontology of the Eureka district. United
RASETTI,F. 1943. New Lower Ordovician trilobites from LCvis, States Geological Survey, Monograph 8.
Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 17: 101- 104. 1913. Cambrian formations of the Robson Peak district,
RAYMOND, P. E. 1913. A revision of the species which have been British Columbia and Alberta. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collec-
referred to the genus Bathyums. Geological Survey of Canada, tions, 57: 327-342.
Museum Bulletin 1, Part VIII, pp. 51 - 80. 1925. Cambrian geology and paleontology. Vol. 3. Cambrian
1924. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites and Ozarkian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections,
from Vermont. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural 75: 61 - 146.
History, 37: 389-466. WESTROP, S. R. 1986. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Sunwaptan
For personal use only.
1925. Some trilobites of the lower Middle Ordovician of Stage, southern Rocky Mountains, Alberta. Palaeontographica
eastern North America. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Canadiana, No. 3.
Zoology, No. 67. WHITTINGTON, H. B., et al. 1984. Definition of the Tremadoc Series
1937. Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician Trilobita and and the series of the Ordovician System in Britain. Geological
Ostracoda from Vermont. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Magazine, 121: 17-33.
America, 48: 1079- 1146. WILSON,J. L. 1954. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobites
ROBISON, R. A., and PANTOJA-ALOR, J. 1968. Tremadocian trilo- from the Marathon uplift, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 28:
bites from the Nochixtlin region, Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Pale- 249-285.
ontology, 42: 767 - 800. ZHOUZ.-Y. and ZHANG J.-L. 1978. Cambrian- Ordovician boundary
Ross, R. J. 1949. Stratigraphy and trilobite faunal zones of the of the Tangshan area with descriptions of the related trilobite fauna
Garden City Formation, northeastern Utah. American Journal of [in chines; with English summ-&y]. Acta palaeontologica sinica,
Science, 247: 472 -49 1. 17: 1-26.
1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in north-
eastern Utah, and its trilobite faunas. Bulletin of the Peabody
Museum of Natural History, No. 6.
1957. Ordovician fossils from wells in the Williston Basin,
Appendix
eastern Montana. United States Geological Survey, Bulletin
1021-M, pp. 439-510. TABLEAl. Counts of trilobite cranidia and pygidia in
1958. Trilobites in a pillow-lava of the Ordovician Valmy collection
Formation, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 32: 559-570.
1970. Ordovician brachiopods, trilobites, and stratigraphy in Taxon Cranidia Pygidia Total
eastern and central Nevada. United States Geological Survey, Pro-
fessional Paper 639. Micragnostus intermedius 64 42 106
Ross, R. J., et al. 1982. The Ordovician System in the United States. Leiostegium manitouensis 25 37 62
International Union of Geological Sciences, Publication 12. Kainella eleutheroljl 8 13 21
SHAW,A. B. 1966. Paleontology of northwestern Vermont, XII. Angelina hyeronimi 4 0 4
Fossils from the Ordovician Highgate Formation. Journal of Perischodory incompertum 0 1 1
Paleontology, 40: 1312- 1330. Apatokephalus jlnalis 1 0 1
SHERGOLD, J. H. 1975. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilo- Gymnagnostus? mexicanus 0 1 1
bites from the Burke River structural belt, western Queensland.