Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
International Journal of
Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrmms
Technical Note
a r t i c l e in fo
Article history:
Received 1 April 2008
Received in revised form
8 November 2008
Accepted 11 November 2008
Available online 24 December 2008
1365-1609/$ - see front matter & 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.11.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
644 J.-Q. Xiao et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 46 (2009) 643–648
0.95
0.9
0.85
Damage, D
p = 6, β= 1.0156
0.8
p = 5, β= 1.0313
0.75 p = 4, β= 1.0625
p = 3, β= 1.125
0.7
p = 2, β= 1.25
0.65
0.6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Relative cycle, n/N
Fig. 1. Stress–strain curve of rock subjected to fatigue loading.
Fig. 4. Influence of p to the inverted S-shaped curve.
0.95
0.9
α = 0.3, β = 1.178
0.85
Damage, D
α = 0.25, β = 1.0596
0.8
α = 2, β = 1.0156
0.75
α = 0.15, β = 1.0028
0.7
α = 0.1, β = 1.0002
0.65
0.6
Fig. 2. Development curve of axial irreversible deformation. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Relative cycle, n/N
cracks undergoes three phases during the process of fatigue By adjusting these four parameters, a perfect fitting curve
fracture too: crack initiation, stable propagation and unstable agreeable to experimental data can be obtained. Parameter D0 is
propagation corresponding to different development phases. called the fatigue initial damage, including the initial damage of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J.-Q. Xiao et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 46 (2009) 643–648 645
rock before loading and the damage caused by increasing the load Parameter b is called the instability factor. It is not an
to maximum stress first time. The fatigue failure curve is independent parameter, but is associated with p and a. When
controlled [3] by the complete stress–strain curve under static the x-axis represents relative cycle, the damage evolution curve
loading and the ultimate strain to failure is equal to that of post- goes through the point (1,1), so
peak corresponding to the maximum stress shown in Fig. 6.
1 D0 p
Accordingly, D0 can be obtained from complete stress–strain curve b¼ þ1 (2)
under static loading and is equal to the ratio of irreversible
a
deformation of pre-peak and that of post-peak corresponding to Meanwhile, there is another control point (b=2, D0 þ a) in the
the maximum stress. inverted S-shaped model.
The parameter p is called instability velocity factor. As shown Collection of all curves is called inverted S-shaped curves
in Fig. 4, p affects the convergence rate of inverted S-shaped curve. family (Fig. 7). Obviously, it includes all forms of damage
The larger is p, the more rapidly the curve converges. Because the development curves of rock. Therefore, an ideal result can be
stage of damage rate increases rapidly corresponding to the obtained by using a inverted S-shaped curve to represent the
accelerated phase of axial irreversible deformation development, process of damage evolution of rock.
i.e. unstable crack propagation stage, p is called the instability
velocity factor. Through the research on the character of inverted 3.3. Calculation of cumulative damage under multi-level loading
S-shaped curve, the suggested value of p ranges from 2 to 8.
The parameter a is called instability proportion factor (Fig. 5).
The inverted S-shaped nonlinear fatigue damage cumulative
a affects the proportion of the accelerated phase to whole fatigue model can be used to calculate the cumulative damage of rock
life. The larger is the a, the smaller is the proportion. The value of
under multi-level cyclic loading. For example, two kinds of three-
a must be taken between 0 and ð1 D0 Þ. level cyclic loadings are illustrated in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively.
The first is decreasing three-level cyclic loading, and the other
represents increasing one with 50 cycles at each level. The
calculation process and results are indicated in Figs. 10 and 11.
The marking paths in Figs. 10 and 11 include solid and dashed
lines. The solid lines represent nonlinear increases of fatigue
0.5
1 D0 = 0.4, p = 6, α = 0.10, β = 12.0282
0.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Logarithmic cycle, In (n)
646 J.-Q. Xiao et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 46 (2009) 643–648
4. Experimental study
Fig. 11. Evolution of fatigue damage under decreasing three-level loading. 4.2. Damage evolution of rock under constant amplitude cyclic
loading
damage and the dashed lines represent the damage equivalent Fig. 12 shows the damage evolution curve when the fatigue
principle. So, we can call the solid line the real path, and the damage is defined by the axial irreversible deformation. Obviously,
dashed line the virtual path. Both the real paths and virtual paths there is a three-phase development law and an initial damage of
constitute fatigue path. 0.55632 (Fig. 12). The fitting curve for experimental data with
When the stress level increases from 0.7 to 0.9, the fatigue the proposed inverted S-shaped model is also present in Fig. 12 and
damage accumulates along the path of ABCDEF (Fig. 10). The the fitted material parameters are D0 ¼ 0:55632, a ¼ 0:13051,
fatigue damage increases by 0.0322 during the first level cyclic b ¼ 1:01822, and p ¼ 3:32306. It is obvious that the inverted
loading, 0.0815 the second and 0.0893 the third. These values at S-shaped model can describe the damage evolution of rock well.
