DRAFT

ISOTRON

ELECTRICAL STUDIES STAGE 2

PFV GUAÑIZUIL I
FECHA: 23-05-2018
INDEX

A1. INTRODUCTION. ......................................................................................................... 3

A2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 3

A2.1. Ubication and linkage to SADI ................................................................................. 3

A2.2. Modeling of the PFV ................................................................................................ 4
A3. DATA USED ............................................................................................................... 11

A4. STUDY SCENARIOS. ................................................................................................... 12

A5. OPERATION IN STATIONARY STATE .......................................................................... 15

DRAFT
A5.1. Operation of the network in N condition .............................................................. 15
A5.2. Operation in condition N-1 of the network .......................................................... 18
A5.3. Short Circuit ........................................................................................................... 20
A6. VOLTAGE CONTROL ANALYSIS – ANNEX 40. ............................................................ 21

A7. BLACK STARTING FACILITIES. .................................................................................... 24

A8. OPERATION IN TRANSITORY STATE. ......................................................................... 24

A8.1. Objective................................................................................................................ 24
A8.2. Dynamic modeling of the network and the PFV ................................................... 24
A8.3. Contingencies analyzed ......................................................................................... 25
A9. CONCLUSIONES Y OBSERVACIONES. ........................................................................ 28

APPENDIX I. National Bank of Parameters .................................................................... 30

APPENDIX II. Stationary State Flows .............................................................................. 37

APPENDIX III. Dynamic stability figures ......................................................................... 62

APPENDIX IV. Analysis RAG PFV Guañizuil I ................................................................... 84

A1. INTRODUCTION.
This document describes the activities carried out to form the Stage 2 Study of the Guañizuil I
Photovoltaic Plant of 80 MWn.

The plant is located in the Estancia Guañizuil of the Iglesia department.

The power generated by the PFV will be delivered in the 132 kV bar of the future Bauchaceta EETT
through a LAT 132 kV (in a first instance).

The results obtained from the steady state and transient studies are shown, which define the
transport limits or restrictions, in addition to the required automatisms to allow the continuity of
operation of the system before network contingencies.

A2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A2.1. Ubication and linkage to SADI

DRAFT
The Bauchaceta 132kV EETT is currently under construction, where the GUAÑIZUIL I PFV will be
connected through an input field at the 132 kV voltage level. The Baucheceta EETT will be linked to the
SADI through the real opening of the 132 kV Jáchal - Calingasta LAT.

The PFV link will be carried out through the construction of a 132 kV single-line, ALAC 300/50
mm2, between the exit bar of the new EETT Guañizuil 132/33 kV and the new 132 kV Baucheceta EETT.
This is the scenario analyzed, as requested by the client.
 Figure 1 shows the location of the new PFV GUAÑIZUIL I, establishing the connection point at 15,4
km southeast approximately, where the Bauchaceta EETT was located.

Figure 2 shows a unifilar diagram reduced to the point of connection to SADI, on the Energía San
Juan network. In the same it has been framed in Green the new Works that are part of the Project.

DRAFT
 Figure 1: Geographic location PFV GUAÑIZUIL I

DRAFT Figure 2: Unifilar diagram connection point to SADI PFV GUAÑIZUIL I

A2.2. Modeling of the PFV

The GUAÑIZUIL I PFV has been modeled in detail on the medium voltage distribution network,
considering a low voltage equivalent generator that delivers the power through a 0.48 / 33 kV - 5 MVA
transformer for each of the collector blocks of 33 kV enter on the main bar EETT Guañizuil, giving the
total power generated by the park through the corresponding feeders and injecting to the transmission
network via a transformer 85 MVA-132/33 kV. Figure 3 shows in detail the configuration of the internal
network arranged for the PFV Guañizuil I.

For the analyzed steady-state scenarios, the characteristics of the inverter that will be installed in
the park, SUN2000-42KTL manufactured by HUAWEI, which has an individual capacity of 42 nominal kW
(47 kW at cos = 1), have been taken into account. Allows to generate a reactive power ± Q = 21 kVAr,
as shown by the capacity diagram indicated in APPENDIX I. This characteristic allows the inverter to
operate in a range of the power factor of ± 0.9. In this way, equivalent 0.48 kV and 4.45 MW generators
are considered in each collector block, operating at the required power factor within the limit values of
± 0.9.

Regarding the modeling to represent the dynamic behavior of the plant, an equivalent machine
located in the 33 kV bar of the Guañizuil ET has been considered. The model provided by the
manufacturer of the inverters is HUAWEI HUA42KTL, with the following parameterization:

DRAFT
7635 'USRMDL' 1 'HUA42KTL' 1 1 5 68 5 42
1
0.0100
-0.6000

2.0000
1.0500
0.9000
0 1
0.0100 0.0100
0.8000 -0.8000

0.1760 1.2000
4
0.0100
1.0000
50.0000 50.5000 52.0000 -0.5000
0.0500
1200.0 1.0500 1200.0
1.0000 0.9500 1200.0
52.0000 15.0000 51.5000 25.0000
48.0000 15.0000 48.5000 25.0000
49.0000 100.0000 49.0000 100.0000
1
0.0100
1.0500
50.5000
1.1000
0.5000
52.5000
1.2500 1.2500
1.1000 0.9500
0.0500 0.5000
0.1200 1.0500
0.1200 0.8000
0.1000 52.5000
51.0000 100.0000 47.5000
0.6000
0.9000
2.0000
1200.0
0.9000
0.1000
0.0500
49.0000 100.0000 49.0000 100.0000
Where the values of the CONs and ICONs respond to the following description:

DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
 Figure 3: Internal network and connection of the PFV GUAÑIZUIL I

DRAFT
A3. DATA USED
The electrical studies for linking the Guañizuil I Solar Plant were carried out on the basis of the
load flows of the CAMMESA Database for the period 2017-2018, in which all the extensions of the SADI
electrical network are considered who have already approved the Access Request. The data provided by
ENERGIA SAN JUAN was also used for detailed modeling of the interest region, complementing the
information of the area with the DISTROCUYO 2017-2024 Reference Guide. The particular data provided
by the owner of the PFV was also taken into account.

