Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By
Spencer P. Reyes
spreyes.rock47@gmail.com
Abstract
John Locke is a British Empiricist. He is one of the empiricist who claims that only the
source of knowledge on about the external world is sense experience. Thus, it held on the
thought that nothing comes in the mind that isn’t first come through the senses. As Locke
continually raised that, the mind is a blank slate (a tabula rasa) which nothing inside it as long as
the senses have something to put there. Mostly, the child has it. The child’s mind is empty in the
first place. They don’t have knowledge of anything. Now, this is the purpose of the paper as it is
wanted to present. It studies the child development through education in the context of John
Locke’s Philosophy. I presume that John Locke is not precisely given a systematic theory on how
to raise a child but rather his strategy is to give just like a philosophical instruction manual which
is more effective than traditional education. This research paper pertains John Locke’s passion to
change the authoritarianism, theoretical studies and so on as part of educational tradition. This
paper discusses John Locke on Tabula rasa, Mind Temperament, Discipline, Child’s Healthcare
and of course in Education in relevance to the idea of child development. Locke would make
some changes in terms of discipline, nourishment and nurturing a child. In the last part of the
paper, the author understands the goal of Locke in preparing the child to be the future
Keywords: John Locke, Empiricist, Tabula Rasa, Sense Experience, John Locke’s Philosophy.
Introduction
John Locke philosophy of education was very influential philosophy throughout the
educational rules. He has a book entitled Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689) which
discusses on the knowledge of God and of Human Understanding and Some Thoughts
Concerning Education (1693) arouses from correspondent when his friend Edward Clarke
requested an advice in raising his son. These two books talk about the way Locke’s own subject
matter. As John Locke made many pieces of advice regarding education, Locke was also an
influential guy in line with medical and became a doctor. He was not only a doctor but a teacher.
He is also a philosopher dealing with political, social, epistemological issues and a member of
other new ruling circle and a mover of policy who appealed beyond party lines. John Locke was
concerned on cultivating the minds of the child from his early age to adulthood. He wanted that
everyone should be educated with freedom on learning and knowing in order to understand life
and its struggles. John Locke believes that rational learning will guide in overcoming
meaningless attitude, undesirable customs and influences. Thus, the educator has a big role in
guiding naive people in learning and knowing the things they have to know. On one hand, John
Locke emphasizes the liberty of education as a ground of learning in all aspects of life and
experience. Furthermore, this reflection of Locke in education may have a big impact on how to
form the better society. Thus, an educated man will understand the government as a center in
reforming the city for everyone. Precisely, man’s behavioral manifestation would reflect the
depth of his learning and experience in the midst of the society. With all through that, it is of the
right to everyone to be educated as it is the stepping stone to reflect for the future. This is which
Locke wanted. Although the child is so young in his age will be given to learn in knowing and
improving things for himself. Now, what is John Locke’s philosophy on child development?
As we all know, the proper development of a child is the foundation on building the
community. A child will be nourished and nurture not only physically but also mentally and
emotionally. But how do we nourish and nurture a child? That is the question of which the author
will study. John Locke himself will lend his glasses in order to see his passion to examine
An empiricist, like Locke, claims that the source of knowledge on the world is what we
have experienced from the world (sense experience). As Locke says, “the mind of a child is
tabula rasa, no innate idea, simply a blank slate. The experience is the source of knowledge. In
experiencing things, we use our senses... All ideas are acquired on facts that can be verified,
experimented and tested. Experience is the basis of gaining knowledge.”1 This is Locke’s
primary goal in his Book entitled Essay Concerning Human Understanding is epistemological,
that is, it has something to do with knowledge. John Locke affirms when he says, “Let us then
suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper, void of all characters, without any ideas. How
comes it to be furnished? Whence has it all the materials of reason and knowledge? To this, I
answer, in one word, from Experience: in that, all our knowledge is founded; and from that it
ultimately derives it self.”2 There’s only one solution for Locke to know and that is our day-to-
day experience. Locke would have a profound study on this experience as he said that experience
has two kinds. It is the primary qualities and secondary qualities. “Primary qualities speak on the
1
Amable G. Tuibeo, Philosophy of Education: A New Perspective (Grandbooks Publishing, Inc., 2012) p.
