Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Chapter 5
Profitability Analysis
5.1Concept of Profit
Profit is the blood of every type of business, without profit business is lifeless.
Most business enterprises exist with the object of earning profits. The task of
organization is maximization of profits. “Profit is the difference between total
revenues and total expenses over a period of time. Profit is the ultimate „Output‟ of a
company and it will have no future if it fails to make sufficient profits.”1
Profits are derived from two sources. Firstly, from operation and secondly from
various non-operating activities related to financing or disposal of assets. According
to Gibson and Boyer, “Profitability is the ability of the firm to generate earnings.”2
Profit is the engine that drives the business enterprise. The efficiency of a business
enterprise is measured by the profit earned. Profit is necessary for every company to
survive in long run. For accounting purposes, profit is the difference between total
income and total expenses. “The principal motivating factor behind conducting
business is profit. Perhaps most important reason for keeping accounts, as far as the
management of a business is concerned is the information contained in them provides
the means of measuring the progress of the business of testing its pulse and indicating
when and where remedial action, if necessary shall be taken.”3 The profit of a
business not only affects its owners but also affect the income tax authorities,
managers, directors etc. Therefore the question is: what is profit? Profit denotes the
surplus of income more than the expenditure during a particular time. It can also be
constructed to mean the excess of assets over liabilities and capital between two
periods.
From the accounting point of view, profit shows the excess of income over
expenses. In the words of F.P. Langley, “Profit is not the surplus of receipts over
payments, but the surplus of revenue over expenses. If total expenses are greater than
120
Profitability Analysis
the revenue there will be loss. By revenue is meant what the business earns in the
period under review, usually from the goods or services it has sold.”5
Continuity of business depends upon profit. The basic aim in free economy
system is to earn higher profits and in socialistic pattern of society to earn nominal
profit which is essential for existence of business enterprise. Profit is the yardstick for
assessing operational efficiency of an enterprise. The economy of a country can be a
beneficial for the society only when it is profit oriented.
The importance of profit is not related with a particular point of view. The
entrepreneur treats the profit as reward for his risk taking and adopting innovative
measures and implementation of diversified programmes. The investors and creditors
treat the profit as safety instrument against their investment. The government treats
the profit as basis for taxation and exercise price control in controlled economy
system. Hence the profit plays diversified role for all concerned.
121
Profitability Analysis
5.4Concept of Profitability
In view of the management the profitability is the money that is earned on the
investment capital. If the invested capital generates the profit, it can be treated as
profit. According to new market researches if the sale is increasing day by day and
payment of operating expenses made regularly than it can be termed as the efficiency
of management.
In view of shareholders the profit is the money (dividend) they earn after the
payments of tax and interest of the company. For getting this money they can analyse
their investment time to time and evaluate their invested capital growth regularly.
In view of the creditors, profit is that interest they received from their loans and
expenditure incurred by them. They also want to confirm the repayment of their loans
and get the interest regularly.
In view of the customers the profit is to get the best quality and goods at the
minimum price. They also need of new improved design of goods by which they can
live the luxurious life. Generally the customer purchases the standard quality of goods
in the name of enterprise like trademark and the service provided by the company
after sale services.
122
Profitability Analysis
5.5Importance of Profitability
The owners can measure the worth of their investments as ability to get a return.
The employees are concerned with their wage rates, bonus and other fringe benefits.
Proper measurement and analysis of profitability satisfies the employees for they are
getting at present. If there is some surplus in profitability the employees can justify
their new demands. The creditors can rely on profitability and treat their investment
safe.
123
Profitability Analysis
5.7Analysis of Profitability
Profitability analysis helps in critically analyzing and interpreting the current and
prospective earning capacity of business corporations. In the process of analysis and
interpretation certain methods are adopted to measure more systematically the trends
of business profits. Profitability analysis owing to its methods enables both official
and unofficial agencies to measure the trends of profits, to construct a number of
124
Profitability Analysis
To maximize the firm‟s profits there is a trade-off between return (profit) and risk.
If more risk exist in a decision, the greater the expected profit. Some persons invest in
bank deposits while others are willing to get more risk and invest in shares. Some
firms are more willing than other firms to accept the high risk in order to get high
potential profit. In making a decision the firm is faced with the trade-off – “risk vs.
return”
The firm is able to make sufficient profit on each element of sales. If there is no
sufficient margin of profit in sales then it is not easy for the firm to include its fixed
charges on debt and to earn a profit for shareholders. The ratios in this category are
Gross Profit Ratio, Operating Ratio, Operating Profit Ratio and Net Profit Ratio.
