Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Acrylic
Acrylic Foam
Foam Tape
Tape for
This Online Learning Seminar is available
through a professional courtesy provided by:
Structural Glazing
for Structural & &
Glazing
Architectural Panel
Architectural Panel
3M Corporate Headquarters Applications
Applications
3M Center
St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
Toll-Free: 1-866-499-8857
Email: bcsales@mmm.comm
Web: www.3m.com/vhb/structuralglazing
START
©2014, 2017 3M. The material contained in this course was researched, assembled, and produced by 3M and
powered by remains its property. Questions or concerns about the content of this course should be directed to the program
instructor. This multimedia product is the copyright of AEC Daily.
Description: Acrylic foam tape is a two-sided, closed-cell acrylic foam, pressure-sensitive adhesive. It
is adhesive throughout its entire construction, including the foam core. This course
evaluates the physical properties, performance characteristics, and design benefits of
using acrylic foam tapes for structural glazing and architectural panel applications.
To ensure the accuracy of this program material, this course is valid only when listed on
AEC Daily’s Online Learning Center. Please click here to verify the status of this course.
If the course is not displayed on the above page, it is no longer offered.
The American Institute of Architects · Course No. AEC706 · This program qualifies for 1.0 LU/HSW Hour.
AEC Daily Corporation is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems (AIA/CES). Credit(s)
earned on completion of this program will be reported to AIA/CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-
AIA members are available upon request. This program is registered with AIA/CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not
include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method
or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services
will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.
This course is approved by other organizations. Please click here for details.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this program, participants will be able to:
• describe the physical and performance characteristics of acrylic foam tapes
• summarize the features and benefits of acrylic foam tape and the added value that each
can bring to the fabricator, engineer, architect, developer, and building owner
• identify key design elements when using acrylic foam tapes for structural glazing and
architectural panel applications
• explain the fabrication process when using acrylic foam tapes, and identify exterior and
interior structural glazing and panel bonding applications that would benefit from this
technology.
This CEU is registered with the Interior Design Continuing Education Council (IDCEC) for continuing
education credits. This credit will be accepted by the American Society of Interior Designers (ASID),
International Interior Designers Association (IIDA) and Interior Designers of Canada (IDC).
The content included is not deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by IDCEC of any
material or construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing or dealing in any
material or product.
Questions related to specific materials, methods and services should be directed to the instructor
or provider of this CEU.
This program is registered for 0.1 CEU value. The IDCEC class-code is: CC-103478-1000.
• This CEU will be reported on your behalf to IDCEC and you will receive an email notification. Please
log in and complete the electronic survey for this CEU.
• Certificates of completion will be automatically issued once you have submitted the online survey for
this CEU.
• Attendees who do not belong to ASID, IIDA or IDC and do not have a unique IDCEC number will be
provided with a Certificate of Completion after this CEU.
• To view this course, use the arrows at the bottom of each slide or the up and down
arrow keys on your keyboard.
• To print or exit the course at any time, press the ESC key on your keyboard. This will
minimize the full-screen presentation and display the menu bar.
• Some slides may contain video clips. To view these video clips, follow the instructions
on individual slides. Note that you must be connected to the Internet in order to view
video clips.
• Within this course is an exam password that you will be required to enter in order to
proceed with the online examination. Please be sure to remember or write down this
exam password so that you have it available for the test.
• To receive a certificate indicating course completion, refer to the instructions at the end
of the course.
• For additional information and post-seminar assistance, click on any of the logos and
icons within a page or any of the links at the top of each page.
Table of Contents
Introduction to
Acrylic Foam Tapes
Background
Background
Conventional methods of bonding glass panels to a metal frame employ either one-part or
two-part structural silicone sealants (wet glazing) or gaskets and mechanical fasteners
(dry glazing)
Wet glazing describes the method of bonding glass panels to metal frames using either
a liquid-applied one- or two-part silicone structural sealant.
Dry glazing is not considered structural glazing as it utilizes a gasket of rubber or vinyl
to surround the perimeter of the glass panel, and this in turn is mechanically captured
by the window frame.