In the analysis carried out, the LAT 132 kV Nueva San Juan - Rodeo was considered out of service,
since at the time of commissioning the PFV Guañizuil Itxz will not be in operation.

Regarding the project data specifically, an 85MVA 132/33 kV transformer was used to model the
EETT GUAÑIZUIL. The following table shows the electrical parameters of the mentioned transformer, in
addition to the transformers 0.48 / 33 kV - 5 MVA used for the modeling of the collector blocks of the

DRAFT
internal network, obtained from the data sheet provided by the manufacturer .

Reactance
Potency Voltage Group
Homopolar
1° Arr 2° Arr 1° Arr 2° Arr Group de X 1-2 Xo 1-2
[MVA] [MVA] kV kV Connection [%] [%]
85 85 132 33 Ynd1 12,5 12,5
5 5 33 0,48 Dy11 6,25 6,25

APPENDIX I complements the data of the power transformer and of the inverters used in the
Photovoltaic Plant Guañizuil I, enclosing the forms of the National Bank of Parameters.
 The connection line between the GUAÑIZUIL 132kV ET and the BAUCHAZETA 132kV ET has been
modeled considering a typical LAT 132 kV, single circuit, with ALAC 300/50 mm2 conductor, whose
parameters are described below:

Section Voltage Longitude R1 X1 B1 R0 X0 B0

2
mm kV km ohm/km ohm/km µs/km ohm/km ohm/km µs/km
300/50 132 15.4 0.1045 0.3981 2.95 0.1672 1.1119 1.83

Also shown below, the calculated data, from the information provided by the manufacturer, of the
drivers used in the modeling of the internal network:

Section Voltage kind R1 X1 B1 R0 X0 B0

2
mm kV Cable ohm/km ohm/km µs/km ohm/km ohm/km µs/km
Al 300 33 XLPE 0,101013 0,1174 618,23 0,8804 0,4627 618,23
Al 185 33 XLPE 0,16478 0,1261 546,5 1,1 0,801 546,5

DRAFT
A4. STUDY SCENARIOS.
The study scenarios analyzed for this project have been designed to evaluate the behavior of the
PFV in the estimated year of project entry, summer 2018/2019. In this way the operation of the plant is
considered for a seasonal summer period and during the rest of the time.

The scenarios contemplate the operation of the PFV for typical days of the week when the
demand is greatest and typical weekend days when demand is minimal. This is done using the data
provided by Energía San Juan (ESJ).

The purpose of the proposed analysis is to verify the capacity of the links in low demand and
maximum hydraulic dispatch scenarios, for which the area where the PFV is located becomes an
exporter of energy, identifying restrictions in the province's transport network. Of San Juan, if any.

Table 1 and Table 2 indicate the dispatches and demands respectively, used in the setting up of the
study scenarios in order to evaluate the impact of the operation of the new Guañizuil PFV I. They have
been defined according to the information provided. By ESJ and compiled from the CAMMESA Database.

Table 1: Province of San Juan typical dispatch

Maximum value Summer Dispatch Winter Dispatch

Source
[MW] [MW] [MW]

CCHH Caracoles + Punta Negra 188,2 150,57 80,0

CH Quebrada de Ullum 44 30,7 30,0

 Maximum value Summer Dispatch Winter Dispatch
Source
[MW] [MW] [MW]

CH Ullum I-II (La Olla) 45 26,74 40,0

CH Cuesta del Viento 9 8,07 4,0

CT Sarmiento 30 7,88 27,0

PFV Cañada Honda 7 7 7

PFV San Juan I 1,2 1,2 1,2

PFV Sarmiento 35 35 35,0

PFV Ullum I a IV 96 96 96,0

PFV Guañizuil 80 80 80,0

PFV Las Lomitas 2 2 2,0

TOTAL APORTES 809,4 445,16 401,0

DRAFT
Table 2: Typical reference demands – ESJ 2017

Demand Minimum demand

installed
Summer Rest summer
EETT Name Level (kV) power
2017/2018 03/12/2017 15:00
(MVA)
(MVA) hs
ET SAN JUAN 132/33/13,2 145 107,4 31,9
ET CENTRO 33/13,2 45 31,1 9,2
ET SARMIENTO 33/13,2 40 31,0 9,2
ET CAUCETE 132/33/13,2 75 49,9 14,8
ET VILLA KRAUSE 132/33/13,2 75 53,5 15,9
ET RAWSON 33/13,2 30 24,7 7,3
ET PUEYRREDON 132/33/13,2 75 40,3 12,0
ET SANTA LUCIA 33/13,2 20 14,2 4,2
ET SCOP 33/13,2 20 12,7 3,8
ET ACCESO SUR 33/13,2 15 11,3 3,4
ET SANTA MARIA DE ORO 33/13,2 20 16,2 4,8
ET PARQUE INDUSTRIAL 33/13,2 20 14,2 4,2
C.H. ULLUM (Hydroelectric San Juan) 13,2/13,2 9 6,1 1,8
ET ZONDA 33/13,2 10 5,2 1,6
ET SAN MARTIN 33/13,2 5 3,7 1,1
ET POCITO 33/13,2 15 13,7 4,1
ET 25 DE MAYO 33/13,2 10 7,6 2,2
ET LA LAJA 33/13,2 10 3,8 1,1
ET LA CHIMBERA 33/13,2 5 3,6 1,1
ET BOERO 33/13,2 10 6,1 1,8
ET LOS BERROS 33/13,2 10 5,2 1,5
ET ANGACO 33/13,2 10 5,4 1,6
ET ALBARDON 33/13,2 20 16,9 5,0
ET 9 DE JULIO 33/13,2 10 6,2 1,8
ET PEÑAFLOR 33/13,2 5 1,8 0,5
ET MEDIA AGUA 33/13,2 10 7,8 2,3
ET CALINGASTA VIEJA 33/13,2 5 0,9 0,3
ET BARREAL 33/13,2 5 1,5 0,4
ET TAMBERIAS 33/13,2 5 0,3 0,1
 Demand Minimum demand
installed
Summer Rest summer
EETT Name Level (kV) power
2017/2018 03/12/2017 15:00
(MVA)
(MVA) hs
ET RODEO 33,0 2,0 0,6
ET SAN AGUSTIN 33/13,2 10 1,2 0,4
ET CAVIC 132/33/13,2 90 77,9 23,1
ET PUNTA DE RIELES 132/33/13,2 75 61,2 18,2
CENTRAL QUEBRADA DE ULLUM 13,2/132
ET JACHAL 132/33/13,2 30 8,9 2,7
ET CAÑADA HONDA 132/33/13,2 30 26,7 7,9
ET RETAMITO 33/13,2 5 1,7 0,5
ET CAÑADITA 33/13,2 5 3,3 1,0
ET GUALCAMAYO 132/33/13,2 13 6,1 1,8
ET HUACO 132/33/13,2 10 0,4 0,1
C.H. CUESTA DEL VIENTO
ET CARPINTERIA 33/13,2 5 3,7 1,1
ET CALINGASTA NUEVA 132/33/13,2 30 8,0 2,4
ET CASA DE GOBIERNO 33/13,2 15 7,6 2,3
ET ISCHIGUALASTO 132/33/13,2 15 1,5 0,4
ET LA BEBIDA 132/33/13,2 30 8,6 2,6