The profit is compared with the capital invested by owners and creditors. If the
firm cannot make an adequate profit on its asset, it may be misusing its assets. The
ratios in this category are return on capital employed, Return on proprietors fund and
Return on total assets.
125
Profitability Analysis
5.8Profitability Ratios
Profitability ratios are of two types: those showing profitability in relation to sales
and those showing profitability in relation to investments. The profitability ratios in
relation to sales are profit margin and expenses ratio. The ratios in relation to
investment can be measured by return on assets, return on capital employed and return
on shareholder‟s equity.
For testing the profitability position of selected aviation companies, the following
ratios have been calculated and to test the significance of difference between two
sample means independent sample t-test is calculated. To check whether the variances
are equal or not, Levene‟s test for equality of variance is used. ANOVA is used as an
extension of independent sample t-test to know which means have to significant
difference.
Companies.
Companies.
126
Profitability Analysis
The operating ratio measures the operational efficiency of the business enterprise.
It establishes the relationship between the cost of goods sold plus operating expenses
to net sales. The total operating expenses include the cost of goods sold,
administrative and general expenses, selling and distribution expenses but excluding
financial charges, income tax and non operating expenses. This ratio is related with
cost structure of the firm.
In interpreting the operating ratio full recognition must be given to the possibility
of variations in the expenses from the year to year or due to change in policies. A
higher operating ratio is regarded as unfavourable because a very low amount of
operating profit is left to meet interest and dividend etc. A low operating ratio is a real
test of operating efficiency of an enterprise. Guthman remarks, “The operating ratio
should be low enough to leave a fraction of the sale rupee sufficient to give a fair
return to the investor.”7
Operating Cost
Operating Ratio= x 100
Net Sales
Table 5.1
Operating Ratio of Public and Private Airline companies
(From 2007-08 to 2012-13)
(Percentage)
Year Public Company Private Companies
Air India Spice Jet Jet Airways
2007-08 130.91 157.76 105.96
2008-09 133.62 122.47 110.26
2009-10 126.49 96.56 97.91
2010-11 128.78 96.45 94.01
2011-12 125.26 114.20 104.57
2012-13 123.75 105.99 99.79
Mean 128.14 115.57 102.08
G. Mean 128.14 108.83
127
Profitability Analysis
Figure 5.1
Operating Ratio of Public and Private Airline Companies
450
400
350
300
100
50
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Table 5.1 demonstrates that operating ratio of public company Air India showed a
fluctuating trend. It was highest in 2008-09 (133.62%) and lowest in 2012-13
(123.75%). Its average ratio was 128.14%. Spice Jet showed decreasing trend in the
initial four years of the study period i.e. from 2007-08 to 2010-11 and in the year
2011-12 it showed a slight increase and in the year 2012-13 again it decrease. It was
highest in 2007-08 (157.76%) and lowest in 2010-11 (96.45%). Its average ratio was
115.57%. Jet Airways exhibited a fluctuating trend throughout the period of study. It
ranged from 110.26% (2008 -09) to 94.01% (2010-11). Its average ratio was
102.08%. The combined average operating ratio of private companies was 108.83%.
Comparing the average operating ratio of public and private companies it was
found that the ratio of public company (Air India) is higher than private companies.
Private companies show better position because of greater profitability and the public
company has very less profit margins for the purpose of payment of dividend and
creation of reserve. With the application of combined coefficient of variance Air India
128
Profitability Analysis
showed least variation in its operating cost. Air India is stable than Spice Jet and Jet
Airways.
Table 5.2
Table Showing Results of Independent Samples Test for Operating
Ratio
Significance Level: 5 Percent
Levene's
Test for
Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Std. Confidence
Sig. Mean Error Interval of the
(2- Differen Differ Difference
F Sig. T df tailed) ce ence Lower Upper
Equal
variances 5.280 .044 3.327 10 .008 19.3074 5.8038 6.3756 32.2393
assumed
Equal
variances
3.327 5.722 .017 19.3074 5.8038 4.9370 33.6779
not
assumed
Conclusion:
The significant value of Levene‟s test (0.044) is less than the 0.050; we assumed that
variances are not equal. An unequal variance t-test þ value 0.017 is less than α value
0.050, we reject the null hypothesis. We conclude that there is statistically significant
(Public = 128.135, Private = 108.27) and standard deviation (Public = 3.69 & Private
13.72).