In these systems, a double-sided, open-cell foam tape (spacer tape) is used to provide a
temporary holding of the glass and to create the necessary open space (face clearance)
for the structural sealant. The dimension of the spacer tape is determined by the required
sealant bite (width) and bead thickness. The bond should not be disturbed during the
curing of the silicone sealant, and it may take days to weeks to achieve handling strength
and full cure.
Here are two typical structural glazing sections which illustrate the difference between
acrylic foam tape glazing and wet glazing with structural silicone sealant.
An acrylic foam structural glazing tape curtain wall system is based on the tape acting as
the main bonding agent between the glass and the structural glazing frame. The wind load
forces acting on the facade are transferred through the structural glazing tape to the
structure of the building. The tape must maintain its strong bonding performance and
strength in order to support the glass panels during high wind load and other
environmental related events.
It is important to note that whenever an acrylic foam structural glazing tape project is
initiated, a comprehensive process protocol—including review of the project by the
manufacturer, adhesion testing, training of the fabricator, and in-process audits—must be
followed to promote a successful project.
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape is usually only considered for four-sided or two-sided
structural glazing applications that are assembled in a temperature controlled production
environment. Years of testing and thousands of real-life applications demonstrate the
high-performance capability of this tape to meet the demanding requirements of this
application.
Composition
In comparison, acrylic foam structural glazing tape is an acrylic adhesive throughout its
entire construction, including the foam core. This is essential since it is the primary bonding
component in the glazing system. The chemical bonds that make up the polymer chains
consist of carbon-carbon single bonds that are highly resistant to energy in the form of heat
or ultraviolet light, as well as chemical attack. In less durable foams or adhesives, such
conditions could lead to cleaving of the polymer backbone and thus a weakening of
mechanical properties.
Composition
Acrylic Foam Tape Bonding System Conventional Wet Glazed System
Adhesive skin
The unique composition of acrylic foam structural glazing tape gives it its performance
properties including viscoelasticity, strength, durability, resistance to moisture and
chemicals, productivity, convenience, and uniform appearance. These properties are the
reason acrylic foam structural glazing tapes play a significant role in design of commercial
building facades.
Viscoelasticity
Durability
The closed-cell construction of acrylic foam tape enables it to form a strong bond and act
as a secondary weather seal in structural glazing applications. The acrylic chemistry
provides a high level of resistance against UV light, weathering, and humidity exposure.
Acrylic foam tapes have a proven performance history in the construction market.
1980 Acrylic foam tapes were introduced
1984 Acrylic foam tapes used for bonding stiffeners on architectural panels in a
Singapore tower
1990 Acrylic foam tapes were first used to replace structural silicone sealants for
structural glazing
The ability of acrylic foam tape adhesives to withstand cold and hot temperatures, UV light
exposure, humidity, and other environmental conditions has been well documented through
both real-life and accelerated aging studies. Accelerated aging tests are conducted by
subjecting bonded samples to cycling heat, humidity, and xenon arc UV lamp exposure,
and measuring the dynamic tensile, shear, and peel strength values.
Thermal Properties
R-value is a measure of the capacity of a material, such as insulation, to impede heat flow.
R-values can be calculated from thermal conductivity, K, and the thickness of the material.
R-value = Thickness
K-value
Thermal transmission of acrylic foam structural glazing tape vs. structural silicone
K-values:
Acrylic Foam Structural Glazing Tape = 0.952 BTU in/hr ft2 °F (0.1373 W/m•K)
Structural Silicone = 2.427 BTU in/hr ft2 °F (0.350 W/m•K)
R-values:
Acrylic Foam Structural Glazing Tape (0.09" or 2.3 mm) = 0.09 ft²·°F·hr/BTU
Structural Silicone (0.25" or 6 mm) = 0.10 ft²·°F·hr/BTU
Acrylic foam tapes have been evaluated in a number of key construction related tests for
building facade applications. This includes independent testing over the last few decades,
dating back to the 1980s.
Early independent third-party testing was conducted in the U.S. and Brazil and included
structural performance tests of acrylic foam structural glazing tapes in four-sided structural
glazing systems.
