Journal of Linguistics & Literature (JLL)

Review Form
Reference No: UoCh/JJL/RN/01 Sent Received

Title of the Paper______ Jokes Are not Innocent: Representation of Punjabis

in Pashto Jokes
INSTRUCTIONS
Read the paper(s) assigned to you twice, once to get an overview of the paper, and a second time to
provide constructive criticism for the author to use when revising his/her paper. Answer the questions
below:
Is the title satisfactory? Any suggestion. Should have some theoretical hints, though it has thematic
touch

Length of the paper Reasonable and satisfactory

Does the abstract adequately summarize the Suggestion have been made in the text
paper or could it be more complete or
concise? Indicate suggested revision on the
manuscript or under "comments" (below).
Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, The missing links have been pointed out in the manuscript,
Literature Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is and they should be supported by some valid evidence
missing?

Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, .yes

clear, and easy to follow?

Mark or highlight any grammatical or spelling Yes, there are multiple, and have been edited and the
errors that need to be addressed. (Use a different scholar will get them incorporated in the paper by simply
color or style font to do this.) accepting it, (by using the feature in MS office). If the
researcher is not aware of it, should be informed of it.

Were there any grammatical or spelling problems? Punctuation, quotation marks,

Point them out.

Was the writer's writing style clear? Were the Yes.

paragraphs and sentences cohesive?
 Journal of Linguistics & Literature (JLL)

Did the writer adequately summarize and discuss It is appreciable

the topic? Explain.

Did the writer comprehensively cover appropriate Yes, he has.

materials available from the standard sources? If
no, what's missing?

Did the writer make some contribution of The paper contributes.

thought to the paper, or merely summarize
data or publications? Explain

Did the writer cite sources adequately and No, the researcher has tired to use APA but has failed and
appropriately (MLA or APA)? Note any kept switching between APA and Chicago and etc..
incorrect formatting.

Were all the citations in the text listed in

the Literature Cited section? Note any
discrepancies
Does the manuscript warrant publication in a. Acceptable with minor revision, no further review
this journal? necessary

Plagiarism (for Editor)

Other (extra page can be used if needed)

Name of the Reviewer: Muhammad Tufail Chandio

Designation: Assistant Professor, Incharge Department of English

Affiliation: University of Sindh Laar Campus Badin

Email: mtufail@usindh.edu.pk