Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
de la escuela
MATERIAL DEL CURSO
Gabriela J. Krichesky
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires (Argentina)
F. Javier Murillo
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
DOI: 10.5944/educXX1.15080
RESUMEN
PALABRAS CLAVE
ABSTRACT
KEY WORDS
INTRODUCCIÓN
MARCO TEÓRICO
METODOLOGÍA
RESULTADOS
Tabla 1
Datos del IES Las Alondras y del IES Los Girasoles. Curso escolar 2012-2013
Los profesores y profesoras del IES Las Alondras consideran que la co-
laboración atiende esencialmente a dos propósitos. En primer lugar incide
en el desarrollo de un buen ambiente de trabajo. La directora explica que
ANÁLISIS Y DISCUSIONES
a) La coordinación
b) El desarrollo conjunto
c) La resolución de problemas
Tabla 2
Caracterización de las distintas prácticas colaborativas
Desarrollo conjunto
Desarrollo Resolución
Desarrollo
Coordinación Desarrollo conjunto de conjunta de
conjunto de
conjunto de actividades problemas
actividades
materiales interdiscipli-
generales
narias
Desarrollo conjunto
Desarrollo Resolución
Desarrollo
Coordinación Desarrollo conjunto de conjunta de
conjunto de
conjunto de actividades problemas
actividades
materiales interdiscipli-
generales
narias
CONCLUSIONES
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Tho- Glaser, B. y Strauss, A. (1967). The Dis-
mas, S. & Wallace, M. (2005). Creating covery of Grounded Theory: Strategies
and sustaining professional learning for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL:
communities. Research Report Num- Aldine Publishing Company
ber 637. Londres: General Teaching Goddard, R., Hoy, W. & Hoy, A. (2000).
Council for England. Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning
Butler, D. L. & Schnellert, L. (2012). and meassure, and impact on student
Collaborative inquiry in teacher pro- achievement. American Educational
fessional development. Teaching and Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.
Teacher Education, 28(8), 1206–1220. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S. & Woo-
Crawford, M. (2012). Solo and distri- lworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of
buted leadership: Definitions and di- teacher community. Teachers College
lemmas. Educational Management Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
Administration & Leadership, 40(5), Hargreaves, A. & Shirley, D. (2012). The
610–620. Global Fourth Way. The Quest for Edu-
Day, Ch. (2005). Formar docentes: cómo, cational Excellent. Thousand Oaks, CA:
cuándo y en qué condiciones aprende el Corwin Press.
profesorado. Madrid: Narcea. Hopkins, D. (2010). A Teacher´s guide
to Classroom Research. Maidenhead:
Donmoyer, R., Yennie-Donmoyer, J. &
Open University Press.
Galloway, F. (2012). The search for
connections across principal prepa- Hord, S. y Hirsh, S. (2008). Making the
ration, principal performance, and promise a reality. En A. Blankstein,
student achievement in an exemplary P. Houston y R. Cole (Eds.), Sustai-
principal preparation program. Jour- ning Professional Learning Communi-
nal of Research on Leadership Educa- ties (pp. 23-40). Thousand Oaks, CA:
tion, 7(1), 5–43. Corwin Press.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R. & Horn, I. & Little, J. (2010). Attending to
Many, Th. (2010). Learning by doing. problems of practice: Routines and
A Handbook for Professional Learning resources for professional learning in
Communities at Work. Bloomington, teachers´ workplace interactions. Ame-
IN: Solution Tree Press. rican Educational Research Journal,
47(1), 181-217.
Duke, D. L. (2006). What we know about
improving low-performing schools. Huberman, M. (1993). The model of the
Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 728-734. independent artisan in teachers’ pro-
fessional relationships. En J. Little y
Escudero Muñoz, J. M. (2009). Comu- M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ Work:
nidades docentes de aprendizaje, for- Individuals, Colleagues and Contexts
mación del profesorado y mejora de (pp.11-50). Nueva York: Teachers Co-
la Educación. Ágora para la Educación llege Press.
Física y el Deporte, 10, 7-31.
Huffman, J. & Hipp, K. (2003). Recultu-
Gairín, J. (2000). Cambio de cultura y ring Schools as Professional Learning
organizaciones que aprenden. Educar, Communities. Lanham: Scarecrow
27, 31-85. Education.
Szczesiul, S. (2014). The [un]spoken Thoonen, E., Sleegers, P., Oort, F. &
challenges of administrator collabo- Peetsma, T. (2012). Building school-
ration: An exploration of one district wide capacity for improvement: The
leadership team’s use of protocols to role of leadership, school organiza-
promote reflection and shared theo- tional conditions, and teacher factors.
ries of action. Journal of Educational School Effectiveness and School Impro-
Change, 15(4), 411–442. vement, 23(4), 441–460.
Vescio, V., Ross, D. & Adams, A. (2008).
Szczesiul, S. & Huizenga, J. (2014). A review of research on the impact of
The burden of leadership: Exploring profesional learning communities on
the principal’s role in teacher colla- teaching practice and student lear-
boration. Improving Schools, 17(2), ning. Teaching and teacher education,
176-191. 24(1), 80-91.
F. Javier Murillo
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
C/ Tomas y Valiente, 3
28049 Madrid
España
E-mail: javier.murillo@uam.es