Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The projects are sent by the administrative departments for approval to the PDWP
1
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development
Serviceability Expertise
Effectiveness Impartiality
Humanness
Functional Dysfunctional
Dynamic Adaptation Insularity (excessive
(change in the internal insulation from the
dynamics of the environment, resulting
Insulation
organization according in unresponsiveness)
to the needs of the
environment)
Input/Output Smoothing Imbalance
Smoothing (smooth (lack of flexibility in
functioning of changing output quality
Regulation organization, but not too or quantity)
much reliance on
material or procedural
hoarding)
Bhutto Era: Urban – Rural divide was kept intact and three tiers of local governments
were as follows:
Urban Rural
Zia Era: Local govt. still divided into Rural and Urban areas.
Rural: District Council Union Council (Tehsil level was abolished)
Urban: Metropolitan Corporation (Big Cities), Municipal Corporation Municipal
Committees Town Committees
Musharraf Era: Three Tiers – Zila Council, Tehsil Council, Union Council.
Zila Council headed by a Zila Nazim (Mayor) and the post of Deputy Commissioner
(DC) was abolished, replaced with a District Coordination Officer (DCO) who served
as the secretary of the Mayor.
Police was also taken outside the control of District Management, District Police
Officer (DPO) being the head of district police, who reported to the Mayor as well.
All Nazims of the Union Councils in the district were members of the Zila Council and
the Mayor was indirectly elected. All Nazims and Councilors of UCs were directly
elected. Seats were reserved for women and farmers.
Tehsil Nazim was elected in the same manner. All Vice Chairmen (Naib Nazims) of
UCs were members of the Tehsil Council.
At both levels, reserved seats for farmers, laborers and women, indirectly elected by
all the councilors.
Local Government post-2013: after devolution, provincial governments have the
authority to make local government systems.
Punjab – 5 years term; Sindh and Balochistan – 4 years terms; KPK – 3 years term.
Punjab: Direct election of Councilors and Chairmen/Vice-Chairmen.
Sindh: Indirect election of Chairmen and Vice Chairmen from directly elected
Councilors.
In both Sindh and Punjab, heads of the District Councils are elected by all the
members of the Council.
KPK: Direct election on all seats.
Issues and Challenges in Local Government:
Dependency on provincial governments for funds
No financial autonomy or authority to raise local taxes
Lack of capacity – no focus whatsoever on training of local representatives
Bureaucratic interventions – bureaucrats don’t like the idea of delegating local govt. to
elected representatives.
Governance and Administrative Reforms
Theoretical foundations of administrative reforms are found in different theories of
administration. E.g. Politics/Administration dichotomy proposed by Woodrow Wilson
would prescribe a certain set of reforms to be undertaken. On the other hand, Weber’s
Bureaucratic structure of administration demands other means of improving
administrative efficiency.
Such reforms mainly fall under the two domains:
Re-engineering the government (based on a structural theory of the government, that
is Public administration is a structure, like society)
Re-inventing the government (based on the governance point of view; has the
objective of changing the very rationale of public administration)
Re-engineering is related to updating the internal processes of the government so
that efficiency of the system may be improved. Optimization of processes through
more appropriate or liberal rules and regulations. The responsibilities of the
government remain more or less the same; however, the means to carry out those
may be improved by employing different approaches, e.g. NPM.
Re-inventing involves a renewed approach to as to what may be the objectives or the
mandate of public administration. E.g. an NPS model may be followed to make public
administration more democratic and responsive in character. Whether the government
should follow a laissez faire model or not is a question in this regard. A govt. supporting
a minimally regulated market will reform its administration accordingly.
Types of Administrative Reforms:
Privatization: such a reform would be motivated by a laissez faire philosophy. Most
services and operations of the government would be privatized in order to minimize
the costs of running the government as well as to achieve better efficiencies and
promote free market competition. E.g. contracting out of civil works; selling of govt.
enterprises to the private sector.
Regulation: The opposite of a free market. Even though markets are largely not
operated by the government itself, they are heavily supervised and controlled to
operate within a defined framework of rules, regulations and even price levels. (Price
controls of vegetables and fruits etc. is an example.)
Regulation may be done in three sectors: Economic, Social and Administrative. (Read:
OECD Whitepaper on Regulatory Reform and Innovation)
De-regulation: The opposite of regulation; minimal oversight of the government on
market phenomena. Government is largely limited to policy making, law and order and
dispensation of justice.
Decentralization: distribution of authority from one center to many. Delegation,
devolution and distribution are various ways of achieving decentralization. The
objective is to improve efficiency as well as to minimize abuse of too much power
concentration.
Partnerships and Collaboration: bringing of public and private sector together.
Mostly seen in instances when funds are provided by one sector and
execution/monitoring is done by the other.
Business Re-engineering: pertains to revising and updating the processes through
which administrative decisions are made, according to the demands of the time and
the problem involved. May include NPM practices like incentives and efficiency as well
as practices like Total Quality Management (TQM) and Micro-management.
Administrative Reform in Pakistan: Privatization, introduction of local governments,
and establishment of authorities and public sector companies have been the most
popular administrative reforms in Pakistan.
However, one very fundamental way in which the administrative structure was
reformed was incorporation of Separation of Powers in the Constitution, which:
Achieved fixation of responsibility
Is sort of a delegation of state authority to different organs of the state
Civil Service Reforms were last done in 1973 by Bhutto. No substantial changes in the
civil service have been made since.
Public Administration Accountability and Control
Public accountability has two facets: answerability and sanction.
Answerability is giving of answer, explanation and justification of one’s actions.