129
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.3
Table Showing Results of One Way ANOVA for Operating Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Total 4929.464 17
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence
Mean Interval
(I) (J) Difference Std. Lower Upper
Company Company (I-J) Error Sig. Bound Bound
Air India Spice Jet 12.56333 8.01740 .290 -8.2616 33.3883
Airways
Spice Jet -13.48833 8.01740 .244 -34.3133 7.3366
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Company N 1 2
Jet Airways 6 102.0833
130
Profitability Analysis
Conclusion:
Since the significant þ value of one way ANOVA 0.018 ˂ 0.05 @ α 0.05, df (2, 15).
We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is significantly difference
between operating ratio of selected aviation companies. The Tukey post hoc test
indicates that operating ratio is differ between Air India & Jet Airways.
Operating profit ratio is a modified version of net profit to sales ratio. This ratio is
very important for growing business and reflects the efficiency. It is the yardstick of
operational efficiency of an enterprise. Kennedy remarks, “A high operating ratio is
the sign of good management.”8 It can also be obtained by subtracting operating ratio
from 100. This ratio is very useful for the purpose of internal analysis in detecting the
areas of difficulty. Operating profit ratio is measurement of the management
efficiency. It compares the quality of a company‟s activity to its competitors.
It establishes the relationship between operating profits and net sales. The
operating ratio is calculated by this formula:
131
Profitability Analysis
Operating Profit
Operating Profit Ratio= x 100
Net Sales
This ratio indicates the operational efficiency of the business. The higher the
operating profit ratio, the better would be the operational efficiency of the firm. A
higher operating profit ratio means that a firm has been able not only to increase its
sales but also been able to cut down its operating expense.
Table 5.4
Operating Profit Ratio of Public and Private Airline companies
(From 2007-08 to 2012-13)
(Percentage)
Year Public Company Private Companies
132
Profitability Analysis
Figure 5.2
Operating Profit Ratio of Public and Private Airline Companies
10
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
-10
-20
Air India
-30 Spice Jet
Jet Airways
-40
-50
-60
-70
Table 5.4 reveals that the operating profit ratio of public company, Air India showed
fluctuating trend. It was highest in 2012-13 (-23.75%) and lowest in 2008-09
(-33.62%). Its average profit was -28.14%. The operating ratio of private company,
Spice Jet reflects fluctuating trend during the study period i.e. from 2007-08 to
2012-13. It was highest in 2010-11 (3.55%) and lowest in 2007-08 (-57.76%). Its
average profit was -15.57%. Jet Airways also showed a fluctuating trend. It ranged
from 5.99% (2010-11) to -10.26% (2008 -09). Its average ratio was -2.08%. Its
average operating profit ratio of private companies was -8.83%.
Comparing the combined average operating profit ratio of both public and private
airline companies it is analyzed that the operating profit ratio of both the companies
are in negative but private companies (-8.83%) are better than the public company
(-28.14%). With the application of coefficient of variance it is found that there is
drastic difference between companies. Air India is much stable company with a
-13.15 percent C.V. and Jet Airways is the most unstable company, with a -285.10
percent C.V. in managing its operating profit.
133
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.5
Table Showing Results of Independent Samples Test for Operating
Profit Ratio
Significance Level: 5 Percent
Levene's
Test for
Equality
of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Std. Confidence
Sig. Mean Error Interval of the
(2- Differen Differ Difference
F Sig. T df tailed) ce ence Lower Upper
Equal
variances 5.28 .044 -3.327 10 .008 -19.307 5.803 -32.239 -6.375
assumed
Equal
variances
-3.327 5.72 .017 -19.307 5.803 -33.677 -4.937
not
assumed
Conclusion:
The significant value of Levene‟s test 0.044 is less than 0.050. We assumed that
variances are not equal. An unequal variance t-test þ value 0.017 is not more than
0.05, so we reject the H0. We conclude that there is significant difference between
operating profit ratio of selected companies with mean (Public = 28.135 & Private =
134
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.6
Table Showing Results of One Way ANOVA for Operating Profit
Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Sum of
Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 2036.924 2 1018.462
Within Groups 2892.540 15 192.836 5.281 .018
Total 4929.464 17
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence
Interval
Mean
(I) (J) Difference Std. Lower Upper
Company Company (I-J) Error Sig. Bound Bound
Air India Spice Jet -12.56333 8.01740 .290 -33.3883 8.2616
Jet
-26.05167* 8.01740 .014 -46.8766 -5.2267
Airways
Spice Jet Air India 12.56333 8.01740 .290 -8.2616 33.3883
Jet
-13.48833 8.01740 .244 -34.3133 7.3366
Airways
Jet Air India 26.05167* 8.01740 .014 5.2267 46.8766
Airways
Spice Jet 13.48833 8.01740 .244 -7.3366 34.3133
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Company N 1 2
Air India 6 -28.1350
Spice Jet 6 -15.5717 -15.5717
Jet Airways 6 -2.0833
Sig. .290 .244
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
135
Profitability Analysis
Conclusion:
Since the significant þ value of one way ANOVA 0.018 ˂ 0.05 @ α 0.05, df (2, 15).