DRAFT
ET TRINIDAD 132/33/13,2 45 16,8 5,0
ET BRASIL 33/13,2 20 11,1 3,3
ET RAWSON/POCITO 132/33/13,2 45 31,8 9,4
ET ALBARDÓN/CHIMBAS 132/33/13,2 45 41,0 12,2
ET BAUCHACETA 132/33/13,2 30 2,4 0,7

The defined scenarios do not take into account the operation of the LAT 132 kV Nueva San Juan -
Rodeo, given that at the time of the start-up planned for the PFV Guañizuil I, said line will not be in
operation.
A5. OPERATION IN STATIONARY STATE
In order to verify the correct functioning of the project under study and the transportation system
to which it is connected, these cases are analyzed for compliance with the restrictions of the electrical
system, with respect to the limits established on transmission lines and levels of transmission voltage
required for the normal operation of the system.

All the graphs of the resulting power flows for each analysis scenario are shown on APPENDIX II.

A5.1. Operation of the network in N condition

Scenarios in complete network condition (N scenarios) are analyzed with the proposed additions.

The limits of the voltages to be verified for 132 kV and 66 kV are:

- Minimum Voltage: 0.95 x Vn (-5%).

- Maximum Voltage: 1.05 x Vn (+5%).

DRAFT
The limits of the voltages to be verified for 33 kV are:

- Minimum Voltage: 0.93 x Vn (-7%).

- Maximum Voltage: 1.07 x Vn (+7%).

The above limits are assumed with the generators operating within 90% of their capacity curve,
considering also that the power transported by the interconnection lines remains below the maximum
admissible power.

In the operating scenarios of the electric system with a complete network, three main scenarios
are analyzed for each typical state of demand:

1. PFV GUAÑIZUIL I out of service.

2. PFV GUAÑIZUIL I generating at 50% of its nominal capacity (40 MW).

3. PFV GUAÑIZUIL I generating at maximum capacity (80 MW).

Prior to the analysis of the operation of the network with the PFV Guañizuil I in the defined
scenarios and analysis of the configuration of the network operated by ESJ is shown. This configuration
tends to minimize transport restrictions that may be caused in certain generation or demand situations.

Dispatch
Figure N°
Case Guañizuil + Observations
Appendix I
Ullum
PFV-RV19-BASE Current configuration of the network with
176 MW Figure 4 PFV Guañizuil at 100% generation. The lines
(maximum
 Dispatch
Figure N°
Case Guañizuil + Observations
Appendix I
Ullum
demand) between La Bebida and Nva San Juan are very
low loaded.
PFV-RV19-A1 LAT P. Rieles - San Juan F / S. The charges are
(maximum 176 MW Figure 5 distributed better by double bonds between
demand) P. Rieles - La Bebida - Nva San Juan.
Current configuration of the network with
PFV-MRV19-BASE PFV Guañizuil at 100% generation. LAT
(minimum 176 MW Figure 6 P.Rieles - San Juan loaded to 100% and low
demand) load of the double list between P. Rieles - La
Bebida - Nva San Juan.
PFV-MRV19-A1 LAT P. Rieles - San Juan F / S. The charges are
(minimum 176 MW Figure 7 distributed better by double bonds between
demand) P. Rieles - La Bebida - Nva San Juan.

DRAFT
This analysis is carried out to demonstrate that the operation of the electrical system covered by
ESJ improves upon the service output of the LAT 132 kV P. Rieles - San Juan, redistributing the load flows
on the adjacent lines that are in operation. In this way, it is possible to opt for a base configuration for
the studies of operation with this line out of service, modifying slightly the current configuration, and
considerably reducing transport restrictions that can be caused in scenarios of low demand, where
excess generation it is driven to the 220 kV and 500 kV transmission lines by means of the EETT San Juan
and Nueva San Juan, respectively.
 The cases analyzed and the results obtained in the electrical system are summarized below, based
on the scenarios PFV-RV19-A1 and PFV-MRV19-A1:

Dispatch Figure N°
Case Observations
PFV Appendix I
Operating scenario without generation in
Figure 8 the GUAÑIZUIL I PFV, but controlling
PFV-RV19-A1-G0 0 MW
Figure 8bis tension. Tension profile is observed within
the limits. No overloads of lines.
PFV generating at 50% and controlling
tension in bars of the ET. Obtaining levels of
Figure 9
PFV-RV19-A1-G50 40 MW tension in the area within admissible limits.
Figure 9bis There are no overloads associated with the
new generation.
PFV generating at 100% and controlling
tension. Profile of tensions in the area of
Figure 10
PFV-RV19-A1-G100 80 MW influence within permitted limits. There are
Figure 10bis no overloads associated with the new
generation.
Scenario of operation without generation in