134-135.
2
John Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, vol II, The Empiricist, Laurence Carlin (Continuum
International Publishing Group, 2009) p. 86.
kind of features that identified by our senses. It includes solidity, extension etc. On the other
hand, Secondary qualities produce idea on the thing that our senses identified. It determines the
color, shape and its dimension.”3 Through these encounters of Locke in his study on human
mind, here we can say that Locke goes beyond his idea on experience. We look things not by
In further study of John Locke, he distinguishes the mere fact that every mind is different.
“John Locke calls it as mind temperament.”4 A temperament is a natural inclination of the child
to some things. There is a kind of mind temperament that John Locke pointed out. That is, “a
pleasure out of the pain of others.”5 John Locke may have confidence that the child temperament
should be taken into its education. This is why the parents, as the first teacher, may guard to what
the child’s weaknesses in his temperaments and inspire them with their strength. Furthermore,
“John Locke instructs that to analyze their children’s capabilities, in many cases, all we can do is
to make the best of what nature has given and to prevent the vices and faults to which such a
constitution is so inclined.” 6 In cultivating the mind of the child, “Locke conveys that in
education, it will go some way toward liberalizing ideas on suitable reading for children…Locke
recommended Aesop’s Fables which talk different stories that will delight and entertain a child.
Locke’s concern here is to “preserve” the child’s “tender mind” from irrational “impressions and
3
John Locke, A Guide to Locke Essay via Google (http://www.philosophypages.com/locke/g01.htm)
4
Some Thoughts Concerning Education, John Locke via Google
(http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/lockethoughts/summary.html)
5
Ibid (Some Thoughts, John Locke)
6
Jamie Gianoutsos, Locke and Rousseau: Early Childhood Education via Philosophy Page
(https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php?id=37670)
notions.”7 Thus, this point is to discover how child’s mind work in absorbing to what he/she
The fundamental attitude of a child rooted on the supervision as it is being taught by their
parents. But some parents nowadays as based on experience, they are misleading their children to
do evil things. They give importance to the wants of the body rather the necessities of
disciplining their child in preparation for the future. By describing the status of a child, he is very
zero in knowing things. We remember that the naïve child is a blank slate. “Locke said strictly
misleading can be linked to this trembling condition, the most notable being the danger that fears
will be imprinted on the minds of children by careless adults.”8 The parents have also an
authority on making their child be disciplined at home. “John Locke never agrees to the thought
of corporal punishment when the child commits mistakes, especially in training and learning.
Locke says, “Beating them and all other sorts of slavish and corporal punishments are not the
discipline fit to be handed upon in educating.” 9 For Locke, “the core of discipline is not
training.”10 The parents continue to nurture their children by training them to act correctly in
social situations. Child in themselves is short-handed in terms of observing rules. “John Locke
advises that instead of spouting rules, parents should gently show their children what to do…the
7
Anne Jamison, Children’s Susceptible Minds: Alicia Lefanu and the “Reasoned Imagination” in Georgian
Children’s Literature(Studies in Romanticism; Boston, 2013) p.590.
8
Robert Mankin, Locke’s Education of the Personality (Etudes Anglaises; Paris, 2005)p. 389.
9
Williams, A. N, “To observe well… and thence to make himself rules”: John Locke’s Principles and Practice
of Child Healthcare, vol. 33; Medical Humanities; London (BMJ Publishing Group LTD, London, 2007) p.26.
10
John S. Brubacher, Modern Philosophies of Education (Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Pvt. LTD, 1969) p.