We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is significantly difference
between operating profit ratio selected aviation companies. The Tukey post hoc test
indicates that operating profit ratio is differ between Jet Airways and Air India.
This ratio is very fruitful to the investor and the owner of the enterprise as it
reveals the overall profitability of the business concern. Net profit is the profit that
arrived after making all the adjustment or revenue and expenses, including non-
operating and abnormal item. This ratio is very helpful when comparing companies in
similar industries. The higher profit margin indicates a more profitable company.
High profit margin also indicates that the company has better control over its costs as
compared to its competitors. “Net profit ratio establishes a relationship between net
profit and sales indicates management‟s efficiency in manufacturing, administering
and selling the products. This ratio also indicates the enterprise capacity to withstand
adverse economic conditions.”9
136
Profitability Analysis
This ratio helps in determining the efficiency with which affairs of the business
are being managed. High net profit ratio means satisfactory returns to the owners. A
low net profit ratio would only indicate inadequate returns to the owners. The higher
the net profit is the more effective the company is at converting revenue into actual
profit.
The net profit ratio is determined by dividing the net profit by net sales.
Net Profit
Net Profit Ratio = x 100
Net Sales
Table 5.7
Net Profit Ratio of Public and Private Airline companies
(From 2007-08 to 2012-13)
(Percentage)
Year Public Company Private Companies
137
Profitability Analysis
Figure 5.3
Net Profit Ratio of Public and Private Airline Companies
40
30
20
10
0 Air India
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
-10 Spice Jet
-30
-40
-50
-60
Table 5.7 demonstrates that the net profit ratio of public company (Air India) and
private companies (Spice Jet, Jet Airways). Public company, Air India showed a
decreasing trend in the initial five years of study period i.e. from 2007-08 to 2011-12
and in the last year it showed major increase. It ranges from 34.25% (2012-13) to
-51.51% (2011-12). Its average ratio was -27.70%. The private company, Spice Jet
exhibited an increasing trend in the initial four year of study period i.e. from 2007-08
to 2010-11, it showed decrease in the year 2011-12 and again it showed a slight
increase in the year 2012-13. It was highest in 2010-11 (3.51%) and lowest in 2007-
08 (-49%). Its average ratio was -13.72%. Jet Airways showed fluctuating trend. It
was highest in 2011-12 (8.34%) and lowest in 2009-10 (-4.51%). Its average ratio was
-1.10%. The combined average net profit ratio of private companies was -7.41%.
Comparing the grand mean of public and private companies it is analysed that the
grand mean of private companies (-7.41%) is higher than the public company
(-27.70%). From the above table it is clear that the operating and non operating
expenses are high in public company. These expenses were not well managed by the
company and indicate that inefficient management of affairs of company. With
application of coefficient of variance it is found that the variation in net profit ratio of
Air India is less in comparison to Spice Jet and Jet Airways.
138
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.8
Table Showing Results of Independent Samples Test for Net Profit
Ratio
Significance Level: 5 Percent
Levene's
Test for
Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Std. Confidence
Sig. Mean Error Interval of the
(2- Differe Differ Difference
F Sig. T df tailed) nce ence Lower Upper
Equal
variances 4.249 0.066 -1.446 10 .179 -20.292 14.037 -51.569 10.984
assumed
Equal
variances
-1.446 5.96 0.199 -20.292 14.037 -54.696 14.111
not
assumed
Conclusion:
The significant þ value of Levene‟s test 0.066 is more than α value 0.050. We
assumed that the variances are equal. An equal variance t-test þ value 0.179 is greater
than 0.05; so we fail to reject null hypothesis. There is no significant difference
between net profit ratio of selected companies.