three levels are similar. If the initial damage being added into, the The nature of fatigue failure lies in the existence and
cumulative damage after the increasing three-level cyclic loading accumulation of plastic deformation. So, fatigue damage being
reaches 0.8031. defined by irreversible deformation seems reasonable, and in this
When the stress level decreases from 0.9 to 0.7, the fatigue case, the real development process of fatigue damage is modeled
damage accumulates along the path of ABCDEF shown in Fig. 11. with the proposed formula.
The fatigue damage increases by 0.2018 during the first level
cyclic loading, 0.0205 during the second, and 0.1363 during the 4.3. Fatigue life prediction of rock under variable amplitude loading
third. The increasing damage in the first level is much larger than
that at other two levels and the cumulative damage finally The method of determining the fatigue cumulative damage has
reaches 0.9587. been discussed in the former section, and an example for
It is obvious that the results of these two reverse loading estimating the fatigue life of rock subjected to variable amplitude
sequences are different. The increasing value under decreasing cyclic loading will be present here. The model sample of F1-24
three-level cyclic loading is 1.8 times of that under increasing was loaded with two stress levels. The maximum stress is
process. Damage accumulation is correlated with the loading 114.75 MPa at the first level, and 121.92 MPa at the second level.
sequence directly, which contributes to the ‘‘training’’ effect. The number of cycles imposed on the sample is 500 at the first
Furthermore, by using the concept of fatigue path, the inverted S- level and the sample is loaded to failure at the second level. The
ARTICLE IN PRESS
J.-Q. Xiao et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 46 (2009) 643–648 647
Table 1
Performance of granite material.
n b
¼b (4)
N D D0 P
þ1
a
Substituting the data listed in Table 1, and D1 , into that equation,
the number of cycles equivalent to the state of damage D1 is found
to be n ¼ 91:99 92.
Fig. 12. Fitting result of specimen F1-6. Step 4: Determination of the residual life and total life. Residual
life is 94 92 ¼ 2. The total life is 500 þ 2 ¼ 502. The tested
fatigue life of specimen F1-24 is 507. So, the relative error
between the tested value and prediction is only 1%.
5. Conclusions
648 J.-Q. Xiao et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 46 (2009) 643–648
[4] Jiang Y, Ge XR, Ren JX. Deformation rules and acoustic emission character- [9] Attewell PB, Farmer IW. Fatigue behaviour of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
istics of rocks in process of fatigue failure. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 2004; Geomech Abstr 1973;10(1):1–9.
23(11):1810–4. [10] Li G, Moelle KHR, Lewis JA. Fatigue crack growth in brittle sandstones. Int J
[5] Ren JX, Jiang Y, Ge XR. Test and analysis on rock fatigue life due to affecting Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1992;29(5):469–77.
factors under uniaxial compression. Chin J Geotech Eng 2005;27(11):1282–5. [11] Willenberga H, Evans KF, Eberhardt E, et al. Internal structure
[6] Lu YF, Zhang MY, Ge XR. Electron-microscopic analysis on marble specimens and deformation of an unstable crystalline rock mass above Randa
of static and cyclic loading tests. Rock Soil Mech 1990;11(4):75–80. (Switzerland): part II—three-dimensional deformation patterns. Eng Geol
[7] Ge XR, Lu YF. Study on fatigue failure and irreversible deformation of rock 2008, in press.
under cyclic loading. Chin J Geotech Eng 1992;14(3):56–60. [12] Xiao JQ, Ding DX, Xu G, et al. Waveform effect on quasi-dynamic loading
[8] Bagde MN, Petroš V. Fatigue properties of intact sandstone samples subjected to condition and the mechanical properties of brittle materials. Int J Rock Mech
dynamic uniaxial cyclical loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2005;42(2):237–50. Min Sci 2008;45(4):621–6.