Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
net/publication/261834711
CITATIONS READS
0 3,143
3 authors:
Shoukat Choudhury
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
77 PUBLICATIONS 1,075 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Accidental Ammonia Release Modeling from Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company (SAFCO), Saudi Arabia View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohammad Mazharul Islam on 11 September 2018.
A simplified simulation model of an ammonia production process has been developed using HYSYSTM.
Special attention has been given to the steady state modeling using proprietary equipment data of Haldor
Topsoe technology for ammonia process. Performance of this model has been compared with actual data
from Jamuna Fertilizer Company Ltd, a 1085 MTPD capacity ammonia plant in Bangladesh. Steady state
simulation results were within 4.4% variation from real plant data. Plant start up condition has also been
analyzed and explained. The secondary objective was to develop a dynamic model using appropriate sizing
and kinetic data. Two ratio controllers have been implemented to control the steam to carbon ratio and flow
rates of burner air to fuel natural gas ratio. Behavior of the model with change in natural gas pressure has
also been studied.
*
Corresponding Author: Mohammad Mazharul Islam
E-mail: shahed080305@gmail.com
reactor in series. The convection zone was modeled 4. STEADY-STATE SIMULATION
using a number of shell-and-tube heat exchangers.
The Steady-state simulation model has been
4.3 Modeling of Ammonia Synthesis Loop developed using the data of Jamuna Fertilizer
Ammonia synthesis loop contains a complex flow Company Ltd (JFCL), Bangladesh. During the
sheet with several recycle streams, energy startup of the plant, the process variables converge
integration and many different unit operations. The to steady state value from their initial transient
recycle streams introduce a feedback of material states.
and energy among units upstream and downstream.
It is difficult to simulate these recycle streams with Fig.1 shows the fluctuation of flue gas outlet
accurate convergence. A Logical operation temperature prior to attain a steady level. Higher
RECYCLE was used to ensure that convergence flue gas temperature arises from preheating the
can be achieved more consistently and quickly. reformer before the reforming reaction. Before the
reforming reaction starts, the heat carried by the
4.4 Appropriate Sizing Data for the Equipments flue gas is not transferred to the reformer tubes as
Sizing data for equipments and reactors are very heat of reaction and thereby the outlet temperature
crucial for dynamic simulation. To obtain sizing of this flue gas initially increases. After the
data the authors frequently contacted plant endothermic reforming reaction starts, the flue gas
personnel and experts. outlet temperature decreases to its steady-state
value.
4.5 Reaction Kinetics Data
Though all reactions in ammonia production Various operating parameters along with product
process are catalytically controlled but modeling specification data for real-life plant and HYSYS
requires kinetic, reactor and catalyst data which are simulation results are similar as shown in Fig.2.
difficult to obtain. A significant amount of effort The product ammonia composition is slightly less
was required to obtain these data from literature, than the real plant composition. Simplification of
lab experiments and real plant experiences. the synthesis loop in the HYSYS model might
cause more impurities in the product stream.
One should also consider the absence of a Purge unit. All the material and energy streams as well as
Gas Recovery Unit which is an important unit to control loop for two ratio controllers is shown.
recover ammonia and Hydrogen. Other variables
such as Flue gas outlet temperature, PRF outlet 6. RESPONSE OF THE MODEL
temperature, H2:N2 ratios are within the plant
steady-state operating range. 6.1 Effect of 20% reduction in NG pressure
Natural Gas is a main raw material and fuel of an
5. DYNAMIC SIMULATION ammonia plant. The change in NG pressure
adversely affects the plant performance with
The development of dynamic model using respect to capacity, stream compositions and steam
AspenTech HYSYS simulation software consists of requirement.
the following steps.
Reduction in NG pressure results in higher flow
1) Specifying dynamic characteristics of process rate of NG. This is because of HYSYS pressure-
equipment flow specification relationship. When using
2) Switching the simulation mode to dynamic mode pressure specifications, if there is no resistance in
3) Adding controllers to the simulation the processing equipment, HYSYS will increase the
4) Adding strip chart displays flow rapidly. This phenomenon increases
combustion in the combustor. Higher heat duty by
The dynamic model is used to study the effects of flue gas causes more preheating of PRF feed stream
disturbances that hamper the production and and higher heat consumption by PRF. This results
adversely affect the safety of the plant if corrective in higher conversion of methane and thus less
control action is not taken in time. To implement percentage of methane in PRF outlet as shown in
control strategy it is imperative to size control valve Fig.4.
properly and set appropriate controller parameters.
Inaccessibility of significant amount of real plant Reduction in NG pressure results in higher flow
data forced us to leave the control scheme in its rate of NG. This will consequently increase the
primary stage. steam flow rate to maintain steam to carbon ratio at
3.3. This is depicted in Fig.5.
Fig.3 shows the dynamic simulation model for the
plant up to the Low temperature Shift conversion
Fig.3: HYSYS dynamic model of Ammonia plant (up to Low Temperature Shift Converter)
Fig.4: Effect of NG pressure change on methane composition in SRF feed
8. REFERENCES
1. Aspen HYSYS, Dynamic Modeling.
Aspen Technology, Inc., Burlington,
Massachusetts, 2007.
2. Aspen HYSYS, Operations Guide. Aspen
Technology, Inc., Burlington,
Massachusetts, 2007.
3. Aspen HYSYS, Simulation Basis. Aspen
Technology, Inc., Burlington,
Massachusetts, 2007.
4. Aspen HYSYS, Tutorials and
Applications. Aspen Technology, Inc.,
Burlington, Massachusetts, 2007.
5. Aspen HYSYS, User’s Guide. Aspen
Technology, Inc., Burlington,
Massachusetts, 2007.
6. AspenTech HYSYS, Version 2006.5
(build 21.0.2.6924); Aspen Technology,
Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts, 2007.
7. Claus Hansen, Dynamic Simulation of
Compressor Control Systems , Aalborg
University Esbjerg, 2008
8. Slack, A. V., James, G. Russell, Ammonia,
Part II, Marcell Dekker Inc., 1974, pp 25-
71
9. Haldor Topsoe NH3 catalyst Manual, 1983