Table 5.9
Table Showing Results of One Way ANOVA for Net Profit Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 2356.260 2 1178.130
Within Groups 8339.730 15 555.982 2.119 .155
Total 10695.990 17
139
Profitability Analysis
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence
Mean Interval
Jet
-26.60000 13.61350 .158 -61.9607 8.7607
Airways
Jet
-5.65833 13.61350 .910 -41.0190 29.7023
Airways
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Company N 1
Sig. .158
140
Profitability Analysis
Conclusion:
Since the significant þ value of one way ANOVA 0.155 is more than 0.05. We fail to
reject the H0 and conclude that there is no significant difference between net profit
ratio of selected aviation companies.
Return on capital employed is calculated as profit before interest, tax and divided
by the difference between total assets and current liabilities. It is also considered as a
best measure of profitability in order to assess the overall performance of the
business. The term capital employed refers to the long-term funds supplied by the
creditors and owners of the firm. It is equal to long-term liabilities plus owner‟s
equity.
141
Profitability Analysis
The main aim of a firm is to earn profit. Return on capital employed is used to see
the value of the business gains from its assets and liabilities. According to Pizzey,
“ROCE employed as a measure for comparison, compares operating profit to capital
employed and acts as common denominator between firms when comparing the
efficiency of managements in using available resources.” 11
Return on capital employed is calculated by dividing the net before interest, tax
and dividend by net capital employed. It can be expressed by this formula, the ratio is:
Table 5.10
Return on Capital Employed of Public and Private Airline companies
(From 2007-08 to 2012-13)
(Percentage)
Year Public Company Private Companies
142
Profitability Analysis
Figure 5.4
Return on Capital Employed of Public and Private Airline companies
200
100
0
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-1 2011-12 2012-13
-100 Air India
-200 Spice Jet
-400
-500
-600
Table 5.10 reveals that the return on capital employed ratio. Air India registered a
fluctuating trend. It was highest in 2009-10 (-10.22%) and lowest in 2011-12
(-39.05%). Its average ratio was -20.55%. The private company Spice Jet showed a
fluctuating trend. It was highest in 2009-10 (88.19%) and lowest in 2008-09
(-540.94%). Its average ratio was -104.26%. Jet Airways also exhibited a fluctuating
trend. It ranged from 7.51% (2012-13) to -4.60% (2008-09). Its average ratio was
1.40%. The combined average ratio of private companies was -51.43%.
By comparing the grand means of return on capital employed ratio of public and
private airline companies, it is examined that the return on capital employed ratio of
public company (-20.55%) is higher than the private companies (-51.43%). This
indicates that the public company is comparatively more efficient in using funds
entrusted to them and therefore it can be stated that the economic condition of the
public company was comparatively much better. Public company was making optimal
utilisation of the assets of the company. It was using long term fund of owners and
lenders most efficiently. By comparing the co-efficient of variance it is found that
there is drastic difference between companies. Air India is stable company than Spice
Jet and Jet Airways.
143
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.11
Table Showing Results of Independent Sample Test for Return on
Capital Employed Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Levene's
Test for
Equality of
Equal
assumed
Equal
variances
0.654 5.10 0.542 30.883 47.237 -89.786 151.552
not
assumed
Conclusion:
The significant value of Levene‟s test 0.078 is not less than 0.050. We assumed that
variances are equal. An equal variance t-test þ value 0.528˃ 0.05, we fail to reject null
hypothesis. There is no statistically significant difference between return on capital
employed of selected companies with mean (Public = 20.546, Private = 51.430) and
standard deviation (Public =11.882, Private = 115.096).
144
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.12
Table Showing Results of One Way ANOVA for Return on
Capital Employed Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Total 294921.165 17
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence
Mean Interval
(I) (J) Difference Std. Lower Upper
Company Company (I-J) Error Sig. Bound Bound
Air India Spice Jet 83.71000 75.66273 .525 -112.8217 280.2417
Jet
-21.94333 75.66273 .955 -218.4750 174.5883
Airways
Spice Jet Air India -83.71000 75.66273 .525 -280.2417 112.8217
Jet
-105.65333 75.66273 .368 -302.1850 90.8783
Airways
Jet Airways Air India 21.94333 75.66273 .955 -174.5883 218.4750
Spice Jet 105.65333 75.66273 .368 -90.8783 302.1850
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Company N 1
Spice Jet 6 -104.2567
Air India 6 -20.5467
Jet Airways 6 1.3967
Sig. .368
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
145
Profitability Analysis
Conclusion:
Since the significant þ value of one way ANOVA 0.363 ˃ 0.05 @ α 0.05, df (2, 15).
