Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The establishment of a system of common reference points does not in any way limit how
different educational sectors with different didactic traditions organize and describe their
own system of levels and modules. It can also be assumed that the concrete formulations of
the system of reference points - that is to say the wording of the descriptors - will be refined
over time, if indeed the experiences made in the Member States and in institutions with
appropriate expertise are precisely those Descriptions to be incorporated.
It is also desirable that the common reference points be presented for different purposes in
different ways. For some purposes, it will suffice to summarize the system of Common
Reference Levels into simple, holistic sections, as in Table 1. Such a simple 'global'
presentation makes it easier to impart the system to non-professionals, and can provide
guidance to both teachers and curriculum planners.
Independent B2 Can understand the main content of complex texts on concrete and
language abstract topics; also understands technical discussions in their own
usage area of expertise. Can communicate so spontaneously and fluently
that a normal conversation with native speakers without great effort
on both sides is well possible. Can express itself clearly and in detail
on a wide range of topics, explain a point of view on a topical issue
and state the advantages and disadvantages of various options.
B1 Can understand the main points when using clear standard language
and when it comes to familiar things from work, school, leisure, and
so on. Can handle most of the situations encountered while traveling
in the language area. Can express itself easily and coherently on
familiar topics and personal areas of interest. Can report on
experiences and events, describe dreams, hopes and goals and give
brief reasons or explanations to plans and views.
Understand
Hear Read
C1 I can follow longer speeches, even if I can understand long, complex texts and
they are not clearly structured and literary texts and perceive style
when relationships are not explicitly differences. I can understand technical
expressed. I can understand TV articles and longer technical manuals,
programs and movies without too much even if they are not my specialty.
effort.
B2 I can understand longer speeches and I can read and understand articles and
lectures, and also follow complex reports on contemporary problems in
reasoning if the topic is reasonably which the writer represents a certain
familiar to me. I can understand most attitude or point of view. I can
news programs and news reports on understand contemporary literary prose
TV. I can understand most movies, if texts.
standard language is spoken.
B1 I can understand the main points when I can understand texts, in which
using clear standard language and when especially very common everyday life? or
it comes to familiar things from work, professional language. I can understand
school, leisure, and so on. I can extract private letters reporting on events,
the main information from many radio feelings and desires.
or television programs about current
events and topics from my field of work
or interest, if it is spoken relatively
slowly and clearly.
A2 I can understand individual sentences I can read very short, simple texts. I can
and the most common words when it find concrete, predictable information in
comes to things that are important to simple everyday texts (eg
me (eg very simple information about advertisements, leaflets, menus or
the person and the family, shopping, timetables) and I can understand short,
work, the surrounding area). I simple personal letters.
understand the essence of short, clear
and simple messages and
announcements.
Speak
C2 I can effortlessly participate in all I can present and discuss facts clearly,
conversations and discussions and am fluently and in the style of each
also well acquainted with phrases and situation; I can build my presentation
colloquialisms. I can speak fluently and logically and thus make it easier for the
accurately express even finer nuances of listener to recognize important points
meaning. When expressing difficulties, I and to remember them.
can start and reformulate so smoothly
that you hardly notice it.
C1 I can express myself spontaneously and I can present complex issues in detail,
fluently, without having to search for linking topics, completing certain aspects
words more clearly. I can use the and completing my contribution
language effectively and flexibly in social appropriately.
and professional life. I can express my
thoughts and opinions precisely and link
my own contributions with those of
others.
B1 I can handle most of the situations I can speak in simple coherent sentences
encountered while traveling in the to describe experiences and events or my
language area. I can participate without dreams, hopes and goals. I can briefly
preparation in conversations about explain and justify my opinions and
topics that are familiar to me, that plans. I can tell a story or play the plot of
interest me personally or that relate to a book or film and describe my reactions.
everyday issues such as family, hobbies,
work, travel, current events.
A1 I can easily communicate when my I can use simple phrases and sentences to
interlocutor is willing to slow down or describe people I know and to describe
say something else, helping me to where I live.
formulate what I'm trying to say. I can
ask and answer simple questions, as long
as they are immediately necessary and
very familiar topics.
Write
C2 I can write clearly, fluently and stylistically according to the purpose. I can write
challenging letters and complex reports or articles that present a well-structured
story, helping the reader to identify key points and remember them. I can summarize
and discuss specialist texts and literary works in writing.
C1 I can express myself clearly and in a well-structured manner and present my view in
detail. I can write in letters, essays or reports on complex issues and highlight the
aspects that are important to me. I can choose in my written texts the style
appropriate for the readers.
B2 I can write clear and detailed texts about a variety of topics that interest me. I can
reproduce information in an essay or report, or present arguments and counter-
arguments for or against a particular point of view. I can write letters to clarify the
personal meaning of events and experiences.
B1 I can write simple coherent texts on topics that are familiar to me or that interest me
personally. I can write personal letters and report on experiences and impressions.
