Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Negotiability – that quality or attribute of a bill or note whereby it may pass from one person to another
similar to money, so as to give the holder in due course the right to collect on the instrument the sum
payable for himself free from any defect in the title of any of the prior parties or defenses available to
them among themselves.
2. Accumulation of secondary contracts – the most important feature of negotiable instruments, as they
are transferred from on person to another. Once an instrument is issued, additional parties can become
involved.
Negotiable Instruments Law deals only with two kind or types of instruments, namely:
1. Promissory notes – those in which the issuer has promised to pay; and
2. Bills of exchange – those in which the issuer has ordered a third person to pay.
Where there is doubt as to the negotiability of the instrument, the courts have adopted the policy of
resolving in favor of the negotiability of the instrument.
The instrument must be in writing; otherwise, nothing could be negotiated or passed from hand
to hand.
The writing may be in ink, print or pencil. It may be upon parchment, cloth, leather or any other
substitute of paper.
There is no such thing as an oral negotiable instrument
1
OI
It must be signed by the maker or drawer. It may consist of mere initials, numbers or thumb marks,
but the holder must prove that what is written is intended as a signature of the person sought to
be charged.
His signature is prima facie evidence of his intention to be bound as either maker or drawer.
The promise or order must be unconditional; it must not be a subject to any condition or
contingency. It must be payable absolutely.
The sum payable must be certain; hence, it must be definite and specific, to assure clarity in
determining the value of the instrument.
If the instrument calls for an act, other than the payment of money, it is not negotiable.
Except:
Gives option to the holder to require something to be done in lieu of money. (Section. 5)
1. Indication of particular fund from which the acceptor disburses himself after payment.
a. The particular fund indicated should only be the source of reimbursement and should
not be the direct source of payment; or else it becomes conditional and therefor non-
negotiable.
b. An instrument which contains a direction to debit a particular instrument is negotiable.
2. Statement of the transaction which gives rise to the instrument
a. The statement payable on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time.
2
OI
a. An instrument payable on demand is due and payable immediately after its delivery. It is
a present debt due at once. Other words equivalent to demand: At sight, on presentation,
on call, at any time called for. At sight means that the instrument is payable as soon as it
is seen by the party primarily liable.
2. No period of payment is stipulated
a. When no time is expressed
3. Issued, accepted, or endorsed after maturity – when the maturity date has already lapses
(overdue) and the drawee is willing to pay, then it is payable on demand.
If the instrument is payable upon a contingency, the happening of the event does not cure the defect, it
is still non- negotiable.
Contingency – an uncertain future event or an event which may or may not happen.
3
OI
1. Where it is drawn payable to the order of a specified person – Pay the order of P the sum of P10k.
2. To a specified person or his order – Pay to P or order the sum of P10k.
One a bearer instrument, it is always a bearer instrument. For order instrument, despite indorsement, it
can be negotiated further by mere delivery.
Where the instrument is addressed to a drawee, he must be named or otherwise indicated with
reasonable certainty.
Section 6. The validity and negotiable character of an instrument are not affected by the fact that:
1. It is not dated; or
2. Does not specify the value given or that any had been given; or
3. does not specify the place where it is drawn or payable; or
4. bears a seal; or
5. Designates a particular kind of current money in which payment is to be made.
The instrument need not to follow the language of the law, any terms are sufficient which clearly indicate
an intention to conform to the requirements hereof. (sec. 10)
4
OI
If the instrument bears a date, it is presumed that said date is the date when it was made by the maker,
drawn by the drawer, accepted by the drawee, or indorsed by the payee or holder. (Sec. 11)
Ante-dating or post-dating an instrument does not render it invalid or non-negotiable provided this is not
done for an illegal purpose or to commit fraud. (Sec. 12)
Effects:
1. The mechanical act of writing the instrument completely and in accordance with the requirements
of Sec.1 NIL;
2. The delivery of the complete instrument by the maker or drawer to the payee or holder with the
intention of giving effects to it.
Every Negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to have been issued for a valuable consideration, and
every person whose signature appears thereon to have becomes a party thereto for value.
The presumption is only prima facie, It may be rebutted or disproved by evidence to the contrary.
Value is any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract, an antecedent or pre-existing debt
constitutes value; and is deemed such whether the instrument is payable on demand or at a future time.
Abnormal Instruments:
5
OI
Two kinds:
Two requisites to bind the person who signed the instrument before delivery:
If the instrument falls on the hands of a holder in due course, it is valid and effectual for all purpose
as though it was filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given and within a reasonable
time.
1. Authority to fill-up the blanks – the holder or the person in possession has prima facie authority
to complete an incomplete instrument by filling up the blanks therein.