We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no statistically
significant difference between return on capital employed of selected aviation
companies.
It is computed as the net profit after tax dividing by the total of shareholder‟s
fund. Shareholders fund include equity share capital, preference share capital, reserve
and surplus and fictitious assets is deducted from it.
Table 5.13
Return on Proprietors Fund of Public and Private Airline companies
(From 2007-08 to 2012-13)
(Percentage)
Year Public Company Private Companies
Air India Spice Jet Jet Airways
2007-08 -48.13 -2268.08 -5.56
2008-09 195.24 82.10 -12.74
2009-10 75.71 -17.96 -17.70
2010-11 52.88 31.50 0.37
2011-12 39.20 395.78 -93.52
2012-13 -34.45 85.14 203.95
Mean 46.74 -281.92 12.47
G. Mean 46.74 -134.73
S.D. 87.84 983.79 99.92
Comb. S.D. 87.84 714.55
C.V. 187.93 -348.96 801.28
G. Mean = Grand mean, SD= Standard Deviation, CV= Coefficient of variance.
Source: Annual Reports of the Public and Private Airline Companies under study.
Figure 5.5
Return on Proprietors Fund of Public and Private Airline Companies
100%
80%
60%
40%
-40%
-60%
-80%
-100%
Table 5.13 discloses the return on proprietor‟s fund of public and private airline
companies. The return on proprietor‟s fund ratio of public company, Air India showed
147
Profitability Analysis
an increasing trend in the initial two year and then it showed a decreasing trend. It
was highest in 2008-09 (195.24%) and lowest in 2007-08 (-48.13%). The average
return on proprietor‟s fund ratio was 46.74%. The private company, Spice Jet displays
the fluctuating trend. It ranges from 395.78% (2011-12) to -2268.08 (2007-08). Its
average ratio was -281.92%. Jet Airways showed the fluctuating trend. It ranges from
203.95% (2012-13) to -93.52% (2011-12). Its average ratio was 12.47%. The
combined grand mean of private companies was -134.73%.
Comparing the grand mean of public and private airlines, it is examined that the
mean of public airline company (46.74%) is higher than private companies
(-134.73%). It indicates that in public company the owner‟s funds were effectively
deployed by the companies, the returns to the owner‟s were good and the profit of
such companies was also good. With the comparison of variance it is observed that
the variance in Air India is least than Spice Jet and Jet Airways. It is concluded that
the Air India is better than Spice Jet and Jet Airways.
Table 5.14
Table Showing Results of Independent Sample Test for Return on
Proprietor’s Fund Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Levene's
Test for
Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
Std. 95% Confidence
Sig. Mean Error Interval of the
(2- Differen Differen Difference
F Sig. T df tailed) ce ce Lower Upper
Equal
variances
3.88 0.077 0.88 10 0.398 181.468 205.551 -276.528 639.464
assumed
Equal
variances
not 0.88 5.31 0.415 181.468 205.551 -337.674 700.611
assumed
148
Profitability Analysis
Conclusion:
The significant þ value of Levene‟s test for equality of variance 0.077 is more than α
value 0.050. We assumed that variances are equal. An equal variance t-test þ value
0.398˃ 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no significant difference
between return on proprietor‟s fund of selected companies.
Table 5.15
Table Showing Results of One Way ANOVA for Return on
Proprietor’s Fund Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Total 5319466.900 17
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence
Mean Interval
(I) (J) Difference Std. Lower Upper
Company Company (I-J) Error Sig. Bound Bound
Air India Spice Jet 328.66167 330.91635 .592 -530.8837 1188.2070
Jet
34.27500 330.91635 .994 -825.2704 893.8204
Airways
Jet
-294.38667 330.91635 .655 -1153.9320 565.1587
Airways
149
Profitability Analysis
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Company N 1
Spice Jet 6 -281.9200
Jet Airways 6 12.4667
Air India 6 46.7417
Sig. .592
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Conclusion:
Since the significant þ value of one way ANOVA 0.563 is more than 0.05 @ α 0.05,
df (2, 15). We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no
significantly difference between return on proprietor‟s fund of selected aviation
companies.