DRAFT
the PFV GUAÑIZUIL I. The low demand of
Figure 11
PFV-MRV19-A1-G0 F/S the scenario requires the effective control
Figure 11bis of tension from the PFV, to avoid over
voltages in the area of influence.
PFV Guañizuil I generating at 50%, effective
control of tension in the Plant is required to
Figure 12 avoid high tensions in the area of influence.
PFV-MRV19-A1-G50 40 MW
Figure 12bis The load of the link La Bebida - Nueva San
Juan rises, to evacuate the excess
generation.
PFV Guañizuil I generating at 100% and
controlling voltage to avoid surges in the
PFV-MRV19-A1- Figure 13 area, with low demand. Increase the load by
80 MW
G100 Figure 13bis the link La Bebida - Nueva San Juan 132 kV,
to evacuate the excess generation to 500
kV.
 The operation of the electrical system with the alternative proposed in the configuration of the
network (LAT 132 kV Punta de Rieles - San Juan out of permanent service) allows a better distribution of
the load flows, decreasing the operation and transport restrictions mainly in the case of scenarios low
demand and maximum hydraulic generation dispatched with the operation of PFV Guañizuil I and Ullum
at 100% of its nominal power. It is also observed the need for tension control from PFV Guañizuil I
before these scenarios that considerably increase the tension in the bars of the area.

A5.2. Operation in condition N-1 of the network

In the analysis of the previous point, it has been determined that the scenario of greatest damage
to the system (during the operation of the PFV Guañizuil I and Ullum) is when the demand is low and the
maximum hydraulic dispatch. For the above, the scenario PFV-MRV19-A1-G100 must be used for the
analysis of the different operations with a series element out of service (N-1). In this way, the operation
and / or transport restrictions will be established in a more accurate manner before the dispatches of

DRAFT
the Solar Plants in Ullum and Guañizuil..

The results obtained for the N-1 cases agreed upon with ESJ and CAMMESA are summarized
below.:

i. Case 1. N-1 link at 132 kV La Bebida – Nueva San Juan

ii. Case 2. N-1 LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles (1 circuit – simple contingency)

iii. Case 3. N-1 LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardón/Chimbas (1 circuit – simple contingency)

iv. Case 4. N-1 LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra

v. Case 5. N-1 LEAT 500 kV Gran Mendoza – Nueva San Juan

 Figure N°
Case Description of case N-1 Observation
Appendix I
Overload in the lines that transport
Loss link La Bebida – Nueva power from EETT La Bebida to the EETT
01 Figure 14
San Juan 132kV San Juan. The dispatch of PFV Guañizuil
and Ullum must be restricted.
There are no restrictions on the electrical
Loss LAT La Bebida – P.
02 Figure 15 system that prevent the normal dispatch
Rieles 132kV
of PFV Guañizuil.
There are no restrictions on the electrical
Loss LAT La Bebida –
03 Figure 16 system that prevent the normal dispatch
Alb/Chimbas 132kV
of PFV Guañizuil.
There are no restrictions on the electrical
Loss LAT Cruz de Piedra –
04 Figure 17 system that prevent the normal dispatch
San Juan 132kV
of PFV Guañizuil.
There are no restrictions on the electrical
Loss LEAT Gran Mza. – Nva.
05 Figure 18 system that prevent the normal dispatch
San Juan 13E2kV
of PFV Guañizuil.

DRAFTIt is observed that for the study scenario (considered as the most demanding regarding transport)
the loss of 132 kV link between the EETT La Bebida and the EETT Nueva San Juan causes a restriction of
the dispatch in the Guañizuil I and Ullum Photovoltaic Plants as the only case. The restriction is
presented taking into account that the operating hours of both are identical, because they deliver
almost all of their generation on the bar of Punta de Rieles. From this EETT the energy is distributed to
the entire system.

The link whose service output causes restrictions in the dispatch of solar energy, is estimated to
have a very low failure rate compared to that of the airlines, since both are adjacent EETT (800mts). This
situation of condition N-1 requires a DAG / RAG analysis to be performed on the mentioned PFV in equal
proportions. The DAG / RAG analysis is attached in ANNEX IV of this document.
A5.3. Short Circuit
The aim of the short-circuit studies is to analyze the impact on the electrical system of the
modifications on the transport network or the addition of new electrical equipment.

The modeling used for the calculation corresponds to the 2017 CAMMESA database, with all the
sequence values corresponding to the elements of the electrical system.

The scenario used to evaluate whether the new works involve significant variations in the values
resulting from short circuit is the maximum generation in the area for the study period, that is, Rest
Summer 2019.

Although the technologies used by this type of generation mean that the PFV contributes almost
zero short-circuit currents to the faults originating in the area, the calculation is made considering that
the contribution by the PFV is not higher than the maximum load current generated at the time of

DRAFT
failure.

The values of short-circuit power resulting from the most relevant bars to the project are shown
below, which serve to verify breaking capacities in some cases and to dimension in others:

PFV GUAÑIZUIL I PFV GUAÑIZUIL I

80 MW 80 MW
allowable
capacity

Nº Out of service In Service

Estación kV
Barra
3F 1F 3F 1F
[MVA] [MVA] [MVA] [MVA]
7270 HUACO 132 5000 177 179 176 178
7268 BAUCHAZETA 132 5000 160 219 160 218
7243 JACHAL 132 5000 231 314 230 313
7267 ALB/CHIMBAS 132 5000 1720 2093 1707 2076
7253 CALINGASTA 132 5000 137 140 136 140
7269 ET GUAÑIZUIL 132 FUTURA 155 218 154 217
7635 PFV GUAÑIZUIL I 33 FUTURA 130 30 125 29

The values of capacity of interruption described above, used to verify admissible levels in the
switches, have been taken from the data provided by ENERGIA SAN JUAN and similar equipment existing
in the electrical system.

It is observed that the presence of the PFV GUAÑIZUIL I practically does not modify the short-
circuit powers in the geographical area to which it is linked.
A6. VOLTAGE CONTROL ANALYSIS – ANNEX 40.
Renewable energies with intermittent resources must comply with the obligations of delivery and
absorption of reactive power in such a way that at the point of connection to the network it exhibits a
power factor (cos φ) of 0.95, both inductive and capacitive. The variation of the generation of the PFV
due to changes in the solar radiation produces fluctuations in the power supplied to the network, and
with it variations in the voltage in the bars of the area of influence of the park. In this sense, the
maximum admissible variations in voltage values are established due to the variation of electrical
power.

