Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Sections Description
Sec 2 Definitions
Sec 2A Dismissal of an Individual workman deemed to be Industrial Dispute
Sec 2B Award
Sec 3 Work Committe
Sec 4 Conciliation officers
Sec 5 Board of Conciliation
Sec 6 Courts of Inquiry
Sec 7 Labour Courts
Sec 7A Tribunals
Sec 7B National Tribunals
sec 10 Reference of disputes to Boards, Courts or Tribunals
Sec 10A Voluntary reference of disputes to arbitration
sec 12 Duties of conciliation officers
sec 13 Duties of Board
sec 14 Duties of courts
sec 15 Duties of Labor Courts, Tribunals and National Tribunals
sec 16 Form of report or award
sec 17 Publication of report and award
sec 17A Commencement of the award
sec 17B Payment of full wages to workman pending proceedings in higher courts
sec 18 Persons on whom settlements and awards are binding
sec 19 Period of operation of settlements and awards
sec 20 Commencement and conclusion of proceedings
sec 21 Certain matters to be kept confidential
sec 17 Publication of report and award
sec 22 Prohibition of strikes and lock-outs
Sec 23 General prohibition of strikes and lock-outs
Sec 24 Illegal strikes and lock-outs
sec 25 Prohibition of financial aid to illegal strikes and lock-outs
25 A- 25 J Lay - Off and Retrenchment
sec Conditions of service, etc., to remain unchanged under certain
33 circumstances during pendency of proceedings.
sec 34 Cognizance of offences
sec 35 Protection of persons
sec 36 Representation of parties
26- 31 Penalties
Harmonious Relationship settle disputes between management and workmen, amicably and
peacefully.
Workmen Dimakuchi Te Estate v Dimakuchi Tea Estate
• Securing and preserving amity and good relationship
• Investigation and settlement
• Prevent strike and lock-outs
• Relief to workmen – layoff
• Promote Collective bargaining
SN Rai v Viswanath Lal
• Redressal, grievance
• Statutory, job security
• Conciliation, court inquiry
Dindigul Skin Merchants Association v Industrial Tribunal- harmony, social justice
Chandrakanth Tukaram Nikam v Muncipal Corp of Ahmedabad- civil suit for
dismissal, barred. Forum constituted should be considered
Definition of Appropriate Government = sec 2(a)
Workmen of Sri Ranga Vila Motors v SRV Motors – state in which he is employed
Mach Kund Hydro Project v Workmen- two state, to whom the work was taken and
carried
Definition of Industry – Sec 2(j)
State of Bombay v Hospital mazdoor Sabha – Hospital is industry
University of Delhi v Ram Nath- university not industry
Madras Gymkhana Club Emp Union v management –Club not industry
Cricket Club v Bombay Labour Union – Not an industry
-------------
Banglore Water Supply and Sewage Board v A Rajappa –1978 triple test
• Systematic activity
• Co-operation between employee and employer
• Production and supply , human wants
T Rajan v State -Science Technology Museum – Industry
Umayammal v Sate of Kerala – not industry if doing sovereign function
C Mohanan v State of Kerala – Tourism Industry
Executive Engineer ( state of Karnataka) v K Somasetty – Irrigation and Telecom not
Industry
Coir board v Indira Devi -Industry, triple test, three bench
Asha Ram v Div Engineer, Telcom Depart- is an industry
Definition of Industrial Dispute- sec 2(k)
• Employers and employers
• Workmen and employers
• Workmen and workmen
In order to constitute Industrial dispute
• There must be an industry
• Dispute
• Dispute connected with employment or non employment or terms or
conditions
• Dispute between any class
Amar Sigh and other v labour court , Bharatpur- doesn’t amount to re judicata
TN State Transport Corp v Neethivilangan, Kumbakonam- need to pay even if
dismissed by the employer until the pendency of dispute is final by tribunal
Compulsory reference – Dispute related to Utility service- based on notice for strike
or lock-out by Sec 22 issued
Reference by Application of parties – sec 10 (2)
Period of award- proposed by appropriate gov, for Individual its 3 months
Government cannot be compelled to make reference - sec 10(1)
Not mandatory its Discretion of government
Art 226 – Govt of India v national Tobacco Co 1997
Constitution Validity – sec 10(1)
Delhi Cloth and General Mills v Shambhu Nath Mukherjee- valid
Settled dispute cannot be again referred
Management Banglore Woollen Cotton and Silk Mills co v Workmen -cannot if by
adjudicatory
Judicial Review is possible : if not bonafied, not appropriate govt, contrary to law,
barred by res judicata, order reference not in writing
Mineral Miners Union v Kudremukh Iron Ore Co Ltd- without notice strike is illegal
Tata Iron and Steel Co v Workman – lock out without notice is illegal- sec 24