The following slides provide an overview of third-party performance testing that has been
completed to evaluate the physical and performance properties of acrylic foam structural
glazing tape. Please contact individual manufacturers for more details regarding the testing
of specific tape products.
Acrylic foam structural glazing tapes have been tested by university labs. The tapes have
met performance requirements in mock-up tests for bomb blast and hurricane rated glazing
systems.
Stress (psi)
Extension (in)
Acrylic foam tapes exhibit excellent durability, comparable to a two-part structural silicone
sealant, in extreme accelerated aging conditions that included high intensity UV light, high
temperature, and high humidity exposure. After 10,000 hours of accelerated exposure, the
survival probabilities for the bonding systems are identical (i.e., none have failed).
The peel adhesion test demonstrates the adhesive bond strength of the acrylic foam
structural glazing tape to the substrate. Since UV light exposure occurs through the glass,
a peel test of the tape off the glass substrate was conducted in the same study. It is critical
to maintain a good adhesive bond to the glass substrate after years of exposure.
Water can hydrolyze not only the chemical bonds of every polymer backbone, but also the
bonding of an adhesive to the substrate’s surface. This phenomenon may appear even at
room temperature and may cause both cohesive and adhesive failure. Adhesion tests have
been performed on acrylic foam tape bonds of aluminum to aluminum that were subjected
to ten years of submersion in 5% salt water and ordinary tap water.
Specific acrylic foam tapes meet the performance requirements for structural glazing and
cladding applications. Some of the performance tests are identified below. Consult
manufacturers regarding specific tests and results for their products.
To further support consideration for acrylic foam structural glazing tape-based applications,
performance tests were conducted at an independent, accredited third-party test facility
(Winwall Technology Pte Ltd., Singapore) to evaluate acrylic foam structural glazing tapes
under stresses and environmental conditions that glass panels would typically experience
in a glazed curtain wall system.
Mock-Up Performance
Mock-Up Performance Testing Test Results Glass Panels in Second Test Sequence
Glass Panels in First Test Sequence
Acrylic Foam Structural One-Part Structural Acrylic Foam Structural One-Part Structural Acrylic Foam Structural
Test Sequence Test Method Glazing Tape Silicone Glazing Tape Silicone Glazing Tape
Laminated Glass IGU IGU 8 mm Tempered 8 mm Tempered
Air ASTM E283 No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage
Infiltration at 0.3 kPa (6.3 psf) from Panel from panel from panel from panel from panel
20 cycles For each cycle, temperature is maintained For each cycle, temperature is maintained
Temperature
at -25°C to 70°C at -25°C (-13°F) for 15 minutes Subjected to 40 cycles at -25°C (-13°F) for 15 minutes
Cycling
(-13°F to 160°F) and 70°C (60°F) for 15 minutes and 70°C (60°F) for 15 minutes
Air ASTM E283 No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage
Infiltration at 0.3 kPa (6.3 psf) from panel from panel from panel from panel from panel
ASTM E330
Windload at -25°C, 32°C and 70°C ± 2.9 kPa (± 60 psf) ± 2.9 kPa (± 60 psf) ± 2.9 kPa (± 60 psf) ± 2.9 kPa (± 60 psf) ± 2.9 kPa (± 60 psf)
Structural (-13°F, 90°F, 160°F) 250 kph (155 mph) 250 kph (155 mph) 250 kph (155 mph) 250 kph (155 mph) 250 kph (155 mph)
hold for 1 minute
Air ASTM E283 No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage No air leakage
Infiltration at 0.3 kPa (6.3 psf) from panel from panel from panel from panel from panel
After numerous mock-up tests around the world over the last twenty years, it is possible to
conclude the following:
An acrylic foam structural glazing tape-based system meets all the typical performance
requirements of a glazed curtain wall system.
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape performance is equal to structural silicone sealant in
mock-up performance tests.
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape provides acceptable wind load structural
performance at elevated (158°F) and cold (-13°F) temperatures (not a typical mock-up
test requirement).