To determine if a photovoltaic generation park requires voltage control devices, the classification
of the type of park should be evaluated before the total disconnection thereof, verifying the voltage
variation caused in the network.

DRAFT
The analysis must be carried out on a low short-circuit power stage and with the plant generating
100% of its capacity, delivering or absorbing the reactive energy necessary to place the voltage values
on the near-by bars within the limit band values normal operation. In this way it seeks to produce the
greatest impact on the tensions of the system before the disconnection of the Plant.

The classification of the type of park is given according to the admissible voltage variations
established in Annex 40. Table 3 shows the summary for each level of nominal operating voltage in the
Argentine electrical system:

Table 3: Classification type of Park - Annex 40

For the analysis of the impact caused by the untimely disconnection of PFV Guañizuil I, a scenario
of Rest Winter has been taken on a Sunday. The chosen scenario has a low demand and the dispatch of
hydraulic generation is minimal. With the established conditions are obtained necessary to assess the
variation of voltage caused by the disturbance.

Figure 19a shows the scenario described above, with PFV Guañizuil I delivering the maximum
generation and controlling voltage with values close to 1.05 pu in 132kV bars. In Figure 19b he same
scenario is shown without the PFV in operation.

The following variation is observed:

PFV GUAÑIZUIL I ET GUAÑIZUIL 132 kV

Estado P [MW] Q [MVAr] U [pu] U [%]
ON 80 -22.3 1.04 -
OFF 0 0 1.128 8.46

DRAFT
According to Table 3, the type of park resulting is type A, whose conclusion is that it requires joint
control of voltage.

To verify if the control exercised by the PFV itself is sufficient, and does not require additional
compensation elements, the behavior must be evaluated against "Fast" and "Frequent" variations.
Understanding as rapid those that occur in minutes (within 10 minutes) and frequent those that occur in
hours (within 1 hour) with a plant power variation of the order of 40% or 50%. 40% for PFV less than or
equal to 10MW and 50% for PFV greater than 10MW.

The evaluation scenario will be the most unfavorable (Lower short circuit power) and the following
deviations allowed in Annex 40 must be met:

In case the voltage variations are greater than those tolerated by Annex 40, the park will have a
large power generation for the network where it will be connected, needing countermeasures such as
increasing the P / Q capacity, reducing the installed power or incorporating elements of Additional
automatic tension control (SVC, shunt reactors, etc.).

In Figure 19a and Figure 20, the analysis scenario is shown with the Plant generating 100% and
50% of its capacity, respectively. This determines a variation in the 132 kV node of the Guañizuil ET of
0.1%, well below the tolerance limit value previously indicated of 2%.

This indicates that the joint control exercised by the PFV is self-sufficient and does not require
additional tension control elements. The following table summarizes the results:

PFV GUAÑIZUIL I ET GUAÑIZUIL 132 kV

Estado P [MW] Q [MVAr] U [pu] U [%]
ON 80 -22.3 1.04 -
ON 40 -25.4 1.039 0.1

DRAFT
A7. BLACK STARTING FACILITIES.
Due to the type of installation referred by a Photovoltaic Plant, no additional equipment is
necessary to start it, after a collapse in the system. Therefore no equipment is required for black start.

A8. OPERATION IN TRANSITORY STATE.

A8.1. Objective
A dynamic stability study is carried out to determine if the new works and network configuration
lead to restrictions in the operation before transient conditions of simple faults.

In this way it is verified that the voltage values during and after the faults are within the limits
established for contingency operation. It is also evaluated that the frequency values achieved do not
cause disconnections of demand or generation in the area of influence.

DRAFT
In general, the dynamic performance criteria that are required are described below:

• Controlled frequency deviations within the limits of 50 + 3 / -2 Hz are permitted during the
electromechanical transient.
• The frequency must reach a stable final value within the band 50 ± 0.8 Hz within 30 s. of the
failure started.
• In bars of 220 kV and 132 kV, the voltage must enter the ± 10% band in a period of 30 s. since the
beginning of the disturbance.
• At no point in the system, the voltage can remain below 0.7 pu. (except during the application of
the fault).
• At no point in the system, the voltage can remain below 0.8 pu. for a time greater than 1 s.
• In post-fault conditions, the voltage levels in all bars of the system should not exceed 1.2 p.u.

A8.2. Dynamic modeling of the network and the PFV

The modeling of the stabilizing resources that have been used for the dynamic simulations of the
SADI corresponds to those present in the Dynamic Base of CAMMESA. The base used is the last one
published that corresponds to the year 2017.

The PFV GUAÑIZUIL I has been modeled considering an equivalent generator that replaces all the
converter modules of the same, delivering the power generated in the corresponding bar of 33 kV of the
new ET GUAÑIZUIL.
 The equivalent machine has been dynamically represented through the manufacturer's model:
HUA42KTL; that takes into account the voltage control carried out at the connection point by the
Photovoltaic Plant, in addition to the different modes of operation and protection against voltage and
frequency fluctuations that may originate in the system.

The parameters used are those described in point A2.2 of this document.

A8.3. Contingencies analyzed

In order to dynamically verify the requirements of the operation against simple contingencies
originating in the network to which the project is linked, the analysis of the system has been determined
in conjunction with the operation of the PFV Guañizuil I.

The disturbances analyzed are described below:

I. Disconnection of the link between the 132 kV bars of the EETT Nueva San Juan and La

DRAFT
Bebida.

