Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

(G.R. No.

73748 - May 22, 1986)

(There is no "Full-Text" of this case. This is a Minute Very truly yours,


Resolution made by the SC.)
(Sgd.) GLORIA C. PARAS
Minute Resolutions
Clerk of Court
EN BANC
* The Court was then composed of Teehankee, C.J. and Abad
LAWYERS LEAGUE FOR A BETTER PHILIPPINES Santos., Melencio-Herrera, Plana, Escolin, Gutierrez, Jr.,
AND/OR OLIVER A. LOZANO VS. PRESIDENT Cuevas, Alampay and Patajo, JJ.-----------------------------------------
-
CORAZON C. AQUINO, ET AL.

SIRS/MADAMS:
DIGEST
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a
resolution of this Court MAY 22, 1986. FACTS:
On February 25, 1986, President Corazon Aquino
In G.R. No. 73748, Lawyers League for a Better issued Proclamation No. 1 announcing that she and
Philippines vs. President Corazon C. Aquino, et al.; Vice President Laurel were taking power.
G.R. No. 73972, People's Crusade for Supremacy of On March 25, 1986, proclamation No.3 was issued
the Constitution vs. Mrs. Cory Aquino, et al., and G.R.
No. 73990, Councilor Clifton U. Ganay vs. Corazon providing the basis of the Aquino government
C. Aquino, et al., the legitimacy of the government of assumption of power by stating that the "new
President Aquino is questioned. It is claimed that her government was installed through a direct exercise of
government is illegal because it was not established the power of the Filipino people assisted by units of
pursuant to the 1973 Constitution. the New Armed Forces of the Philippines."
As early as April 10, 1986, this Court* had already
voted to dismiss the petitions for the reasons to ISSUE:
be stated below. On April 17, 1986, Atty. Lozano Whether or not the government of Corazon Aquino is
as counsel for the petitioners in G.R. Nos. 73748 legitimate.
and 73972 withdrew the petitions and manifested
that they would pursue the question by extra-
judicial methods. The withdrawal is functus HELD:
oficio. Yes. The legitimacy of the Aquino government is not
a justiciable matter but belongs to the realm of politics
The three petitions obviously are not impressed with where only the people are the judge.
merit. Petitioners have no personality to sue and their
petitions state no cause of action. For the legitimacy
 The Court further held that:
of the Aquino government is not a justiciable matter.
It belongs to the realm of politics where only the  The people have accepted the Aquino
people of the Philippines are the judge. And the government which is in effective control of the
people have made the judgment; they have accepted entire country;
the government of President Corazon C. Aquino  It is not merely a de facto government but in
which is in effective control of the entire country so fact and law a de jure government; and
that it is not merely a de factogovernment but is in fact  The community of nations has recognized the
and law a de jure government. Moreover, the legitimacy of the new government.
community of nations has recognized the legitimacy
of the present government. All the eleven members
of this Court, as reorganized, have sworn to uphold
the fundamental law of the Republic under her
government.

In view of the foregoing, the petitions are hereby


dismissed.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1

Potrebbero piacerti anche