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape has demonstrated acceptable performance at three
to five times the design values in various mock-up tests.
Benefits to
Façade Applications
Aesthetics
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape Traditional glazing. Acrylic foam tape glazing.
is only 0.090" (2.3mm) thick,
resulting in a much cleaner look
where it appears as if the glass is up
against the mullion.
Acrylic foam tapes conform and bond to a variety of surfaces to simultaneously bond and
seal. This means there is more design flexibility allowing for a greater choice of materials
for visual impact, as seen in the images below.
Pettlaarspark.
Den Bosch, Netherlands 2006.
Fabricator: Sorba.
Aluminum panel bonding.
Acrylic foam tapes bond on contact with no curing, drying, fixturing, or liquid mess, which
translates to a simplified fabrication process saving time, labor, and materials.
The immediate handling strength and ease of use of acrylic foam tape results in a
significant reduction in fabrication time as compared to that for structural silicone bonding.
There is no cure time, unlike silicone sealants which require hours or days to cure
before units can be moved.
There are fewer process steps; no mixing, testing, or tooling required.
It is faster to apply. Trained personnel can typically fabricate acrylic foam structural
glazing tape units faster than silicone glazed units.
Fully cured adhesive allows for batch-processing of glazing frame components, frame
assemblies, or glass panels, resulting in increased throughput—even if all components
are not available.
Finished units can be loaded on a truck immediately after fabrication for faster delivery
and installation.
In-process, non-destructive testing is possible (able to test all taped panels without
deglazing).
Faster fabrication, delivery, and installation allows cost savings to be passed upstream to
the building owner, reducing the overall cost of a project. Faster project completion and
increased productivity allows for quicker building enclosure and occupancy, which
translates to improved ROI.
Using acrylic foam structural glazing tape can reduce the total cost to manufacture a
building facade compared to one that utilizes conventional silicone bonding in the following
ways:
Improved speed and productivity—reduced labor costs and increased profitability
No in-process silicone testing
No major two-component equipment investment and maintenance
Reduced material handling—no staging while silicone cures, allowing fabrication in
small production area
Less production space required due to the ability to move and ship assembled units
immediately after bonding
Reduced waste—less than 5% material waste with acrylic foam structural glazing tape
Thus, it is important to have the manufacturer review an acrylic foam structural glazing
tape project and conduct adhesion tests on project substrates to determine the appropriate
surface preparation method for each structural glazing substrate. This will help to ensure
that high bond strength of the acrylic foam tape is obtained to both bonding surfaces.
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape must be the appropriate width to securely fasten the
glass panel and allow the dynamic load (wind, seismic, etc.) to be transferred to the
building structure. The appropriate tape width is determined based on wind load and/or
dead load calculations depending on the design of the structural glazing system. In
structural glazing systems without dead load support, the weight of the glass places a
constant load on the adhesive tape. A static load and dynamic load calculation must be
performed for these applications.
The minimum tape width for a structural glazing application is dependent on three factors:
1. The design strength of the bonding agent (acrylic foam structural glazing tape)
2. Design pressure (dynamic wind load) requirement for the building
3. Size of the glass panel
The design guidelines presented on the next slide are applicable only for acrylic foam
tapes designed and thoroughly tested for structural glazing and architectural panel bonding
applications. Always consult with the manufacturer of the acrylic foam tape for proper
design guidance.
Design Guidelines
Tensile strength for dynamic loads.
Ultimate dynamic strength. Dynamic load design strength
(glass and metal panels).
70 psi (480 kPa) ASTM D897. 12 psi (85 kPa).
Thermophysical properties.
AFT Tape. Conductivity (k).
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape (0.090", Grey). 0.1373 W/m•K.
Acrylic foam structural glazing tape (0.090", Black). 0.1378 W/m•K.