II. Successful single-phase reclosing (RME) of the LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles.

III. Single-phase reclosing unsuccessful (NEMR) of the LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles.
(With Clearance line)

IV. RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardón/Chimbas

V. RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardón/Chimbas

VI. RME LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra

VII. RMNE LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra

VIII. RME LAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mendoza

IX. RMNE LAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mendoza

X. RME LAT 132 kV Bauchaceta – Jáchal

XI. Untimely Disconnection PFV Guañizuil I

All the contingencies have been evaluated in a scenario of maximum generation and minimum
demand for the study period (Rest Summer 2018/2019), considering in addition to the PFV Guañizuil I 80
MW in service, the PFV Ullúm I - IV delivering 96 MW over the rail tip ET 132 kV. In this way the
maximum transfer is obtained by the lines under study that put in maximum demand the electricity
network during the transients caused.
The results obtained from each contingency under study are summarized in the following table:
Contingencies
Service Out link 132 kV La Bebida
– Nueva San Juan
DRAFT
RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta
de Rieles
RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida –
Punta de Rieles (Opening a single
circuit)
RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida –
Albardón/Chimbas
RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida –
Albardón/Chimbas (Aperture of
single line)
RME LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz
de Piedra
Figures
Observations
Appendix IV
This contingency overloads the links
that go towards the EETT San Juan
Figure 21 220/132 kV. DAG in Ullúm I-IV and
Figure 22 Guañizuil I to avoid service output of
LAT 132 kV Rawson / Pocito - V.
Figure 23
Krause. PFV remains in service
controlling tension.
The transient generated is quickly
damped. Both the electrical system
Figure 24 and the PFV tolerate without
Figure 25 problems the contingency, allowing
Figure 26 the normal operation within
optimum levels of operation.
The transient generated is quickly
damped. Both the electrical system
Figure 27 and the PFV tolerate the
Figure 28 disconnection carried out without
problems, allowing normal
Figure 29
operation within optimal operating
levels.
The transient generated is quickly
damped. Both the electrical system
Figure 30 and the PFV tolerate the
Figure 31 contingency without problems,
Figure 32 allowing normal operation within
optimum levels of operation.
The transient generated is quickly
damped. Both the electrical system
Figure 33 and the PFV tolerate without
Figure 34 problems the disconnection
Figure 35 affected, allowing normal operation
within optimum operating levels.
Figure 36 Faults 1F on this line are also
Figure 37 overcome successfully, avoiding the
Figure 38 disconnection of the PFV. The
system remains in operation within
 Figures
Contingencies Observations
Appendix IV
normal operating limits.

The loss of this link generates a

RMNE LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz
de Piedra
Figure 39 transient that is successfully
Figure 40 overcome, keeping the PFV and the
electrical system operating within
Figure 41
the limits of operation.

The transients originated are

RME LAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan –
Gran Mendoza
Figure 42 successfully overcome by the PFV
Figure 43 and the electrical system. The post-
fault operation is performed within
Figure 44
normal operating limits.

The clearance of this line is

successfully overcome by the system

DRAFT
Figure 45 given the low level of demand,
RMNE LAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan Figure 46 where the San Juan end is a power
– Gran Mendoza Figure 47 emitter. No lines or transformers are
Figure 48 overloaded. The voltage control in
the San Juan system is optimal.

This disturbance in the vicinity of the

RME LAT 132 kV Bauchaceta -
Jáchal
Figure 49 Guañizuil PFV shows that it does not
Figure 50 disconnect and that the LVRT
control works correctly during the
Figure 51
generated transient.

The disconnection of PFV Guañizuil I

untimely disconnection PFV
Guañizuil I
does not alter the normal
functioning of the system to which it
Figure 52 is connected, although there may be
Figure 53 high voltages in the Rodeo area, due
Figure 54 to the control of tension exerted by
the PFV and which is removed
untimely.
A9. CONCLUSIONES Y OBSERVACIONES.

 The results of the steady state analysis show that the power grid correctly absorbs the PFV
generation Guañizuil I, without overloading the lines or transformers during the normal operation
of the same. Except in some case N-1 that is proposed, the clearance of the PFV Guañizuil in
conjunction with the PFV Ullúm I-IV is restricted.

 It has been shown that the system is better balanced in the distribution of load flows through the
lines, if operated with the LAT 132 kV Punta de Rieles - San Juan out of service. This is visible in the
baseline scenario (minimum demand maximum hydraulic generation) where the reference LAT
begins with a load close to 100%, leaving the other new lines to the San Juan ET unloaded.

 An automatic generation reduction scheme has been defined that allows the continuity of the

DRAFT
operation of the electric system in the province of San Juan before the service outlet of the link
between the New San Juan 132 kV ET and the 132 kV La Bebida ET. This is the only severe case
identified that implies having this automatism. It is applicable to scenarios of minimum demand in
the network and the total dispatch of PFV in nominal conditions.

The scheme defines a RAG because it is important to control the tension in the northern area of San
Juan, for the considered demand scenario. Figure 23 shows the operation of the PFV before the
request of a RAG of 100%.

 Through the analysis of voltage control, following the guidelines of ANNEX 40, it has been shown
that PFV Guañizuil I is a Type A Park. Therefore, it requires joint control of tension in the link bar to
SADI. The voltage control can be exercised by the capacity of the inverters having ± 40 MVAr for the
voltage control according to the manufacturer's data sheets and the values reached in the steady-
state studies reported in this document. The latter indicates that no additional control elements are
required to exercise the joint tension control.

 The values resulting from the short-circuit powers with the presence of PFV Guañizuil I are slightly
modified, verifying that the capacities of the circuit breakers in the area absorb without problems
the values reached.

 The dynamic studies show the correct functioning of the dynamic model of the inverter delivered by
the manufacturer, exercising a correct tension control during the analyzed faults.
 Likewise, the perturbations analyzed show that in the most severe case (service exit of the link La
Bebida - Nueva San Juan 132 kV), where the generation reduction of the PFV are required, and the PFV
can reduce the generation by 100%. in service for voltage control in the area. The shot required to
reduce generation has been established at about 200 msec after the failure. This time should be
coordinated with the times resulting from the study of protections.

For the other disturbances analyzed, it is shown that the operation of PFV Guañizuil I is capable of
absorbing the transients caused, without affecting the normal operation of the system to which it is
linked.

