Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
satisfaction score
Percentag
Sl. No. of e Mean SD
Category
No. Consumers (%) Score
1. Low 215 21.5 2.32 0.08
2. Medium 512 51.2 2.74 0.18
3. High 273 27.3 3.43 0.42
Total 1000 100.0
It is observed from Table 4.2 that 21.5 per cent of the consumers have
perceived low level of satisfaction towards services offered by the organized
retail stores, 51.2 per cent of the consumers have perceived medium level of
satisfaction and 27.3 per cent of the consumers have perceived high level of
satisfaction towards services offered by the organized retail stores. Among the
3 categories of the consumers, the majority of the consumers were satisfied at
the high level with a mean score of 3.43 points.
The distribution of consumers’ level of satisfaction towards the services
of the store according to their location, age, gender, marital status, educational
status, occupational status, annual income, family size, type of family, period of
purchase, type of store, frequency of visit, amount spent for purchase and mode
of purchase is discussed using Chi-square analysis.
4.2.2 Chi-Square Analysis
It is observed from Table 4.3 that the level of satisfaction towards the
organised retail stores perceived by the consumers belonging to Chennai ranges
between 36 and 85 with an average of 48.1. The level of satisfaction towards
the organised retail stores perceived by the consumers who belong to
183
S. Level of satisfaction
Location Total
No. Low Medium High
1. Chennai 52 (20.8%) 132(52.8%) 66(26.47%) 250
2. Coimbatore 41(20.5%) 110(55.0%) 49(24.5%) 200
3. Madurai 42(24.0%) 80(45.7%) 53(30.3%) 175
4. Tiruchirappalli 28(18.7%) 73(48.7%) 49(32.7%) 150
5 Salem 16(12.8%) 80(64.0%) 29(23.2%) 125
6 Tirunelveli 36(36.0%) 37(37.0%) 27(27.0%) 100
Total 215 512 273 1000
It could be identified from the Table 4.4 that the percentage of high
level of consumer satisfaction towards organised retail stores was the highest
184
(32.7%) among the Tiruchirappali consumers and the same was the lowest
(23.2%) among the Salem consumers. The percentage of medium level of
consumer satisfaction towards organised retail stores was the highest (64.0%)
among the Salem consumers and the same was the lowest (37.0%) among the
Tirunelveli consumers. The percentage of low level of consumer satisfaction
towards organised retail stores was the highest (36.0%) among the Tirunelveli
consumers and the same was the lowest (12.8%) among the Salem consumers.
Table 4.5 Location of the consumers and level of satisfaction (chi square
test)
2
Calculated Table
Factor D.F Remarks
Value Value
Location 28.818 23.209 10 Significant at 1% level
It is stated from Table 4.5 that the calculated chi-square value is greater
than the table value and the result is significant at 1% level. Hence, the
hypothesis, “location of the consumer and their satisfaction towards organised
retail stores are not associated” does not hold good. From the analysis, it is
found that there is a close relationship between the location of the consumer
and their satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
185
Table 4.6 signifies that the level of consumer satisfaction towards the
organised retail stores perceived by the consumers who are 20 years and below
ranges between 39 and 85 with an average of 54.3 and that of the consumers
belonging to the age group 21 to 30 years ranges between 38 and
186
65 with an average of 48.2, the satisfaction level of the consumers from the age
group 31 to 40 years ranges between 36 and 70 with an average of 46.3 and that
of the consumers in the age group 41 to 50 years ranges between 38 and 65
with an average of 49.2. Finally, the consumers above 50 years reveal their
satisfaction level towards the organised retail stores ranging between 38 and 66
with an average of 48.2. From the analysis, it is discovered that the maximum
level of consumer satisfaction towards the organised retail stores is attained by
the consumers who belong to the age group 20 years and below.
Table 4.7 Age and level of satisfaction of the consumers (Two-way table)
S. Level of satisfaction
Age Total
No. Low Medium High
16 29 25
1. 20 years and below 70
(22.9%) (41.4%) (35.7%)
65 213 96
2. 21 to 30 years 374
(17.4%) (57.0%) (25.7%)
75 155 53
3. 31 to 40 years 283
(26.5%) (54.8%) (18.7%)
29 80 68
4. 41 to 50 years 177
(16.4%) (45.2%) (38.4%)
30 35 31
5 Above 50 years 96
(31.3%) (36.5%) (32.3%)
Total 215 512 273 1000
is the lowest (18.7%) among the consumers belonging to the age group 31 to 40
years. The percentage of medium level of consumer satisfaction towards the
organised retail stores is the highest (57.0%) among the consumers of the age
group 21 to 30 years and it is the lowest (36.5%) among the consumers who are
above 50 years. The percentage of low level of consumer satisfaction towards
the organised retail stores is the highest (31.3%) among the consumers above
50 years and the same is the lowest (16.4%) among the consumers pertaining to
the age group 41 to 50 years.
