Benefits of Switching to QA Automation Testing Services

• Incredible speed
• Cross Platform testing in Parallel Integration with other CI tools
• Reusability
• Timely bug detection
• Self-sufficiency
• High precision with no human error

We have a dedicated team with Technical experts. Our skilled technical resources can create
frameworks or work within any existing automation framework to improve throughput and test
coverage.

Best Tools and Best Practices of QA Automation Testing Services:

Charter Global evaluates your current process to determine areas for improvement and to
establish a benchmark. Our experienced team offers insight for best practices to improve
production with a reliable, secure, and high-performance product output.

Our best practices include:

• Recommending the best automation tools to fit your business

• Optimizing the automation process when it's implemented
• Reducing the cost for a shorter time-to-production
• Identifying automation risks and planning effective mitigation strategies
• Selecting the best suited automation tool for product technologies and requirements
• Developing a modular, portable, maintainable, and reusable automation framework
• Integrating various tools & technologies with an automation framework
• Regression testing your application
• Developing robust automated tests and environments
• Assessing every test cycle thoroughly

Charter Global’s Capabilities:

• Faster Time-to-Market: we quickly implement the automation suite using a ready-to-

use, in-house, automation framework. This maximizes the ROI.
• Accelerated Results: we use a parallel execution method on Cloud Networking with
Docker.
• Faster Feedback: Customized HTML views and advanced Extent Reports.
• Expertise in CI/CD: Agile & DevOps transformations support the changing needs of
your business. Continuous Integration – Jenkins, Bamboo, TFS etc.
• Tech Stack: Identify tools and recommend based on your ecosystem and a wide range in
the technology landscape (Selenium, Appium, Nightwatch, UFT, Jmeter, WAPT).
Go Beyond the Limitations of Manual Testing with Automation:

In manual testing, a product is checked against non-practical and utilitarian prerequisites

manually, usually supervised by a quality affirmation group.

This method involves a bit of beta-testing, like running the application on various gadgets to
discovering possible deviations from the initial prerequisites. The quality group uses some
redefined test cases to measure quality, keeping a watchful eye on any possible blunders or
defects with the application’s utility, UX, and outline.

Manual Testing Activities

Requirements Analysis:

This is where the analyzers familiarize themselves with the app’s details so as to identify any
errors.

Test Cases Creation:

With the useful details in hand, the testing group begins a series of experiments on the item,
covering every real component and plan components inside the product.

Conducting the Tests:

Tests are carried out one after the other, armed with a good understanding of the product and
how it operates.

Logging Bug Reports:

As the tests are conducted, the existing bugs and blunders are noted, logged, and presented in a
detailed report including recommendations for remediation.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Pros:

Manual testing is Consistent with Life Testing

Manual testing seeks to use the product in a perceived real-time, mirroring the exact
environment in which the application will be utilized. As a result, a preventative discovery of
potential bugs or blemishes can be identified prior to the client launching the application.
Exhaustive Plan Audit

Obviously, an automated system can not offer criticism regarding the application’s look and feel,
unlike a cognitive, real-life perspective. An individual’s honest feedback about the physical
qualities of the application is usually thorough and insightful.

Cost Effectiveness

When it comes to additional device usage, the manual testing process saves resources. Also, no
pre-requisites, certifications, or discernment applies to the candidate(s) interested in performing
the review – anyone can do it. Friends and colleagues, for instance, could be enlisted to perform
quality checks.

Expanded Adaptability

With manual testing, there is the flexibility advantage where adjustments can be done quickly
and on the go.

Cons:

Risks of Disappointment

Since manual testing rests on the shoulders of the person responsible, the findings may prove
less precise; with an exhaustive process. Minor outline blunders and blemishes may not be
identified due to the margin of human error. Further, when a QA Automation Testing group is
conditioned to a product and the process, they may lack the foresight in identifying new bugs.

Requires More Time and Assets

Manual testing can be a slow, meticulous process. The simplicity of automation testing lies in the
usage of just one single machine to run all tests. The need to expend human resources is only in
the instance of each set of tests. As your program advances, so does the increase in costs and
expenses.

Lack of Manual Intervention

There are a few limitations to the manual testing approach, as in the instance of direct load and
execution testing. In this instance, many users, analyzers and gadgets are interconnected in
tandem to run the program.

If you are interested in learning more about Benefits of Automated Testing, check out other
blogs here.