117-118
child can practice his new lesson in manners but should not be harassed if he makes a mistake…
John Locke reminds parents that it would be years to teach with a child…so be patient with
younger children…the more years the child is being in good company, much he can learn until
good manners becomes virtually natural.”11Thus, disciplining is not harassing but part of
To be a parent, the goal is to have proper guidelines on how to develop a child. This is to
attain that the development of a child will be flourished in their daily life. To ensure the health
of a child is the priority. On one hand, John Locke was not only concern on how the child being
developed but also on the health of a child. As a physician, John Locke may be teaching also on
how to maintain the healthy lifestyle of the child and its prevention on having sickness. “For
John Locke, obedience to the body’s needs for food, sleep and exercise. The stage on freeing the
child from sickness is that, the child could have a “bellyful of bread daily” and thus little amount
of meat or fruit on which this is the prescription for the healthy bones and healthy body. And,
bathing their feet in cold water so as to expose themselves and of letting themselves be
accustomed to wet shoes or boots and exposing themselves to a cold weather if it is needful.” 12
The explicit point of this child healthcare is that mothers, in particular, should have controlled
their child from spoiling. In this point, Locke emphasizes the importance of the parental duty in
the midst of children’s life, “The authority that parents have their over their children arise from
that duty which is compulsory to them, that is, to take care of their offspring during the imperfect
state of childhood. To enlighten the mind and govern the actions of their yet ignorance nonage,
11
Jamie Gianoutsos, Locke and Rousseau: Early Childhood Education via Philosophy Page
(https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php?id=37670)
12
Williams, A. N, “To observe well… and thence to make himself rules”: John Locke’s Principles and
Practice of Child Healthcare, vol. 33; Medical Humanities; London (BMJ Publishing Group LTD, London, 2007) p.26.
till reason shall take its place and comfort them of that troubles and struggles, is what the
children want, and the parents are bound to.” 13 It is of careful guarding not just the transition of
the attitude of the child but also the health in each self. Thus, Locke’s advice would be the rules
to observe well in developing a child. In this way, they would acquire a physical strength akin to
In educating a child, John Locke gave reminders. He warns parents to wake their children
gently from their sleep, for example. He reminds them that “fear is inconsistent with learning;
instructing a trembling mind is like writing on shaking paper. Locke always remembers to
“consider them as children.”14 And that is to “bear carefully the mind of a child as it is
assimilating experience in his day to day life.”15In Some Thoughts Concerning Education, this
book of John Locke gives a philosophical instruction on how to raise a child. It is a good option
for an efficient educator to choose the education steps provided by Locke in molding a child in
the midst of emptiness. Precisely, this book compiled with letters written to a friend, Edward
education is an aim of developing character. What matters is not what the child learns, but who
“gracefulness” of a public character which is the harmonious translation of the mind into actions
13
A.N Williams, Physician, Philosopher, and Paediatrician: John Locke’s Practice of Child Health Care
(Archives of Disease in Childhood, London 2006) p. 88.
14
, John Locke on Education via Google(www.google.com.ph/webhp?sourceid=chrome-
instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=locke+on+education)
15
Amable G. Tuibeo, Philosophy of Education: A New Perspective (Grandbooks Publishing, Inc., 2012) p.
134.
16
Ibid. (www.google.com.ph/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-
8#q=locke+on+education)
of the body in space and social life.”17 Basically the thought of education is not just to store
learning but also to be virtuous and useful men and women, whatever their status in life. Virtuous
is not being taught upon but freely known by individual. John Locke emphasizes “the mean of
freedom to learn and of knowing, this refers to the thought of liberty.”18 The inclination for
liberty is important to Locke in terms of education. For Locke, “Liberty itself does not mean a
complete absence of restraint, but it does entail a sense of independence in action. Children want
to show that their actions come from themselves and that they are free.” 19 On the other hand,
some may argue that, in a statement, children love play-games because they excite their
imagination or desire for amusement, but Locke argues that it is “liberty alone which gives the
true relish and delight to their ordinary play-games”20It has much to appreciate if everyone has its
own freedom to learn and to develop everyone’s way of reasoning. We have to imagine if we try
to force a child to learn and to know things they don’t like to. Perhaps they may come to the
point of tiring and weary. Thus, Liberty may be an beneficial asset to a reasonable man. Parents
may not be as a forcing educator but rather “a guidance to their children towards reasoning
abstractly and practicing sensible actions in life that are appropriate to the dignity and excellency
of a rational creature.”21 The teacher/educator has to make things develop with these character
traits as a central to the concept of childhood development. “These are consciousness of object
and events and in particular the capacity to feel pain. The capacity of reasoning as to develop
capacity to solve new and relatively complex problems. The self-motivated activity in which the
17
Robert Mankin, Locke’s Education of the Personality(Etudes Anglaises: 2005) p. 395.
