Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
ADVANCE TOPICS IN ENGINEERING
Submitted by:
Callejo. Paulo
Callope, Jerard Renz V.
Tolentino, Paul Diony
Malapit, Stephen Alfred G.
Yanson, Erniel John T.
Submitted to:
i. Truss
ii. Ground floor to Second Floor
V. References/guidelines/tables
I. PROJECT DETAILS
i. Location and details
Height of Truss: 2m
o Residential unit
o Located in Palawan
o Enclosed structure
ii. Loadings
Dead Loads & Live Loads (these loads are stated in the lecture)
These are the list of load combinations to be used in the STAAD analysis which can be
observed in the attached e-files, and executable STAAD files.
II. Superstructure
I. Trusses
Purlins
LOAD DEFINITIONS
a. Dead load
G.I. sheet (1mm) @ 84.2756m2 @ 7.75g/cm3
Purlins (c-section) = 0.0775kg/cm2
No sagrods considered
=7,602.75Pa
G.I. sheet = 7.6kPa
Θ = 32.167
c. Tangential Loads
1.34kPa(cos19.4612) = 1.134309kPa wind load
0.6kPa(cos90-32.167) = 0.3194kPa Roof live load
7.6kPa(cos90-32.167) = 4.046kPa G.I. sheet
Normal Loads
Tangential = 5.0148(0.6)
= 3.009kN/m
@ x
RAx = Rbx = 4.457KN
Mmaxx = wl2/8
= 5.212(1.71)2/8 = 1.905Nm
@ y
RAy = Rby = 2.573KN
Mmaxy = wl2/8
= 3.009(1.71)2/8
= 1.0998Nm
e. Design of Purlin
Loads Applied hrough Shear Center:
𝑀𝑢 𝑀𝑢𝑦
+ ≤ 1.0
∅𝑏𝑀𝑛𝑥 ∅𝑀𝑛𝑦
Mnx=Zxfy fy=420MPa
Mny=Zyfy Θb=0.9
*using excel
Purlin design: C channel : 75x5.2
Properties : weight = 5.2kg/m = 0.054 KN/m
Mnx = 1.9247
Mny = 1.11952
Manual computation of point loads to apply on trusses
HT-1
T1-
B Truss and Purlins (6
purlins)
6 spacings
f. 7 purlins at each joint for T-1, 9 purlins for HT-1 (0.6
spacing)
Purlin location at T-1 (7 purlins)
-Tangential-
Dead loads
Purlins
0.054sin(23.962) =
0.02193
g. GI sheet
7.6(0.6)(sin23.962) = 1.852
Live loads
(0.6)(0.6)(sin23.962) = 0.1462
Wind
(3.48)(0.6)(cos23.962) = 1.908
-Normal-
Wind
(0.6)(3.4803)(sin23.962) = 0.848
GI sheet
(7.6)(0.6)(cos23.962) = 4.16699
Purlins = 0.0493
Live load
(0.6)(0.6)(cos23.962)=0.329
Purlins T-1 leeward
Tangential
Dead loads
h. GI sheet = 7.6sin32.167(0.6) = 2.428
Purlins = 5.2(9.81)sin3.167 = 2.716
Roof live = 0.6(0.6)sin32.167 = 0.1917
Wind = (3.48)(0.6)cos32.167 = 1.7675
Normal
GI sheet = 7.6cos32.167(0.6) = 6.4339
Purlin = 0.054cos32.167 = 0.0457
Roof = 0.5079cos32.167(0.6) = 0.258
Wind = 3.48(0.6)sin32.167 = 1.1116
Given:
Solution:
Cc = T1
0.85 * fc’ * a * 200 = As * fy; As = ƿ5 * b * d
0.85 * 21 * a * 200 = 0.01355 * 200 * 290 * 420
a = 92.4375
c = a / β1 = 92.4375/0.85 = 108.75
fs = 600 (d – c) / c
fs = 600 (290 – 108.75) / 108.75
fs = 1000
Mn1 = T1 (d – a/2)
Mn1 = ƿ5 * b * d * fy (d – a/2)
Mn1 = 80448270
2BX-1
2BX-2
2GX-1 (Right End)
2GX-1 (Mid span)
2GY2-3
2GY2-3 (End Span)
2GY2-3 (Mid Span)
SUMMARY OF SECOND FLOOR BEAM DESIGN (W/o stirrups)
Sample Computation for the Design of Stirrups
Sample Computation for Beam 2BX-1
