Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract— Different types of techniques have been used for There are various methods used to track for MPP. Some
tracking the MPPT of PV system such as perturb and observe of the most popular methods are[1, 4, 5, 13, 15-16]:
and incremental conductance, etc. The incremental i. The Incremental Conductance MPPT methods
conductance MPPT tracking techniques is complex but more
efficient than P&O of PV system under specified atmospheric ii. The Perturb-Observe MPPT methods (Hill Climbing)
conditions. Therefore, the aim of this work is to present iii. The Fractional open circuit voltage MPPT methods
comparison between P&O and INC maximum power point iv. The Fractional short circuit current MPPT methods
tracking techniques. This paper presents the implementation v. The Parasitic Capacitance MPPT Method
and comparison of performances with respect to output
parameters for P&O and INC MPPT algorithms. The vi. The Constant Voltage MPPT Method
comparison shows INC technique is more efficient and offers a vii. The Constant Current MPPT Method
fast tracking speed for the MPPT of a PV array. The modeling viii. The Fuzzy based MPPT methods
of the system is executed with MATLAB/SIMULINK software.
ix. The Hybrid MPPT Methods
Keywords— Photovoltaic (PV) system, Maximum power point
tracking (MPPT), Perturb and observe (P&O), Incremental The PV array lies of various PV systems in parallel and
conductance (INC). series connections. The series assemblies are accountable for
growing module voltage; in which parallel assembly is
I. INTRODUCTION
accountable for growing the array current. The basic
The natural resources like sunlight, wind energy, rain, conceptual diagram to implement MPPT of PV system is
tides and geothermal can generate renewable power. The revealed in Fig. 1 [9].
renewable sources are naturally replenished. Therefore, most
useful applications of these generating resources are
limitless, unlike decreasing normal fossil fuels. The global
power has given by a rehabilitated momentum for growth
and build renewable power and clean and resources.
Consequently, renewable energy resources are much cleaner
and which are not producing toxic waste contrasting their
conventional sources.
Fig. 1. The Block diagram to implement MPPT of PV system [9]
II. THE MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING
(MPPT) METHODS III. PERTURB & OBSERVE (P&O) MPPT
Generally the solar systems have very low efficiency. ALGORITHM
Hence to maximize efficiency, several types of MPPT The Perturb and Observe strategies expresses, the PV
methods are applied [1, 4, 5, 7-9, 13-16, 19]. This is a system working voltage is through little augmentation, but a
procedure used for getting maximum possible power from variation in control annoyed the power is certain, at that
variable sources. For PV system the I-V characteristic is non- point are going toward MPP and continue perturbing a
linear, therefore making it problematic to be used for power similar way. On the off chance that P is negative, we are
such a load. Boost converter is also used for this, whose duty moving far from course MPP and sign bother provided has
is changed by MPPT. A converter is utilized on the demand be of changed Shows the stream graph of P&O strategy
side and solar system is employed to supply this converter calculation [1, 4]. Here, P&O calculation conveys the current
and voltage estimation from the photovoltaic. The result of
[17-18]. This technique increases the output power of PV
current and voltage is intensity of sunlight based photograph
systems. MPPT systems are typically connected into an
voltaic exhibit. The value of sun powered photovoltaic
electrical power conversion device that gives current or module power and voltage at ith moment are kept. All over
voltage conversion, regulation and filtering, for driving again the sunlight based photograph voltaic (PV) power is
different loads, including motors, batteries. Solar systems, computed after that esteem (i+1)th moment from the
inverters change the DC - AC energy and can incorporate deliberate measure of current and voltage [7]. By the side of
MPPT: these inverters sample response powers (I-V (i+1)th moment the power as well as voltage are subtracted
characteristic) from photovoltaic string and utilization of individuality on ith moment. Under the RHS of P-V normal
proper load so as to produce maximum power [6-9]. MPP is for sun powered photograph voltaic exhibit where the
a product of MPP current (Impp) and voltage (Vmpp). voltage is relatively staying steady incline of intensity and
Photovoltaic solar system I-V characteristic, where a line voltage is negative and on the LHS, the slant of intensity and
intersects a knee of curves where the maximum power voltage is certain [15]. The flowchart to implement Perturb
conversion point is located. & Observe Algorithm is given in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4. Simulation modeling of system with P&O MPPT method for constant irradiation
Fig. 5. Simulation modeling of system with INC MPPT method for constant irradiation
(a)
(b)
Figure 8: PV array maximum power for constant irradiation with (a) P&O;
(b) INC Method
(a)
(a)
(b) (b)
Fig. 7. PV array voltage for constant irradiation with (a) P&O; (b) INC Fig. 9. Boost converter output voltage for constant irradiation with (a)
Method P&O; (b) INC Method
is larger with INC method than P&O. Hence, the system
output performance parameters like voltage and power are
more effective for INC over P&O method.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 10. Boost converter output power for constant irradiation with (a)
P&O; (b) INC Method
(a)
Fig. 11. Comparison of PV max power and converter output power with
P&O and INC Method for constant irradiation
Fig. 15. Simulation modeling of system with INC MPPT method for variable irradiation
(a) (a)
(b) (b)
Fig. 16. PV array maximum power for variable irradiation with (a) P&O; Fig. 17. Boost converter output voltage for variable irradiation with (a)
(b) INC Method P&O; (b) INC Method
from the above analysis it can be concluded that the INC
method shows a superior performance over P&O method.
