Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
net/publication/291421120
CITATIONS READS
0 237
7 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Survivorship care needs for patients with cancer in Singapore View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Haikel A. Lim on 13 December 2018.
Research Assistant1
Research Assistant1
Senior Consultant Psychiatrist1 and Tan Geok Yin Professor for Psychiatry and Neuroscience2
Rathi Mahendran
Accepted for publication in The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing on 7 October 2015. The final publication is available at Slack Inc.
Please cite this article as: Lim, H. A., Tan, J. Y. S., Liu, J., Chua, J., Ang, E. N. K., Kua, E. H., & Mahendran, R.. (2015). Strengthening
resilience and reducing distress through a continuing education program in psychosocial care for nurses practicing in oncology settings. The
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, in press.
2
1
Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower
2
Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower
3
National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System,
4
Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore,
Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11 Level 2, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597
5
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857
Corresponding Author:
Email: rathi_mahendran@nuhs.edu.sg
Abstract
Resilience has been identified as key to protecting nurses against the sequelae of their
work and compassion fatigue; however, a recent review highlighted a lack of training programs
targeted at improving resilience and studies providing evidence that resilience can even be
education program for nurses practicing in oncology settings targeted at improving their
knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviours in psychosocial care would also have a secondary
effect of improving resilience and reducing distress in these nurses. Non-parametric correlation
analyses revealed that improvements in knowledge and self-reported practices were related to
improvements in resilience, and that improvements in resilience were associated with reductions
in distress. While more targeted research is required, findings provide preliminary evidence that
continuing education programs targeted at psychosocial care may also be helpful in improving
Distress
4
Nurses face numerous stressors on a daily basis within their clinical workplace that often
result in clinically significant distress, well-being impairments, and eventually lead to burnout
(Lim, Bogossian, & Ahern, 2010). These debilitating effects may affect nurses’ ability to
effectively care for their patients (Barnett, Baker, Elman, & Schoener, 2007); as such, fostering
psychosocial resources like resilience has been highlighted as key to improving patient care and
surviving compassion fatigue and burnout in nurses (Jackson, Firtko, & Edenborough, 2007).
Mental or psychological resilience is the ability and capacity to cope successfully with
significant change, adversity, or risk (Rutter, 1987), and thrive in the face of adversity (Connor
& Davidson, 2003). Nurses’ resilience can be strengthened through mentorship programs that
develop and nurture professional relationships, and encourage positivity, emotional insight,
holistic balance, spirituality, and personal reflection (Jackson et al., 2007). Strengthening
resilience also requires a multi-level approach that builds on strengths and capabilities of the
individuals, while maintaining sensitivity to culture and context (Ungar, 2008). A recent
literature review, however, found no formal training programs and thus no evidence even
While under- and post-graduate nursing education programs may already have begun
highly stressful settings who may potentially benefit from such programs. These nurses, however,
are also often time-strapped, with few opportunities to reflect on their practice, much less attend
(McAllister & McKinnon, 2009). It was thus of interest to explore if nurse continuing education
training programs may have a secondary effect of improving resilience and reducing distress.
screening in a national cancer centre in Singapore, all nurses practicing in the medical- and
radiation-oncology units were invited to attend a voluntary continuing education (CE) training
program in psychosocial care and distress management. The two-hour standardised program
sought to improve (theoretical and applied) knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviours (KAPb)
of these 180 nurses with various experience and training. The program was conducted in two
segments: a formal didactic session, which provided information on tools for measuring
emotional distress, clinical scenarios of patient presentations, and relaxation techniques such as
progressive muscle relaxation and controlled breathing; and a small group role-playing session
(of six to ten nurses) who were provided clinical scenarios for experiential learning facilitated by
psychologists and psychiatrists. The program outline and its efficacy have been described in
detail elsewhere (Mahendran et al., 2014); results revealed that the program improved applied
knowledge and self-reported practice behaviours and were sustained over 12-weeks.
