PRIME M & E Form 1

INTERIM PROGRESS MONITORING/TRACKING OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2011

Region : 01 Cluster : Luzon

RPO : JAMES PAUL B. LAGRIADepeEd Counterpart: SAULA T. JOMAYA

A. PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE

EXPECTED PLANNED MEANS OF DEVIATION, IF ANY

ACTUAL ACTIVITIES ACTUAL OUTPUTS VERIFICATION & REASONS
OUTPUTS ACTIVITIES
Rapid Rapid PRIME Implementation Submitted Rapid Rapid
AppraisalPrioritization Appraisal Team Meeting Appraisal Report Appraisal
of Division Report
Coordination Meeting with
NCIP
Data Gathering& Analysis
Presentation of Rapid
Appraisal Results to the
Regional Director
Finalization of Rapid
Appraisal Report
Submission of Report to
OPS
Program MEPA Attendance to the MEPA Accomplishment MEPA
UpdatesPhysical and Issues reported Outputs
Outputs Planning to MEPA

B. ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

RESOLUTION/
ISSUE Commented [GI-M1]: Good breakdown of issues by thematic
ACTION/S TAKEN type
Technical:acceptance of IPs re Prime may either be  PRIME program must be properly
affirmative/negative explained; state benefits/privileges that
Institutional:involvement of the other agencies in the they will get/receive; end result of the
Issues Within the

implementation of program may be lukewarm , lack of info,

Team’s Control

program will be for them

agencies not involved except NCIP
 (Network) Commented [GI-M2]: Is it possible that networking activities
Financial:exact amount/ allocation is not known possibly leading to an advisory group with key stakeholders (IP
Infrastructure:division PRIME office has no place leaders, other agencies) is another possible action to address
lukewarm response to Prime
except wherever the division focal person stays
Social: Info data practices / tribes may not be as open
as expected
Inclusion/Participation: Given the limitation in the
quality of data on IP and Muslim population, it is possible
that the most marginalized communities were not included
 ISSUE ACTION/S SOUGHT FROM DEPEDMGT/PRIME CO

Data Gathering limitations due to geographical No action needed, baseline study will do a more
Issues Beyond Control

location thorough process of data collection Commented [GI-M3]: Is this a possible answer here?
Limited involvement of staff assigned to the Regular reporting to RD/ARD to schedule activities
program in program activities due to multiple and resolve scheduling conflicts?
and overlapping regular tasks that they perform.

C. PLANS FOR THE NEXT MONTH

EXPECTED
ACTIVITIES
OUTPUTS Commented [GI-M4]: The July Cluster meeting will identify the
RCEFA Meeting: Orientation on PRIME RCEFA to become the Multi Sectoral Advisory Body of activities and outputs for next month using the Technical Assistance
Plan
PRIME
PRIME Implementation Team Meeting MEPA Updates
Agreements on activities for Regional Action Plan
Data Gathering for the Regional Action Plan Pertinent data for action planning

Prepared by:

SAULA T. JOMAYA JAMES PAUL B. LAGRIA

Focal Person Regional Program Officer
PRIME Region 1 PRIME Region 1
 QUARTERLY PROGRESS MONITORING REPORT
AS OF THE END OF _________QTR. 2011

SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

INTRODUCTION

ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

REVIEW OF PROGRESS AND IMPLEMENTATION

APPROACH

Key Results

Implementation Progress

Monitoring & Evaluation

SUSTAINABILITY

Adjusted Sustainability Plan

Monitoring of Sustainability Strategies

Implementation
GENDER

ISSUES

LESSONS LEARNED