DRAFT
APPENDIX I.
National Bank of Parameters

DRAFT
 Propietario

Fuente datos:
ELEMENTOS DEL MISMO TIPO (de
Nº DESCRIPCION UNIDADES
uno a seis)
1 Central PFV GUAÑIZUIL I

2 Nombre de Estación Transformadora ET GUAÑIZUIL I

3 Nº de inversores 1941

4 Marca del inversor HUAWEI

5 Modelo del inversor 42KTL

6 Potencia Aparente nominal kVA 47,0

7 Potencia Activa mínima técnica KW 0,025

Valor predeterminado 47 KW; 42 KW opcional en
8 Potencia Activa máxima técnica KW
la configuración
480, 3W +
9 Tensión nominal alterna V
PE

DRAFT
10 Máxima tensión alterna de operación V 624

11 Mínima tensión alterna de operación V 124

12 Corriente nominal alterna A 50,6

13 Frecuencia nominal alterna Hz 50

14 Máxima frecuencia alterna de operación Hz 55

15 Mínima frecuencia alterna de operación Hz 45

16 Diagrama P-Q del inversor (adjunta) SI (Graph 1)

Potencia Reactiva mínima a potencia activa
17 MVAr 0,0
nominal
Potencia Reactiva máxima a potencia
18 MVAr 0,0211
activa nominal
0,8 LG-0,8
19 Factor de potencia nominal
LD
20 Funcionamiento de noche SI/NO SI
391 Var (La potencia reactiva es un valor fijo que
Potencia Reactiva mínima a potencia activa está determinado por la capacitancia de
21 MVAr
nula (de noche) inversores, cual no suele variar entre máxima y
mínima)
Potencia Reactiva máxima a potencia
22 MVAr Ver Graph 1
activa nula (de noche)
23 Curva LVRT (adjunta) SI (Graph 2)
% de I
24 Aporte al cortocircuito trifásico 111,86
nominal
% de I
25 Aporte al cortocircuito monofásico 111,86
nominal
26 Distorsión armónica total % < 3%
Diagramas de bloques de los sistemas de
27 (1) Ver Graph 3
control del inversor (adjunta)
 Propietario

Fuente datos:

28 Protección anti-isla SI/NO SI

Tiempo máximo de actuación de la
29 s 2,0
protección anti-isla
30 Fecha de entrada en servicio -

31 Fecha de la información Abril 2018

DRAFT
BANCO NACIONAL DE PARAMETROS -Planilla de recolección de datos de: TRANSFORMADOR
Empresa:
ELEMENTOS DEL MISMO TIPO (de
Nº DESCRIPCION UNIDADES
uno a seis)
1 Identificación del elemento (lugar de ubicación, Nº del elemento) T1
Clasificación: (1: transformador -2: autotransformador -3:
2 1
transformador de puesta a tierra)
3 Tipo: (1: trifásico -2: banco) 1
4 Número de columnas del núcleo 3
5 Número de bobinados por fase 2
6 Diagrama de conexiones de los arrollamientos (adjuntar)
7 Denominación del grupo de conexionado de arrollamientos YNd11
8 Norma utilizada para el ítem 7 IRAM/IEC
9 Tensión nominal del arrollamiento de mayor tensión (1) kV 138
10 Tensión nominal del arrollamiento de tensión media (2) kV -
11 Tensión nominal del arrollamiento de menor tensión (3) kV 33
12 Potencia nominal del arrollamiento de mayor tensión (1) MVA 85
13 Potencia nominal del arrollamiento de tensión media (2) MVA -
14 Potencia nominal del arrollamiento de menor tensión (3) MVA 85
Reactancia directa del arrolla. 1, 3 abierto, 2 C.C., en P.U. de los
15 p.u. -
valores del arrolla. 1 (X12)

DRAFT
Reactancia directa del arrolla. 1, 2 abierto, 3 C.C., en P.U. de los
16 p.u. 0.125
valores del arrolla. 1 (X13)
Reactancia directa del arrolla. 2, 1 abierto, 3 C.C., en P.U. de los
17 p.u. -
valores del arrolla. 1 (X23)
18 Reactancia homopolar del arrolla. 1, 3 abierto, 2 C.C., en P.U. de los p.u.
-
valores del arrolla. 1 (X120) (*)
19 Reactancia homopolar del arrolla. 1, 2 abierto, 3 C.C., en P.U. de los p.u.
-
valores del arrolla. 1 (X130) (*)
20 Reactancia homopolar del arrolla. 2, 1 abierto, 3 C.C., en P.U. de los p.u.
-
valores del arrolla. 1 (X230) (*)
21 Neutro a tierra del arrollamiento 1 (1: SI, 2: NO) 1
22 Neutro a tierra del arrollamiento 2 (1: SI, 2: NO) -
23 Neutro a tierra del arrollamiento 3 (1: SI, 2: NO) 2
24 Resistencia puesta a tierra en arrollamiento 1 Ohm -
25 Resistencia puesta a tierra en arrollamiento 2 Ohm -
26 Resistencia puesta a tierra en arrollamiento 3 Ohm -
27 Reactancia puesta a tierra en arrollamiento 1 Ohm -
28 Reactancia puesta a tierra en arrollamiento 2 Ohm -
29 Reactancia puesta a tierra en arrollamiento 3 Ohm -
30 Cambiador de topes (1: bajo carga -2: en vacio -3: no tiene) 1
Ubicación de los topes (1, 2, 3, 12, 23, en los arrolla. 1, 2, 3, 1 y 2, 1
31 1
y 3, 2 y 3 respectivamente)
32 Números de los topes c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 1 21
33 Números de los topes c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 2 -
34 Números de los topes c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 3 -
35 Registro máximo c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 1 kV 151.8
36 Registro máximo c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 2 -
37 Registro máximo c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 3 -
38 Registro mínimo c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 1 kV 124.2
39 Registro mínimo c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 2 -
40 Registro mínimo c/cambiador en el arrollamiento 3 -
41 Sobrecarga admisible en el arrollamiento 1 % 150
42 Tiempo máximo de duración de la misma min. 3
43 Sobrecarga admisible en el arrollamiento 2 %
44 Tiempo máximo de duración de la misma Min. -
BANCO NACIONAL DE PARAMETROS -Planilla de recolección de datos de: TRANSFORMADOR
Empresa:
ELEMENTOS DEL MISMO TIPO (de
Nº DESCRIPCION UNIDADES
uno a seis)
45 Sobrecarga admisible en el arrollamiento 3 % -
46 Tiempo máximo de duración de la misma Min. -
47 Pérdidas en vacio KW 38
Reactancia de núcleo de aire (Xac) del arrollamiento 1, en P.U. de
48 P.U. -
los valores del arrolla. 1 (**)
Reactancia de núcleo de aire (Xac) del arrollamiento 1, en P.U. de
49 P.U. -
los valores del arrolla. 2 (**)
Reactancia de núcleo de aire (Xac) del arrollamiento 1, en P.U. de
50 P.U. -
los valores del arrolla. 3 (**)
Curva magnetización o, en su defecto, codo saturación en P.U.
51 -
tensión nominal del arrollamiento 1
ET
52 Nombre de la estación transformadora o central eléctrica GUAÑIZUIL
I
53 Fecha de la información Abril 2018

