3E 3F 3G 3H TAX 2

ASSIGNMENT FOR TAX 2 ( 1/6/20) 3-H, 3-F, 3-G & 3-E

PRESCRIBED TEXTBOOK:
a) Quick Quick Reviewer on Taxation by Atty. Nicasio C. Cabaneiro*
b) Tax Reform Code of 1997 (as amended by the Train Law)
1. Read Income Taxation covered by a,b, & c above
2. Tax Reform Code of 1997 - Title II (codal provisions), as amended by the Train Law
3. Read and be prepared to recite on above topics and on the following cases:
a. CIR vs. Premium Leisure Corp., CTA EB No. 1702, April 26, 2018
b. Goodyear Philippines Inc. vs. CIR, GR No. 216130- August 3, 2016
c. Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels Inc. vs. CIR - GR. No. 212530- August 30, 2016
d. HSBC Limited-Phil. Branch vs. CIR, CTA EB No. 1257, May 17, 2016
* Quick Quick Reviewer on Taxation may be purchased from Ceballos Bar Trends, Inc. No. 7 Laurel Street,
Xavierville 3 Village, Loyola Heights, Quezon City or you may email www.ceballosbartends.com or you may
contact Mobile No. +63 917 631 0324
3B 3C 3E 3H
HW Corpo
I. Corporation Law
A. Introduction/ Classification of Private Corporations
B. Formation and Organization of Corporations

3C 3D 3E 3G 3H PALE
ASSIGNMENT (PALE)
-CANONS 1 to 9
-EXPECTED that Canons are known by heart
-READ the following cases:
1) Tapucar vs. Atty. Tapucar
2) Acejas vs. Molina
3) Paguia vs. Molina
4) Donton vs. Dr. Tansingco
5) Velez vs. Atty. De Vera
6) Linsangan vs. Dasig
7) Vitriolo vs. Dasig
8) Khan Jr. vs. Simbillo
9) Ramos vs. Imbang
10) Huyssen vs. Gutierrez
11) Lim-Santiago vs. Atty. Sagucio
12) Cuenca vs. CA
13) Ali vs. Atty. Bubong
14) Olazo vs. Tinga
15) Bernardo vs. Mejia
3S 3B 3D 3E 3F 3G
Specpro Assignment
General Principles
Jurisdiction
Venue
I. Rule 62 – Interpleader
Article 1256, Civil Code
1. Sy-Quia v. Sheriff of Ilocos Sur, 46 Phi. 400 (1924)
2. United Coconut Planters Bank v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. Nos. 726645-65, 20 March
1990
3. Del Carmen v. Spouses Sabordo, et al., G.R. No. 181723, 11 August 2014; Del Rosario v.
Sandico, 85 Phi. 170 (1949)
4. Arreza v. Diaz, G.R. No. 133113, 30 August 2001
5. Lui Enterprises, Inc., v. Zuellig Pharma Corporation, et al., G.R. No. 193494, 12 March 2014
6. Beltran v. People’s Homesite and Housing Corporation, G.R. No. L-25138, 28 August 1996
7. Wack Wack Golf and Country Club, Inc., v. Won, et al., G.R. No. L-23851, 26 March 1976
8. Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation v. Metro Container Corporation, G.R. No. 127913, 13
September 2001
9. United Coconut Planters Bank v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. Nos. 726645-65, 20 March
1990
II. Rule 63 – Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies
Article 476, Civil Code
Articles 1607 and 1616 of the Civil Code
1. Valerde v. Social Justice Society, G.R. No. 159357, 28 April 2004
2. Tambunting, et al., v. Spouses Sumabat, et al., G.R. No. 144101, 16 September 2005
3. Malana, et al., v. Tappa, et al., G.R. No. 181303, 17 September 2009
4. City of Lapu-Lapu v. Phil. Economic Zone Authority, G.R. No. 184203 and 187583, 26 November
2014
5. CJH Development Corporation v. Bureau of Internal Revenue, et al., G.R. No. 172457, 24
December 2008
6. Ollada v. Central Bank of the Philippines, No. L-11357, 31 May 1962
7. DILG v. Gatuz, G.R. No. 191176, 14 October 2015
8. PDIC v. CA, G.R. No. 126911, 30 April 2003
9. Matalin Coconut Co. v. Municipal Council of Malabang, G.R. No. L-28138, 13 August 1986
10. Department of Budget and Mangement, et al., v. Manila’s Finest Retirees Association, Inc., et al.,
G.R. No. 169466, 9 May 2007
11. Republic v. Batuigas, G.R. No. 183110, 7 October 2013
III. Rule 64 – Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the COMELEC and the COA
1. Fortune Life Insurance Company, Inc., v. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 213525, 27 January
2015
2. Promento v Estrada, et al., G.R. No. 191988, 31 August 2010