Table 4.8 Age and level of satisfaction of the consumers (Chi-square test)
Calculated 2
Factor Value Table Value D.F Remarks
Significant at 1%
Age 41.140 20.090 8
level
Table 4.8 shows that there is a close relationship between the age of
the consumers and their level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores
as the calculated chi-square value is greater than the table value and the result is
significant at 1% level. Hence, the hypothesis “age of the consumers
188
and their level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores are not
associated” does not hold good.
It is pointed out from Table 4.9 that the satisfaction level of the male
consumers towards the organised retail stores ranges between 36 and 64 with
an average of 46.5 and that of the female consumers ranges between 37 and 85
with an average of 49.2. Hence, it is concluded that the female consumers
acquire the maximum level of consumer satisfaction in utilising the organised
retail stores than the male consumers.
consumers and their satisfaction level towards the utilisation of the organised
retail stores.
S. Level of satisfaction
Gender Total
No. Low Medium High
104 181 73
1. Male 358
(29.1%) (50.6%) (20.4%)
111 331 200
2. Female 642
(17.3%) (51.6%) (31.2%)
Total 215 512 273 1000
Table 4.10 gives a very clear picture that the percentage of high level
of consumer satisfaction towards the organised retail stores is the highest
(31.2%) among the female consumers and it is the lowest (20.4%) among the
male consumers. The percentage of medium level of satisfaction towards the
organised retail stores is the highest (51.6%) among the female consumers and
the same is the lowest (50.6%) among the male consumers. The percentage of
low level of satisfaction towards the utilisation of organised retail stores is the
highest (29.1%) among the male consumers and it is the lowest (17.3%) among
the female consumers.
H1 : There is a significant relationship between the gender of the consumers and their level of
satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
Calculated 2
Factor Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Significant at 1%
Gender 24.580 9.210 2
level
Since, the calculated chi-square value is greater than the table value
and the result is significant at 1% level, the hypothesis “gender of the
consumers and their level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores are
not associated” does not hold good. Thus there is a close relationship between
the gender of the consumers and their satisfaction level towards the organised
retail stores.
Table 4.12 Marital status of the consumers and their level of satisfaction
Table 4.12 shows that the maximum level of satisfaction towards the
organised retail stores is perceived by the unmarried consumers because their
satisfaction level ranges between 38 and 85 with an average of 49.6 and that of
the married consumers ranges between 36 and 70 with an average of 47.6.
2
Calculated
Factor Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Marital
3.163 5.991 2 Not Significant
status
relationship between the marital status of the consumers and their satisfaction
level towards the organised retail stores.
This null hypothesis is framed and tested with the help of Chi-square
analysis to ascertain the relationship between the educational qualification of
the consumers and their level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores
which is shown in Table 4.17.
Calculated 2
Factor Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Educational Significant at 1%
46.917 23.209 10
qualification level
196
S. Level of satisfaction
Occupation Total
No. Low Medium High
23 95 32
1. Unemployed 150
(15.3) (63.3) (21.3)
5 7 11
2. Agriculturalist 23
(21.7) (30.4) (47.8)
57 48 47
3. Self Employed 152
(37.5) (31.6) (30.9)
119 294 159
4. Pvt. Employee 572
(20.8) (51.4) (27.8)
11 68 24
5. Govt. Employee 103
(10.7) (66.0) (23.3)
Total 215 512 273 1000
198
The following null hypothesis is framed and tested with the help of
Chi-square analysis and given along with its result in Table 4.20 to discover the
relationship between the occupation of the consumers and their level of
satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
Calculated 2
Factor Value Table Value D.F Remarks
Significant at 1%
Occupation 55.483 20.090 8
level
199
Table 4.21 Consumers’ annual income of their family and their level of
satisfaction
Table 4.22 Consumers’ annual income of their family and their level of
satisfaction (Two-way table)
income and their level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
income and their level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
Table 4.23 Consumers’ annual income of their family and their level of
satisfaction (Chi-square test)
Calculated 2
Factor Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Family’s annual Significant at 5%
12.849 12.592 6
income level
202
Since the calculated chi-square value is greater than the table value
and the result is significant at 5% level, the hypothesis “annual income of the
consumers and their satisfaction level towards the organised retail stores are not
associated” does not hold good. Consequently, it is found that there is a close
relationship between the annual income of the consumers and their satisfaction
level towards the organised retail stores.
with an average of 48.2. The level of satisfaction towards the organised retail
stores among the consumers who have above 5 members in their family ranges
between 38 and 70 with an average of 46.6. Hence, it is proved that the
maximum level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores is observed
by the consumers who have up to 3 members in their family.