A2 I can write short, simple notes and messages. I can write a very simple personal
letter, eg. B. to thank me for something.
A1 I can write a short simple postcard, z. B. Holiday greetings. I can on forms, for. In
hotels, name, address, nationality, etc.
To give learners, teachers and other users guidance in the education system for practical
purposes, a more detailed overview is probably needed. Such an overview may take the
form of a grid showing the main categories of language usage at each of the six levels. The
example in Table 2 is the design of a first orientation tool for self-assessment in relation to
the six levels. It is designed to help learners build a profile of their main language skills and
then decide what level they want to use checklists with more detailed descriptors to assess
their own proficiency level.
For other purposes, it may be desirable to focus attention on a specific range of levels and
categories. If you limit yourself to a section of the levels and categories that are relevant to
a particular purpose, you can add more details, using finer levels and categories. Such
detailing makes it possible to set a series of modules related to each other - and of course in
relation to the common frame of reference to situate.
Rather than creating a profile in relation to the categories of communicative activity, one
might want to assess performance based on aspects of communicative language
competence that can be derived from these activities. The grid in Table 3 was designed to
assess oral performance. It focuses on various qualitative aspects of language usage.
spectrum
C2 Shows a great deal of flexibility in formulating ideas with different linguistic means,
in order to emphasize subtler nuances of meaning or to emphasize something, to
differentiate or to eliminate ambiguity. Also has good knowledge of colloquial and
idiomatic phrases.
C1 Has a wide range of resources from which he / she can select suitable language to
express himself clearly and adequately on a wide range of general, academic,
professional or leisure topics without being in what he / she wants to say to have to
restrict.
B2
+
B1
+
A2
+
A2 Uses elementary sentence structures with memorized phrases, short phrases, and
speech formulas to exchange limited information in simple everyday situations.
A1 Has a very limited repertoire of words and phrases relating to personal information
and specific situations.
correctness
C2 Even with the use of complex speech means, even when the attention is being
otherwise claimed (eg, by anticipating or focusing on the reactions of others), the
grammar is consistently mastered.
B2
+
B1
+
A2
+
A2 Uses some simple structures correctly, but still systematically makes elementary
mistakes.
A1 Shows only a limited mastery of a few simple grammatical structures and sentence
patterns in a memorized repertoire.
liquid
C2 Can express himself spontaneously and with natural language fluency in longer
speeches and handle difficulties so smoothly or set new, that the discussion
partners barely notice.
C1 Can express almost spontaneously and fluently; only conceptually difficult topics can
affect the natural language flow.
B2
+
B2 Can speak at a fairly steady pace. Even if he / she may hesitate to search for
structures or words, there are only barely noticeable long breaks.
B1
+
B1 Can express himself without much hesitation, although he / she makes clear breaks
in order to plan or correct the utterances grammatically and in the choice of words,
especially if he / she speaks freely for longer.
A2
+
A2 Can make himself understood in very short speeches, although obviously he / she
often stumbles and needs to start or reformulate.
A1 Can use very short, isolated, largely prefabricated utterances; It takes a lot of pauses
to search for expressions, to articulate less familiar words, or to solve
communication problems.
interaction
C2 Can easily and easily communicate, and he / she apparently effortlessly registers
and uses means of intonation and non-verbal means. Can interweave speeches into
the conversation by taking the floor naturally, referring to something, making
allusions etc.
C1 Can choose from a readily available repertoire of discursive means a suitable phrase
to adequately initiate his / her utterance when he / she wants to speak or keep the
word, or to skillfully connect his / her own contributions with those of other
persons.
B2
+
B2 Can start conversations, take over the role of speaker if appropriate, and end the
conversation if he / she wants, even if that may not always succeed elegantly. Can
contribute to the progress of the conversation in familiar territory by confirming
understanding, encouraging others to speak, etc.
B1
+
B1 Can start, stop, and end a simple direct conversation on familiar or personally
interesting topics. Can repeat parts of what someone has said to ensure mutual
understanding.
A2
+
A2 Can ask questions and answer questions as well as respond to simple findings. Can
show when he / she understands, but hardly understands enough to keep the
conversation going.
A1 Can ask questions about the person and answer questions. Can communicate in a
simple way, but the communication is entirely dependent on being repeated,
reformulated or corrected a little more slowly.
coherence
C1 Can speak clearly, very fluently and well structured and shows that he / she masters
the means of articulation and articulation.
B2
+
B2 Can use a limited number of linking tools to combine his / her utterances into a
clear, coherent contribution; longer contributions may be somewhat erratic.
B1
+
B1 Can link a series of short, simple single elements to a coherent linear expression.
A2
+
A2 Can associate phrases with simple connectors such as 'and', 'but', and 'because'.
A1 Can associate words or phrases with simple connectors such as 'and' or 'then'.