Given:
b = 200 Concrete cover (cc) = 40 mm
h = 350 Stirrup diameter = 10 mm
Mu = 92.55 x 10^6 N mm Diameter of rebar = 20 mm
fc’= 21 MPa
fy = 420 MPa
fy (stirrups) = 280 MPa
Solution:
Vu @ face = 66.65 kN
s = (Av * fy * d) / Vs
𝜋
s = ([2 𝑥 4 𝑥 102 ] * 280 * 290) / 43.682
s = 291.99
Check smax:
Smax = 145 mm
SUMMARY OF SECOND FLOOR BEAM DESIGN
III. SLABS
The reinforced concrete slabs were designed individually using STAAD.Pro. Since all but one
slabs were two-way slabs, the group decided to employ this method to avoid tedious procedures and
computations.
The slabs were modeled individually as plates resting on two sub-frames, and had their
properties and loading assigned. Floor loads were applied on the plate’s range, and self-weight was
applied to all members.
Steel reinforcements were determined using the design element command in concrete design
after inputting the necessary parameters. Clear top and bottom spacing, main reinforcement strength of
280 MPa, and concrete compressive strength (fc’) of 21 MPA were applied. Thereafter, the plate was
assigned the “Design Element” command. Analysis was performed thereafter.
Output file of two-way slab on left side of grid line A’-B’:
In the output file, “LONG. REINF (SQ.MM/MM)” denotes the steel area per millimeter. This can
be easily multiplied by the span in millimeters to get the total area of steel along the span. The same is
applied to steel along the “TRANS. REINF” to get the required area of steel. The number of bars for top
and bottom can be easily computed using this method.
“MOM-X/LOAD (KN-MM/MM)” denotes the design moment used by STAAD.Pro to compute the
area of reinforcing steel along the corresponding direction.
Sample Computations:
LONG REINF.:
Asteel = (0.200 sq. mm/mm) *
4870 mm = 974 mm2
TRANS. REINF:
Asteel = (0.200 sq. mm/mm) * 2870 mm = 574 mm2
Note: This slab is also the most critical slab due the moment being critical 2.25 kN-mm when loading
of 1.2 DL + 1.6 LL
A’
Grade steel: 420 Mpa
column
B’
Comppressive strength of concrete: 21 Mpa
12.6 m
Concrete Cover = 40 mm Tributary area C’
3.63 m
2.6 m
D’
4.96 m
C. Design of Members
P2 = 28.27
Use B= 200mm
Check P:
Using 110.89 to solve for rho actual… rho actual <0.01, then use…
Use rho=0.01 and use 16 dia. Main bars and 10mm. dia. Bars for ties
No. of bars = (400/ (pi/4)* 162 ) = 1.99 bars, therefore use 4-16 mm bars
Ties:
CS
S =256mm = approx.. 250 mm
Use 18 stirrups
A .Details
One-way shear:
x = (1.4/2) – d = 0.7 – d
Vu = φVc
140(1.4)(0.7-d) = 0.75 * 0.33 * (√21/2) * 1000 * d
d = 179.79 mm = 180 mm
Two-way shear:
Vu = φVc
ƿ = 0.00051
ƿmin = 1.4/120 = 0.00333
ƿ < ƿmin, use ƿ = ƿmin
Most critical member of the structure experienced the largest Fx (shear) at 1.2 DL + 1.6 LL +0.5 RL is the
Column at Grid (2’/c’)
Max Mz
Max Mx
REFRENCES/tables/guidelines