Table 4.25 Consumers’ family size and their level of satisfaction (Two-
way table)
S. Level of satisfaction
Family size Total
No. Low Medium High
48 124 74 246
1. Up to 3 members
(19.5%) (50.4%) (30.1%)
125 305 176 606
2. 4 to 5 members
(20.6%) (50.3%) (29.0%)
42 83 23 148
3. Above 5 members
(28.4%) (56.1%) (15.5%)
Total 215 512 273 1000
level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores is the highest (28.4%)
among the consumers who have above 5 members and the same is the lowest
(19.5%) among the consumers who have up to 3 members in their family.
H0 : There is no significant relationship between the consumers’ family size and their level of
satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
H1 : There is a significant relationship between the consumers’ family size and their level of
satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
Table 4.26 Consumers’ family size and their level of satisfaction (Chi-
square test)
Calculated 2
Factor Value Table Value D.F Remarks
Significant at 1%
Family size 13.600 13.276 4
level
Table 4.27 Type of family of the consumers and their level of satisfaction
S. Level of satisfaction
Type of family Total
No. Low Medium High
167 351 218 736
1. Nuclear family
(22.7%) (47.7%) (29.6%)
48 161 55 264
2. Joint family
(18.2%) (61.0%) (20.8%)
Total 215 512 273 1000
family and their level of satisfaction towards the organised retail stores.
Calculated 2
Factor Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Type of Significant at 1%
14.039 9.210 2
family Level
As the calculated chi-square value is greater than the table value and
the result is significant at 1% level, the hypothesis “type of family of the
consumer and their satisfaction level towards the organised retail stores are not
associated” does not hold good. Thereby, it is understandable that there is a
close relationship between the type of family of the consumers and their
satisfaction level towards the organised retail stores.
S. Level of satisfaction
Period of purchase Total
No. Low Medium High
93 213 80
1. 5 years and below 386
(24.1%) (55.2%) (20.7%)
89 195 114
2. 6 to 10 years 398
(22.4%) (49.0%) (28.6%)
16 89 36
3. 11 to 15 years 141
(11.3%) (63.1%) (25.5%)
17 15 43
4. More than 15 years 75
(22.7%) (20.0%) (57.3%)
Total 215 512 273 1000
Calculated
Factor 2 Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Period of Significant at 1%
59.214 16.811 6
purchase Level
Consumers prefer the format that provides them different retail mix
based on their demographics, lifestyle and purchase behaviour. The type of
store visited by the consumers is classified into three groups as departmental
store, supermarket and hyper market. The sample consists of 524 (52.4%)
consumers who visit the departmental stores, 211 (21.1%) consumers visiting
the super markets and 265 (26.5%) consumers visiting the hyper markets.
211
Table 4.33 Type of store visited by the consumers and their level of
satisfaction
(55.0%) among the consumers who frequently visit the departmental stores and
the same is the lowest (41.7%) among the consumers who visit the super
markets. The percentage of low level of satisfaction towards organized retail
stores is the highest (35.1%) among the consumers who visit the super markets
and it is the lowest (15.5%) among the consumers who visit the departmental
stores.
Table 4.34 Type of store visited by the consumers and their level of
satisfaction (Two-way table)
S. Level of satisfaction
Type of store Total
No. Low Medium High
81 288 155
1. Departmental Store 524
(15.5%) (55.0%) (29.6%)
74 88 49
2. Super Market 211
(35.1%) (41.7%) (23.2%)
60 136 69
3. Hyper Market 265
(22.6%) (51.3%) (26.0%)
Total 215 512 273 1000
Calculated
Factor 2 Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Significant at 1%
Type of store 34.734 13.276 4
level
Table 4.36 Consumers’ frequency of visiting the store and their level of
satisfaction
Table 4.37 Consumers’ frequency of visiting the store and their level of
satisfaction (Two-way table)
S. Level of satisfaction
Frequency of visit Total
No. Low Medium High
7 25 11
1. Rarely 43
(16.3) (58.1) (25.6)
40 185 62
2. Monthly 287
(13.9) (64.5) (21.6)
42 53 12
3. Fortnightly 107
(39.3) (49.5) (11.2)
111 208 130
4. Weekly 449
(24.7) (46.3) (29.0)
10 30 36
5. Once in three days 76
(13.2) (39.5) (47.4)
5 11 22
6. Every day 38
(13.2) (28.9) (57.9)
Total 215 512 273 1000
stores is the highest (39.3%) among the consumers visiting the store fortnightly
and the same is the lowest (13.2%) among the consumers visiting the store
every day and once in three days.
