NAT IONAL

Republic of the Philippines AN H

IG
SAN S EBAST
Department of Education

HS
CHOOL
Region VIII
Division of Samar SA
A

R
NS 1994
AM
EB AS TIA N, S
District of San Sebastian
SAN SEBASTIAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
San Sebastian, Samar

A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1

Name of Teacher: MA. JOAN L. HEMBRA Grade Level: Grade 11

Date: JANUARY 30, 2020 Time: 1:00 – 2:00/2:00 – 3:00

I. Objectives
A. Content Standards
The learner demonstrates understanding of ethical standards in writing related
literature.
B. Performance Standards
The learner is able to use sources according to ethical standards.
C. Learning Competencies
Follows ethical standards in writing related literature. CS_RS11-IIIf-j-5
1. Identify and analyze violations of research ethics; and
2. Provide suggestions to correct malpractices in research. CS_RS11-IIIf-j-5.1

II. Key Understanding/Content

A. Key Understanding
1. A well-conducted research adhering to the ethical principles protects the participants
and the researchers of the study.
2. Knowing different violations of research ethics promotes awareness and guidance
among researchers.
3. Research ethics provide guidelines for the responsible conduct of the research
particularly when human subject is involved.
B. Content
1. Ethical Principles of Conducting and Writing a Research
2. Importance of Ethical Standards in Conducting and Writing a Research
3. Violations of Research Ethics

III. Learning Resources

A. References
1. Teacher’s Guide pages N/A
2. Learner’s Material pages N/A
3. Textbook pages N/A
4. Additional Materials from Learning Resource Portal N/A
B. Other Learning Resources
1. Practical Research 1 by Esther L. Baraceros
2. Slide Deck from NTOT on School-Based Research for SHS

IV. Procedures
A. Preliminary Activities
Checking of Attendance
Review of concepts previously discussed
Sharing of insights about a quotation
B. Motivation
Show a picture of a social media post of a researcher together with the students
who are subjects of her research. The caption in the post says, “Feeling blessed to have
these kids as subjects for my research” #research #humansubjects #thesisit!
 Ask students the following questions:
1. What can you say about the picture?
2. Is there something wrong with the picture? In the caption?
3. What could be the violations committed by the researcher?
4. What do we call these violations in conducting a research and do you know that
there are other violations in conducting a research?

Process students’ responses.

C. Activity
Divide the participants into four groups. Assign a particular case to each group.
Let them analyze the case by answering the question that follows. Give them 5 minutes
to do this activity and 3 minutes to share their answers. Let them choose a
representative from the group to present their output.

Group 1: Ethic Simulation Case Number 1

Tony conducted an experiment that yielded findings that has low significance. He
was bothered because he followed the same pattern and methodology derived from four
other related studies that elicited highly significant results. To avoid disappointment, he
then modified some data in his research in order to come up with the same highly
significant results.
Guide Question:
What ethical dilemmas were implied in the situation?

Group 2: Ethic Simulation Case Number 2

Steve pursued a research on the learning style of children in conflict with the law.
On his first day of data collection, right upon his arrival at the DSWD institution, he
immediately gave the research participants survey questionnaires for them to answer.
For documentation, he even took pictures (groupies/selfies) along with the research
participants and upload it on social media.
Guide Question:
What ethical violations were evident in the situation?

Group 3: Ethic Simulation Case Number 3.

Ben was astonished due to the findings of his research involving the HIV patients.
In his excitement to report, he mentioned the name of his respondents (HIV patients)
among his colleagues. Days after, Ben received a notice that someone filed a case
against him.
Guide Question:
Why is it important not to mention the participants/respondents of the study?

Group 4: Ethic Simulation Case Number 4.

Professor Data has been a very productive scholar; he has been publishing in
major journals for many years. Because of his productivity, he is now known as one of
the thought leaders in your field of study. You have recently begun to work with
Professor Data and discovered that he has an interesting approach to research. He
typically begins by gathering and analyzing data (which may include using a student
data set) to “see if the data have anything to say.” You have found that Professor Data
 often manipulates the data and changes the dependent variable to ensure a statistically
significant result and increase the probability of a major publication.
Guide Questions:
1. Have you seen this type of research before?
2. Is Professor Data’s approach to scholarship ethical? Why/why not?

After all the presentations, process the activity by providing relevant feedbacks
and answer the following questions:
1. How do you find the activity?
2. What insights or realizations have you gained from the activity?
3. What similarities are present in all cases?
4. Do you know the specific violations in conducting a research evident in each case?

D. Analysis
Let the participants watch the video clip titled “Research Methods, An Introduction
to Ethical and Legal Issues.” Then process the video clip by asking the following
questions:
1. What have you learned from the video clip?
2. What realizations have you gained after watching the video clip?
3. Which of the concepts presented in the video clip are still unclear to you (discuss if
there’s any)?

E. Abstraction
Discuss the following concepts aided with a slide deck on Research Ethics:
1. What is Ethics?
Ethics came from the Greek word “Ethos” meaning character.
2. What are research misconducts?
Fabrication - making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
Falsification - manipulating research materials, or changing or omitting data or
results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research
record.
Plagiarism - the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or
words without giving appropriate credit.
3. What are research malpractices?
Misfeasance: Commission of a proper act in a wrongful or injurious manner or
the improper performance of an act that might have been performed lawfully.
Malfeasance: Commission of a wrongful or unlawful act.
Nonfeasance: The failure to perform an act that is part of one’s responsibility.
4. What are the 5 Principles for Research Ethics?
a. Discuss intellectual property
b. Be conscious of multiple roles
c. Follow informed consent roles
d. Respect confidentiality and privacy
e. Tap to ethics resources

F. Application
Ask students to do Activity 3 “Let’s Make It Right”. Let the students consider the
situations given in the previous activity.
1. If you were given the chance to conduct the research, how would you do it better?
2. Brainstorm with your groupmates in 5 minutes.
3. Write and post your answers in your respective wall for the Gallery Walk.

G. Generalization
1. What are the different violations in research ethics?
Answer: fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism
2. What can you do to avoid such violations?
Possible answer: Be honest in analyzing data and don’t be afraid to repeat
the process to find out what went wrong.
 H. Assessment
Do the “Gallery Walk”. Let the students choose one group’s output and answer
the following questions. Write your answer in a ¼ sheet of yellow paper.
1. What were the violations observed in the situation?
2. Were the suggestions to correct the malpractices and misconducts correct and
proper? Explain.
Scoring Rubrics for the Formative Test
Indicators Points

Give and explain answer clearly and comprehensively. 5

State the answer and gives a brief explanation. 4
State the answer only. 3
Try to answer and explain even if the answer is incorrect. 2
Give incorrect answer. 1

I. Additional Activities
Research on the importance of ethical standards in conducting research.

V. Remarks

VI. Reflection
A. No. of learners who earned 75% in the
formative assessment
B. No. of learners who require activities for
remediation
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No. of
learners who have caught up with the
lesson
D. No. of learners who continue to require
remediation
E. Which of my teaching strategies worked
well? Why did these work?
F. What difficulties did I encounter which my
supervisor can help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized materials did
I use/discover which I wish to share with
other teachers?
Prepared by:

MA. JOAN L. HEMBRA

MT-I/Subject Teacher

Process Observers:

ALADIN E. JAVIER, Ph.D. CONCEPCION P. MABINI

MT-I/Academic Dept. Head Secondary School Principal III

MARICEL O. BARDELAS, Ph.D.

District In-Charge