150
Profitability Analysis
Return on assets shows the income generated from invested capital. Return on
assets gives an idea as to how efficient administration is using its assets to generate
earnings. The assets of a company are included both debt and equity. Debt and equity
are used to fund the operations of an organization. The formula for return on assets
is:-
Earnings
Return on Total Assets = x 100
Total Assets
The term earnings include the net profit after tax but before interest. Total assets
include all net fixed assets, current assets and non-trading investments. Fictitious
assets are excluded but intangible assets are excluded only when they have no
realizable value. The higher the ratio, the better is the profit earning capacity of the
firm or vice versa.
Table 5.16
Return on Total Assets of Public and Private Airline companies
(From 2007-08 to 2012-13)
(Percentage)
Year Public Company Private Companies
151
Profitability Analysis
Figure 5.6
Return on Total Assets of Public and Private Airline Companies
20
10
-30
-40
-50
Table 5.16 displays the return on total assets of public and private airline companies.
Public company, Air India showed a fluctuating trend. It ranges from 11.67%
(2012-13) to -11.31% (2008-09). Its average ratio was -5.42%. Private company,
Spice Jet showed fluctuating trend. It was highest in 2010-11 (10.13%) and lowest in
2007-08 (-45.61%). The average ratio was -17.22%. Jet Airways exhibited a rising
trend till 2010-11 and in 2011-12 it showed a slight decrease and again it increased in
2012-13. It ranges from 5.02% (2010 -11) to -1.26% (2011-12). Its average ratio was
1.87%. The combined average return on total assets ratio of private companies was
(-7.68%).
152
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.17
Table Showing Results of Independent Sample Test for Return on
Total Assets Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Levene's
Test for
Equality of
95%
Std. Confidence
Equal
assumed
Equal
variances
0.346 8.489 0.738 2.2583 6.529 -12.650 17.166
not
assumed
Conclusion:
The significant value of Levene‟s test 0.055 is more than α level value 0.050. We
assumed variances are equal. An equal variance t-test þ value 0.737 is more than 0.05;
we fail to reject the H0. We conclude that there is no significant difference between
return on total assets of selected companies.
153
Profitability Analysis
Table 5.18
Table Showing Results of One Way ANOVA for Return on Total
Assets Ratio
Significance Level: 5 percent
Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Total 4771.575 17
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence
Mean Interval
Jet
-4.04000 9.37922 .903 -28.4022 20.3222
Airways
Jet
-15.84000 9.37922 .242 -40.2022 8.5222
Airways
Tukey HSDa
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Company N 1
Spice Jet 6 -17.2150
Air India 6 -5.4150
Jet Airways 6 -1.3750
Sig. .242
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
154
Profitability Analysis
Conclusion:
Since the significant þ value of one way ANOVA 0.246 ˃ 0.05 @ α 0.05, df (2, 15).
We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no significant
difference between return on total assets ratio of selected aviation companies.
155
Profitability Analysis
REFERENCES
1. Pandey I.M. (2001), Financial Management, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.,
New Delhi, p. 130
2. Gibson Charles H. and Boyer patriciya A. (1979), Financial Statement Analysis,
CBI Publishing Co. Inc., Boston, p. 189
3. Duck R.E.V. and Jorvis F.R.J.(1999), Management Accounting, George G. Harrap
& Company Ltd., New York, p. 98
4. Chakraborty H. (2001), Management Accountancy, Nababharat Publishers,
Kolkata, p. 585
5. F.P. Langley (1978), Introduction to Accounting for Business, Butter Worths,
London, p. 21.
6. Weston J.F. and Brigham E.F. (1968), “Essentials of Management Finance” New
York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., p. 47
7. Guthman H.B.(1976), Analysis of Financial Statement, Prentic Hall of India Pvt.
Ltd., New Delhi, p. 22
8. Kenedy Ralph D. & M. Stewan (1978), Financial statement, Richard D Irwin Inc.,
Homewood, p. 404
9. Pandey I.M, op. Cit., p. 132
10. Kishore Ravi M. (2005), “Cost Accounting and Financial Management” Taxman
Allied Service Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, p. 534
11. Pizzey Alan (2001), Accounting and Finance: A Firm Foundation, Continuum
books, London, p. 241.
156