REFERENCES
[1] Visweswara K., “An investigation of incremental conductance based
maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic system”, Energy
Procedia, vol. 54, pp.11-20, jan, 2014.
[2] Nema S, Nema RK, Agnihotri G., “Matlab/simulink based study of
photovoltaic cells/modules/array and their experimental verification”,
International journal of Energy and Environment, Vol. 1(3), pp. 487-
500, Jan, 2010.
[3] Pandiarajan N, Muthu R., “Mathematical modeling of photovoltaic
module with Simulink”, In International Conference on Electrical
Energy Systems (ICEES 2011), Vol. 6, pp. 314-319, Jan, 2011.
(a) [4] Putri RI, Wibowo S, Rifa’i M., “Maximum power point tracking for
photovoltaic using incremental conductance method”, Energy
Procedia, Vol 68, pp. 22-30, Apr 2015.
[5] Chafle SR, Vaidya UB., “Incremental conductance MPPT technique
FOR PV system”, International Journal of Advanced Research in
Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Vol 2(6), pp.
2719-2726, Jun 2013.
[6] Kun Ding, Hohai University “A MATLAB-Simulink-Based PV
Module Model and Its Application Under Conditions of Nonuniform
Irradiance”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 27, no.
4, 864-872, December 2012.
[7] Bharti RN, Mandal RK., “Modeling and Simulation of Maximum
Power Point Tracking for Solar PV System using Perturb and Observe
Algorithm”, International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology, Vol. 3(7), pp. 7-18, 2014.
[8] Patel H, Gupta M, Bohre AK, “Mathematical modeling and
performance analysis of MPPT based solar PV system”, In Electrical
(b) Power and Energy Systems (ICEPES), IEEE International Conference
Fig. 18:.Boost converter output power for variable irradiation with (a) on, pp. 157-162, Dec 2016.
P&O; (b) INC Method [9] Viswambaran, Vidhya K., Arfan Ghani, and Erping Zhou, "Modelling
and simulation of maximum power point tracking algorithms &
review of MPPT techniques for PV applications", Electronic Devices,
Systems and Applications (ICEDSA), 2016 5th IEEE International
Conference, pp. 1-4, 2016.
[10] Garg R, Singh A, Gupta S., “PV cell models and dynamic simulation
of MPPT trackers in MATLAB”, In Computing for Sustainable
Global Development (INDIACom), 2014 IEEE International
Conference, pp. 6-12, 2014.
[11] Safari A, Mekhilef S., “Incremental conductance MPPT method for
PV systems”, In Electrical and computer engineering (CCECE), 2011
24th IEEE Canadian Conference, pp. 345-34, May 2011.
[12] Parekh AP, Vaidya BN, Patel CT., “Modeling and Simulation Based
Approach of Photovoltaic System” Global Research Analysis, Vol
2(4), Apr 2013.
[13] Lokanadham, M., and K. Vijaya Bhaskar, "Incremental conductance
based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) for photovoltaic
system." International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications (IJERA) Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1420-1424, 2012.
Fig. 19. Comparison of PV max power and converter output power with [14] Ranjan K, Kumar N., “Modelling and simulation of perturb and
P&O and INC Method for variable irradiation observe algorithm on solar pv system using different converters in
matlab/simulink” In Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and
VI. CONCLUSION Energy Systems (ICPEICES), IEEE International Conference, pp. 1-6,
July 2016.
Initially, the overall PV models run with constant [15] Gomathi, B., and P. Sivakami, "An Incremental Conductance
irradiations with P and O and INC MPPT technique for the Algorithm based Solar Maximum Power Point Tracking
presented system. For constant irradiations the boost System."International Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 9, No 1,
pp. 15-24, 2016.
converter output voltage including P&O and INC MPPT [16] Uma Maheswara Rao, and A. Srihari Babu. Ch UM, Babu AS.,
method are 341 V and 350.2 V respectively. Also, the boost “Design and Simulation of PV System with Incremental Conductance
converter output voltage including P&O and INC MPPT Method for Maximum Power Point Tracking”, International Journal
method for constant irradiations are 8970 W and 9465 W of Scientific Engineering and Technology, Vol. No.3 Issue No.5, pp.
respectively. It is seen that at constant irradiations the INC 643-646, May 2014.
[17] Bhuvaneswari G, Annamalai R., “Development of a solar cell model
MPPT algorithm/ technique/ method gives better results and
in MATLAB for PV based generation system”, In India Conference
less oscillation over P&O. Subsequently, the proposed (INDICON), 2011 Annual IEEE 2011, pp. 1-5, Dec 2011.
system models run with variable irradiations including P&O [18] Hassan, M., and A. H. Bhuiyan, "Design and performance evaluation
and INC MPPT method. In the results analysis it’s found that of three-phase inverter for grid-connected photovoltaic system",
the output voltage of boost converter including P&O and Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 2010, pp1-8, 2010.
INC MPPT method for variable irradiations are 274.7 V and [19] I. H. Altas and A.M. Sharaf, “A Photovoltaic Array Simulation Model
for Matlab-Simulink GUI Environment,” IEEE, Clean Electrical
287.8 V respectively. Furthermore, the boost converter Power, International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP
output power with P&O and INC MPPT method for variable '07), June 14-16, 2007.
irradiations are 5825 W and 6393 W respectively. Hence,