2. Authority to put up any amount – a signature on a blank paper delivered in order that may be
converted into a Negotiable instrument operates as a prima facie authority to fill it up as such for
any amount.
3. Rights against party prior to complete – the instrument may be enforced only against a party
prior to completion if filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given and within a
reasonable time.
Note:
In both cases 1 & 2, the presumption is that the blank was filled up in accordance with the
authority given and within reasonable time.
The defense that the instrument had not been filled up in accordance with the authority given
and within reasonable time is not available as against a holder in due course.
Sec. 14 raises a personal defense – if the last holder is a HIDC, maker is liable to pay.
Before delivery:
An incomplete and undelivered instrument which is completed and negotiated without authority
is not a valid contract in the hands of ANY holder as against the person who signed the instrument.
After delivery:
However, after delivery, persons who signed the instrument can be held liable to HIDC.
Persons liable:
6
OI
General indorsers are liable because they warrant that the instrument is genuine and valid; thus,
they are estopped to deny the validity of the instrument
Note:
Where an incomplete instrument has not been delivered, it will not, if completed and negotiated
without authority, be a valid contract in the hands of any holder against any person who signed
before delivery.
The invalidity of the instrument is only with reference to the parties whose signatures appear
before and not after delivery.
Sec. 15 raises a Real Defense – even if the last holder is a HIDC, Maker is not liable to pay.
(Indorsers are liable because they warrant that the instrument is genuine and in all respects what
it purports to be. As their signatures appear on the instrument after delivery, the instrument is
valid as to them.)
3. Complete but undelivered (sec. 16)
Effects of a complete but undelivered instrument:
If a complete instrument is undelivered, then it is inoperative because delivery is a requisite to
liability. It is considered incomplete; thus, revocable.
In the absence of delivery, the instrument though complete in all its particulars, there is no
contract.
In possession of an immediate party or a remote party:
Immediate party – a party having been held to know of the conditions or limitations placed upon
the delivery of the instrument.
Remote party – a party who is not in direct contractual relation to each other. They can be
transformed into “immediate party.”
If a complete instrument is found in their possession, there is a prima facie presumption of
delivery (but subject to rebuttal).
Delivered conditionally or for a special purpose
If delivery was conditional or for a special purpose only, then it is not for the purpose of
transferring title to the instrument. However, it is presumed to be made with the intention to
transfer title – this can be rebutted.
Effects to a HIDC:
If a complete instrument is in the hands of a HIDC, a valid delivery thereof by all parties prior to
him is CONCLUSIVELY presumed.
Note:
If the instrument is no longer in the possession of the person who signed it and it is complete in
its terms, “a valid and intentional delivery by him is presumed until the contrary is proved.
Sec. 16 raises a Personal Defense – if the last holder is a HIDC, Maker is liable to pay.
7
OI
However, when the words are ambiguous, reference may be had to the figures to determine the
true amount.
2. Date when stipulated interest to run not specified
If the date when the stipulated interest is to run is not specified, the interest runs from the date
of the instrument or if undated from the date of its issue.
3. An undated instrument is considered dated as of the date of its issue.
4. Written and printed words in conflict
In case of conflict between the written and printed provisions, the written provisions prevail.
Written words are deemed to express the true intention of the maker or drawer because they are
placed there by him.
5. Whether instrument bill or note in doubt
In case of doubt as to whether the instrument is a bill or note, the holder may treat either at his
election.
6. Capacity in which the person signed in doubt
In case of doubt due to the ambiguous location of the signature, the party who signed is deemed
to be an indorser, who assumes the least liability, and not as a maker or drawer.
7. Instrument signed by two or more persons – their liability may either be solidary or joint.
I promise to pay, signed by two or more persons gives rise to solidary liability.
We promise to pay, signed by two or more persons gives rise to joint liability.
Requisites:
1. He must be duly authorized:
2. He must add words to his signature indicating that he signs as an agent; and
3. He must disclose his principal.
If an agent does not disclose his principal, the agent is personally liable on the instrument.
Signature by procuration – operates as notice that the agent has a limited authority to sign.
Effects:
The principal is only bound if the agent acted within the limits of the authority given.
The person who takes the instrument is bound to inquire into the extent and nature of the
authority given.
8
OI
9
OI
10
OI
May always show by parol evidence that he is only such an accommodation party.
Cannot avail of the defense of absence or failure of consideration against a HIDC.
After paying the holder, may sue for reimbursement the accommodated party.
Regular Party:
Signs the instrument for value.
Does not sign for the purpose of lending his name to other person.
Cannot disclaim or limit his personal liability as appearing on the instrument by parol evidence.
May avail the defense of absence or failure of consideration against a HIDC.
May not sue any subsequent party for reimbursement.
11