PILA, LIZA AINGELICA B.

SIR TALABIS

1-B NURSING

PROBLEM #1

1. Ho: There is no significant difference in the mean weight of tomatoes produced

under different soil condition.
H1: There is a significant difference in the mean weight of tomatoes produced under
different soil condition.
2. Level of significance: 0.05
3. Test statistics: F-test, One-way ANOVA
4. Reject Ho: If F> F critical
5. Computation: ANOVA TABLE
Source of SS df MS F P-value F crit
variation
Between Group 36648561 14 9162140 4.480982 0.824794 3.47807
Within Group 20446726 10 2044673

Total 57095287 14

6. Statistical Decision: Reject Ho since F> F critical

7. Interpretation/conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a
significant difference in the mean weight of tomatoes produced under different soil
condition.

Problem #2

1. Ho: There is no significant difference in the mean goals of the four different teams.
H1: There is a significant difference in the mean goals of the four different teams.
2. Level of Significance: 0.02
3. Test Statistics: F-test, One-way ANOVA
4. Reject Ho: If F> F critical
5. Computation: ANOVA TABLE
Source of SS df MS F P-value F crit
variation
Between Group 25.75 3 8.583333 10.40404 0.000485 4.360943
Within Group 13.2 16 0.825

Total 38.95 19
6. Statistical Decision: Reject Ho since F> F critical
7. Interpretation/ Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a
significant difference in the mean goals of the four different teams.
Problem #3

1. Ho. 1: There is no significant difference on Factor A.

H1.1: At least one of the Factors in A is different.
Ho.2: There is no significant difference on Factor B.
H1.2: At least one of the Factors in B is different.
Ho.3: There is no interaction between Factor A and Factor B.
H1.3: At least one interaction exists.
2. Level of Significance: 0.01
3. Test Statistics: F-Test, Two-way ANOVA With Replication
4. Reject Ho: If F> F critical
5. Computation: ANOVA TABLE

Source of SS df MS F P-value F critical

Variation
Sample 240 1 240 26.66667 3.58E-06 7.128819
Columns 2080 2 1040 115.5556 3.08E-20 5.021217
Interaction 280 2 140 15.55556 4.62E-06 5.021217
Within 486 54 9

Total 3086 59

6. Statistical Decision: Reject Ho.1 since F > F critical

Reject Ho.2 since F > F critical
Reject Ho.3 since F > F critical
7. Interpretation/ Conclusion: there is sufficient evidence to conclude that at least one
interaction exists.

Problem #4

1. Ho.1: Nine different students have the same mean score.

H1.1: At least one in nine students has the same mean score.
Ho.2: Four different subjects have the same mean score.
H1.2: At least one of the four subjects has the same mean score.
2. Level of Significance: 0.02
3. Test Statistics: F-Test, Two-way ANOVA Without Replication
4. Reject Ho: If F> F critical
5. Computation: ANOVA TABLE
 Source of SS Df MS F P-value Fcritical
Variation
Rows 868.556 8 108.569 1.73364 0.14165 2.91858
Columns 1510.75 3 503.583 8.04125 0.0007 3.95778
Error 1503 24 62.625

Total 3882.31 35

6. Statistical Decision: Fail to reject Ho.1 since F > F critical

Reject Ho.2 since F > F critical
7. Interpretation/ Conclusion:
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that at least one in nine students has the
same mean score.
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that at least one of the four subjects has the
same mean score
 ROSEMARIE RIZZO PARSE:
HUMAN BECOMING

PERSON HEALTH ENVIRONMENT NURSING

Open being -open process

who is more of being and
Everything in -basic science
than and becoming
the person and -practicing of
different from - involves
his experiences performing art
the sum of synthesis of
parts values

MEANING RHYTHMICITY
-imaging and -configuring TRANSCENDENCE
valuing of rhythmical -change and
language patterns possibility

IMAGING REVEALING- POWERING

-individual view as CONCEALING -conveys meaning
about struggles and
reality -disclosing-not
will to go on despite
disclosing hardship

ENABLING- ORIGINATING
VALUING -human
-confirming not LIMITING
-potentiating- uniqueness
confirming
restricting

LANGUAGING TRANSFORMING
CONNECTING-
-how humans -continuously
SEPARATING
symbolize and changing and shifting
-attending-
express their views people have in
distancing their lives
imaged realities