Sanction comes into play when the accountable one is negligent or deviant.
Sanction takes two forms; remedy and punishment.
A citizen wronged by public servant can claim remedy. In a fair system, the delinquent
official also faces punishment for wrong action. The punishment can again be
departmental as well as criminal.
Bureaucratic responsiveness is a good measure or motivator of internal
accountability of bureaucracy, and ensures that administration is responsive to the
demands of the people.
A closely linked concept is that of Representative Bureaucracy: requires that social
groups should have representation in administration.
Accountability and Control: Can be either Internal and/or External. Usually by
internal accountability is meant Control.
Internal: Rules, regulations, Office procedures, supervision by political bosses.
External: Laws, Audit (Financial and Performance), Administrative Tribunals,
Ombudsman
Institutional Framework for Accountability:
Legislative: inasmuch as it makes laws and empowers the executive to make rules
and regulations, it can legislate to exercise its control on administration. Also, political
executive is a part of the legislative, so the former is answerable in the parliament to
the latter.
Executive: Political executive is the head of the administration and serves as the first
check; also upholds the principle of democratic accountability of the Civil Servants.
Judicial: starting from the constitution to executive rules and regulations, finality of
interpretation lies with the judiciary. If there has been an alleged misinterpretation or
mala fide implementation of rules, judiciary can rectify it by its judgments.
Role of Civil Society: spreading awareness; spearheading movements for fairness,
justice and transparency; inculcating respect for law in the people; identifying and
indicating flaws in the system as well as administrative practices; forming public
opinion.
The Situation in Pakistan: Internal and External Audits; Performance Evaluation by
Reporting Officers; Administrative Tribunals (e.g. Service Tribunals like FST);
Ombudsman (deals with grievances of public against public administrators).
Role of Public Administration in Development
Development is a multi-dimensional process.
Contemporary notion of ‘Development’ is all encompassing – includes infrastructure
development, services mechanisms development, human development, gender
development, Urban/Rural development. Economic development, and even political
and social development.
The process of development also involves institutional and cultural changes – it
includes Public sector, private sector, community, family and individual development.
May be measured through indicators such as Human Development Index (HDI) which
combines different measures like literacy, life expectancy and per capita GDP.
Role of Administration in Development: both at the policy formulation level and
execution level.
Policy level deals with development objectives, which are in turn determined on the
basis of information received from officials working in the field, making it necessary to
obtain administrators’ input in policy making. Only civil servants aware of the various
development aspects would be able to suggest good policy.
At execution level, policies may cause inordinate suffering to some segments of the
society, especially poor people; these considerations are important for public
administrators so that flexibility of a policy can be employed to facilitate the public as
much as possible at the execution level.
Concept of Development Administration:
It has been argued that primary obstacles to development are Administrative and not
Economic.
Development Administration is an instrumental means for defining, consolidating, and
implementing national goals in developing countries.
It indicates an increased responsibility on the civil servants who are responsible for
implementing the development agenda of the political government; implies an
expansion of the government or a tightly supervised execution of development policy.
The concept of a Welfare State is closely related; as the sphere of action of the
government expands, more and more administrative machinery/authority is required
to be exercised.
Types of Development Administration: The concept of development administration
has two major aspects:
Development of administration: This means to develop administration. It involves
strengthening and improving administrative capabilities as a mean for achieving
development goals.
For example, the functions of improving the education of, and imparting training to, the
personal engaged in developmental goals.
Administration of Development: has a key role in implementing the development
programs, projects and policies.
Two main functions: one relates to realizing development goals and objectives and
second is to improving and enhancing capabilities of those involved in development
goals and objectives.
Functions of development administration may be divided into the following six
categories:
1. Formulation of development goals and policies
2. Programme formulation and program project management.
3. Re-organization of administrative structures and procedures.
4. Evaluation of results
5. Ensuring people’s participation in the development effort.
6. Promoting growth of social and political infrastructure.
Development administration focuses on all kinds of development, and its impacts
instead of just infra-structure.
It is directed at progress rather than achievement of static objectives; essentially
strategic in nature.
Aims to find innovative solutions; maximize human development impact of various
development projects.
On policy level, it leaves rooms for future adjustments; for tapping the potential that
will be created by the completion of projects.
Development Management is characterized by a liberal economy, minimal regulation
and reduction of government’s role to a mere facilitator. However, the overall objective
is still the same, i.e. a holistic design and execution of development agenda of a
country.
It is used interchangeably with development administration but implies lesser control
or involvement of the govt. in the market, or execution of the development agenda.
Changing Role of Public Administration in Development: with the rise of the
concept of the welfare state, govt.’s involvement in provision of at least basic services
has become more pronounced.
Increasing population of the world means tremendous pressure on the available
resources. The role of providing for basic amenities like food and shelter has therefore
fallen into the lap of the Government.
There is increasing public demand for development in the various sectors, requiring
the government to intervene continuously.
Only an amply trained and professional public administration can be able to carry out
these interventions.
Issues and Challenges of Public Administration in Pakistan:
1. Lack of professionalism and specialization.
2. Poor quality of public decision-making
3. Lack of effective policies, taking into account the proportionate interests of both
public and private entities;
4. Bureaucratic structure reminiscent of the Colonial era
5. Very little focus on appropriate/suitable professional training
6. Postings/appointments not commensurate with competency of the Civil Servants
7. Lack of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
8. Concentration of power in the bureaucracy; highly regulated markets.
9. Political interference and lack of constitutional safeguards for honest civil servants.
<><><><><><><>