Table 4.38 Consumers’ frequency of visiting the store and their level of
satisfaction (Chi-square test)
Calculated
Factor 2 Table Value D.F Remarks
Value
Frequency of Significant at 1%
86.130 23.209 10
visit level
The analysis from Table 4.70 details that among the selected thirteen
independent variables, the age and the amount spent for every purchase do not
have significant relationship with the consumers’ level of satisfaction towards
the organized retail stores. The variables annual income and the type of family
are statistically significant at 5 per cent level. The variables gender, marital
status, educational status, occupational status, family size, period of purchase,
type of store, frequency of visit and mode of purchase are statistically
significant at 1 per cent level and hence, these variables have positive
correlation with the consumers’ level of satisfaction towards the organized
retail stores.
approve twelve factors are closely associated with their satisfaction level
towards the organized retail stores.
1. Age
2. Gender
3. Marital status
4. Educational status
5. Occupational status
6. Annual income
7. Family size
8. Type of family
9. Period of purchase
10. Type of store
11. Frequency of visit
12. Amount spent for purchase
13. Mode of purchase
Table 4.71 indicates that the variable age is not associated with the
level of satisfaction. On the other hand the co-efficient of gender, marital status,
educational status, occupational status, annual income, family size, type of
family, period of purchase, type of store, frequency of visit, amount spent for
purchase and mode of purchase are positively associated with the
consumers’ level of satisfaction indicating that the contribution of these
variables is statistically significant implying that their influence on the
consumers’ level of satisfaction is stronger than the other variables.
Unstandardized Standardized
S. coefficients coefficients
Variables T Sig.
No. Std.
B Beta
Error
(Constant) 1.237 0.138
1 Age -0.020 0.019 -0.045 -1.058 NS
2 Gender 0.090 0.020 0.130 4.410 1%
3 Marital Status 0.134 0.023 0.135 5.762 1%
4 Educational Status 0.041 0.021 0.070 2.000 5%
5 Occupational Status 0.134 0.019 0.175 7.043 1%
6 Annual Income -0.066 0.017 -0.118 -3.965 1%
7 Family size -0.038 0.016 -0.072 -2.362 5%
8. Type of family -0.149 0.036 -0.137 -4.160 1%
9 Period of purchase 0.093 0.026 0.121 3.587 1%
10 Type of store 0.037 0.017 0.068 2.173 5%
11 Frequency of visit 0.085 0.013 0.210 6.648 1%
12 Amount spent for
purchase 0.127 0.011 0.365 11.391 1%
13 Mode of purchase -0.243 0.042 -0.241 -5.762 1%
2 Degree of Degree of
R-Value R –Value F Value Significance
freedom – V1 freedom – V2
0.964 0.930 13 986 1010.86 1%Level
The above analysis enables to arrive at a conclusion that the
consumers’ level of satisfaction towards the organized retail stores is positively
associated with their gender, marital status, educational status, occupational
status, annual income, family size, type of family, period of purchase, type of
store, frequency of visit, amount spent for purchase and mode of purchase.
influence. Further, VIF values score from 1.061 to 1.156 indicates that
multicollinearity among the independent variables is not a problem.
Standardized
No. Factors t Value Sig. VIF
Coefficient ( )
1 Customized service 0.388 15.036 0.000 1.156
2 Consistency of the store 0.352 13.674 0.000 1.154
3 Corporal facet 0.461 18.664 0.000 1.061
4 Professional relationship 0.201 9.674 0.000 1.011
5 Cognitive Processing 0.647 16.091 0.000 1.265
4.2.7.4 Conclusion
The factor analytic results of the present study depict a very different
structure. Due to certain additions and deletions in the proposed instrument, the
items were redefined and then relocated under five different factors. The 5-
factor structure model has been constructed (consisting 18 factors) representing
customized service, consistency of the store, corporal facet, professional
relationship and cognitive processing and these five factors have significant
impact on the overall consumers’ influence towards organized retail stores in
Tamil Nadu.