MAPÚA UNIVERSITY

School of Civil, Environmental, and Geological Engineering

658 Muralla St, Intramuros, Manila, 1002 Metro Manila,
Philippines

TITLE PAGE

TWO-STOREY BUILDING STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND

ANALYSIS USING STAAD.Pro

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in the course CE181/C1

(Technical Elective 2: Advanced Topics and Problems in Structural Engineering)

By:

CARRASCO, Niko
CONSIGNA, Kenth Paul Clifford
GABRIEL, Ethan Roy
JURIA, Jov Nicole
MANGUERRA, Clarence Jade

To:

Engr. Jerome Katigbak

January 20, 2020

STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLANS
FUNDATION PLAN
SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
ROOF BEAM FRAMING
ROOF FRAMING PLAN

GENERAL NOTES AND

SPECIFICATIONS
GENERAL NOTES
FOOTING SECTION DETAIL
SECOND FLOOR SLAB LAYOUT
SLAB SECTION & DETAILS AND SCHEDULE
FOOTING TIE BEAM SECTION AND DETAIL
SECOND FLOOR BEAM DETAIL
ROOF BEAM SECTION AND DETAIL
COLUMN SECTION, DETAIL AND SCHEDULE

LOAD DISTRIBUTION

DESIGN OF SLABS

STAAD MODEL (SI NIK MAKINO NA

BAHAL DITO)
PERSPECTIVE VIEW
FRONT VIEW
REAR VIEW
LEFT SIDE VIEW
RIGHT SIDE VIEW
TOP VIEW
GEOMETRY
POSTPROCESSING
FOOTING
FOOTING TIE BEAM
2ND FLOOR BEAM
ROOF BEAM
COLUMNS

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND GIRDERS

BEAM CALCULATIONS

Checking for adequacy of the most critical beam, Beam no. 42:

Assume yielding, (𝑓𝑠 > 𝑓𝑦 ):

𝐶=𝑇
0.85𝑓𝑐′ 𝑎𝑏 = 𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦
 𝜋
0.85(21)(𝑎)(200) = (16)2 (3)(414)
4
𝑎 = 69.95 𝑚𝑚

Solving for 𝑓𝑠 :
600(𝑑 − 𝑐) 1 𝑎 69.95
𝑓𝑠 = , 𝑑 = 400 − 40 − (16) = 352, 𝑐= = = 82.29
𝑐 2 𝛽1 0.85
600(352 − 82.29)
𝑓𝑠 =
82.29
𝑓𝑠 = 1966.43

Verify Assumption:
𝑓𝑠 > 𝑓𝑦

1966.43 > 414

∴ 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑦

Solve for 𝜀𝑡 :
𝑓𝑠 1966.43
𝜀𝑡 = = = 0.00983
𝐸𝑠 200 × 103
0.005 < 0.00983
∴ 𝑇𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝐹𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑒, 𝑈𝑠𝑒 ∅ = 0.90

Solve for Nominal and Design Strength:

𝑎
𝑀𝑛 = 𝐶 = 0.85𝑓𝑐′ 𝑎𝑏 (𝑑 − )
2
69.95
𝑀𝑛 = 0.85(21)(69.95)(200) (352 − )
2
𝑀𝑛 = 79167229.96 𝑁 − 𝑚𝑚 = 79.17 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
∅𝑀𝑛 = 0.90(79.17) = 71.25 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑀𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤ ∅𝑀𝑛
62.64 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 < 71.25 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
 ∴ 𝐴𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒!

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND GIRDERS

DESIGN OF COLUMNS

Checking adequacy of the most critical column, Beam no. 35:

Considering as a Pure Axially Loaded column:
∅ = 0.65, 𝛼 = 0.80
 𝐴𝑔 = 𝐻 2 = (300)2 = 90000 𝑚𝑚2
𝜋
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = (16)2 (12) = 768𝜋
4

∅𝑃𝑛 = ∅𝛼 [0.85𝑓′𝑐 (𝐴𝑔 − 𝐴𝑠𝑡 ) + 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑓𝑦 ]

∅𝑃𝑛 = 0.65(0.8)[0.85(21)(90000 − 768𝜋) + 768𝜋(414)]

∅𝑃𝑛 = 1332400.27 𝑁 = 1332.4 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤ ∅𝑃𝑛

106.88 𝑘𝑁 < 1332.4 𝑘𝑁

∴ 𝐴𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒!