Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Some viruses cause less discrete manifestations CNS infection and are
described with broader terms:
and has a broad range of presenting symptoms and signs. The clinical
manifestations vary depending upon the viral agent, the affected region(s) of the
brain, the age of the patient, and the patient’s immune status [1].
EVALUATION
The initial step in the evaluation of the child with altered brain function begins
with assessment of the airway, breathing, and circulation. The first priorities are
stabilization of cardiorespiratory status and management of seizures.
(See "Initial assessment and stabilization of children with respiratory or
circulatory compromise" and "Management of convulsive status epilepticus in
children", section on 'Initial treatment'.)
History — The history may provide clues to a particular viral etiology (table
5 and table 6). When evaluating a patient with suspected encephalitis, it is
important to ask specific questions regarding travel and exposures (eg, animals,
insects, toxins, etc), particularly within the two to three weeks before onset.
Immunizations and immune status should also be reviewed [1,3]. (See "Viral
encephalitis in adults", section on 'Historical clues'.)
Physical examination — The physical examination should include careful
neurologic evaluation for focal findings. Neurologic evaluation should include
assessment of the mental status and motor, sensory, cranial nerve, cerebellar,
and reflex function. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score (table 8), although
not validated in patients with nontraumatic brain injury, can be helpful in
quantifying the level of consciousness and monitoring neurologic progression.
(See "Detailed neurologic assessment of infants and children".)
●Vesicular rash in neonates with CNS herpes simplex virus (HSV) disease
(picture 1A-C) (see "Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection: Clinical
features and diagnosis", section on 'Neonatal HSV')
●Maculopapular rash in West Nile virus (WNV) disease (picture 2)
(see "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of West Nile virus infection",
section on 'Clinical manifestations')
●Characteristic lesions of hand, foot, and mouth disease (coxsackieviruses
A and B) (picture 3A-D) (see "Hand, foot, and mouth disease and
herpangina")
●The rash of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (picture 4), which typically does
not appear until several days after the onset of fever (see "Clinical
manifestations and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever")
Laboratory findings that may provide clues to the etiology include the following
[3]:
Samples of CSF should be sent for cell count and differential, glucose, protein,
Gram stain, bacterial culture, HSV polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and
enterovirus PCR; additional tests should be done as indicated by epidemiology
and clinical findings [3,5]. (See 'Identifying the specific pathogen' below.)
The CSF indices in viral encephalitis are similar to those in viral meningitis and
meningoencephalitis and may overlap with those of bacterial meningitis (table
10). Characteristic findings include:
In a study of >1500 cases of encephalitis, there was a wide range of CSF WBC
counts and protein levels [16]. Patients with infectious encephalitis had
significantly higher CSF WBC compared with patients with noninfectious
encephalitis (median CSF WBC 53.5 versus 9.5 cells/microL), but the difference
in protein levels was not significant (median level 71 versus 67 mg/dL). Among
patients with viral encephalitis, 83 percent had CSF WBC count
≥6 cells/microL, and 32 percent had protein levels ≤45 mg/dL.
●Blood culture
●CSF Gram stain, acid fast stain, and culture
●Urine and serum toxicology screening (see "Approach to the child with
occult toxic exposure")
●Metabolic studies (serum ammonia, lactate, and blood pH) (see "Inborn
errors of metabolism: Identifying the specific disorder")
●Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and anti-voltage-gated
potassium channel (VGKC) antibodies if clinically indicated
(see "Paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis")
●CSF studies – Tests of the CSF that can help to establish an infectious
etiology for encephalitis include PCR and antibody testing [3]:
•Multiplex PCR testing – Multiplex or panel-based nucleic acid
amplification tests are now available that test for multiple bacterial and
viral pathogens simultaneously in a single CSF sample (eg,
FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel [BioFire]) [17-19]. Where
available, these tests can be helpful in evaluating a child with
suspected encephalitis. The FilmArray panel targets 14 pathogens:
cytomegalovirus (CMV), enterovirus, HSV 1 and 2, human herpesvirus
6 (HHV-6), human parechovirus, varicella-zoster virus
(VZV), Escherichia coli K1, Haemophilus
influenzae, Listeriamonocytogenes, Neisseria
meningitidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus
pneumoniae, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Cryptococcus
gattii [20].Multiplex PCR tests are highly sensitive and specific, though
false-positive and false-negative results can occur. If a multiplex panel
is performed, it should be used in conjunction with standard
microbiologic tests (eg, cultures of CSF and blood). Multiplex panels
do not detect all causes of CNS infection, nor do they provide any
information on antimicrobial susceptibility.
•Individual PCR tests – If multiplex testing is not available, enterovirus
and HSV CSF PCR testing should be performed [3]. These tests are
helpful when positive, but negative tests do not necessarily exclude the
pathogen. CSF enterovirus PCR does not permit identification of the
enterovirus serotype. Enterovirus 71, an important cause of
encephalitis in young children, is rarely detected by CSF PCR.
•CSF antibody testing – The detection of virus-specific immunoglobulin
(Ig)M in the CSF usually indicates CNS disease because IgM
antibodies do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier.
•Viral culture – CSF viral cultures are not routinely recommended
[3,21].
●Testing of sites outside the CNS – When the pathogen is identified from
an anatomic site other than the CNS (eg, respiratory tract, skin, stool), the
results must be interpreted in conjunction with epidemiologic and clinical
findings, and other diagnostic studies (table 5 and table 6 and table 7) [3].
The isolated pathogen may play a role in the CNS manifestations, but not
necessarily by direct invasion, or may be present but unrelated to
encephalitis (eg, hepatitis C, rotavirus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae) [3].
● Antibody titers – Acute and convalescent antibody titers may be helpful if
cultures and PCR have not established a diagnosis and the patient remains
ill. Detection of antibodies in acute serum may be helpful in identifying
some pathogens (arboviruses, HIV, rabies) and may be used as evidence
of causation if the infection is rare or highly fatal (eg, rabies, Eastern equine
encephalitis) [3,5,22].
●Brain biopsy – Brain biopsy is rarely indicated in children with suspected
encephalitis. It can be considered if the etiology remains uncertain after
extensive noninvasive testing in a patient with a severe and/or progressive
disease course despite empiric therapy [3].
It may be helpful to freeze samples of CSF and serum to allow for further testing
later if the diagnosis is not reached initially.
The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should be
notified when certain pathogens are isolated from patients in the United States.
An updated list of these pathogens is available at the CDC website.
MRI findings vary somewhat depending on the viral etiology. However, with the
exception of temporal lobe localization in HSV encephalitis, most findings are
not highly sensitive or specific for a particular pathogen. Typical findings include
[3,5,16,25]:
●HSV – Temporal lobe localization (image 1); temporal localization also
may occur with other herpes viruses and syphilis (see "Neonatal herpes
simplex virus infection: Clinical features and diagnosis", section on 'Brain
imaging' and "Herpes simplex virus type 1 encephalitis", section on
'Imaging studies').
●Flavivirus, Eastern equine encephalitis virus – Lesions in the thalamus,
basal ganglia, and midbrain that are of mixed intensity or hypodense on T1
and hyperdense on T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)
images (see "Arthropod-borne encephalitides").
●Enterovirus 71 encephalitis – Hyperintense T2 and FLAIR lesions in the
midbrain, pons, and medulla (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections:
Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention").
●Respiratory virus encephalitis (eg, influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus,
respiratory syncytial virus) – Abnormalities in the thalamus or basal ganglia
(see "Seasonal influenza in children: Clinical features and diagnosis").
Neuroimaging also may detect other conditions that are in the differential
diagnosis (table 4) (see 'Differential diagnosis' below):
encephalitis (table 4). Many of these conditions require specific therapy, and
prompt initiation of therapy may improve outcome. Information from the history,
examination, laboratory, and radiologic evaluation can help distinguish between
viral encephalitis and other conditions in the differential diagnosis.
(See 'Evaluation' above.)
sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are
provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Infectious encephalitis".)
patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics
patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade
reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might
have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a
general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the
Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more
detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are
best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some
medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We
encourage you to print or email these topics to your patients. (You can also
locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on
"patient education" and the keyword[s] of interest.)
REFERENCES
1. Bronstein DE, Shields WD, Glaser CA. Encephalitis and meningoencephalitis. I
n: Feigin and Cherry’s Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 7th ed, Cherry
JD, Harrison GJ, Kaplan SL, et al (Eds), Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia 2014.
p.492.
2. Venkatesan A, Tunkel AR, Bloch KC, et al. Case definitions, diagnostic
algorithms, and priorities in encephalitis: consensus statement of the
international encephalitis consortium. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57:1114.
3. Tunkel AR, Glaser CA, Bloch KC, et al. The management of encephalitis:
clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin
Infect Dis 2008; 47:303.
4. Thompson C, Kneen R, Riordan A, et al. Encephalitis in children. Arch Dis Child
2012; 97:150.
5. Glaser C, Long SS. Encephalitis. In: Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectio
us Diseases, 4th ed, Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG (Eds), Elsevier Saunde
rs, Edinburgh 2012. p.297.
6. Kolski H, Ford-Jones EL, Richardson S, et al. Etiology of acute childhood
encephalitis at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, 1994-1995. Clin Infect
Dis 1998; 26:398.
7. Caviness AC, Demmler GJ, Selwyn BJ. Clinical and laboratory features of
neonatal herpes simplex virus infection: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis
J 2008; 27:425.
8. Fowler A, Stödberg T, Eriksson M, Wickström R. Childhood encephalitis in
Sweden: etiology, clinical presentation and outcome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol
2008; 12:484.
9. Galanakis E, Tzoufi M, Katragkou A, et al. A prospective multicenter study of
childhood encephalitis in Greece. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009; 28:740.
10. Weil AA, Glaser CA, Amad Z, Forghani B. Patients with suspected herpes
simplex encephalitis: rethinking an initial negative polymerase chain reaction
result. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:1154.
11. Fodor PA, Levin MJ, Weinberg A, et al. Atypical herpes simplex virus
encephalitis diagnosed by PCR amplification of viral DNA from CSF. Neurology
1998; 51:554.
12. Jakob NJ, Lenhard T, Schnitzler P, et al. Herpes simplex virus encephalitis
despite normal cell count in the cerebrospinal fluid. Crit Care Med 2012;
40:1304.
13. Balfour HH Jr, Siem RA, Bauer H, Quie PG. California arbovirus (La Crosse)
infections. I. Clinical and laboratory findings in 66 children with
meningoencephalitis. Pediatrics 1973; 52:680.
14. Przelomski MM, O'Rourke E, Grady GF, et al. Eastern equine encephalitis in
Massachusetts: a report of 16 cases, 1970-1984. Neurology 1988; 38:736.
15. Whitley RJ. Viral encephalitis. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:242.
16. Glaser CA, Honarmand S, Anderson LJ, et al. Beyond viruses: clinical profiles
and etiologies associated with encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43:1565.
17. Leber AL, Everhart K, Balada-Llasat JM, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of BioFire
FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel for Detection of Bacteria, Viruses, and
Yeast in Cerebrospinal Fluid Specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54:2251.
18. Liesman RM, Strasburg AP, Heitman AK, et al. Evaluation of a Commercial
Multiplex Molecular Panel for Diagnosis of Infectious Meningitis and
Encephalitis. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56.
19. Blaschke AJ, Holmberg KM, Daly JA, et al. Retrospective Evaluation of Infants
Aged 1 to 60 Days with Residual Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tested Using the
FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56.
20. Ramanan P, Bryson AL, Binnicker MJ, et al. Syndromic Panel-Based Testing in
Clinical Microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2018; 31.
21. Glaser CA, Gilliam S, Schnurr D, et al. In search of encephalitis etiologies:
diagnostic challenges in the California Encephalitis Project, 1998-2000. Clin
Infect Dis 2003; 36:731.
22. McJunkin JE, de los Reyes EC, Irazuzta JE, et al. La Crosse encephalitis in
children. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:801.
23. Ward KN, Leong HN, Thiruchelvam AD, et al. Human herpesvirus 6 DNA levels
in cerebrospinal fluid due to primary infection differ from those due to
chromosomal viral integration and have implications for diagnosis of
encephalitis. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45:1298.
24. Bykowski J, Kruk P, Gold JJ, et al. Acute pediatric encephalitis neuroimaging:
single-institution series as part of the California encephalitis project. Pediatr
Neurol 2015; 52:606.
25. Beattie GC, Glaser CA, Sheriff H, et al. Encephalitis with thalamic and basal
ganglia abnormalities: etiologies, neuroimaging, and potential role of respiratory
viruses. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56:825.
26. To TM, Soldatos A, Sheriff H, et al. Insights into pediatric herpes simplex
encephalitis from a cohort of 21 children from the California Encephalitis
Project, 1998-2011. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33:1287.
27. Baskin HJ, Hedlund G. Neuroimaging of herpesvirus infections in children.
Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37:949.
28. Parmar H, Ibrahim M. Pediatric intracranial infections. Neuroimaging Clin N Am
2012; 22:707.
29. Maschke M, Kastrup O, Forsting M, Diener HC. Update on neuroimaging in
infectious central nervous system disease. Curr Opin Neurol 2004; 17:475.
30. Teixeira J, Zimmerman RA, Haselgrove JC, et al. Diffusion imaging in pediatric
central nervous system infections. Neuroradiology 2001; 43:1031.
31. Okanishi T, Yamamoto H, Hosokawa T, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for early
diagnosis of neonatal herpes simplex encephalitis. Brain Dev 2015; 37:423.
32. Lian ZY, Huang B, He SR, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of
enterovirus 71 encephalitis. Acta Radiol 2012; 53:208.
33. Gold JJ, Crawford JR, Glaser C, et al. The role of continuous
electroencephalography in childhood encephalitis. Pediatr Neurol 2014; 50:318.
34. Pillai SC, Hacohen Y, Tantsis E, et al. Infectious and autoantibody-associated
encephalitis: clinical features and long-term outcome. Pediatrics 2015;
135:e974.
35. Lai CW, Gragasin ME. Electroencephalography in herpes simplex encephalitis.
J Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 5:87.
36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Primary amebic
meningoencephalitis--Arizona, Florida, and Texas, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2008; 57:573.
37. Schuster FL, Yagi S, Gavali S, et al. Under the radar: balamuthia amebic
encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:879.
38. Florance NR, Davis RL, Lam C, et al. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
(NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents. Ann Neurol 2009; 66:11.
39. Suleiman J, Brenner T, Gill D, et al. VGKC antibodies in pediatric encephalitis
presenting with status epilepticus. Neurology 2011; 76:1252.
40. Bseikri MR, Barton JR, Kulhanjian JA, et al. Anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor
encephalitis mimics viral encephalitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012; 31:202.
41. Gable MS, Sheriff H, Dalmau J, et al. The frequency of autoimmune N-methyl-
D-aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in
young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project. Clin Infect Dis
2012; 54:899.