18
Jamie Gianoutsos, Locke and Rousseau: Early Childhood Education via Philosophy Page
(https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php?id=37670)
19
Ibid, p.3.
20
Ibid, p.4.
21
Ibid, (https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php?id=37670)
inclination of the child matters. The capacity to communicate and ask question in all means with
variety of types of topics if possible. And, the presence of self-awareness on individual, race
etc.”22 The call of duty in raising a child is somewhat not easy as it is the concept of study of
Conclusion
education of which the authoritarian formula is the practice of teaching. That is, a type of
teaching in which the teacher is giving rules on how to carry out lessons and the students are just
listeners and a puppet on the method of teaching. The courage of Locke states to his book on
education which is Some Thoughts Concerning Education. The aim of this book is not to
discourage the educators but to remind them the different kind of mind of every individual
students they have. To be an educator is to know not only the potentials of the students but also
their weakness. In treating a child, the parents may always consider the emptiness of a child.
Moreover, the education itself means to teach. Locke did not stop to the point of teaching but
in experience. It is not that type of an education of which the teacher is the midpoint of student’s
learning. It is not that type of spoon feeding way of leaning. Rather, it is of going back to what is
education really means. That is to go in practical learning, self-analysis and liberty. The freedom
to learn and of knowing is the key to widen our perspective in education. The consciousness of
practical learning is practicing to which the mind is the tool of making ideas on what is simple
and easy. Although there are times to mishandle things as part of our limitations but the thought
is to grow, to go beyond limitations of our mind. That is to think profoundly as part also of self-
22
Theodore Schick Jr., &Lewis Vaughn, Doing Philosophy. 3 rd ed. An Introduction Through Thought
Experiment(McGraw Hill Publishing Company, Inc. 2006) p. 46.
analyzes. In acquiring the concept of liberty, it is not of freeing oneself up to the point of doing
whatever we like to do. Rather, the thought of liberty is exercising independency. In looking
forward, it is only the “I” who makes decisions in life. When in terms of problem and struggles,
the “I” only knows the solutions to be done. Thus, this is why, John Locke never stops to remind
the parents and fellow educators, that in developing a child, the main purpose of it is to give
guidance to a child to think, act and to behave freely in the society. Independency is exercising
oneselfs’ attitude to stand firm. It is not just to stand firm as alone but to stand firm freely in
learning, doing decisions and making solutions. If the mind of the child matured enough, then he
Bibliography
Brubacher, John S. Modern Philosophies of Education .Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Pvt.
LTD, 1969.
Carlin, Laurence. John Locke. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, vol II. The Empiricist.
Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009.
Gianoutsos. Jamie. Locke and Rousseau: Early Childhood Education. Philosophy Page
https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php?id=37670.
Grant, Ruth W. & Hertzberg, Benjamin R. John Locke on Education. via Google.
www.google.com.ph/webhp?sourceid=chrome-
instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=locke+on+education.
Jamison, Anne. Children’s Susceptible Minds: Alicia Lefanu and the “Reasoned Imagination” in
Georgian Children’s Literature. Studies in Romanticism: Boston, 2013.
Mankin, Robert. Locke’s Education of the Personality. Etudes Anglaises: Paris, 2005.
Schick Jr.,Theodore & Vaughn, Lewis. Doing Philosophy. 3rd ed. An Introduction Through
Thought Experiment. McGraw Hill Publishing Company, Inc. 2006.
Williams, A. N. “To observe well… and thence to make himself rules”: John Locke’s Principles
and Practice of Child Healthcare, vol. 33; Medical Humanities; London .BMJ
Publishing Group LTD, London, 2007.