Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Historians need to use and evaluate sources when researching about the past. When
evaluating sources you do it in terms of their values and limitations by examining their
origin, purpose and content.
Origin:
Who produced the source?
What is the nature of this source? Is it a letter, a speech, a visual source, etc?
Purpose:
Why was this source published?
What impact does the producer of this source wants to create on its audience?
Content:
Is the language used in the source objective or does it sound exaggerated or one-sided?
Limitations: In what ways do I have to be careful when using this source for my study?
Examples:
historians - May offer sources based on a range - The producer of the source may
of documents. be influenced by his/her
nationality, race, politics or
context.
Eyewitness accounts. - Might offer an expert view (for - May only give an ‘overview’ of the
example in the case of a situation.
documentary).
- May only give a one-sided
- Can give insight into contemporary perspective.
- it can give sense into the immediate - May distort the bigger picture
impact of an event on a particular because of their limited view.
response.
- Might reflect only what the
- Might offer information on the photographer wants to show.
environment.
Cartoons/paintings -can inform publicly held opinions as -could be censored and not reflect
cartoonists often reflect popularly held public opinion.
views.
- relies on stereotypes and
- can show the government’s line if there exaggerations.
Government -may give an insight into the -might not reveal a dissent or
documents/speeches government’s position of an issue.
divergent opinion.
- Might reveal motives for government - Might not explain the motives for a
policies.
specific policy/decision.
- Might tell what the public has been - May have limitations due to tone
told about an event or issue by the or use of language.
government.