The present study thus sought to investigate if changes in KAPb following such a CE
training program for nurses, would be associated with changes in their resilience and distress. It
was hypothesized that, after the CE program, improvements in KAPb (measured by the KAPb
Scale; Mahendran et al., 2014), would be positively correlated with improvements in resilience
(measured by the Resilience Scale; Wagnild, 2011) and reductions in distress (as measured by
A subset of data from 162 female nurses (77% registered nurses) practicing in the
medical-oncology setting (65% inpatient settings; 53% had less than four years of experience)
that had attended the aforementioned CE training program and completed both baseline (one-
week pre-CE program) and follow-up measures (eight weeks post-CE program) were used for
the present analyses. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline from the follow-
up scores of the measures of interest. All participants provided informed consent and the present
study had ethics approval from the Institutional Review Board at the National University of
Singapore.
As seen in Table 1, findings from these exploratory analyses revealed that improvements
in overall KAPb, specifically theoretical knowledge, applied knowledge, and practice behaviours
and practice behaviours were unrelated to distress, but improvements in resilience were
correlated with reductions in distress. While no follow-up qualitative interviews were conducted
Learning about the prevalence and effect of psychological distress on cancer patients’
treatment outcomes and prognoses, and the various ways in which nurses could play a part in
alleviating this sequelae may have resulted in a greater sense of participants’ self-efficacy and
community capability about managing such patients, which may have led to improvements in
resilience (Ungar, 2008). Participants may thus have been more likely to interact and engage
with patients on the causes of their distress, and offer skills (e.g., deep breathing or progressive
muscle relaxation) to alleviate distress symptoms, which may have also reinforced self-efficacy
and improved resilience. In their interactions with patients and identifying causes of distress,
participants may also have experienced patients’ adversity by proxy. This may have triggered
7
personal reflection via social comparisons and a broadened perspective on their own lives and
dealing with their stressors, which has been shown to improve resilience (Jackson et al., 2007).
While much is still speculative, these findings provide preliminary evidence that nurse
resilience can be strengthened. Continuing education programs for nurses targeted at improving
psychosocial care for patients may thus also have a secondary effect of improving participants’
resilience, and consequently reducing their distress. More research, however, is required to
ascertain the veracity of these results in other settings and organisational and national cultures.
8
References
Barnett, J. E., Baker, E. K., Elman, N. S., & Schoener, G. R. (2007). In pursuit of wellness: The
doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.6.603
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new Resilience scale: The
doi:10.1002/da.10113
Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. D. P. M. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health
Jackson, D., Firtko, A., & Edenborough, M. (2007). Personal resilience as a strategy for
surviving and thriving in the face of workplace adversity: A literature review. Journal of
Lim, J., Bogossian, F., & Ahern, K. (2010). Stress and coping in Singaporean nurses: A literature
Mahendran, R., Chua, J., Peh, C. X., Lim, H. A., Ang, E. N. K., Lim, S. E., & Kua, E. H. (2014).
Knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviors (KAPb) of nurses and the effectiveness of a
training program in psychosocial cancer care. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(8), 2049–
2056. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2172-9
9
McAllister, M., & McKinnon, J. (2009). The importance of teaching and learning resilience in
the health disciplines: A critical review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 29(4),
371–379. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.011
McCann, C. M., Beddoe, E., McCormick, K., Huggard, P., Kedge, S., Adamson, C., & Huggard,
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. The American Journal of
Ungar, M. (2008). Putting resilience theory into action: Five principles for intervention. In L.
Liebenberg & M. Ungar (Eds.), Resilience in action (pp. 17–38). Toronto, ON, Canada:
Wagnild, G. M. (2011). The resilience scale user’s guide for the US English version of the
resilience scale and the 14-item resilience scale (RS-14). (3.20 ed.). Worden, MT, USA:
Resilience Center.
10
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the participants of this study,
as well as the various study team members and oncology healthcare professionals who have