DRAFT
DRAFT
Graph 1: P-Q inverter curve

Graph 2: LVRT curve

 Graph 3: Block diagram Huawei inverter 42KTL

DRAFT
APPENDIX II.
Stationary State Flows

DRAFT
DRAFT
Figure 4: Stage with complete network RV19 (maximum demand - maximum hydraulic dispatch)
DRAFT
Figure 5: Configuration alternative - LAT 132 kV P. Rails - San Juan F / S (maximum demand - maximum
hydraulic dispatch)
DRAFT
Figure 6: RV19 Complete network scenario (minimum demand – maximum hydraulic dispatch)
DRAFT
Figure 7: Configuration alternative - LAT 132 kV P. Rails - San Juan F / S (minimum demand - maximum
hydraulic dispatch)
DRAFT
Figure 8: Case PFV-RV19-A1-G0
DRAFT
Figure 8bis: Case PFV-RV19-A1-G0_Red Internal
DRAFT
Figure 9: Case PFV-RV19-A1-G50
DRAFT
Figure 9bis: Case PFV-RV19-A1-G50_Red Internal
DRAFT
Figure 10: Case PFV-RV19-A1-G100
DRAFT
Figure 10bis: Case PFV-RV19-A1-G100_Red Internal
DRAFT
Figure 11: Case PFV-MRV19-A1-G0
DRAFT
Figure 11bis: Case PFV-MRV19-A1-G0_Red Internal
DRAFT
Figure 12: Case PFV-MRV19-A1-G50
DRAFT
Figure 12bis: Case PFV-MRV19-A1-G50_Red Internal
DRAFT
Figure 13: Case PFV-MRV19-A1-G100
DRAFT
Figure 13bis: Case PFV-MRV19-A1-G100_Red Internal
DRAFT
Figure 14: Case 1 – N-1 La Bebida – Nva San Juan 132 kV
DRAFT
Figure 15: Case 2 – N-1 La Bebida – P. Rieles 132 kV
DRAFT
Figure 16: Case 3 – N-1 La Bebida – Albardón/Chimbas 132 kV
DRAFT
Figure 17: Case 4 – N-1 Cruz de Piedra – San Juan 220 kV
DRAFT
Figure 18: Case 5 – N-1 Gran Mza – Nva San Juan 500 kV
DRAFT
Figure 19a: RI19 Minimum hydraulic generation – PFV Guañizuil I E/S
DRAFT
Figure 19b: RI19 Minimum hydraulic generation – PFV Guañizuil I F/S
DRAFT
Figure 20: RI19 Minimum hydraulic generation – PFV Guañizuil I E/S al 50%
APPENDIX III.
Dynamic stability figures

DRAFT
DRAFT
Figure 21: Line La Bebida – Nueva San Juan 132 kV F/S – Voltages
DRAFTFigure 22: Line La Bebida – Nueva San Juan 132 kV F/S – Flows

Figure 23: Line La Bebida – Nueva San Juan 132 kV F/S – PFV Guañizuil I
DRAFT
DRAFT
Figure 24: RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles – Voltages

Figure 25: RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles – Flows

DRAFT
Figure 26: RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles – PFV Guañizuil I
DRAFT
Figure 27: RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles – Voltages
 Figure 28: RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles – Flows

DRAFT
Figure 29: RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Punta de Rieles – PFV Guañizuil I
 Figure 30: RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardon/Chimbas – Voltages

DRAFT
Figure 31: RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardon/Chimbas – Flows
DRAFT
Figure 32: RME LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardon/Chimbas – PFV Guañizuil I

Figure 33: RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardon/Chimbas – Voltages

DRAFT
Figure 34: RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardon/Chimbas – Flows

Figure 35: RMNE LAT 132 kV La Bebida – Albardon/Chimbas – PFV Guañizuil I

DRAFT
Figure 36: RME LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra – Voltages

Figure 37: RME LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra – Flows
DRAFT
Figure 38: RME LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra – PFV Guañizuil I
 Figure 39: RMNE LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra – Voltages

DRAFT
Figure 40: RMNE LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra – Flows
Figure 41: RMNE LAT 220 kV San Juan – Cruz de Piedra – PFV Guañizuil I

DRAFT
Figure 42: RME LEAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mza. – Voltages
 Figure 43: RME LEAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mza. – Flows

DRAFT
Figure 44: RME LEAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mza. – PFV Guañizuil I
 Figure 45: RMNE LEAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mza. – Voltages

DRAFT
Figure 46: RMNE LEAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mza. – Flows
DRAFT
Figure 47: RMNE LEAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mza. – PFV Guañizuil I

Figure 48: RMNE LEAT 500 kV Nueva San Juan – Gran Mza. – Frequency
DRAFT
Figure 49: RME LAT 132 kV Bauchaceta – Jáchal – Voltages

Figure 50: RME LAT 132 kV Bauchaceta – Jáchal – Flows

DRAFT
Figure 51: RME LAT 132 kV Bauchaceta – Jáchal – PFV Guañizuil I
 Figure 52: Desconexión Intempestiva PFV Guañizuil I – Voltages

DRAFT
Figure 53: Desconexión Intempestiva PFV Guañizuil I – Flows
 Figure 54: Untimely disconnection PFV Guañizuil I - Generators area

DRAFT
APPENDIX IV.
Analysis RAG PFV Guañizuil I

DRAFT