Acrylic foam structural glazing tapes are used in the following types of glazing systems:
unitized curtain walls
(four-sided and two-sided)
hybrid stick walls
(factory glazed cassette)
ribbon walls
window walls
punched opening windows
operable vents
commercial doors
skylights and canopies
In addition, note:
The “glazing pocket” depth is less than a typical silicone or dry gasket glazed system
due to 0.090"-thick acrylic foam structural glazing tape
The acrylic foam structural glazing tape is not a primary weather seal, although its
closed-cell nature will allow it to act as a secondary weather seal
These drawings show the use of acrylic foam structural glazing tape in captured glazing
(left) and four-sided structural glazing (right).
Captured glazing. Structural glazing.
This glazing system drawing shows a unitized curtain wall stack joint mullion. Note, there
must be dead load support when using structural glazing with acrylic foam structural
glazing tapes.
These images illustrate how acrylic foam tapes provide an invisible attachment solution for
interior and exterior wall panels. The images on the left are examples of stiffener bonding
with acrylic foam tape, while the ones on the right show architectural panel bonding with
acrylic foam tape.
These drawings show typical architectural panel stiffener bonding in applications, one with
structural silicone (left) and the other with acrylic foam tape (right). Again, structural silicone
bonding requires two bonding components and considerable cure time, while stiffener
bonding with acrylic foam tape requires only one bonding component and provides
immediate handling strength.
Structural
Spacer Acrylic
Silicone
tape. foam tape.
Sealant
Please take the time to view a short video which shows the process used in the fabrication
of a four-sided, unitized punched opening window system with acrylic foam structural
glazing tape.
If you've downloaded the course, click on image to start video (no audio).
If you are using a mobile device to take this course, you will be required to view the video on YouTube. Click here to access and click the “back”
button to return to the course.
Architectural Panels
Batten Strips
Architectural Panels
Pettlaarspark.
Den Bosch, Netherlands.
2006.
Fabricator: Sorba.
Structural Glazing
Structural Glazing
Structural Glazing
Robosoft Technologies.
New Udupi, India.
2007.
Structural Glazing
Structural Glazing
Structural Glazing
Structural Glazing
Al Akaria Plaza. In this office building, the first floor is point-supported glazing,
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. and floors two through six are all structurally glazed with acrylic
2008. foam tape. This demonstrates the ability of acrylic foam tapes to
be successfully utilized in locations with high temperatures and
intense UV light exposure.
Structural Glazing
A. Zahner Company.
Kansas City, MO.
2010.
Architect: Crawford Architects.
Design, Engineering, and Fabrication: A. Zahner Company.
Structural Glazing
A. Zahner Company.
Kansas City, MO.
2010.
Architect: Crawford Architects.
Design, Engineering, and Fabrication:
A. Zahner Company.
Structural Glazing
Structural Glazing
Structural Glazing
The M Resort.
Las Vegas, NV.
2008.
Contract Glazer: Heinaman Contract Glazing.
Glazing Profile: EN-Wall Unitized Curtain Wall.
Course Summary
Resources
Austin, Steve and Uwe Manert. “Acrylic Foam Structural Glazing Tapes.” 11DBMC
International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Istanbul,
May 2008. Ed. A. Nil Türkeri and Özkan Şengül.
http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB13027.pdf (accessed May 2014)
Glass Association of North America (GANA Glazing Manual and GANA Sealant
Manual), www.glasswebsite.com (accessed May 2014)
Salmon, Fay et al. “Evaluating the Performance and Durability of 3M VHB™ Acrylic
Foam Tapes for Structural Glazing Applications.” Pressure Sensitive Tape Council,
March 2010. http://www.pstc.org/files/public/TECH33Papers/2010SalmonFay.pdf
(accessed May 2014)
Conclusion
If you desire AIA/CES, state licensing or CE
credits for another organization, please click on
the button to commence your online
examination. A score of 80% or better will allow
you to print your Certificate of Completion; you
may also go to your AEC Daily Transcript to see
your completed courses and certificates.
©2014, 2017 3M. The material contained in this course was researched,
For additional knowledge and post-seminar assembled, and produced by 3M and remains its property. Questions or
concerns about the content of this course should be directed to the program
assistance, click on the Ask an Expert link
instructor. This multimedia product is the copyright of AEC Daily.
above.
MORE
Click Here to Take the Test
powered by Exit