Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DOCTRINE: Protection of laws is not violated by a legislation based on reasonable classification. The
classification to be reasonable, (1) must rest on substantial distinctions; (2) must be germane to the
purposes of the law; (3) must not be limited to existing conditions only; (4) must apply equally to all
members of the same class.
Facts:
Respondent Cayat, native of Baguio, Benguet and a member of the non-Christian tribe was found guilty
of violating sections 2 and 3 of Act No. 1639 for possessing an intoxicating liquor (one bottle of gin)
which is not a native wine.
Section 2 of the said act prohibits any native of the Philippines who is a member of the non-Christian
tribe to buy, receive and possess any intoxicating liquor other than their so-called native wines.
Consequently, Section 3 thereof provides for its punishment.
Cayat challenges the constitutionality of Act No. 1639 on the grounds that it is discriminatory and denies
the equal protection of the laws, violative of the due process and it is an improper exercise of police
power.
Issues:
Whether the Act No. 1639 violates the equal protection clause?
Held:
No, the Act No. 1639 is not violative of the equal protection clause.
Equal protection of the laws is not violated by a legislation based on reasonable classifications. The
classification to be reasonable, (1) must rest on substantial distinctions; (2) must be germane to the
purposes of the law; (3) must not be limited to existing conditions only; (4) must apply equally to all
members of the same class.
Page 1 of 1